Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Working with women, do men get all the credit?

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Are firms that are managed and owned by females-only appraised differently than those where genders mix at the top? To answer this question, we study 7,467 small and medium-sized firms from 22 countries. We find that—when borrowing from banks—firms that are both managed and owned by females more often report binding credit constraints and higher interest rate payments than male-only firms: differences that we can attribute to taste-based discrimination. In contrast, if the manager and the owner have a different gender, we find no such differences with male-only firms. Hence, interestingly banks seem to assume that women invariably play second fiddle in the mixed-gender firms. We also show that discrimination between female-only and other firms disappears from economically more developed regions and from credit markets that are more competitive or dominated by transactional lenders.

Plain English Summary

Is mixing genders at the top good or bad for firm financing? It may matter or not. To arrive at this answer, we study almost 7,500 small and medium-sized firms from 22 countries. When borrowing from banks, firms that are both managed and owned by females obtain less financing. In contrast, if the manager and the owner have a different gender, we find no such differences with male-only firms. The implication is that bankers rightly or wrongly seem to assume that women invariably play second fiddle in mixed-gender firms. More progress toward gender equality seems possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The 22 countries include: Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, FYR Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, and Ukraine.

  2. BEEPS also collects information on the value of the collateral, but the information is very incomplete and there are many firms that do not report this information. For firms that do report the information, we use the value of the pledged collateral and the value of the loan at origination to calculate the loan-to-value ratio. The number is 80% on average, which is very reasonable.

  3. The BEEPS survey mainly focus on SMEs and according to the European Commission’s “Enterprise and industry SBA Factsheet 2016: Poland”, in 2015, SMEs in Poland account for 99.8 percent of businesses in the Polish “non-financial business economy.”.

  4. Although crime experience and product losses may correlate with the social or economic environments where the firm is located and thus contribute to credit access via local banking market competition, but in our analyses we have controlled the PSU fixed effects to address any regional differences and thus only focus on within region variation. Within each region, the social and economic environments are constant.

  5. We do not report the full set of control variables starting with Table 5 to save space. But we report the results with a full set of control variables in the online appendix from Table IA2 to Table IA7.

  6. In BEEPS V, there is a module about information of top managers. But this module is only available for Turkey, which is not part of our final sample. However, using this module we can get some idea about if gender is related to differences in ability. Specifically, the module collects the top managers’ highest level of formal education, for a sample of 1,299 firms in Turkey. Within this sample, we find no significant correlation between gender and the level of education. This preliminary correlation result can give us some confidence that the ability of top managers is not gender-specific.

  7. The matching process is done in Stata by the “psmatch2” command, and the results are unaffected if we use the “teffects” command.

  8. We utilize both the inverse-probability-weighted (IPW) estimator and the IPW-regression-adjustment (IPWRA). The results are the same.

  9. The Oster (2019) approach has been applied in a lot of top journal papers including Gavazza, Nardotto, and Valletti (2019), Heimer, Myrseth, and Schoenle (2019), and Tabellini (2020).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank two anonymous referees, Yangming Bao, Jia He, Mingming Jiang, Da Ke, Esteban Lafuente (Editor), Jakob Madsen, and participants at Australasian Finance & Banking Conference, China International Conference in Finance (Tianjin), Great China Area Finance Conference (Xiamen), Nankai University Young Scholars in Finance Conference (Tianjin), 11th International Conference of Methods in International Finance Network (Ji’nan), and Dongbei University of Finance and Economics Workshop (Dalian) for useful comments. Shusen Qi acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71903164, 71790601) and Social Science Foundation of Fujian Province (FJ2019B140). Steven Ongena acknowledges financial support from ERC ADG 2016—GA 740272 lending.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hua Cheng.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 77 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qi, S., Ongena, S. & Cheng, H. Working with women, do men get all the credit?. Small Bus Econ 59, 1427–1447 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00579-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00579-1

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation