Skip to main content
Log in

On the performance of continuous stirred tank reactor and plug flow reactor for chemical reactions characterised by non-elementary kinetics

  • Published:
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This manuscript deals with the comparison of the performance of a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) versus plug flow reactor (PFR) for non-elementary reactions carried out in homogeneous phase. In particular, we propose the commented analysis of some case of interest in terms of characteristics of kinetic expressions, plots of the rate of reaction versus degree of conversion, CSTR/PFR space–time ratio, comparison between the rate of reaction and its mean value, non-dimensional parameters and operating conditions. To this end, three case-studies have been chosen: (1) chemical reactions that can be described by kinetic laws resembling the ones known as Michaelis–Menten’s; (2) production of hydrogen bromide as example of chain reaction in gas phase; (3) chemical reactions governed by Monod-like kinetic expressions. The three cases have been scrutinised under the hypothesis of an isothermal, homogeneous, single and globally irreversible reaction with negligible density changes of the reacting system. The discussion also allowed to highlight non-trivial aspects intimately related to the formal expression of the kinetic laws under investigation. The application of the approach here developed to two practical case-studies of literature has been proposed, i.e. the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated sugarcane straw and the biomass growth fermentation process for the production of hydrogen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levenspiel O (1999) Chemical reaction engineering, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Westerterp KR, van Swaaij WPM, Beenackers AACM (1988) Chemical reactor design and operation, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hill CG Jr, Root TW (2014) Introduction to chemical engineering kinetics and reactor design, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Roberts GW (2009) Chemical reactions and chemical reactors. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smith R (2005) Chemical process design and integration. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dowd JE, Riggs DS (1965) A comparison of estimates of Michaelis-Menten kinetic constants from various linear transformations. J Biol Chem 240:863–869

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson KA, Goody RS (2011) The original Michaelis constant: translation of the 1913 Michaelis-Menten paper. Biochemistry 50:8264–8269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Michaelis L, Menten ML (1913) Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung. Biochem Z 49:333–369

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Arruda de Queiroz G, de Menezes Bezerra Barbosa CM, Moraes de Abreu CA (2018) Mechanism-based kinetics of the water-gas shift reaction at low temperature with a ruthenium catalysts. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 123:573–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar KV, Porkodi K, Rocha F (2008) Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetics—a theoretical study. Catal Commun 9:82–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Niksa S, Liu GS, Hurt RH (2003) Coal conversion submodels for design applications at elevated pressures. Part I. Devolatilization and char oxidation. Prog Energ Combust Sci 29:425–477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Spasiano D, Marotta R, Malato S, Fernandez-Ibañez P, Di Somma I (2015) Solar photocatalysis: materials, reactors, some commercial, and pre-industrialized applications. A comprehensive approach. Appl Catal B-Environ 170–171:90–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Twaiq F, Nasser MS, Onaizi SA (2014) Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetic study for palm oil catalytic cracking over Al-MCM-41. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 112:477–488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bodenstein M, Lind SC (1907) Geschwindigkeit der Bildung des Bromwasserstoffs aus Seiner Elementen. Z Phys Chem 57:168–192

    Google Scholar 

  15. Herzfeld KF (1919) Zur Theorie der Reaktionsgeschwindigkeiten in Gasen. Ann Phys 364:635–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rice FO, Herzfeld KF (1934) The thermal decomposition of organic compounds from the standpoint of free radicals. VI. The mechanism of some chain reactions. J Am Chem Soc 56:284–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Husain A (1998) Mathematical models of the kinetics of anaerobic digestion—a selected review. Biomass Bioenerg 14:561–571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kovárová-Kovar K, Egli T (1998) Growth kinetics of suspended microbial cells: from single-substrate-controlled growth to mixed-substrate kinetics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:646–666

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Monod J (1942) Recherches sur la Croissance des Cultures Bactériennes. Hermann et Cie, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  20. Okpokwasili GC, Nweke CO (2005) Microbial growth and substrate utilization kinetics. Afr J Biotechnol 5:305–317

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pratto B, Alencar de Souza RB, Sousa R Jr, Gonçalves da Cruz AJ (2016) Enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated sugarcane straw: kinetic study and semi-mechanistic modeling. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 178:1430–1444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nath K, Muthukumar M, Kumar A, Das D (2008) Kinetics of two-stage fermentation process for the production of hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:1195–1203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Montagnaro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Balsamo, M., Montagnaro, F. On the performance of continuous stirred tank reactor and plug flow reactor for chemical reactions characterised by non-elementary kinetics. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 125, 449–469 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-018-1475-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-018-1475-0

Keywords

Navigation