Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding Producers’ Intentions and Viewers’ Learning Outcomes in a Science Museum Theater Play on Evolution

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Science museums often introduce plays to liven up exhibits, attract visitors to specific exhibitions, and help visitors to “digest” difficult content. Most previous research has concentrated on viewers’ learning outcomes. This study uses performance and spectator analyses from the field of theater studies to explore the link between producers’ intended aims, the written script, and the learning outcomes. We also use the conflict of didactics and aesthetics, common to the design of both educational plays and science museum exhibits, as a lens for understanding our data. “Darwin’s journey,” a play about evolution, was produced by a major science museum in Israel. The producers’ objectives were collected through in-depth interviews. A structural analysis was conducted on the script. Viewer (n = 103) and nonviewer (n = 90) data were collected via a questionnaire. The results show strong evidence for the encoding of all of the producers’ aims in the script. Explicit and cognitive aims were decoded as intended by the viewers. The evidence was weak for the decoding of implicit and affective aims. While the producers were concerned with the conflict of didactics and aesthetics, this conflict was not apparent in the script. The conflict is discussed within the broader context of science education in informal settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, S. (2004). Designs for learning: studying science museum exhibits that do more than entertain. Science Education, 88(S1), S17–S33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, S. (2007). Exhibit design is science museums: dealing with a constructivist dilemma. In J. H. Falk, L. D. Dierking, & S. Foutz (Eds.), In principle, in practice: museums as learning institutions (pp. 43–56). Lanham: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balme, C. B. (2008). The Cambridge introduction to theatre studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, Y., & Tal, T. (2008). Multiple outcomes of class visits to natural history museums: the students’ view. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(3), 274–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2005). Text genre as a factor in the formation of scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(4), 403–428.

  • Baum, L., & Hughes, C. H. (2001). Ten years of evaluating science theater at the museum of science, Boston. Curator, 44(4), 355–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S. (1988). The role of the theatre audience: a theory of production and reception. Doctoral dissertation, Hamilton, Ontario: McMaster University.

  • Bennett, S. (1997). Theatre audiences: a theory of production and reception (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicknell, S., & Fisher, S. (1994). Enlightening or embarrassing? Drama in the Science Museum, London, UK. Visitor Studies, 6(1), 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpineti, M., Cavinato, M., Giliberti, M., Ludwig, N., & Perini, L. (2011). Theatre to motivate the study of physics. Journal of Science Communication, 10(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, C. (1991). Assessment and testing in the primary school. Basingstoke: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council, N. R. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: people, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J., & Evans, E. M. (2007). Museums teach evolution. Evolution, 61(6), 1500–1506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Learning in science — from behaviourism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B. J. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 3–25). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: formal, non-formal, and informal education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, E. M., Spiegel, A., Gram, W., & Diamond, J. (2009). Integrating developmental and free-choice learning frameworks to investigate conceptual change in visitor understanding. VSA Articles, Center for the Advancement of Informal Science Education (briefCAISE January/February, Issue 5).

  • Evans, E. M., Spiegel, A. N., Gram, W., Frazier, B. N., Tare, M., Thompson, S., & Diamond, J. (2010). A conceptual guide to natural history museum visitors’ understanding of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 326–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eversmann, P. (2004). The experience of the theatrical event. In V. A. Cremona, P. Eversmann, H. van Maanen, W. Sauter, & J. Tulloch (Eds.), Theatrical events: borders, dynamics frames (pp. 139–174). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

  • Fisch, S. (2000). A capacity model of children’s comprehension of educational content on television. Media Psychology, 2, 63–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gesser-Edelsburg, A. (2005). Paradoxical outcomes in an educational drama about gang rape: ethical responsibilities of practitioners and educators. Research in Drama Education, 10(2), 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourdon, A.-M. (1988). Theatre, audience, perception. In W. Sauter (Ed.), New directions in audience research. Advances in reception and audience research (pp. 287–316). Utrecht: Instituut voor Theaterwetenschap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, T. (2008). Understanding evolutionary trees. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1(2), 121–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwet, K. (2012). Handbook of inter-rater reliability (3rd ed.). Gaithersburg: Advanced Analytics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagay, G. (2005). High school students’ conceptions related to speciation and common descent. Master’s thesis, Haifa: Technion - Israel Institute of Technology.

  • Hall, S. (1993). Encoding, decoding. In S. During (Ed.), The cultural studies reader (pp. 507–517). New York: Routledge.

  • Halpern, M. K. (2008). Understanding how audiences understand science on stage: cultural context in the dramatization of Darwin’s letters. In AEJMC annual convention (pp. 1–29). Chicago (2008, August 6-8).

  • Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, G. H. (1998). Learning in the museum. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C. H. (2008). Performance for learning: how emotions play a part. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University. Retrieved from http://etd.ohiolink.edu/send-pdf.cgi/Hughes Catherine.pdf?osu1211932278

  • Hughes, C. H. (2010). Theatre performance in museums: art and pedagogy. Youth Theatre Journal, 24(1), 34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C. H., Jackson, A., & Kidd, J. (2007). The role of theatre in museums and historic sites: visitors, audiences and learners. In L. Bresler (Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education (pp. 679–699). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Jackson, A. (1980). Can theatre teach? Fifty years of an alternative theatre. Critical Quarterly, 22(4), 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A. (2005). The dialogic and the aesthetic: some reflections on theatre as a learning medium. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 39(4), 104–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A., & Kidd, J. (2008). Performance, learning and heritage report. Manchester: University of Manchester. Retrieved from www.plh.manchester.ac.uk

  • Jackson, A., & Rees Leahy, H. (2005). “Seeing it for real …?” — Authenticity, theatre and learning in museums. Research in Drama Education, 10(3), 303–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerusalem Foundation. (2008). The Bloomfield Science Museum Jerusalem 2008 report. Jerusalem, Israel. Retrieved from http://www.jerusalemfoundation.org/media/17156/The-Bloomfield-Science-Museum-Report-2008.pdf

  • Krippendorff, K. (2009). Testing the reliability of content analysis data. In K. Krippendorff & M. A. Bock (Eds.), The content analysis reader (pp. 350–357). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of Nature of Science questionnaire: towards valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, J. (1976). Theatre in education. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedretti, E. (2002). T. Kuhn meets T. Rex: critical conversations and new directions in science centres and science museums. Studies in Science Education, 37, 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg, R., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2011). Atom surprise: using theatre in primary science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 508–524.

  • Porter, A. C. (2006). Curriculum assessment. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 141–159). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, M. (2010). Being an active audience. In Evaluating the performing arts: a step by step teaching guide. Edinburgh: Imaginate. Retrieved from http://www.imaginate.org.uk/corporate/documents/evaluatingtheperformingartsred.pdf

  • Redington, C. (1983). Can theatre teach? An historical and evaluative analysis of theatre in education. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, L. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauter, W. (2000). The theatrical event: dynamics of performance and perception. Iowa City: University of Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, A. N., Evans, E. M., Frazier, B., Hazel, A., Tare, M., Gram, W., & Diamond, J. (2012). Changing museum visitors’ conceptions of evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5(1), 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urian, D. (2008). Theatre in society. Raanana: Open University. [in Hebrew].

  • Van Maanen, H. (2004). How contexts frame theatrical events. In V. A. Cremona, P. Eversmann, H. van Maanen, W. Sauter, & J. Tulloch (Eds.), Theatrical events: borders, dyanmics, frames (pp. 243–277). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

  • Velayutham, S., Aldridge, J., & Fraser, B. (2011). Development and validation of an instrument to measure students’ motivation and self-regulation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 33(15), 2159–2179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieringa, N. F., Swart, J. A. A., Maples, T., Witmondt, L., Tobi, H., & van der Windt, H. J. (2011). Science theatre at school: providing a context to learn about socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 1(1), 71–96.

  • Wilson, E. (1994). The theater experience (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

  • Wolf, R. M. (1997). Questionnaires. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology and measurement: An international handbook (2nd ed., pp. 422–427). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

  • Wren-Lewis, J. (1983). The encoding/decoding model: criticisms and redevelopments for research on decoding. Media, Culture and Society, 5, 179–197.

  • Yore, L., Bisanz, G., & Hand, B. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

    R. Peleg

  2. Department of Education in Science and Technology, Technion, Haifa, Israel

    A. Baram-Tsabari

Authors
  1. R. Peleg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Baram-Tsabari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Peleg.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 108 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peleg, R., Baram-Tsabari, A. Understanding Producers’ Intentions and Viewers’ Learning Outcomes in a Science Museum Theater Play on Evolution. Res Sci Educ 46, 715–741 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9477-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9477-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation