Abstract
Many studies have found that co-authored research is more highly cited than single author research. This finding is policy relevant as it indicates that encouraging co-authored research will tend to maximise citation impact. Nevertheless, whilst the citation impact of research increase as the number of authors increases in the sciences, the extent to which this occurs in the social sciences is unknown. In response, this study investigates the average citation level of articles with one to four authors published in 1995, 1998, 2001, 2004 and 2007 in 19 social science disciplines. The results suggest that whilst having at least two authors gives a substantial citation impact advantage in all social science disciplines, additional authors are beneficial in some disciplines but not in others.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avkiran, N. K. (1997). Scientific collaboration in finance does not lead to better quality research. Scientometrics, 39(2), 173–184.
Bordons, M., Gomez, I., Fernandez, M. T., Zulueta, M. A., & Mendez, A. (1996). Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics, 37(2), 279–295.
Bordons, M., Zulueta, M. A., Romero, F., & Barrigon, S. (1999). Measuring interdisciplinary collaboration within a university: The effects of the Multidisciplinary Research Programme. Scientometrics, 46(3), 383–398.
Costas, R. & van Bochove, C. (2012). On the relationship between author collaboration and impact of scientific publications. Proceedings of 17th international conference on science and technology indicators, Montréal: Science-Metrix and OST, 447–448.
Crase, D., & Rosato, F. D. (1992). Single versus multiple authorship in professional journals. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dancing, 63(7), 28–31.
Didegah, F., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Determinants of research citation impact in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(5), 1055–1064.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.
European Commission (2013). Intra-European cooperation compared to international collaboration of the ERA countries. Conducted by Science-Metrix. Available at. http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/intra-european_intern_collab.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none.
Finlay, S. C., Ni, C., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2012). New methods for an old debate: Utilizing reader response to investigate the relationship between collaboration and quality in academic journal articles. Library & Information Science Research, 34(2), 131–137.
Franceschet, M., & Costantini, A. (2010). The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 540–553.
Frederiksen, L. F. (2004). Disciplinary determinants of bibliometric impact in Danish industrial research: Collaboration and visibility. Scientometrics, 61(2), 253–270.
Gazni, A., & Didegah, F. (2011). Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: A case study of Harvard University’s publications. Scientometrics, 87(2), 251–265.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Glänzel, W. (2000). Science in Scandinavia: A bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 48(2), 121–150.
Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69–115.
Glänzel, W. (2002). Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980–1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, 50(3), 461–473.
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199–214.
Goldfinch, S., Dale, T., & DeRouen, K. (2003). Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and ‘periphery effects’ in the citation of New Zealand crown research institutes articles, 1995–2000. Scientometrics, 57(3), 321–337.
Gómez, I., Fernandez, M. T., & Sebastian, J. (1999). Analysis of the structure of international scientific cooperation networks through bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 44(3), 441–457.
Hart, R. L. (2007). Collaboration and article quality in the literature of academic librarianship. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(2), 190–195.
Haythornthwaite, C. (2006). Learning and knowledge networks in interdisciplinary collaborations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 1079–1092.
Herbertz, H. (1995). Does it pay to cooperate—a bibliometric case-study in Molecular-Biology. Scientometrics, 33(1), 117.
Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40(3), 541–554.
Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18.
Lancho-Barrantes, B. S., Guerrero Bote, V. P., & de Moya Anegón, F. (2013). Citation increments between collaborating countries. Scientometrics, 94(3), 817–831.
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702.
Lee, K., Brownstein, J., Mills, R., & Kohane, I. (2010). Does collocation inform the impact of collaboration? PLoS One, 5(12), e14279.
Leimu, R., & Koricheva, J. (2005). Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles? BioScience, 55(438), 438–443.
Leta, J., & Chaimovich, H. (2002). Recognition and international collaboration: The Brazilian case. Scientometrics, 53(3), 325–335.
Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2009). Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 434–442.
Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2010). Does the higher citation of collaborative research differ from region to region? A case study of Economics. Scientometrics, 85(1), 171–183.
Ma, N., & Guan, J. C. (2005). An exploratory study on collaboration profiles of Chinese publications in Molecular Biology. Scientometrics, 65(3), 343–355.
Pereira, J. C. R., Fischer, A. L., & Escuder, M. M. L. (2000). Driving factors of high performance in Brazilian management sciences for the 1981–1995 period. Scientometrics, 49(2), 307–319.
Persson, O., Glänzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3), 421–432.
Research Council of Norway (2014). Bibliometric study in support of Norway’s strategy for international research collaboration. Conducted by Science-Metrix. Available at. http://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobheadername1=Content-Disposition%3A&blobheadervalue1=+attachment%3B+filename%3D%22SMBibliometricsRCNInterimReport.pdf%22&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1274503829794&ssbinary=true.
Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314(7079), 498–502.
Uthman, O. A. (2008). HIV/AIDS in Nigeria: A bibliometric analysis. BMC Infectious Diseases, 8(2), 19.
Van Raan, A. F. J. (1998). The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results. Some simple mathematical considerations concerning the role of self-citations. Scientometrics, 42(3), 423–428.
Vogel, E. E. (1997). Impact factor and international collaboration in Chilean physics: 1987–1994. Scientometrics, 38(2), 253–263.
Weale, M. (2013). Scientific community: Tapping into success and collaboration. Nature, 498, 299. doi:10.1038/498299b.
Yi, H., Ao, X. L., & Ho, Y. S. (2008). Use of citation per publication as an indicator to evaluate pentachlorophenol research. Scientometrics, 75(1), 67–80.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council [Grant reference: RES-000-22-4415]. I thank Gertrude Levitt for her very careful proof-reading; this was a particularly exacting task, as the author of this paper is severely partially sighted.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levitt, J.M. What is the optimal number of researchers for social science research?. Scientometrics 102, 213–225 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1441-1
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1441-1