Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fractions in College: How Basic Math Remediation Impacts Community College Students

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the link between basic math skills, remediation, and the educational opportunity and outcomes of community college students. Capitalizing on a unique placement policy in one community college that assigns students to remedial coursework based on multiple math skill cutoffs, I first identify the skills that most commonly inhibit student access to higher-level math courses; these are procedural fluency with fractions and the ability to solve word problems. I then estimate the impact of “just missing” these skill cutoffs using multiple rating-score regression discontinuity design. Missing just one fractions question on the placement diagnostic, and therefore starting college in a lower-level math course, had negative effects on college persistence and attainment. Missing other skill cutoffs did not have the same impacts. The findings suggest the need to reconsider the specific math expectations that regulate access to college math coursework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Association of Colleges and Universities. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/2015_Survey_Report2_GEtrends.pdf

  • Attewell, P., Lavin, D., Domina, T., & Lavey, T. (2006). New evidence on college remediation. Journal of Higher Education, 77, 886–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, T., Jeong, D. W., & Cho, S. W. (2010). Referral, enrollment, and completion in developmental education sequences in community colleges. Economics of Education Review, 29(2), 255–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boatman, A., & Long, B. T. (2018). Does remediation work for all students? How the effects of postsecondary remedial and developmental courses vary by level of academic preparation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(1), 29–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S., & Treisman, U. (2010). Make math a gateway, not a gatekeeper. Chronicle of Higher Education, 56(32), B19–B20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdman, P. (2015). Degrees of freedom: Diversifying math requirements for college readiness and graduation. Report 1 of a 3-part series. Berkeley, CA: Jobs for the Future. Retrieved from http://edpolicyinca.org/sites/default/files/PACE%201%2008-2015.pdf

  • California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO). (n.d.). California community colleges key facts. Retrieved from http://californiacommunitycolleges.cccco.edu/PolicyInAction/KeyFacts.aspx

  • Chen, X. (2016). Remedial coursetaking at U.S. public 2- and 4-year institutions: Scope, experiences, and outcomes. NCES 2016-405, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.

  • Fong, K. E., & Melguizo, T. (2017). Utilizing additional measures of high school academic preparation to support students in their math self-assessment. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 41, 566–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong, K., Melguizo, T., & Prather, G. (2015). Increasing success rates in developmental math: The complementary role of individual and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 56(7), 719–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9368-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Givvin, K. B., Stigler, J. W., & Thompson, B. J. (2011). What community college developmental mathematics students understand about mathematics, Part II: The interviews. The MathAMATYC Educator, 2(3), 4–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, N. (1999). Honored but invisible: An inside look at America’s community colleges. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, A. (2015). The math myth: And other STEM delusions. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodara, M. (2013). Improving students’ college math readiness: A review of the evidence on postsecondary interventions and reforms. A CAPSEE working paper, Center for Analysis of Postsecondary Education and Employment.

  • Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, B. A., & Lefgren, L. (2004). Remedial education and student achievement: A regression-discontinuity analysis. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 226–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. S., & Lemieux, T. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 281–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2012). College for all gaps between desirable and actual P–12 math achievement trajectories for college readiness. Educational Researcher, 41(2), 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariano, L. T., & Martorell, P. (2013). The academic effects of summer instruction and retention in New York City. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(1), 96–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martorell, P., & McFarlin, I., Jr. (2011). Help or hindrance? The effects of college remediation on academic and labor market outcomes. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(2), 436–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathematics Diagnostic Testing Project (MDTP). (n.d.). Uses of MDTP. Retrieved from http://mdtp.ucsd.edu/about/uses.html

  • Mattern, K. D., & Packman, S. (2009). Predictive validity of ACCUPLACER scores for course placement: A meta-analysis. Research report no. 2009-2. New York: College Board.

  • McCrary, J. (2008). Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 698–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melguizo, T., Bos, J., Ngo, F., Mills, N., & Prather, G. (2016). Using a regression discontinuity design to estimate the impact of placement decisions in developmental math. Research in Higher Education, 57(2), 123–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melguizo, T., Hagedorn, L. S., & Cypers, S. (2008). Remedial/developmental education and the cost of community college transfer: A Los Angeles County sample. The Review of Higher Education, 31(4), 401–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melguizo, T., Kosiewicz, H., Prather, G., & Bos, J. (2014). How are community college students assessed and placed in developmental math?: Grounding our understanding in reality. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(5), 691–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murnane, R. J., & Willett, J. B. (2010). Methods matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngo, F., & Kosiewicz, H. (2017). How extending time in developmental math impacts student persistence and success: Evidence from a regression discontinuity in community colleges. The Review of Higher Education, 40(2), 267–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngo, F., & Melguizo, T. (2016). How can placement policy improve math remediation outcomes? Evidence from community college experimentation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(1), 171–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papay, J. P., Willett, J. B., & Murnane, R. J. (2011). Extending the regression-discontinuity approach to multiple assignment variables. Journal of Econometrics, 161(2), 203–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, T., Woods, C. S., Hu, S., Bertrand Jones, T., & Tandberg, D. (2018). What happens to underprepared first-time-in-college students when developmental education is optional? The case of developmental math and Intermediate Algebra in the first semester. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(3), 318–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, K. E., Reardon, S. F., Unlu, F., Bloom, H. S., & Cimpian, J. R. (2017). Estimating causal effects of education interventions using a two-rating regression discontinuity design: Lessons from a simulation study and an application. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(1), 138–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posselt, J. R. (2015). Disciplinary logics in doctoral admissions: Understanding patterns of faculty evaluation. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(6), 807–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, S. F., & Robinson, J. P. (2012). Regression discontinuity designs with multiple rating-score variables. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 5(1), 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. P. (2011). Evaluating criteria for English learner reclassification: A causal-effects approach using a binding-score regression discontinuity design with instrumental variables. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 267–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutschow, E. Z., & Hayes, A. K. (2018). Early findings from a survey of developmental education practices. Center for the Analysis of Postsecondary Readiness. Retrieved from https://postsecondaryreadiness.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/early-findings-national-survey-developmental-education.pdf

  • Scott-Clayton, J., Crosta, P., & Belfield, C. (2014). Improving the targeting of treatment: Evidence from college remediation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(3), 371–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Clayton, J., & Rodriguez, O. (2015). Development, discouragement, or diversion? New evidence on the effects of college remediation. Education Finance and Policy, 10(1), 4–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, J. W., Givvin, K. B., & Thompson, B. J. (2010). What community college developmental mathematics students understand about mathematics. MathAMATYC Educator, 1(3), 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, J. C., Konstantopoulos, S., & Goldrick-Rab, S. (2017). What happens to students placed into developmental education? A meta-analysis of regression discontinuity studies. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 806–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. (2013). Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1081–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, V. C., Steiner, P. M., & Cook, T. D. (2013). Analyzing regression-discontinuity designs with multiple assignment variables a comparative study of four estimation methods. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38(2), 107–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D., & Dadgar, M. (2018). How effective are community college remedial math courses for students with the lowest math skills? Community College Review, 46(1), 62–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federick Ngo.

Appendix

Appendix

See Fig. 7 and Tables 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Density of the running variable (McCrary density test)

Table 9 Discontinuity in covariates at one-point bandwidth, binding-score regression discontinuity estimates
Table 10 Characteristics of “one-off” students (means)
Table 11 Robustness of binding-score RD at basic math/pre-algebra (BM/PA) cutoff; outcome: passing PA w/C or better
Table 12 Robustness of frontier-score RD at pre-algebra/elementary algebra cutoff (bandwidth = 1); outcome: passing EA w/C or better
Table 13 Binding-score RD estimates with PA/EA compliers only (1) and conditional on attempting EA (2)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ngo, F. Fractions in College: How Basic Math Remediation Impacts Community College Students. Res High Educ 60, 485–520 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9519-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9519-x

Keywords

Navigation