Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does a one-size-fits-all approach to financial regulations alleviate default risk? The case of dual banking systems

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Financial regulations are developed to curb financial and economic fragility costs without undermining the economic contributions of banks to economic development. To understand the impact financial regulations have on reducing the financial fragility of banks we use the probability-of-default of banks as a proxy for bank failure. After analyzing data collected from 15 countries with a dual banking system for the period 2000–2015, we find convincing evidence that not all financial regulations have risk-reducing benefits for banks and the impact of financial regulations on default risk is not the same for conventional banks (CBs) and Islamic banks (IBs). The empirical evidence suggests that regulations that lessen overall default risk have a greater impact on IBs while those increasing default risk have a greater impact on CBs. Based on our findings we recommend that regulators should consider the different natures of CBs and IBs and tailor financial regulations to suit these operationally distinct financial intermediaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A dual banking system allow both conventional banks (CBs) and Islamic banks (IBs) to operate in conjunction with each other.

  2. See for example Laeven and Levine (2009) and Delis and Staikouras (2011).

  3. See Ronn and Verma (1986).

  4. In its simplest form equity and debt holders have contingent claims on the assets of a firm.

  5. This module has been accessed from copulafit from Mathworks: https://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/copulafit.html.

  6. The extreme example is the trading of credit derivatives without knowing the risk of underlying assets.

  7. Refer table 1 on page 23 of Ramalho et al. (2011) for specifications of these distributional functions.

  8. Data is publicly available and has free access. It can be accessed from data section at: http://www.globalbanking.org.

  9. Data is publicly available and has free access. It can be accessed from data section at: http://www.globalbanking.org.

  10. These surveys are available online in the data section of http://econ.worldbank.org. We also cross checked the data from the Global Banking database with the original surveys.

  11. The endogenous nature of systemic risk and financial regulations is out of the scope of our paper and we refer readers to Prasch and Warin (2016), Korinek (2011), Alexander et al. (2005), and Kaufman and Scott (2003).

  12. For detailed discussion on these functional forms please see Ramalho et al. 2011, 2014.

  13. For interested readers, the results of other models are available from the corresponding author.

  14. Table 6 reports the estimation results of all variables used in Table 5 and interactive slope variables except for the macroeconomic control variables to conserve space. However, the results of other models are available on demand from the corresponding author.

  15. We used macroeconomic controls but these are not reported for the sake of brevity.

  16. See for example, Ashraf et al. (2016) and Laeven and Levine (2007).

References

  • Acharya, V. V. (2009). A theory of systemic risk and design of prudential bank regulation. Journal of Financial Stability, 5(3), 224–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, K., Dhumale, R., & Eatwell, J. (2005). Global governance of financial systems: the international regulation of systemic risk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, F., & Gale, D. (2004). Competition and financial stability. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 36(3), 453–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arena, M. (2008). Bank failures and bank fundamentals: A comparative analysis of Latin America and East Asia during the nineties using bank-level data. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(2), 299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, D. J. (1988). Ability, moral hazard, firm size, and diversification. The Rand Journal of Economics, 19(1), 72–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf, D., & Goddard, J. (2012). Derivatives in the wake of disintermediation: A simultaneous equations model of commercial and industrial lending and the use of derivatives by US banks. International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, 4(3), 250–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf, D., Altunbas, Y., & Goddard, J. (2007). Who transfers credit risk? Determinants of the use of credit derivatives by large US banks. The European Journal of Finance, 13(5), 483–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf, D., Rizwan, M. S., & L’Huillier, B. (2016). A net stable funding ratio for Islamic banks and its impact on financial stability: An international investigation. Journal of Financial Stability, 25, 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf, M. A. (2010). The effectiveness of microcredit programs and prospects of islamic microfinance institutes (IMFIs) in muslim countries: A case study of Bangladesh. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 6(4), 32–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank for International Settlements (BIS). (2005). Foreign direct investment in the financial sector—experiences in Asia, Central and Eastern Europe and Latin America. Committee on the Global Financial System, Number 25 (June). Available at:http://www.bis.org/publ/cgfs25.pdf.

  • Barth, J. R., Caprio, G., & Levine, R. (2004). Bank regulation and supervision: What works best? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 13(2), 205–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, J. R., Caprio, G., & Levine, R. (2006). Rethinking bank regulation. Till Angels Govern.

  • Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2006a). Bank concentration, competition, and crises: First results. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(5), 1581–1603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2006b). Bank supervision and corruption in lending. Journal of Monetary Economics, 53(8), 2131–2163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, C., & Czado, C. (2013). Multivariate option pricing using copulae. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 29(5), 509–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonin, J. P., & Louie, D. (2016). Did foreign banks stay committed to emerging Europe during recent financial crises?. Journal of Comparative Economics. (in press)

  • Bourgain, A., Pieretti, P., & Zanaj, S. (2012). Financial openness, disclosure and bank risk-taking in MENA countries. Emerging Markets Review, 13(3), 283–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, J. H., & De Nicolò, G. (2005). The theory of bank risk taking and competition revisited. The Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1329–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, J., De Nicolo, G., & Jalal, A. M. (2006). Bank risk taking and competition revisited: New Theory and Evidence, IMF Working paper, WP/06/297.

  • Bridges, J., Gregory, D., Nielsen, M., Pezzini, S., Radia, A., & Spaltro, M. (2014). The impact of capital requirements on bank lending., Bank of England Working Paper No. 486. Online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2388773.

  • Bushman, R. M., & Williams, C. D. (2012). Accounting discretion, loan loss provisioning, and discipline of banks’ risk-taking. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 54(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butzbach, O., & von Mettenheim, K. E. (2015). Alternative banking and theory. Accounting, Economics and Law-A Convivium, 5(2), 105–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprio, G., & Levine, R. (2002). Corporate governance in finance: Concepts and international observations. Financial sector governance: The roles of the public and private sectors (pp. 17–50).

  • Chandler, A. D. (1977). The visible hand. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M., Jeon, B. N., Wang, R., & Wu, J. (2015). Corruption and bank risk-taking: Evidence from emerging economies. Emerging Markets Review, 24, 122–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Čihák, M., & Hesse, H. (2010). Islamic banks and financial stability: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Services Research, 38(2–3), 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S. & Van Horen, N. (2011). Foreign Banks: Trends, impact and financial stability. DNB Working Paper No. 330.

  • Claessens, S., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Huizinga, H. (2001). How does foreign entry affect domestic banking markets? Journal of Banking and Finance, 25(5), 891–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clair, R. W. S. (2004). Macroeconomic determinants of banking financial performance and resilience in Singapore, (Vol. 38). Monetary Authority of Singapore: Macroeconomic Surveillance Department.

  • Cole, R. A., & White, L. J. (2012). Déjà vu all over again: The causes of US commercial bank failures this time around. Journal of Financial Services Research, 42(1–2), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, J. S., Dages, B. G., & Goldberg, L. S. (2002). Has foreign bank entry led to sounder banks in Latin America? Current Issues in Economics and Finance, 8(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalla Valle, L., De Giuli, M. E., Tarantola, C., & Manelli, C. (2016). Default probability estimation via pair copula constructions. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(1), 298–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Giuli, M. E., Fantazzini, D., & Maggi, M. A. (2008). A new approach for firm value and default probability estimation beyond Merton models. Computational Economics, 31(2), 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Nicolò, G. (2015). Revisiting the impact of bank capital requirements on lending and real activity. Online: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2688110.

  • Deli, Y. D., & Hasan, I. (2016). Real effects of bank capital regulations: Global evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance,. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.11.022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delis, M. D., & Staikouras, P. K. (2011). Supervisory effectiveness and bank risk. Review of Finance, 15(3), 511–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Huizinga, H. (2010). Bank activity and funding strategies: The impact on risk and returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 98(3), 626–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Detragiache, E., & Tressel, T. (2008). Banking on the principles: Compliance with Basel Core Principles and bank soundness. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 17(4), 511–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, R. S., & Strahan, P. E. (1997). Diversification, size, and risk at bank holding companies. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 29(3), 300–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, D. W. (1984). Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. The Review of Economic Studies, 51(3), 393–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Distinguin, I., Roulet, C., & Tarazi, A. (2013). Bank regulatory capital and liquidity: Evidence from US and European publicly traded banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(9), 3295–3317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart, A. C. (2005). A comparison of Merton’s option pricing model of corporate debt valuation to the use of book values. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1), 401–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edirisuriya, P., Gunasekarage, A., & Dempsey, M. (2015). Bank diversification, performance and stock market response: Evidence from listed public banks in South Asian countries. Journal of Asian Economics, 41, 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Agency problems and residual claims. The Journal of Law & Economics, 26(2), 327–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, N., & Fich, E. (2009). Does financial experience help banks during credit crises?. Unpublished working paper, Drexel University.

  • Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2011). Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociological Theory, 29(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, F. T., & Keeley, M. C. (1989). Capital regulation and bank risk-taking: A note. Journal of Banking & Finance, 13(6), 883–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gennotte, G., & Pyle, D. (1991). Capital controls and bank risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 15(4–5), 805–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertner, R. H., Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. (1994). Internal versus external capital markets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4), 1211–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannetti, M., & Ongena, S. (2012). “Lending by example”: Direct and indirect effects of foreign banks in emerging markets. Journal of International Economics, 86(1), 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, F. (2005). Bank regulation and risk-taking incentives: An international comparison of bank risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(5), 1153–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, R., & Lelyveld, I. (2014). Multinational banks and the global financial crisis: Weathering the perfect storm? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 46(s1), 333–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann, T. F., Murdock, K. C., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). Liberalization, moral hazard in banking, and prudential regulation: Are capital requirements enough? American Economic Review, 90(1), 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herring, R. J., & Vankudre, P. (1987). Growth Opportunities and risk-taking by financial intermediaries. The Journal of Finance, 42(3), 583–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFSB (2017), Islamic financial services industry stability report, Published by Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB), http://www.ifsb.org/docs/IFSB%20IFSI%20Stability%20Report%202017.pdf.

  • Jacques, K., & Nigro, P. (1997). Risk-based capital, portfolio risk, and bank capital: A simultaneous equations approach. Journal of Economics and business, 49(6), 533–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiraporn, P., Jiraporn, N., Boeprasert, A., & Chang, K. (2014). Does corporate social responsibility (CSR) improve credit ratings?. Evidence from geographic identification. Financial Management, 43(3), 505–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jokipii, T., & Monnin, P. (2013). The impact of banking sector stability on the real economy. Journal of International Money and Finance, 32, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, G. G., & Scott, K. E. (2003). What is systemic risk, and do bank regulators retard or contribute to it? The Independent Review, 7(3), 371–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, M. C. (1990). Deposit insurance, risk, and market power in banking. The American Economic Review, 1183–1200.

  • Kim, D., & Santomero, A. M. (1988). Risk in banking and capital regulation. The Journal of Finance, 43(5), 1219–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, M. R. (2013). The Basel III net stable funding ratio and bank net interest margins. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(11), 4144–4156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, M., & Santomero, A. M. (1980). Regulation of bank capital and portfolio risk. The Journal of Finance, 35(5), 1235–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korinek, A. (2011). Systemic risk-taking: amplification effects, externalities, and regulatory responses. Externalities, and Regulatory Responses. ECB Working Paper No. 1345.

  • Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2007). Is there a diversification discount in financial conglomerates? Journal of Financial Economics, 85(2), 331–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2009). Bank governance, regulation and risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2), 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laker, J. (1999). Monitoring financial system stability. Reserve Bank of Australia Bulletin, 10, 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, W. R., Looney, S. W., & Wansley, J. W. (1986). An application of the Cox proportional hazards model to bank failure. Journal of Banking & Finance, 10(4), 511–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapteacru, I. (2017). Market power and risk of Central and Eastern European banks: Does more powerful mean safer? Economic Modelling, 63, 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lardy, N. R. (2001). Foreign financial firms in Asia. In R. E. Litan, P. Masson, & M. Pomerleano (Eds.), Open doors: Foreign participation in financial systems in developing countries (pp. 267–271). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lensink, R., & Hermes, N. (2004). The short-term effects of foreign bank entry on domestic bank behavior: Does economic development matter? Journal of Banking and Finance, 28(3), 553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., & Zhang, Y. (2013). Are there diversification benefits of increasing noninterest income in the Chinese banking industry? Journal of Empirical Finance, 24, 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liewellyn, D., Nieto, M. J., Huertas, T., & Enoch, C. (2017). Policy responses to the Great Financial Crisis. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance,. doi:10.1108/JFRC-05-2017-0043.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macey, J. R., & O’Hara, M. (2003). Solving the corporate governance problems of banks: A proposal. Banking LJ, 120, 326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manganaris, P., Beccalli, E., & Dimitropoulos, P. (2017). Bank transparency and the crisis. The British Accounting Review, 49(2), 121–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Männasoo, K., & Mayes, D. G. (2009). Explaining bank distress in Eastern European transition economies. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(2), 244–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, A. J. (1984). Deregulation and bank financial policy. Journal of Banking & Finance, 8(4), 557–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. C. (1970). A dynamic general equilibrium model of the asset market and its application to the pricing of the capital structure of the firm. Sloan School of Management Working Paper, No. 497–70, December 1970. (Chapter 11 in Continuous-Time Finance)

  • Merton, R. C. (1974). On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates. The Journal of Finance, 29(2), 449–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. C. (1977). An analytic derivation of the cost of deposit insurance and loan guarantees an application of modern option pricing theory. Journal of Banking & Finance, 1(1), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, A., & Whalley, A. E. (2001). Bank capital regulation and incentives for risk-taking. Cass Business School Research Paper. doi:10.2139/ssrn.299319

  • Peterkort, R. F., & Nielsen, J. F. (2005). Is the book-to-market ratio a measure of risk? Journal of Financial Research, 28(4), 487–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. (1994). The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data. The Journal of Finance, 49(1), 3–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porta, R. L., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasch, R., & Warin, T. (2016). Systemic risk and financial regulations: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Banking Regulation, 17(3), 188–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puyou, F. R. (2014). Ordering collective performance manipulation practices: How do leaders manipulate financial reporting figures in conglomerates? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(6), 469–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramalho, E. A., Ramalho, J. J., & Murteira, J. M. (2011). Alternative estimating and testing empirical strategies for fractional regression models. Journal of Economic Surveys, 25(1), 19–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramalho, E. A., Ramalho, J. J., & Murteira, J. M. (2014). A generalized goodness-of-functional form test for binary and fractional regression models. The Manchester School, 82(4), 488–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochet, J. C. (1992). Capital requirements and the behaviour of commercial banks. European Economic Review, 36(5), 1137–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ronn, E. I., & Verma, A. K. (1986). Pricing risk-adjusted deposit insurance: An option-based model. The Journal of Finance, 41(4), 871–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotemberg, J. J., & Saloner, G. (1994). Benefits of narrow business strategies. The American Economic Review, 84(5), 1330–1349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeck, K., & Cihak, M. (2012). Banking competition and capital ratios. European Financial Management, 18(5), 836–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, M. M., & Walter, I. (2009). Do financial conglomerates create or destroy economic value? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 18(2), 193–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrieves, R. E., & Dahl, D. (1992). The relationship between risk and capital in commercial banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 16(2), 439–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soedarmono, W., Machrouh, F., & Tarazi, A. (2013). Bank competition, crisis and risk taking: Evidence from emerging markets in Asia. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 23, 196–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stulz, R. (1990). Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(1), 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, E. D., & Huang, S. M. (2010). Comparing firm failure predictions between logit, KMV, and ZPP models: Evidence from Taiwan’s electronics industry. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 17(3), 209–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Süer, Ö., Levent, H., & Şen, S. (2016). Foreign entry and the Turkish banking system in 2000s. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 37, 420–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J., & Liu, G. (2014). Audit committees’ oversight of bank risk-taking. Journal of Banking & Finance, 40, 376–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabak, B. M., Gomes, G. M., & da Silva Medeiros, M. (2015). The impact of market power at bank level in risk-taking: The Brazilian case. International Review of Financial Analysis, 40, 154–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanda, A. (2015). The effects of bank regulation on the relationship between capital and risk. Comparative Economic Studies, 57(1), 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. M., & Quintyn, M. M. (2002). Regulatory and supervisory independence and financial stability (No. 2-46). International Monetary Fund.

  • Uhde, A., & Heimeshoff, U. (2009). Consolidation in banking and financial stability in Europe: Empirical evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(7), 1299–1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, C. K. (2010). Reframing financial regulation (p. 42). Paper: Cornell Law Faculty Publications.

  • Williamson, O. E. (1970). Corporate control and business behavior: An inquiry into the effects of organization form on enterprise behavior. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, L. (2015). Economies of scale, economies of scope and financial holding companies appropriate/moderate scale management. Geo-Informatics in Resource Management and Sustaina ble Ecosystem, 482, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Editor of the Journal of Regulatory Economics, and the anonymous referee for their helpful comments and suggestions that enabled us to improve the quality of this paper considerably. The authors acknowledge and are grateful for financial support and encouragement from the Islamic Research and Training Institute, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia and the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Research at Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Saudi Arabia. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Islamic Research and Training Institute or the Islamic Development Bank Group. All errors are the responsibility of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawood Ashraf.

Additional information

The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Islamic Research and Training Institute or the Islamic Development Bank Group.

Appendix A

Appendix A

See Table 8.

Table 8 Explanation of regulatory variables used in the paper

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rizwan, M.S., Moinuddin, M., L’Huillier, B. et al. Does a one-size-fits-all approach to financial regulations alleviate default risk? The case of dual banking systems. J Regul Econ 53, 37–74 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-017-9340-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-017-9340-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation