Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Early-Years Teachers’ Professional Upgrading in Science: a Long-Term Programme

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present a professional development/upgrading programme in science for early-years teachers and investigate its impact on the teachers’ competencies in relation to their knowledge and teaching of science. The basic idea of the programme was to motivate the teachers by making them members of an action research group aimed at developing and implementing curriculum activities to which they would contribute and thus meaningfully engaging them in their own learning. The programme used a ‘collaborative partnership’ model for the development of the activities. In this model, the collaborative notion is defined as an act of ‘shared creation’: partners share a goal and members bring their expertise to the partnership. Within this context, the partners were a researcher in science education with a background in physics, who also served as a facilitator, and six in-service early-years teachers with a background in early-years pedagogy and developmental sciences, who had many years of experience (classroom experts). These teachers participated in the programme as co-designers, but were involved to a significantly lesser degree than the researcher. The programme procedures comprised group work and individual teachers’ class work. Data sources included teachers’ essays, field-notes, lesson recordings and group-work records. Data were qualitatively analysed. The main results indicate improvement of teachers’ ‘transformed’ knowledge of the subject matter, development/improvement of knowledge of instructional strategies, including factors related to quality of implementation of the activities, knowledge of the pupils and improvement of the teachers’ efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appleton, K. (2005). Elementary science teacher education: international perspectives on contemporary issues and practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K. (2008). Developing science pedagogical content knowledge through mentoring elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 523–545. doi:10.1007/s10972-008-9109-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 10–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. (2005).Making the biggest difference: planning professional development in schools. The Adviser, January, 5–8.

  • Barba, R., & Rubba, P. (1992). A comparison of pre-service and in-service earth and space science teachers’ general mental abilities, content knowledge and problem solving skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(10), 1021–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J., & Hodson, D. (2001). Pedagogical context knowledge: towards a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Teacher Education, 85, 426–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blömeke, S., & Delaney, S. (2012). Assessment of teacher knowledge across countries: a review of the state of research. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44, 223–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1995). Expanding a teachers’ knowledge base: a cognitive psychological perspective on professional development. In T. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: new paradigms and practices (pp. 35–66). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In P. L. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), Third international encyclopaedia of education, 7 (pp. 548–556). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boudreaux, A., Shaffer, P., Heron, P., & McDermott, L. (2008). Student understanding of control of variables: deciding whether or not a variable influences the behaviour of a system. American Journal of Physics, 76(2), 163–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulter, C. J. (2000). Language, models and modelling in the primary science classroom. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 289–305). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boulter, C. J., & Buckley, B. C. (2000). Constructing typology of models for science education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 41–57). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boulter, C. J., Prain, V., & Armitage, M. (1998). “What is going to happen in the eclipse tonight?” Rethinking perspectives on primary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 487–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, C. D., Indigo, E., Ross, J., Dookie, L., & Beatty, R. (2010). The effects of sustained classroom-embedded teacher professional learning on teacher efficacy and related student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1598–1608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, T. & Glover, D. (2003). Leadership development for new school leaders: the New Visions Induction to Headship programme, paper presented at BELMAS Conference, Milton Keynes, October.

  • Chaille, C., & Britain, L. (1991). The young child as scientist. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood teacher education: the case of geometry. Journal of Math Teacher Education, 14, 133–148. doi:10.1007/s10857-011-9173-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: an integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copley, J., & Padron, Y. (1999). Preparing teachers of young learners: professional development of early childhood teachers in mathematics and science. In: Dialogue on early childhood science, mathematics, and technology education. Washington, DC: AAAS.

  • Cormas, P., & Barufaldi, J. P. (2007). Effective research-based characteristics of professional development: a mixed methods study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Cormas, P., & Barufaldi, J. P. (2011). The effective research-based characteristics of professional development of the National Science Foundation’s GK-12 Programme. J SciTeachrEduc, 22(3), 255–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How Teacher Education Matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 166–173.

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). State of the profession: study measures status of professional development. Journal of Staff Development, 30(2), 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dass, P. M. (2001). Implementation of instructional innovations in k-8 science classes: perspectives of in-service teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 969–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649–672.

  • Edmonds, S., & Lee, B. (2002). Teacher feelings about continuing professional development. Education journal, 61, 28–29.

  • Elstgeest, J. (1985). The right question at the right time. In W. Harlen (Ed.), Primary science: taking the plunge (pp. 36–46). Oxford: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan, I., & Campbell, T. (2008). Teacher questioning and interaction patterns in classrooms facilitated with differing levels of constructivist teaching practices. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1891–1914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, G. L. (1979). Children’s conceptions of heat and temperature. Science Education, 63(2), 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshach, H., & Fried, M. (2005). Should science be taught in early childhood? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 315–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, A. (2012). Teachers learning from professional development in elementary science: reciprocal relations between formative assessment and pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 96, 265–290. doi:10.1002/sce.20473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Balboa, J.-M., & Stiehl, J. (1995). The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M. (1993). Science education in child care. Science Education, 77(6), 561–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M. (2009). Supporting scientific conceptual consciousness or learning in ‘a roundabout way’ in play-based contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 31(8), 1069–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M. (2016). Early childhood science teacher education. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 347–354). Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0.

  • Fleer, M., & Robbins, J. (2003). Understanding our youngest scientific and technological thinkers: international developments in early childhood science education. Research in Science Education, 33, 399–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funk, J. H., Fiel, R. L., Okey, J. R., Jaus, H. H., & Sprague, C. S. (1985). Learning science process skills. IA, Kendall/Hunt: Dubuque.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbett, D. (2003). Science education in early childhood teacher education: putting forward a case to enhance student teachers’ confidence and competence. Research in Science Education, 33, 467–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, R. M., & Nichol, K. (2015). How to support primary teachers’ implementation of inquiry: teachers’ reflections on teaching cooperative inquiry-based science. Research in Science Education, 45, 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H., Lee, J., & Boyd, J. (2008). Mathematics education for young children: what it is and how to promote it. Social Policy Report, 22, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitomer, D. H., & Zisk, R. C. (2015). Knowing what teachers know. Review of Research in Education, 39, 1–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gramann, J. (2004). Windows of opportunity in early learning. Literacy Links, Volume 8, No. 3, Texas Center for the Advancement of Literacy and Learning.

  • Greenfield, D., Jirout, L., Dominguez, X., Greenberg, A., Maier, M., & Fuccillo, J. (2009). Science in the preschool classroom: a programmatic research agenda to improve science readiness. Early Education and Development, 20(1), 138–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teacher College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teacher: re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2002). A study of the development of the concept of mechanical stability in preschool children. Research in Science Education, 32(3), 373–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haefner, L., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2004). Learning by doing? Prospective elementary teachers’ developing understandings of scientific inquiry and science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1653–1674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W. (1996). The teaching of science. London: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W., Holroyd, C., & Byrne, M. (1995). Confidence and understanding: issues in the teaching of science and technology in Scottish primary schools. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havu-Nuutinen, S. (2005). Examining young children’s conceptual change process in floating and sinking from a social constructivist perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 259–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S-Y., Torquati, J. & Molfese, V. (2013). Theory guided professional development in early childhood science education. Faculty Publications from CYFS. Paper 29, http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cyfsfacpub/29

  • Honold, L. (2003). Developing effective employee learning experiences. Development and Learning in Organisations, 17(6), 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, A., & Berry, A. (2011). Constructing CoRes—a strategy for building PCK in pre-service science teacher education. Research in Science Education, 41, 341–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, F., Westbroek, H., & Doyle, W. (2014). The practical turn in teacher education: designing a preparation sequence for core practice frames. Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 195–206. doi:10.1177/0022487113518584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (2008). Collaborative partnerships: a model for science teacher education and professional development. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 60–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallery, M. (2000). Children’s science questions and ideas provide an invaluable tool for the early years’ teacher. Primary Science Review, 61, 18–19.

  • Kallery, M. (2001). Early-years Educators' Attitudes to Science and Pseudo-science: The case of astronomy and astrology. European Journal of Teacher Education, 24(3), 329–342.

  • Kallery, M. (2004). Early years teachers' late concerns and perceived needs in science: an exploratory study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 27(2), 147–165.

  • Kallery, M. (2011). Astronomical Concepts and Events Awareness for Young Children. International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 341–369.

  • Kallery, M. (2014). In quest of teaching quality in preschool science: Teacher views of factors influencing their work. Proceedings of the 9th International conference of the European Science Education Research Association (E.S.E.R.A.). Retrieved from http://www.esera.org/publications/esera-conference-proceedings/science-educationresearch-for-evidence-/.

  • Kallery, M. (2015). Science in early years education: introducing floating and sinking as a property of matter. International Journal of Early Years Education, 23(1), 31–53.

  • Kallery, M., & Psillos, D. (2001). Preschool teachers’ content knowledge in science: Their understanding of elementary science concepts and of issues raised by children’s questions. International Journal of Early Years Education, 9(3), 165–179.

  • Kallery, M., & Psillos, D. (2002). What happens in the early years science classroom? The reality of teachers curriculum implementation activities. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 10(2).

  • Kallery, M., & Psillos, D. (2004). Anthropomorphism and animism in early years’ science: Why teachers use them, how they conceptualise them and what are their views on their use. Research in Science Education, 34, 291–311.

  • Kallery, M., Psillos, D., & Tselfes, V. (2009). Typical didactical activities in the Greek early-years science classroom: Do they promote science learning? International Journal of Science Education, 31(1), 1187–1204.

  • Kariotoglou, P., Pnevmatikos, D. & Karnezou, M. (2014). In-service teachers’ professional development in science education: designing principles of a research project. 2nd EduCbr-CTE 2014, Albania-Korçё. ISBN (print) 9789928146274; ISBN (on line) 978992814619, 401–408.

  • Kelly, J. (2000). Rethinking the elementary science methods course: a case of content, pedagogy and informal science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 755–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, J. (2010). Preparing pre-service primary teachers to teach primary science: a partnership-based approach. International Journal of Science Education, 32(10), 1267–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kind, V. (2015). On the beauty of knowing then not knowing: pinning down the elusive qualities of PCK. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 178–195). New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. B., & Newmann, F. M. (2001). Building school capacity through professional development: conceptual and empirical considerations. International Journal of Educational Management, 15(2), 86–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, C. J. (1990). Some primary teachers’ ideas about energy. Physics Education, 25, 86–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, C., & Summers, M. (1988). Primary school teachers’ understanding of science concepts. Journal of Education for Teaching, 14(3), 259–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrenz, F. (1986). Misconceptions of physical science concepts among elementary school teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 86(8), 654–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, K. (1999). Science in early childhood: developing and acquiring fundamental concepts and skills. In, Dialogue on early childhood science, mathematics and technology education (pp. 73–83). Washington, DC: AAAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: the construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, A., & Smith, G. (2010). Developing schools as professional learning communities: the TL21 experience. US-China education review, 7(9), 106–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mant, J., & Summers, M. (1993). Some primary school teachers’ understanding of the earth’s place in the universe. Research Papers in Education, 8(1), 101–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIldowie, E. (1998). Introducing temperature scales. Physics Education, 33, 368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. M. (1997). Fertile minds. Time, 3, 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2007). Taking science to school: learning and teaching science in grades k-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2012). Developing assessments of science proficiency in K-12. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordenbo, S-E., Søgaard Larsen, M., Tiftik¸i, N., Wendt, R. E., & Østergaard, S. (2008). Lærerkompetencer og elevers læring iførskole og skole. Et systematisk review udført for Kunnskapsdepartementet, Oslo [Teacher competence and student learning in preschool and school]. Køpenhamn: Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitetsskole.

  • Palardy, G. J., & Rumberger, R. W. (2008). Teacher effectiveness in first grade: the importance of background qualifications, attitudes, and instructional practices for student learning. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(2), 111–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Oliver, S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38, 261–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1951). The child’s conception of the world. Maryland: Littlefield Adams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piggot-Irvine, E. (2006). Establishing criteria for effective professional development and use in evaluating an action research programme. Journal of In-service Education, 32(4), 477–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, D. (1998). Transferring theory into practice: a model for professional development for science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(1), 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J. & Reynolds, D. (2006). Teachers’ continuing professional development: a new approach [online]. Paper presented at 20th Annual World International Congress for effectiveness and Improvement. Available from: http://wwwfm-kp.si/zalozba/ISBN/978-961-6573-65-8/219-240.pdf [Accessed September 2015].

  • Ross, J. A., Bruce, C. D., & Hogaboam-Gray, A. (2006). The impact of a professional development programme on student achievement in grade 6 mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 551–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozenszajn, R., & Yarden, A. (2014). Expansion of biology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) during a long-term professional development program. Research in Science Education, 44, 189–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, R. (1999). Human resources management in New Zealand. Longman: Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scher, L., & O’Reilly, F. (2009). Professional development for K-12 math and science teachers: what do we really know? Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 209–249. doi:10.1080/19345740802641527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P. H., & Driver, R. H. (1998). Learning about science teaching: perspectives from an action research project. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 67–80). GB: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, R. (1997). Rethinking the brain: new insights into early development. New York: Families and Work Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (2015). PCK: its genesis and exodus. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 3–13). New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S., & Sykes, G. (1986). A national board for teaching? In search for a bold standard. A report for the task force on teaching as a profession. Carnegie Corporation: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. (2014). An innovative model of professional development to enhance teaching and learning primary science in Irish schools. Professional Development in Education, 40(3), 467–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. (2015). The impact of a professional development programme on primary teachers’ classroom practice and pupils’ attitudes to science. Research in Science Education, 45, 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.C. & Neale, D.C., 1991). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. In: J. Brophy (Ed.) Advances in research on teaching, vol. 2. JAI Press.

  • Sparks, G. M. (1983). Synthesis of research on staff development for effective teaching. Educational Leadership, 41, 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spektor-Levy, O., Baruch, Y. K., & Mevarech, Z. (2013). Science and scientific curiosity in pre-school—the teacher’s point of view. International Journal of Science Education, 35(13), 2226–2253. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.631608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, C. (2010). Pedagogy: the silent partner in early years learning. Early Years, 30(1), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory, procedures and techniques. CA, Sage Publications: Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. McMillan, D., & McConnell, B. (2011). Continuous professional development and its impact on practice: a north-south comparative study of Irish teachers’ perceptions, experiences and motivation [SCoTENS]

  • Sutala, V., & Krajcik, J. S. (1988). The effective use of analogies for solving mole problems in high school chemistry. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching.

  • Sykes, G. (1996). Reform of and as professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(7), 465–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, P. (1988). Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 99–110.

  • Thulin, S., & Redfors, A. (2016). Student preschool teachers’ experiences of science and its role in preschool. Early Childhood Education Journal. doi:10.1007/s10643-016-0783-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomita, A., & Kallery, M. (2016). Expert teachers’ views of factors influencing their teaching quality in early childhood science in Japan. Proceedings of the 10th International conference of the European Science Education Research Association (E.S.E.R.A.), Helsinki Finland, September 2015.

  • Torquati, J., Cutler, K., Gilkerson, D., & Sarver, S. (2013). Early childhood educators’ perceptions of nature, science, and environmental education. Early Education and Development., 24(5).

  • Treagust, D. F., Duit, R., Josh, P., & Lindauer, I. (1990). A naturalistic study of science teachers’ use of analogies us part of their regular teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.

  • US Department of Education (1996). Why professional development. In Achieving the goals: goal 4, professional development. Retrieved from www.ed.gov.pubs/AchGoal14/intro.html.

  • Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(8), 26–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: the role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novac, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177–210). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster-Wright, A. (2009). Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 702–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa, H., Wieland, C., Brooks-Gunn, J., Burchinal, M. R., Espinosa, L. M., Gormley, W. T., et al. (2013). Investing in our future: the evidence base on preschool education. Society for Research in Child Development. http://fcd-us.org/resourcec/evidence-base-preschool.

  • Dick, B. (1997). Action learning and action research. Retrieved from http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/arp/actlearn.html.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Special thanks are extended to the early-years teachers, M. Homata, P. Patinioti, T. Loupidou, F. Fista, F. Sarigiannidou and E. Fragonikolaki, for participating in the work group, for their interest and for their valuable views.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Maria Kallery

Authors
  1. Maria Kallery
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Kallery.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kallery, M. Early-Years Teachers’ Professional Upgrading in Science: a Long-Term Programme. Res Sci Educ 48, 437–464 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9575-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9575-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation