Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transcending the Capitalism and Slavery Debate: Slavery and World Geographies of Accumulation

  • Published:
Theory and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The capitalism and slavery debate is among the most significant in world historiography. This essay suggests that its main perspectives still use nation-based approaches and employ analytical categories of classical and neoclassical economics that obscure the very notion of capital. As a result, the material relations of slavery are reduced to the problem of profitability within national or colonial contexts, an approach that depicts the nineteenth-century nexus between slavery and capitalism as a transhistorical one. Against this backdrop, this essay proposes that the rise and fall of slavery can be better understood by examining the changing material composition of capital as well as its equally changing cluster of global circuits. Based on critical value theory, it argues that industrialization consistently reshaped spatial and material relations between town and country, capital and labor, and production and consumption, engendering world geographies of accumulation that both fueled and challenged the reproduction of slave labor in the Americas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This literature is unfathomably large. Since my goal is to discuss conceptual assumptions in key authors, for a more comprehensive bibliographical overview I refer the reader to Connerman and Zeuske (2020).

  2. Pro-Williams scholars were then making an analytical move that Latin American scholars had already made decades earlier, but without mentioning them probably due to the unequal exchange of knowledge within world academia (Cox 1987; Novais 1972, 1979).

  3. It would be worth examining to what extent these features also shape the agrarian capitalism approach laid out in the special issue “Capitalism and American Empire,” (Parisot, 2020), but this is beyond my scope here.

References

  • Adamson, C. R. (1983). Punishment after Slavery: Southern State Penal Systems, 1865–1890. Social Problems, 30(5), 555–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. W. [1956] 1990. “Drei Studien zu Hegel”, in Gesammelte Schriften, v. 5. Frankfurt: Suhrkampf.

  • Adorno, T. W. [1957] 1972. “Soziologie und empirische Forschung”, in Soziologische Schriften. Frankfurt: Suhrkampf.

  • Adorno, T. W. [1966] 1972. “Gesellschaft (I)”, in Soziologische Schriften. Frankfurt: Suhrkampf.

  • Adorno, T. W. 1969. “Einleitung”. In: Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie. Ed. Adorno et alii. Berlin, Neuwied: Luchterhand.

  • Annual Statement of the Trade and Navigation of the United Kingdom with Foreign Countries and British Possessions. 1846–1863. London.

  • Anstey, R. (1975). The Volume and Profitability of the British Slave Trade, 1761–1807. In S. L. Engerman & E. D. Genovese (Eds.), Race and Slavery in the Western Hemisphere: Quantitative Studies (pp. 3–31). Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Araghi, F. (2003). Food Regimes and the Production of Value: Some Methodological Issues. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 30(2), 337–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aufhauser, R. K. (1973). Slavery and scientific management. The Journal of Economic History, 33(4), 811–824.

  • Aufhauser, R. K. (1974). Profitability of Slavery in the British Caribbean. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 5, 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, H-G. 1997. Dialektik der Wertform: Untersuchungen zur Marxschen Ökonomiekritik. Freiburg: Ca ira.

  • Baptist, E. E. (2014). The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, S. (2001). The Monied Metropolis: New York City and the Consolidation of the American Bourgeoisie, 1850–1896. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, S. (2014). Empire of Cotton: A Global History. Alfred Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, S., & Rockman, S. (2016). Slavery’s Capitalism: A New History of American Economic Development. University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. (1997). The Making of New World Slavery: From the Baroque to the Modern, 1492–1800. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, R. 2014. “White Gold, Black Labour.” New Left Review, xcv.

  • Blackmon, D. A. (2008). The Re-enslavement of Black Americans from the Civil Wars to World War II. Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldizzoni, F. (2011). The Poverty of Clio: Resurrecting Economic History. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, GR. Jr. 1997. “Eric Williams and the Moral Rhetoric of Dependency Theory”, in Callaloo, v. 20, n. 4, Eric Williams and the Postcolonial Caribbean: A Special Issue, 817–27.

  • Bose S. (1993). Peasant labour and colonial capital. Rural Bengal since 1770. Cambridge University Press.

  • Bosma, U. (2013). The Sugar Plantation in India and Indonesia: Industrial Production, 1770–2010. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique. Editions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brading, D. A. (1970). Mexican Silver-Mining in the Eighteenth Century: The Revival of Zacatecas. Hispanic American Historical Review, L, 4, 665–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2015). Towards a new epistemology of the urban? City, 19(2–3), 151–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (2004). New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbridge, S. (1970). Studies in railway expansion and the capital market in England, 1825–1873. Frank Cass.

  • Bunker, SG. 1985. Underdeveloping the Amazon. Extraction, Unequal Exchange, and the Failure of the Modern State. Chicago: Chicago of University Press.

  • Burbank, J., & Cooper, F. (2010). Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnard, T and Riello, G. 2020. “Slavery and the New History of Capitalism, Journal of Global History”, 15: 2, 225–244.

  • Burkett, P. (1999). Marx and Nature: A Red and Green Perspective. St. Martin’s Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, SHH. 1987. “The American Revolution and the British West Indies' Economyª, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Vol. 17, No. 4, Caribbean Slavery and British Capitalism (Spring, 1987), pp. 823–850.

  • Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. (1965). The Railroads: The Nation’s First Big Busines. Harcourt, Brance & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciccantell, P. S., & Smith, D. A.  (2005). Nature, raw materials, and political economy: An introduction. In P. S. Ciccantell, D. Smith, & G. Seidman (Eds.), Nature, raw materials, and political economy (pp. 1–20). Elsevier.

  • Clark, H. (1846). A Theory of Investment in Railway Companies. John Weale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, J. (2015). Capitalism and slavery. Critical Historical Studies, 2(2), 281–304.

  • Coclanis, P. (2018). Slavery, capitalism, and the problem of misprision. Journal of American Studies, 52(3), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, A., & Meyer, J. (1958). The economics of slavery in the Ante Bellum South. Journal of Political Economy, 66(2), 95–130.

  • Connerman, S., & Zeuske, M. (2020). The Slavery / Capitalism Debate Global. From ‘Capitalism and Slavery’ to Slavery as Capitalism. Comparativ, N., 5–6, 448–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, OC.  (1978). Race, Classe, and the World System. ed. Herbert Hunter e Sameer Abraham. New York: Monthly Review, 1987.

  • Cunha, D. (2020). Coppering the Industrial Revolution: History, Materiality and Culture in the Making of an Ecological Regime. Journal of World-Systems Research, 26(1), 40–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darity, W. Jr. 1997. “Eric Williams and Slavery: A West Indian Viewpoint?” Callaloo, Autumn, 1997, Vol. 20, No. 4, Eric Williams and the Postcolonial Caribbean: A Special Issue, 800–816.

  • Darity, W. Jr. 2014. “From the Dissertation to Capitalism and Slavery: Did Williams’s Abolition Thesis Change?”, in Eric Williams. The Economic Aspect of the Abolition of the West Indian Slave Trade and Slavery. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

  • Darity, W. Jr. 1985. The Numbers Game and the Profitability of the British Trade in Slaves. The Journal of Economic History, Sep., 1985, vol. 45, No. 3, 693–703.

  • Davis, R. 1979. The Industrial. Revolution and British Overseas Trade. Atlantic Highlands, Nova Jersey: Humanities Press.

  • Drescher, S. 2010 [1977]. Econocide: British Antislavery in the Era of Abolition. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

  • Drescher, S. (2002). The Mighty Experiment: Free Labor versus Slavery in British Emancipation. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elson, D. (Ed.). (2015). 1979. Value: The Representation of Labour in Capitalism. Radical Thinkers. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eltis, D. (1987). Economic Growth and the Ending of the Transatlantic Slave Trade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engerman, S. L. (1972). The Slave Trade and British Capital Formation in the Eighteenth Century: A Comment on the Williams Thesis. Business History Review, 46, 430–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engerman, S. (1976). Some economic and demographic comparisons of slavery in the United States and the British West Indies. Economic History Review, 29(2), 258–275.

  • Engerman, S. L., & Eltis, D. (2000). The importance of slavery and the slave trade to industrializing Britain. Journal of Economic History, 60(1), 123–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engerman, S., & Fogel, R. (1971). The Reinterpretation of American Economic History.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. (1999). Industry and Empire: From 1750 to the Present Day. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans R. Jr. (1962). The economics of American Negro slavery. In Aspects of labor economics : A conference of the Universities  (pp. 185–256). Princeton University Press.

  • Ewald, J. (2021). African enslavement and the East India articles: Two captive- labor regimes in the Western Indian Ocean ca. 1750–1900. In D. W. Tomich, & P. E. Lovejoy (Eds.), The Atlantic and Africa: The second slavery and beyond (pp. 217–246). SUNY Press.

  • Fishlow, A. (1975). American Railroads and the Transformation of the Ante-bellum Economy. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, R., & Engerman, S. (1974). Time on the Cross: The Economics of American Negro Slavery. Little, Brown and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, RW. [1989] 1994. Without Consent or Contract: The Rise and Fall of American Slavery. Reissued. New York, NY: Norton.

  • Fogel, R. (1977). Cliometrics and culture: Some recent developments in the historiography of slavery. Journal of Social History, 11(1), 34–51.

  • Foner, E. (1995). Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party Before the Civil War (1970). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. B. (2000). Marx’s Ecology: Materialism and Nature. Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. B., & Burkett, P. (2016). Marx and the earth an anti-critique. Haymarket Books.

  • Fraser, N. (2014). Behind Marx’s hidden abode: For an expanded conception of capitalism. New Left Review, 86(4), 55–72.

  • Fraser, N, and Jaeggi R. 2018. Capitalism: A Conversation in Critical Theory. Medford, MA: Polity.

  • Friedmann, H., & McMichael, P. (1989). Agriculture and the State System: The Rise and Fall of National Agricultures, 1870 to the Present. Sociologia Ruralis, Xxix, 2, 93–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habib, I. (2015). Essays in Indian  history: Towards a marxist perception. Tulika.

  • Harvey, D. [1982] 2018. The limits to capital. Verso.

  • Headrick, D. R. (1981). The Tools of Empire: Technology and European Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, M. (1988). Was ist die Werttheorie noch wert? Zur neueren Debatte um das Transformationsproblem und die Marxsche Werttheorie. PROKLA Heft, 72, 15–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, M. (2001). Monetäre Werttheorie. Geld und Krise bei Marx. PROKLA Heft, 123, 151–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilt, E. (2017). Economic history, historical analysis, and the ‘New History of Capitalism’. The Journal of Economic History, 77(2), 511–536.

  • Hodgson, GM. 2002. How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science. Economics as Social Theory. London; New York: Routledge.

  • Hollingsworth, J. R., & Boyer, R. (1997). Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, T. K. (2020). Sociology and the substantive view of the economy. Review, 39(1–4), 13–51.

  • Inikori, J. E. (1981). Market Structure and the Profits of the British African Trade in the Late Eighteenth Century. The Journal of Economic History, 41, 745–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inikori, J. E. (1983). Market Structure and the Profits of the British African Trade in the Late Eighteenth Century: A Rejoinder. The Journal of Economic History, 43, 723–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inikori, J. (1987). Slavery and the development of industrial capitalism in England. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 17(4), 771–793.

  • Inikori, J. E. (2002). Africans and the Industrial Revolution in England: A Study in International Trade and Economic Development. CUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James, C. L. R. (1989). Black Jacobins: Toussaint L’Ouverture and the San Domingo Revolution. Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (1993). The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. (2013). River of Dark Dreams: Slavery and Empire in the Cotton Kingdom. Belknap Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kosik, K. (1976). Dialectics of the Concrete: A Study on Problems of Man and World. Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. [1970] 2003. The Urban Revolution. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.

  • Levi, L. (1885). Wages and Earnings of the Working Classes. John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludden, D. (1990). World economy and Village India 1600–1900: Exploring the Agrarian history of capitalism. In B. Sugata (Ed.), South Asia and World Capitalism (pp. 159–177). Oxford University Press.

  • Luxemburg, R. (2014–2016). The Complete Works of Rosa Luxemburg. Vols. 1–2. Verso Books.

  • Maier, C. S. (2016). Once within Borders: Territories of Power, Wealth, and Belonging since 1500. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malm, A. (2016). Fossil Capital: The Rise of Steam Power and the Roots of Global Warming. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquese, R., Berbel, M., & Parron, T. (2016). Slavery and Politics: Cuba and Brazil, 1790–1850. The University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquese, R. (2012). Capitalismo e escravidão e a historiografia sobre a escravidão negra nas Américas. In E. Williams (Ed.), Capitalismo e escravidão (pp. 9–23). Cia. das Letras.

  • Martin, T. P. (1935). Cotton and Wheat in Anglo-American Trade and Politics, 1846–1852. The Journal of Southern History, 1(3), 293–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. 1868 [1974]. Marx to Engels, [London], January 8. In K. Marx, & F. E. Werke (v. 32, pp. 9–10). Dietz Verlag.

  • Marx, K. (1971). Theories of Surplus Value III. Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. 1992a. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. V. 1: Penguin Classics. London ; New York, N.Y: Penguin Books in association with New Left Review.

  • Marx, K. 1992b. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. V. 2: Penguin Classics. London ; New York, N.Y: Penguin Books in association with New Left Review.

  • Marx, K. 1992c. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. V. 3: Penguin Classics. London ; New York, N.Y: Penguin Books in association with New Left Review.

  • Marx, K. 1993. Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough Draft). Penguin Classics.

  • Massey, D. (1999). Imagining globalization: power-geometries of time-space. In A. Brah, M. J. Hickman, & M. M. Ghaill (Eds.), Global Futures. Explorations in Sociology (pp. 27–44). Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Mathias, C. L. K. (2013). A tese de Williams e o Antigo Sistema Colonial: Notas sobre um debate clássico. História Da Historiografia, N, 11, 190–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathias, P. (1983). The First Industrial Nation? An Economic History of Britain 1700–1914 (1969). Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathisen, E. (2018). The second slavery, capitalism, and emancipation in civil war America. The Journal of the Civil War Era, 8(4), 677–699.

  • McMichael, P. (1991a). Slavery in capitalism: The rise and demise of the U. S. Ante-Bellum cotton culture. Theory and Society, 20(3), 321–349.

  • McMichael, P. (1991b). Slavery in the Regime of Wage Labor: Beyond Paternalism in the U S Cotton Culture. Social Concept, 6(1), 10–28.

  • McMichael, P. 2013. Food Regimes and Agrarian Questions. Halifax: Fernwood.

  • McMichael, P. (2019). Incorporating Comparison in Ontological Encounters. Revista De História Comparada, 13(1), 209–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzer, J. (1975). Rational management, modern business practices, and economies of scale in the antebellum southern plantations. Explorations in Economic History, 12(2), 123–150.

  • Mintz, S. (1985). Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History. Viking Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B. R. (1992). International Historical Statistics: Europe, 1750–1988. McMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. (2020). Infrastructures work on time. e-flux Architecture.

  • Moore, J. W. (2015). Capitalism in the web of life: Ecology and the accumulation of capital. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, C. (2018). Freedom and Convict Leasing in the Postbellum South. American Journal of Sociology, 124(2), 367–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narváez, B. N. (2019). Abolition, chinese indentured labor, and the statee: Cuba, Peru, and the United States during the Mid Nineteenth Century. The Americas, 76(1), 5–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, S. R. (2012). A Nation of Deadbeats: An Uncommon History of America’s Financial Disasters. Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, S. (2015). Who put their capitalism in my slavery? The Journal of Civil War Era, 5(2), 289–310.

  • Northup, D. (1995). Indenture labor in the age of imperialism, 1834–1922. Cambridge University Press.

  • Novais, F. (1972). As dimensões da Independência. In C. G. Mota (Ed.), 1822: Dimensões (pp. 15–26). Perspectiva.

  • Novais, F. 1979. Portugal e Brasil na crise do Antigo Sistema Colonial (1777–1808). São Paulo: Hucitec.

  • Novak, D. A. (1978). The Wheel of Servitude: Black Forced Labor after Slavery. University Press of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, P. (2000). Merchants and bankers as patriots or speculators? foreign commerce and monetary policy in wartime, 1793–1815. In J. McCusker, & K. Morgan (Eds.), The early modern Atlantic economy (pp. 250–277). Cambridge University Press.

  • O’Rourke, K. (2006). The worldwide economic impact of the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, 1793–1815. Journal of Global History, I, 123–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, J. (2016). Capitalism and slavery and the civil war. International Labor and Working- Class History, 89, 195–220.

  • Ollman, B. (1976). Alienation: Marx’s conception man in capitalist society. University Press.

  • Olmstead, A., & Rhode, P. (2008). Biological Innovation and Productivity Growth in the Antebellum Cotton Economy. The Journal of Economic History, 68(4), 1123–1171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead, A., & Rhode, P. (2018). Cotton, slavery, and the new history of capitalism. Explorations in Economic History, 67(1), 1–17.

  • Overton, M. (2006). Agricultural Revolution in England: The Transformation of the Agrarian Economy, 1500–1850. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, C. A. (2006). Eric Williams and the making of the modern Caribbean. The University of North Carolina Press.

  • Parisot, J. (2020). Capitalism and American Empire. Journal of Historical Sociology, 33, 1–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parron, T. (2018). The British Empire and the Suppression of the Slave Trade to Brazil: A Global History Analysis. Journal of World History, 29(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parron, T. (2021). The great transformation: World capitalism and the crisis of slavery in the Americas. In D. W. Tomich, & P. E. Lovejoy (Eds.), The Atlantic and Africa: The second slavery and beyond (pp. 19–46). SUNY Press.

  • Parron, T. (2022). Revolução Industrial e circuitos mercantis globais: A crise da escravidão no império britânico. Revista USP, 1(132), 185–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., & Theodor, N. (2007). Variegated Capitalism. Progress in Human Geography, 31(6), 731–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, M. (2006). Railroading Economics: The Creation of the Free Market Mythology. Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (2001). 1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. 2nd Beacon (Paperback). Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeranz, K. (2000). The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Postone, M. (1993). Time, labor, and social domination: a reinterpretation of marx’s critical theory. Cambridge University Press.

  • Proceedings of the Manchester Chamber of Commerce, Manchester Central Library, M8/2/2.

  • Reichelt, H. [1970] 2006. Zur logischen Struktur des Kapitalbegriffs bei Karl Marx. Freiburg: Ça Ira.

  • Riello G. (2013). Cotton: The fabric that made the modern world. Cambridge University Press.

  • Rischbieter, L. J. (2010). (Trans) National consumer cultures: coffee as a colonial product in the German Empire. In Lindner, Ulrike et al. (Eds.), Hybrid cultures, nervous states: Britain and Germany in a post-colonial world (pp. 107–126). Rodopi.

  • Rockman, S. (2014). What makes the history of capitalism newsworthy? Journal of the Early Republic, 34(3), 439–466.

  • Rosenthal, C. (2018). Accounting for slavery: Masters and management. Harvard University Press. Proceedings of the Manchester Chamber of Commerce. 1822. Manchester Central Library. M8/2/2.

  • Rosdolsky, R. [1968] 1977. The making of Marx’s “Capital. Pluto Press

  • Sayer, D. 1987. The Violence of Abstraction: The Analytic Foundations of Historical Materialism. Oxford, UK ; New York, NY, USA: B. Blackwell.

  • Schermerhorn, C. (2015). The Business of Slavery and the Rise of American Capitalism, 1815–1860. Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, B. (2009). The Fragile Fabric of Union: Cotton, Federal Politics, and the Global Origins of the Civil War. The John Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schonhardt-Bailey, C. (2006). From the Corn Laws to Free Trade: Interests, Ideas, and Institutions in Historical Perspective. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J. (1988). New Industrial Spaces. Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J., & Storper, M. (2003). Regions, globalization, development. Regional Studies, 37(6–7), 579–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seccombe, W. (1992). A Millennium of Family Change: Feudalism to Capitalism in Northwestern Europe. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seccombe, W. (1995). Weathering the Storm: Working-Class Families from the Industrial Revolution to the Fertility Decline. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuman, A. (1883). Statistical Report of the Railroads in the United States. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, B. L. (1985). Caribbean Slavery and British Growth: The Eric Williams Hypothesis. Journal of Development Economics, 17, 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, B. L. (Ed.) (1991). Slavery and the rise of the Atlantic system. Cambridge University Press.

  • Steffen, W, Crutzen, PJ, McNeill, JR. n.d. “The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature?” Ambio 36 8: 614-621.

  • Sutch, R. (1965). The profitability of Ante-Bellum slavery – revisited. Southern Economic Journal, 31(4), 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Neither Global nor Local: ‘Glocalization’ and the Politics of Scale. In K. R. Cox (Ed.), Reasserting the power of the local (pp. 137–166). The Guilford Press.

  • Tables of the Revenue, Population, Commerce etc (1821-1852) of the United Kingdom and its Dependencies.London: William Clowes, 1821–1852.

  • Tilly, C. (1984a). The demographic origins of the European proletariat. In D. Levine (Ed.), Proletarianization and family history (pp. 1–85). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1984b). Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilzey, M. (2018). Political Ecology, Food Regimes, and Food Sovereignty: Crisis, Resistance, and Resilience. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tomich, D. (1990). Slavery in the Circuit of Sugar: Martinique and the World-Economy, 1830–1848. John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomich, D. 2004. Through the Prism of Slavery: Labor, Capital, and World Economy. World Social Change. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

  • Tomich, D. (2011). Econocide? From Abolition to Emancipation in the British and French Caribbean. In S. Palmié & F. Scarano (Eds.), The Caribbean: An Illustrated History (pp. 303–316). The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomich, D. (2014). Commodity frontiers, conjuncture, and crisis: The remaking of the caribbean sugar industry, 1783–1866. In J. Laviña, & M. Zeuske (Eds.), The second slavery: Mass slaveries and modernity in the Americas and in the Atlantic Basin (pp. 143–164). LIT Verlag.

  • Tomich, D. (2015a). Capitalism and slavery revisited: The ‘Williams Thesis’ in Atlantic perspective. In C. Palmer (Ed.), The legacy of Eric Williams: Caribbean scholar and statesman (p. 131–164). University of the West Indies Press.

  • Tomich, D. (2015b). Commodity Frontiers, Spatial Economy and Technological Innovation in the Caribbean Sugar Industry, 1783–1866. In A. Leonard & D. Pretel (Eds.), The Caribbean and the Atlantic World Economy (pp. 184–216). Palgrave-Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tomich, D. (2016). Civilizing America’s Shore: British world-economic hegemony and the abolition of the international slave trade (1814–1867). In D. Tomich (Ed.), The politics of the second slavery (pp. 1–25). SUNY Press.

  • Tomich, D. W. (Ed.). (2017). Slavery and Historical Capitalism during the Nineteenth Century. Lexington Books, an imprint of Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group Inc.

  • Vilar, P. (1984). A History of Gold and Money, 1450 to 1920. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, J. (1987). La urbanización de Europa, 1500–1800. Editorial Crítica.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, J. (2008). The industrious revolution: Consumer behavior and the household economy, 1650 to the present. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (2000). Oliver C. Cox as world system analyst. In H. Hunter (Ed.), The sociology of Oliver C. Cox: New perspectives (pp. 173–184). Emerald Publishing.

  • Wallerstein, I. (1989). The Modern World-System III: The Second Era of Great Expansion of the Capitalist World-Economy, 1730–1840s. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiman, D. (1990). The first land boom in the antebellum united states: was the south different? In E. Aerts et al. (Eds.), Structures and dynamics of exploitations. Studies in social and economic history (vol. 5, pp. 2739). Leuven University Press.

  • White, R. (2012). Railroaded: The Transcontinental and the Making of Modern America. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, EE. [1938] 2014. The Economic Aspect of the Abolition of the West Indian Slave Trade and Slavery. World Social Change. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

  • Williams, EE. [1944] 1994. Capitalism & Slavery. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

  • Williams, E. E. (1969). Inward Hunger: The Education of a Prime Minister. Andre Deutsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. A. (1941). The ocean in English history: Being the Ford lectures. The Clarendon Press.

  • Wolf, E. (2010). Europe and the People Without History. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. M., & Patriquin, L. (2013). The Ellen Meiksins Wood Reader. Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. (2008). How Fiction Works. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G. (2006). Slavery and American Economic Development. Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G. 2019. “Slavery and Anglo-American Capitalism Revisited.” Working paper. Stanford University, May

  • Yasuba, Y. (1961). The profitability and viability of plantation slavery in the United States. The Economic Studies Quarterly, 12(1), 60–67.

  • Young, E. (2014). Alien Nation: Chinese migration in the Americas from the coolie era through world war II. University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaneti, O., & Alvarez, A. G. (1998). Sugar & Railroads: A Cuban History, 1837–1959. University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitz, J. M. (2000). The Missouri Compromise Reconsidered: Antislavery Rhetoric and the Emergence of the Free Labor Synthesis. Journal of the Early Republic, 20(3), 447–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žmolek, MA (2013) Rethinking the Industrial Revolution: Five Centuries of History from Agrarian to Industrial Capitalism in England. Leiden: Brill, 2013.

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Capes-Print 41/2017 (grant number 88881.310263/2018–00) and FAPERJ Jovem Cientista do Nosso Estado (grant number E-26/201.462/2022).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tâmis Parron.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Author Tâmis Parron declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parron, T. Transcending the Capitalism and Slavery Debate: Slavery and World Geographies of Accumulation. Theor Soc 52, 677–709 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-022-09501-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-022-09501-4

Keywords

Navigation