Skip to main content
Log in

Creating and maintaining an alternative public sphere: The struggles of social justice feminism, 1899–1925

  • Published:
Theory and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most successful and influential contributions to examining the intersection between society and its effect on public action is Jurgen Habermas's landmark The structural transformation of the public space (1962). But as subsequent scholars pointed out, the Habermasian definition of “public sphere” needed to be expanded beyond its original historical context. This article contributes to that ongoing expansion by arguing that a social movement in the United States, social justice feminism, created an alternative public space in the United States by 1907 to the mainstream discourse championed by patriarchal political and social leaders about the effects of the Second Industrial Revolution. The alternative social justice feminist public space differed from Habermas’s original conception in three important ways: it involved a more ideological viewpoint; it encompassed a myriad of cross-class and cross-gender coalitions; and the movement embraced direct political action, promoting and passing women’s labor legislation as an “entering wedge” for the eventual inclusion of all workers under state protection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I use this term in part from the inspiration of Nancy Fraser’s reconceptualization of Habermas’s original definition of public sphere as “subaltern counterpublics” to encompass non-mainstream or subordinated public groups such as women or people of color (Fraser, 1992: 123). In terms of considering an alternative public sphere, the following definition seems especially apropos: a conceptual space for information sharing, discussion, and debate among those sections of the population that reject mainstream discourse (Oxford Reference, 2021). In addition I decided to use “public sphere” consistently throughout the article, given its interchangeability with “public space.”

  2. This term originally comes from Sklar et al., (1998), Introduction: 8–9.

  3. To his credit Habermas realized the limitations of his original definition of the public sphere and extended his concept of discourse to include everyone within society capable of rationality (see, e.g., Habermas, 1984:15; Habermas, 1990: 93).

  4. For an interesting discussion of how the public space can be extended to other areas such as anthropology, see Graan A. (2021). Publics and the public sphere. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.013.568.

References

  • Addams, J. (1893). The objective value of a social settlement. In H. C. Adams (Ed.), Philanthropy and social progress (pp. 27–56). Crowell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Addams, J. (1895). Prefatory note to hull-house maps and papers: A presentation of nationalities and wages in a congested district of Chicago. Crowell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Addams, J. (1964 [1902]). Democracy and Social Ethics. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

  • Addams, J. (1990 [1910]). Twenty Years at Hull-House, With Autobiographical Notes. University of Illinois Press.

  • Adkins v. Children’s Hospital, 261 U.S. 525 (1923).

  • Athey, L. (1971). Florence Kelley and the Quest for Negro Equality. Journal of Negro History, 56(4), 249–261.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. (1984). The domestication of politics: Women and American political history, 1780–1920. American Historical Review, 89(3), 620–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, R. (2009). Shaping the public sphere: Habermas and beyond. The American Sociologist, 40, 175–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BethkeElshtain, J. (2001). Jane Addams and the dream of American democracy. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodnar, J. (1985). The transplanted: A history of immigrants in Urban America. Indiana University Press

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Polity Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2011 [1986]). The forms of capital. In I. Sezman & T. Keposy (Eds.), Cultural theory: An anthology (pp. 81–93). Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Bunting v Oregon, 243 U.S. 436 (1917).

  • Calhoun, C. (2010). The public sphere in the field of power. Social Science History, 34, 301–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S. B., et al. (Eds.). (2006). Historical statistics of the United States: Earliest times to the present (Vol. 5). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castle, S., & Davidson, A. (2000). Citizenship and migration: Globalization and the politics of belonging. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, G. (2023). Three concepts of power: Foucault, Bourdieu, and Habermas. Power & Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/17577438231187129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, B. W. (1999). Eleanor Roosevelt, Vol. I: 1884-1933. Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, L. B. (2003). Two sisters for social justice: A biography of Grace and Edith Abbott. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cott, N. F. (1987). The grounding of modern feminism. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, N., & Roberts, J. M., eds. (2004). Introduction, After Habermas: New Perspectives on The Public Sphere (pp. 13-16). Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Dawley, A. (1991). Struggles for social justice: Social responsibility and the liberal state. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawley, A. (2003). Changing the world: american progressives in war and revolution. Princeton University Press.

  • Dayton, C. H. (1995). Women Before the Bar: Gender, Law, and Society in Connecticut, 1639–1789. The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diner, S. J. (1998). A very different age: Americans of the progressive era. Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Docherty, S. (2015). The Contemporary Global Public Sphere as Reincarnation of Habermas’ Bourgeois Society. Inquiries: Social Sciences, Arts, & Humanities 7(2), 1–2. Retrieved September 5, 2023. https://inquiries.com/articles

  • Doogan, M. J. (1988). W.E.B. Du Bois and the Women of Hull House, 1895-1899. The American Sociologist, 19(4), 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (1903). The Talented Tenth. In The Negro Problem. James Pott and Company.

  • Dubofsky, M. (1994). The state and labor in modern America. The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubofsky, M. (1996). Industrialization and the American Worker: 1865–1920 (3rd ed.). Harlan Davidson, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichergreen, B. (2018). The Populist Temptation: Economic Grievance and Political Temptation In the Modern Era. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, E. (1990). Endless crusade: women social scientists and progressive reform. Oxford University Press.

  • Foner, E. (1988). Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863–1877. Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurter, F. (1916). Hours of labor and realism in constitutional law. Harvard Law Review, 29, 353–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of democracy as it really is. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109–142). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, L. (2002). A history of American law. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, R. H., & Walker, R. H. (1986). The courses of American democratic thought (3rd ed.). Greenwood Press of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldmark, J. A. (1953). Impatient crusader: Florence Kelley’s life story. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graan, A. (2021). Publics and the public sphere. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Amthropology. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.013.568 

  • Green, J. (2007). Death in the Haymarket: A story of Chicago, the first labor movement and the bombing that divided gilded age America. Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. A. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. A. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. A. (1992). Further Reflections on the Public Sphere: Habermas and the Public Sphere. In C. Calhoun (Ed.). Cambridge University Press.

  • Habermas, J. A. (1995). Reconciliation through the public use of reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s political liberalism. Journal of Philosophy, 92(3), 109–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.A. (1989[1962]). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society, translated by Thomas Burger with the assistance of Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge University Press.

  • Hall, K. L. (Ed.). (2002). The oxford companion to American law. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan, L. (1983). Booker T. Washington: The Wizard from Tuskegee, 1901-1915. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2015). Scholar Denied: W.E.B. Du Bois and the Birth of modern sociology. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, M. (1997). Social Darwinism in European and American thought, 1860–1945: Nature as model and nature as threat. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, E. B. (1990). In politics to stay: Black women leaders and party politics in the 1940s. In L. Tilly & P. Griffin (Eds.), Women, politics, and change. Russell Sage Foundation Press. pp. 199–220

  • Hobsbawm, E. (2010). The age of revolution, 1789–1848. Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hounshell, D. A. (1984). From the American system to mass production, 1800–1832. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, T. (2010). Marx’s general: The revolutionary life of Friedrich Engels. Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. M. (1998). Destined for equality: The inevitable rise of women’s status. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. M. ([1989] 2004). A Shopkeeper’s millennium: Society and revivals in Rochester, New York, 1815–1837. Hill and Wang.

  • Kelley, F. (1905). Some ethical gains through legislation. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, F. (1926). My Philadelphia. Survey Graphic, 57(7–11), 50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, F., & Stevens, A. P. (1895). Wage-earning children. In Hull-House maps and papers: A presentation of nationalities and wages in a congested district of Chicago (pp. 49–76). Crowell Press.

  • Kennedy, R. A. (2009). The will to believe: Woodrow Wilson, World War I, and America’s strategy for peace and security. Kent State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, D. M. (2004 [1980]). Over here: The First World War and American society. Oxford University Press.

  • Kerr, T. J., IV. (1971). The New York factory investigating commission and the minimum wage movement. Labor History, 12, 373–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. H. (1999). Labor law and labor policy in New York State, 1920s-1930s. Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Binghamton.

  • Kloppenberg, J. T. (2016). Toward democracy: The struggle for self-rule in European and American thought. Oxford University Press.

  • Knight, L. W. (2005). Citizen: Jane Addams and the Struggle for Democracy. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. (1971). Jane Addams and the liberal tradition. State Historical Society of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. L. (1994). W.E.B. Du Bois, 1868-1919: The history of a race. Owl Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmeyer, K. (1997). ‘A Right to Childhood’: The U.S. Children’s Bureau and Child Welfare, 1912–46. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, P., et al. (2003). Inventing America: A History of the United States, Vol. II. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. (1998). Justice. In R. Wrightman Fox & J. T. Kloppenberg (Eds.), A companion to American thought (p. 63). Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. (2014). Trends in migration to the U.S. population research bureau. Retrieved April 20 2020. http://www.prb.org/us-migration-trends

  • Materson, L. G. (2009). For the freedom of the race: Black women and electoral politics In Illinois. University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGerr, M. (2003). A fierce discontent: The rise and fall of the progressive movement, 1870–1920. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. T. (2004). From the courts to the state legislatures: Social justice feminism, labor legislation, and the 1920s. Labor History, 45(2), 225–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. T. (2012). The boundaries of democratic reform: Social justice feminism and race in the South, 1931–1939. Journal of Southern History, 78(4), 887–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. T. (2013). Working within the labyrinth of race: Crystal bird fauset, urban African-American Women, and the national democratic party, 1934–1944. Journal of Urban History, 39(2), 172–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motomura, H. (2007). Americans waiting: The lost story of immigration and citizenship in the United States. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller v. Oregon. (1908). 208 U.S. 412.

  • Nielsen, K. E. (2001). Un-American womenhood: Antiradicalism, antifederalism, and the first red scare. Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norrell, R. J. (2009). Up from History: The life of Booker T. Washington. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Reference. (2021). Alternative Public sphere. Retrieved June 17 2021 https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199646241.001.0001/acref9780199646241-e-58

  • People v. Charles Schweinler Press. (1915). 214 N.Y. 395.

  • Perkins, F. (1946). The Roosevelt I knew. Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, F. (1929). Address at Testimonial Luncheon in [Frances Perkins’] Honor. Frances Perkins Papers, Rare Book and Manuscript Collection, Butler Library, Columbia University, box 44.

  • Robinson, R. (2021). The enlightenment: The pursuit of happiness, 1680–1790. Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D. T. (2009). Atlantic crossings: Social politics in a progressive age. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M. (1992). Gender and public access: Women’s politics in Nineteenth-Century America. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneiderman, R. (1926). Extracts from address delivered by Miss Rose Schneiderman before the women’s industrial conference . . . Jan 20, 1926: The Right to Citizenship. Mary van Kleeck Papers, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts, Box 71, Folder 1171.

  • Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scranton, P. (1997). Endless novelty: Specialty production and American industrialization: 1865–1925. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, K. K. (1985). Hull house in the 1890s: A community of women reformers. Signs, 10(2), 658–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, K. K. (1995a). Florence Kelley and the nation’s work: The rise of women’s culture, 1830–1900. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, K. K. (1995b). Two political cultures in the progressive era: The National Consumers’ League and the American Association for labor legislation. In L. Kerber, A. Kessler-Harris, & K. Kish Sklar (Eds.), United States history as women’s history. University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, K. K. (Ed.). (2000). Women’s rights emerges within the anti-slavery movement 1830–1870: A brief history with documents. Bedford/St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, K. K., & Wilson, B. (Eds.). (2009). The selected letters of Florence Kelley, 1869–1931. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, K. K., Schuler, A., & Susan Strasser, A. (Eds.). (1998). Social justice feminists in the United States and Germany: A dialogue in documents, 1885–1933. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, M. R. (1993). Citizenship and the place of the public sphere: Law, community, and political culture in the transition to democracy. American Sociological Review, 58, 587–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storrs, L. R. Y. (2000). Civilizing capitalism: The National Consumers’ league, women’s activism, and labor standards in the new deal Era. University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urofsky, M. (2009). Louis D. Brandeis: A life. Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, S. (1981). Beyond suffrage: Women in the new deal. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, S. (1987). Partner and I: Molly Dewson, feminism, and new deal politics. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe, R. (1967). The search for order, 1877–1920. Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. D. (2007). The women’s joint congressional committee and the politics of maternalism. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the anonymous editors and reviewers who made this article a better effort, as well as Benjamin Moss and Leo Kellogg. I dedicate this article to Kathryn Kish Sklar, my dissertation advisor, who introduced me to Jurgen Habermas in 1997.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Thomas McGuire.

Ethics declarations

The author did not receive support from any organization for the work submitted.

The author does not possess any relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

No data became generated or analyzed for purposes of this article.

The author is the sole contributor to this article,

Conflicts of interest

The author possesses no other conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McGuire, J.T. Creating and maintaining an alternative public sphere: The struggles of social justice feminism, 1899–1925. Theor Soc 53, 143–165 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-023-09531-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-023-09531-6

Keywords

Navigation