Skip to main content
Log in

Mean reverting in stock ratings distribution

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study elucidates how the distribution of stock recommendations influences brokerages’ revision strategies and investors’ response to the revisions. We first observe that brokerages tend to adopt mean reverting strategies when their current recommendation distribution deviates too much from their long-term mean buy ratio. However, this process is not straightforward, because brokerages adopt all buy- and sell-type strategies simultaneously. Further, we find that a “mean reverting” strategy for recommendation revisions provokes a less significant reaction from the market. In addition, any revision that enlarges the deviation results in a lower response because of the market’s suspicions of relative optimism or pessimism on the brokerage’s part. We conclude that a steady buy ratio is the best strategy for the brokerage to obtain most effective recommendation returns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig.1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A buy ratio refers to the composition of the buy recommendation contained in the quarterly overall recommendation distribution at the broker level.

  2. Information on analysists research report, prior analyst recommendation literature and analyst recommendation data (mainly I/B/E/S), are merely focus on the sell-side analyst’s behavior (Groysberg et al. 2013; Jung et al. 2018). Roger (2017) points out that “To date, most empirical studies about sell-side financial analysts use the I/B/E/S database”. Therefore we employ the I/B/E/S database as our major source of dataset.

  3. The industry coverage ratio is computed by dividing the number of firms in each industry the broker covered by the total number of companies the brokerage house covered.

  4. Sell recommendations include sell and strong sell recommendations.

  5. The market risk premium (Rm–Rf) is the return on NYSE/AMEX/NASDAQ value-weighted index (Rm) less the U.S. one-month T-bill rate (Rf).

  6. We do not account for dropping the coverage of stocks because brokerages do not ordinarily disclose such news and identifying the exact date when analysts drop the coverage of the stocks is not easy when using I/B/E/S data.

  7. We exclude the period from experience if a lapse of more than 182 days occurs before an analyst issues any forecasts. The experience continues to accumulate until the analyst’s forecasts appear on I/B/E/S.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chia-Ying Chan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lo, HC., Chan, CY. Mean reverting in stock ratings distribution. Rev Quant Finan Acc 60, 1065–1097 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-022-01121-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-022-01121-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation