Abstract
Researchers have consistently demonstrated that studying multiple examples is more effective than studying one example because comparing multiple examples can promote schema construction and facilitate discernment of critical aspects. Teachers, however, are usually absent from those self-led text-based studies. In this experimental study, a learning study approach based on variation theory was adopted to examine the effectiveness of teachers’ different ways of designing multiple examples in helping students learn a physics principle. Three hundred and fifty-one tenth-grade students learned to distinguish action-reaction from equilibrium (a) by comparing examples that varied critical aspects first separately and then simultaneously, or (b) by comparing examples that separately varied critical aspects only. Results showed that students with average academic attainment benefited more from comparing examples in the first condition. Students with higher academic attainment learned equally within both conditions. This finding supports the advantage of simultaneous variation. The characteristics of students and instructional support should be taken into account when considering the effectiveness of patterns of variation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albro, E., Uttal, D., De Loache, J., Kaminski, J. A., Sloutsky, V. M., Heckler, A. F., et al. (2007). Fostering transfer of knowledge in education settings. In D. S. McNamara & G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 21–22). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Catrambone, R. (1995). Aiding subgoal learning: effects on transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 5–17.
Catrambone, R. (1996). Generalizing solution procedures learned from examples. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22(4), 1020–1031.
Catrambone, R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15(6), 1147–1156.
Clarke, T., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The impact of sequencing and prior knowledge on learning mathematics through spreadsheet applications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 15–24.
Cooper, G., & Sweller, J. (1987). Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 347–362.
Gentner, D. (2005). The development of relational category knowledge. In D. H. Rakison & L. Gershkoff-Stowe (Eds.), Building object categories in developmental time (pp. 245–275). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Gentner, D., & Namy, L. L. (1999). Comparison in the development of categories. Cognitive Development, 14(4), 487–513.
Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Hung, B. (2007). Comparison facilitates children’s learning of names for parts. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8(3), 285–307.
Guo, J. P., & Pang, M. F. (2011). Learning a mathematical concept from comparing examples: the importance of variation and prior knowledge. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26, 495–525.
Guo, J. P., Pang, M. F., Yang, L. Y., & Ding, Y. (2012). Learning from comparing multiple examples: on the dilemma of “similar” or “different”. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 251–269.
Guo, J. P., Yang, L. Y., & Ding, Y. (2014). Effects of example variability and prior knowledge in how students learn to solve equations. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29, 21–42.
Hammer, R., Bar-Hillel, A., Hertz, T., Weinshall, D., & Hochstein, S. (2008). Comparison processes in category learning: from theory to behavior. Brain Research, 1225, 102–118.
Ingerman, Å., Berge, M., & Booth, S. (2009). Physics group work in a phenomenographic perspective-learning dynamics as the experience of variation and relevance. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(4), 349–358.
Kalyuga, S. (2006). Rapid assessment of learners’ proficiency: a cognitive load approach. Educational Psychology, 26(6), 735–749.
Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2004). Measuring knowledge to optimize cognitive load factors during instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 558–568.
Ki, W. W. (2007). The enigma of Cantonese tones: how intonation language speakers can be assisted to discern them. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hong Kong.
Linder, C., Fraser, D., & Pang, M. F. (2006). Using a variation approach to enhance physics learning in a college classroom. The Physics Teacher, 44, 589–592.
Lo, M. L., Chik, P., & Pang, M. F. (2006). Patterns of variation in teaching the colour of light to primary 3 students. Instructional Science, 34, 1–19.
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Marton, F. (1999, August). Variatio est mater Studiorum. Opening address delivered to the 8th European Association for Research on learning and instruction biennial conference, Goteborg, Sweden.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Marton, F., & Morris, P. (2002). What matters? Discovering critical conditions of classroom learning. Kompendiet, Goteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 193–220.
Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. M. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Namy, L. L., & Clepper, L. E. (2010). The differing roles of comparison and contrast in children’s categorization. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107, 291–305.
Pang, M. F. (2002). Making learning possible: the use of variation in the teaching of school economics. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hong Kong.
Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2003). Beyond lesson study: comparing two ways of facilitating the grasp of some economic concepts. Instructional Science, 31(3), 175–194.
Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2005). Learning theory as teaching resource: enhancing students’ understanding of economic concepts. Instructional Science, 33(2), 159–191.
Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2013). Interaction between the learners’ initial grasp of the object of learning and the learning resource afforded. Instructional Science, 41(6), 1065–1082.
Prosser, M., & Millar, R. (1989). The “how” and “what” of learning physics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 4(4), 513–528.
Quilici, J. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1996). Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 144–161.
Renkl, R. (2014). Toward an instructional oriented theory of example-based learning. Cognitive Science, 38(1), 1–37.
Renkl, A., Stark, R., Gruber, H., & Mandl, H. (1998). Learning from worked-out examples: the effects of example variability and elicited self-explanations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 90–108.
Richland, L. E., & McDonough, I. M. (2010). Learning by analogy: discriminating between potential analogs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 28–43.
Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2007). Does comparing solution methods facilitate conceptual and procedural knowledge? An experimental study on learning to solve equations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 561–574.
Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2009). Compared with what? The effects of different comparisons on conceptual knowledge and procedural flexibility for equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 529–544.
Rittle-Johnson, B., Star, J. R., & Durkin, K. (2009). The importance of prior knowledge when comparing examples: influences on conceptual and procedural knowledge of equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 836–852.
Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: the hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 129–184.
Silver, E. A., Ghousseini, H., Gosen, D., Charalambous, C., & Strawhun, B. (2005). Moving from rhetoric to praxis: issues faced by teachers in having students consider multiple solutions for problems in the mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 287–301.
Staples, M. (2007). Supporting whole-class collaborative inquiry in a secondary mathematics classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 25(2), 161–217.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.
Svensson, L. (1989). The conceptualization of cases of physical motion. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 4(4), 529–545.
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 123–138.
Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 59–89.
Wittwer, J., & Renkl, A. (2010). How effective are instructional explanations in example-based learning? A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 393–409.
Zhu, X., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Learning mathematics from examples and by doing. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 137–166.
Acknowledgments
This research was based on the project “Creating Effective Teaching Context in Different Subject Areas” supported by the China Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2013221021).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, JP., Yang, LY. & Ding, Y. The Use of Learning Study in Designing Examples for Teaching Physics. Res Sci Educ 49, 499–520 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9635-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9635-1