Abstract
Based on provincial panel date of China for the period 2001–2014, this study empirically adopts the slacks-based measure of directional distance function model and spatial Durbin model to explore the impacts of environmental regulation and its spatial spillover effect on air pollution control. The results show that the increase of environmental regulation stringency will help to improve air pollution control efficiency or reduce air pollutant emissions. In terms of spatial effect, evidence has been found to support environmental regulation has significantly spatial spillover effects. Specifically, the increase of environmental regulation in other provinces will decrease local air pollution control efficiency or increase local air pollutant emissions, which implies that there is strategic interaction of environmental regulation among local governments. Moreover, the results of the time interval test indicate that the effects of environmental regulation on air pollution control have improved in recent years, and with the increase of environmental regulation stringency, its spatial spillover effects have increased.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models (Vol. 4(D), p. 3735). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Anselin, L., & Le Gallo, J. (2006). Interpolation of air quality measures in Hedonic House Price Models: Spatial aspects. Spatial Economic Analysis, 1(1), 31–52.
Antweiler, W., Copeland, B., & Taylor, M. (2001). Is free trade good for the environment? The American Economic Review, 91(4), 877–908.
Bagayev, I., & Lochard, J. (2017). EU air pollution regulation: A breath of fresh air for Eastern European polluting industries? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 83, 145–163.
Blackman, A., & Kildegaard, A. (2010). Clean technological change in developing-country industrial clusters: Mexican leather tanning. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 12(3), 115–132.
Caldeira, E. (2012). Yardstick competition in a federation: Theory and evidence from China. China Economic Review, 23(4), 878–897.
Case, A. C., Rosen, H. S., & Hines, J. R. (1993). Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: Evidence from the states. Journal of Public Economics, 52(3), 285–307.
Chen, W. Y., Hu, F. Z. Y., Li, X., & Hua, J. (2017). Strategic interaction in municipal governments’ provision of public green spaces: A dynamic spatial panel data analysis in transitional China. Cities, 71, 1–10.
Chirinko, R. S., & Wilson, D. J. (2017). Tax competition among U.S. states: Racing to the bottom or riding on a seesaw? Journal of Public Economics, 155(2015), 147–163.
Chung, Y., Are, R. F., & Grosskopf, S. (1998). Emissions trading and profitability: The Swedish pulp and paper industry. Environmental and Resource Economics, 12, 345–356.
Claude, D., Figuières, C., & Tidball, M. (2012). Regulation of investments in infrastructure: The interplay between strategic behaviors and initial endowments. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 14(1), 35–66.
Cole, M. A., Elliott, R., & Shimamoto, K. (2005). Industrial characteristics, environmental regulations and air pollution: an analysis of the UK manufacturing sector. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50(1), 121–143.
Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2000). Data envelopment analysis. In W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, & J. Zhu (Eds.), Handbook on data envelopment analysis, 1st ed. (pp. 1–40).
Delmas, M., & Keller, A. (2005). Free riding in voluntary environmental programs: The case of the U.S. EPA WasteWise program. Policy Sciences, 38, 91–106.
Deng, H., Zheng, X., Huang, N., & Li, F. (2012). Strategic interaction in spending on environmental protection: Spatial evidence from Chinese cities. China and World Economy, 20(5), 103–120.
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Pasurka, C. A. (2007). Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions. Energy, 32(7), 1055–1066.
Feng, L., & Liao, W. (2016). Legislation, plans, and policies for prevention and control of air pollution in China: Achievements, challenges, and improvements. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1549–1558.
Feng, L., Mears, L., Beaufort, C., & Schulte, J. (2016). Energy, economy, and environment analysis and optimization on manufacturing plant energy supply system. Energy Conversion and Management, 117, 454–465.
Fredriksson, P. G., & Millimet, D. L. (2002). Strategic interaction and the determination of environmental policy across U.S. states. Journal of Urban Economics, 51(1), 101–122.
Fukuyama, H., & Weber, W. L. (2009). A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 43(4), 274–287.
Gan, K., Sun, S., Wang, S., & Wei, Y. (2018). A secondary-decomposition-ensemble learning paradigm for forecasting PM2.5 concentration. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 9, 989–999.
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National bureau of economic research working paper series, no. 3914 (pp. 1–57).
Hamamoto, M. (2006). Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries. Resource and Energy Economics, 28(4), 299–312.
Jaffe, A., & Palmer, K. (1997). Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), 610–619.
Khan, M. M., Zaman, K., Irfan, D., Awan, U., Ali, G., Kyophilavong, P., et al. (2016). Triangular relationship among energy consumption, air pollution and water resources in Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1375–1385.
Konisky, D. M., & Woods, N. D. (2012). Environmental free riding in state water pollution enforcement. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 12(3), 227–251.
Kurian, M., Ardakanian, R., Veiga, L. G., & Meyer, K. (2016). Political decentralization and public services. In M. Kurian, R. Ardakanian, L. G. Veiga, & K. Meyer (Eds.), Resources, services and risks (pp. 31–49). Cham: Springer.
Lanoie, P., Laurent-lucchetti, J., Johnstone, N., & Ambec, S. (2011). Environmental policy, innovation and performance: New insights on the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 20(3), 203–842.
Lanoie, P., Patry, M., & Lajeunesse, R. (2008). Environmental regulation and productivity: Testing the porter hypothesis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 30, 121–128.
Laplante, B., & Rilstone, P. (1996). Environmental inspections and emissions of the pulp and paper industry: The case of Quebec. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31(1), 19–36.
LeSage, J. P. (2008). An introduction to spatial econometrics. Revue d’économie industrielle, 123, 19–44.
Lesage, J., & Pace, R. (2010). Spatial econometric models. Berlin: Springer.
Levinson, A. (2003). Environmental regulatory competition: A status report and some new evidence. National Tax Journal, 56(1), 91–106.
Levinson, A., & Taylor, M. S. (2008). Unmasking the pollution haven effect. International Economic Review, 49(1), 223–254.
Li, B., & Wu, S. (2017). Effects of local and civil environmental regulation on green total factor productivity in China: A spatial Durbin econometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 342–353.
Li, X., Yang, Y., Xu, X., Xu, C., & Hong, J. (2016). Air pollution from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons generated by human activities and their health effects in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1360–1367.
Li, H., & Zhou, L.-A. (2005). Political turnover and economic performance: The incentive role of personnel control in China. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9), 1743–1762.
Lin, L., & Sun, W. (2016). Location choice of FDI firms and environmental regulation reforms in China. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 50(2), 207–232.
Lindstad, H. E., & Eskeland, G. S. (2016). Environmental regulations in shipping: Policies leaning towards globalization of scrubbers deserve scrutiny. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 47(8), 67–76.
Liu, Y., Hao, Y., & Gao, Y. (2017a). The environmental consequences of domestic and foreign investment: Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 108(February), 271–280.
Liu, Y., Huang, L., Kaloudis, A., & Støre-Valen, M. (2017b). Does urbanization lead to less energy use on road transport? Evidence from municipalities in Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 57, 363–377.
Lundberg, J. (2006). Spatial interaction model of spillovers from locally provided public services. Regional Studies, 40(6), 631–644.
Ma, Y. R., Ji, Q., & Fan, Y. (2016). Spatial linkage analysis of the impact of regional economic activities on PM2.5 pollution in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 1157–1167.
Marco, A. Z., & Giménez, J. V. (2013). Environmental tax and productivity in a decentralized context: New findings on the Porter Hypothesis. European Journal of Law and Economics, 40(2), 313–339.
Nasreen, S., Anwar, S., & Ozturk, I. (2017). Financial stability, energy consumption and environmental quality: Evidence from South Asian economies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67, 1105–1122.
Nauleau, M. L. (2014). Free-riding on tax credits for home insulation in France: An econometric assessment using panel data. Energy Economics, 46, 78–92.
Shan, H. J. (2008). Reestimating the capital stock of China: 1952–2006 (in Chinese). The Journal of Quantitative and Technical Economics, 10, 17–31.
Shi, G. M., Wang, J. N., Fu, F., & Xue, W. B. (2017). A study on transboundary air pollution based on a game theory model: Cases of SO2 emission reductions in the cities of Changsha, Zhuzhou and Xiangtan in China. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 8(2), 244–252.
Tobler, A. W. R. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 234–240.
Tone, K. (2004). Dealing with undesirable outputs in DEA: A slacks-based measure (SBM) approach. In GRIPS research report series, 2003 (pp. 44–45). Toronto: Presentation at NAPW III.
Vargas-Vargas, M., Meseguer-SantamarÃa, M. L., Mondéjar-Jiménez, J., & Mondéjar-Jiménez, J. A. (2010). Environmental protection expenditure for companies: A spanish regional analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research, 4(3), 373–378.
Xu, X., & Song, L. (2000). Regional cooperation and the environment: Do dirty industries migrate. Weltwirtschafthches Archiv, 136(1), 137–157.
Xu, J., Zhou, M., & Li, H. (2016). ARDL-based research on the nexus among FDI, environmental regulation, and energy consumption in Shanghai (China). Natural Hazards, 84(1), 1–14.
Yilmaz, O., Kara, B. Y., & Yetis, U. (2016). Hazardous waste management system design under population and environmental impact considerations. Journal of Environmental Management, 203, 720–731.
York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003). STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 351–365.
Yu, J., Zhou, L.-A., & Zhu, G. (2016). Strategic interaction in political competition: Evidence from spatial effects across Chinese cities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 57(71171005), 23–37.
Zeng, D. Z., & Zhao, L. (2009). Pollution havens and industrial agglomeration. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58(2), 141–153.
Zhang, Y. J., Peng, Y. L., Ma, C. Q., & Shen, B. (2017). Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China. Energy Policy, 100, 18–28.
Zhao, X., & Sun, B. (2016). The influence of Chinese environmental regulation on corporation innovation and competitiveness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1528–1536.
Zheng, S., Kahn, M. E., Sun, W., & Luo, D. (2014). Incentives for China’s urban mayors to mitigate pollution externalities: The role of the central government and public environmentalism. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 47(1), 61–71.
Zheng, S., Yi, H., & Li, H. (2015). The impacts of provincial energy and environmental policies on air pollution control in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49, 386–394.
Zhou, Y., Zhu, S., & He, C. (2017). How do environmental regulations affect industrial dynamics? Evidence from China’s pollution-intensive industries. Habitat International, 60, 10–18.
Zhu, S., He, C., & Liu, Y. (2014). Geoforum Going green or going away: Environmental regulation, economic geography and firms’ strategies in China’ s pollution-intensive industries. Geoforum, 55, 53–65.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge financial support from the National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 18BGL176). The authors acknowledge the very helpful research assistance of the SSS (Economics) and the Economic growth Centre (EGC) in Nanyang Technological University. The authors are grateful for very helpful comments from anonymous reviewers. Chen Jianqing provides very competent research assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, X., Gao, M., Guo, S. et al. Effects of environmental regulation on air pollution control in China: a spatial Durbin econometric analysis. J Regul Econ 55, 307–333 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-019-09384-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-019-09384-x
Keywords
- Environmental regulation
- Air pollution control
- Strategic interaction
- Spatial Durbin model
- Local government