Skip to main content
Log in

Market making and risk management in options markets

  • Published:
Review of Derivatives Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the personal trading strategies of member proprietary traders in the natural gas futures options market. Trading activity is found to mirror previous findings in futures markets, specifically high frequency trading, with low risk exposure. The portfolio of risk holdings by member proprietary traders are also examined to identify whether they are instantaneously hedged using the underlying futures market, as well as to investigate how they manage their inventory holding, rebalancing, and volatility risk exposures. Findings of longer-term risk management practices by option markets indicate that instantaneous hedging does not take place in this market. Exposure to price and volatility risks is actively managed, while rebalancing risk exposure has a significant impact on profit for this trading group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For example, if the delta of an option is .5, then a $.10 change in the futures price will lead to an approximately $.05 change in the option value, holding all else constant. By selling one futures contract for every two options contracts, this will temporarily eliminate the futures price. The residual risk would be the other option pricing factors, such as volatility.

  2. A subsample was also studied that evaluated the position risk positions matched by executing broker IDs after electronic trading in futures markets began because in theory option market makers could simultaneously trade in both markets using hand held devices. Our findings were insignificantly different and robust to the matching procedure using account numbers.

  3. Bloomberg implied volatilities were also used with no significant changes in the results. Thus, our estimation of the implied volatility is robust to the methodology described.

  4. Marking the position parameter levels to market each increment entails summing the positions of each increment to carry forward the balance (if the trader is net long in the increment) or debit (if the trader is net short in the increment) of trades. The balance is then added to the first trade in the increment and multiplied by the increment’s parameter estimate to calculate the increment’s parameter position level.

  5. Due to the lack of trading in the first hour, the first 2 h of trade are combined for the incremental analysis.

References

  • Agarwal, Vikas, & Naik, Narayan Y. (2004). Risks and portfolio decisions involving hedge funds. The Review of Financial Studies, 17(1), 63–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzarello, S. (2014). Energy price spread: Natural Gas vs. Crude Oil in the US. Chicago: CME Group Market Insights Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barberis, N., & Huang, M. (2008). Stocks as lotteries: The implications of probability weighting for security prices. American Economic Review, 98, 2066–2100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baschmeir, L., & Griffin, J. (2006). Testing for market integration: Crude oil, coal and natural gas. The Energy Journal, 27, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benston, G., & Hagerman, R. (1974). Determinants of bid-ask spreads in the over the counter market. Journal of Financial Economics, 1(4), 353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, B., Mitton, T., & Vorkink, K. (2010). Expected idiosyncratic skewness. Review of Financial Studies, 23, 169–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buyuksahin, B., & Robe, M. (2014). Speculators, commodities, and cross-market linkages. Journal of International Money and Finance, 42, 38–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çetin, U., Jarrow, R., Protter, P., & Warachka, M. (2006). Pricing options in an extended black scholes economy with illiquidity: Theory and empirical evidence. The Review of Financial Studies, 19(2), 493–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J. C., & Rubinstein, M. (1985). Options markets. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figlewski, S. (1989). Options arbitrage in imperfect markets. Journal of Finance, 44, 1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannetti, A., Zhong, R., & Wu, L. (2004). Inventory hedging and option market making. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 7(7), 853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, T. S. Y., & Stoll, H. R. (1983). The dynamics of dealer markets under competition. Journal of Finance, 38, 1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huh, S., Lin, H., & Mello, A. (2012). Hedging by option market makers: Theory and evidence. Working paper.

  • Hull, J. (2000). Options, futures and other derivative securities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, M., & Wilhelm, W. (1992). Market making in the options markets and the costs of discrete hedge rebalancing. The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klock, M., & McCormick, D. T. (1999). The impact of market maker competition on NASDAQ spreads. Financial Review, 34, 55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuserk, G., & Locke, P. (1993). Scalper behavior in futures markets: An empirical analysis. Journal of Futures Markets, 13, 409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuserk, G., & Locke, P. (1994). Market maker competition on futures exchanges. Journal of Derivatives, 56, 409–431.

  • Locke, P. R., & Mann, Steven C. (2005). Professional trader discipline and trade disposition. Journal of Financial Economics, 76, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, P. R., & Sarajoti, P. (2004). Interdealer trading in futures markets. Journal of Futures Markets, 24, 923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manaster, S., & Mann, S. C. (1996). Life in the pits: Competitive market making and inventory control. Review of Financial Studies, 9, 953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, M., & Oldfield, George S. (1986). The microeconomics of market making. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 21(4), 361–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onur, I. (2009). Natural gas markets: How sensitive are they to crude oil price changes? OPEC Energy Review, 17–35.

  • Serletis, A., & Ricardo, R. (2004). Testing for common features in North American Energy Markets. Energy Economics, 26, 401–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serletis, A., & Shahmoradi, A. (2006). Returns and volatility in the NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas futures market. OPEC Review: Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, 30, 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silber, W. (1984). Marketmaking behavior in an auction market: An analysis of scalpers in futures markets. Journal of Finance, 39, 937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, H. R. (1978). The pricing of security dealer services: An empirical study of NASDAQ stocks. Journal of Finance, 33, 1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinic, S., & West, R. (1972). Competition and the pricing of dealer service in the over-the-counter stock market. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 7(3), 1707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahal, S. (1997). Entry, exit, market makers, and the bid-ask spread. Review of Financial Studies, 10, 871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Working, H. (1977). Price effects of scalping and day trading. Selected Writings of Holbrook Working, Chicago Board of Trade.

  • Working, H. (1967). Tests of a theory concerning floor trading on commodity exchanges. In Food Research Institute Studies: Supplement (Vol. 7, pp. 5–38). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naomi E. Boyd.

Additional information

I would like to thank Peter Locke for his invaluable insights, comments and guidance, Li Sun, participants of the 2008 Financial Management Association doctoral consortium, the 2009 Financial Management Association and Southern Finance Association meetings, seminar participants from West Virginia University, Kansas State University, Clemson University and the University of Rhode Island for their helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boyd, N.E. Market making and risk management in options markets. Rev Deriv Res 18, 1–27 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-014-9101-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-014-9101-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation