Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quality of life after stroke: a longitudinal analysis of a cluster randomized trial

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Health-related quality of life (QoL) is poor after stroke, but may be improved with comprehensive care plans. We aimed to determine the effects of an individualized management program on QoL in people with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), describe changes in QoL over time, and identify variables associated with QoL.

Methods

This was a multicenter, cluster randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment of outcomes and intention‐to‐treat analysis. Patients with stroke or TIA aged ≥ 18 years were randomized by general practice to receive usual care or an intervention comprising a tailored chronic disease management plan and education. QoL was assessed at baseline and 3, 12, and 24 months after baseline using the Assessment of Quality of Life instrument. Patient responses were converted to utility scores ranging from − 0.04 (worse than death) to 1.00 (good health). Mixed-effects models were used for analyses.

Results

Among 563 participants recruited (mean age 68.4 years, 64.5% male), median utility scores ranged from 0.700 to 0.772 at different time points, with no difference observed between intervention and usual care groups. QoL improved significantly from baseline to 3 months (ß = 0.019; P = 0.015) and 12 months (ß = 0.033; P < 0.001), but not from baseline to 24 months (ß = 0.013; P = 0.140) in both groups combined. Older age, females, lower educational attainment, greater handicap, anxiety and depression were longitudinally associated with poor QoL.

Conclusion

An individualized management program did not improve QoL over 24 months. Those who are older, female, with lower educational attainment, greater anxiety, depression and handicap may require greater support.

Clinical trial registration

https://www.anzctr.org.au. Unique identifier: ACTRN12608000166370.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Anonymized data and all code for data cleaning and analysis may be available by reasonable request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Lawrence, L., & Christie, D. (1979). Quality of life after stroke: A three-year follow-up. Age and Ageing, 8(3), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/8.3.167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen, K. R., Hazelett, S., Jarjoura, D., Wickstrom, G. C., Hua, K., Weinhardt, J., & Wright, K. (2002). Effectiveness of a postdischarge care management model for stroke and transient ischemic attack: A randomized trial. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 11(2), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1053/jscd.2002.127106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fryer, C. E., Luker, J. A., McDonnell, M. N., & Hillier, S. L. (2016). Self-management programs for quality of life in people with stroke. Stroke, 47(12), e266–e267. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Harwood, M., Weatherall, M., Talemaitoga, A., Barber, P. A., Gommans, J., Taylor, W., McPherson, K., & McNaughton, H. (2012). Taking charge after stroke: Promoting self-directed rehabilitation to improve quality of life—A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 26(6), 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215511426017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ryan, T., Enderby, P., & Rigby, A. S. (2006). A randomized controlled trial to evaluate intensity of community-based rehabilitation provision following stroke or hip fracture in old age. Clinical Rehabilitation, 20(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215506cr933oa

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ellis, G., Rodger, J., McAlpine, C., & Langhorne, P. (2005). The impact of stroke nurse specialist input on risk factor modification: A randomised controlled trial. Age and Ageing, 34(4), 389–392. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afi075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Allen, K., Hazelett, S., Jarjoura, D., Hua, K., Wright, K., Weinhardt, J., & Kropp, D. (2009). A randomized trial testing the superiority of a postdischarge care management model for stroke survivors. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 18(6), 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.02.002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. McManus, J. A., Craig, A., McAlpine, C., Langhorne, P., & Ellis, G. (2009). Does behaviour modification affect post-stroke risk factor control? Three-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 23(2), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215508095874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carod-Artal, F. J., & Egido, J. A. (2009). Quality of life after stroke: The importance of a good recovery. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 27(Suppl 1), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1159/000200461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, E. S., Kim, J. W., Kang, H. J., Bae, K. Y., Kim, S. W., Kim, J. T., Park, M. S., Cho, K. H., & Kim, J. M. (2018). Longitudinal impact of depression on quality of life in stroke patients. Psychiatry Investigation, 15(2), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2017.10.11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pan, J. H., Song, X. Y., Lee, S. Y., & Kwok, T. (2008). Longitudinal analysis of quality of life for stroke survivors using latent curve models. Stroke, 39(10), 2795–2802. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.515460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sadlonova, M., Wasser, K., Nagel, J., Weber-Kruger, M., Groschel, S., Uphaus, T., Liman, J., Hamann, G. F., Kermer, P., Groschel, K., Herrmann-Lingen, C., & Wachter, R. (2021). Health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression up to 12 months post-stroke: Influence of sex, age, stroke severity and atrial fibrillation—A longitudinal subanalysis of the Find-AFRANDOMISED trial. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 142, 110353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schindel, D., Schneider, A., Grittner, U., Jobges, M., & Schenk, L. (2019). Quality of life after stroke rehabilitation discharge: A 12-month longitudinal study. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1699173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tse, T., Binte Yusoff, S. Z., Churilov, L., Ma, H., Davis, S., Donnan, G. A., Carey, L. M., & team, S. r. (2017). Increased work and social engagement is associated with increased stroke specific quality of life in stroke survivors at 3 months and 12 months post-stroke: A longitudinal study of an Australian stroke cohort. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 24(6), 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2017.1318339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van Mierlo, M. L., van Heugten, C. M., Post, M. W., Hajos, T. R., Kappelle, L. J., & Visser-Meily, J. M. (2016). Quality of life during the first two years post stroke: The restore4stroke cohort study. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 41(1–2), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Haley, W. E., Roth, D. L., Kissela, B., Perkins, M., & Howard, G. (2011). Quality of life after stroke: A prospective longitudinal study. Quality of Life Research, 20(6), 799–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9810-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Olaiya, M. T., Cadilhac, D. A., Kim, J., Nelson, M. R., Srikanth, V. K., Gerraty, R. P., Bladin, C. F., Fitzgerald, S. M., Phan, T., Frayne, J., & Thrift, A. G. (2017). Community-based intervention to improve cardiometabolic targets in patients with stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Stroke, 48(9), 2504–2510. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Olaiya, M. T., Cadilhac, D. A., Kim, J., Ung, D., Nelson, M. R., Srikanth, V. K., Bladin, C. F., Gerraty, R. P., Fitzgerald, S. M., Phan, T., Frayne, J., & Thrift, A. G. (2017). Effectiveness of an intervention to improve risk factor knowledge in patients with stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Stroke, 48(4), 1101–1103. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Olaiya, M. T., Cadilhac, D. A., Kim, J., Ung, D., Nelson, M. R., Srikanth, V. K., Bladin, C. F., Gerraty, R. P., Fitzgerald, S. M., Phan, T. G., Frayne, J., & Thrift, A. G. (2016). Nurse-led intervention to improve knowledge of medications in survivors of stroke or transient ischemic attack: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Neurology, 7, 205. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2016.00205

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Olaiya, M. T., Kim, J., Nelson, M. R., Srikanth, V. K., Bladin, C. F., Gerraty, R. P., Fitzgerald, S. M., Phan, T., Frayne, J., Cadilhac, D. A., Thrift, A. G., & investigators, S. (2017). Effectiveness of a shared team approach between nurses and doctors for improved risk factor management in survivors of stroke: A cluster randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Neurology, 24(7), 920–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Thrift, A. G., Olaiya, M. T., Phan, T. G., Cadilhac, D. A., Nelson, M. R., Srikanth, V. K., & Investigators, S. (2015). Statistical analysis plan (SAP) for shared team approach between nurses and doctors for improved risk factor management (STANDFIRM): A randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Stroke, 10(5), 770–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thrift, A. G., Srikanth, V. K., Nelson, M. R., Kim, J., Fitzgerald, S. M., Gerraty, R. P., Bladin, C. F., Phan, T. G., & Cadilhac, D. A. (2014). Risk factor management in survivors of stroke: A double-blind, cluster-randomized, controlled trial. International Journal of Stroke, 9(5), 652–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00933.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thayabaranathan, T., Cadilhac, D. A., Srikanth, V. K., Fitzgerald, S. M., Evans, R. G., Kim, J., Gerraty, R. P., Phan, T. G., Bladin, C. F., Nelson, M. R., Frayne, J. H., & Thrift, A. G. (2016). Maximizing patient recruitment and retention in a secondary stroke prevention clinical trial: Lessons learned from the STAND FIRM study. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 25(6), 1371–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.02.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hawthorne, G., Richardson, J., & Osborne, R. (1999). The assessment of quality of life (AQoL) instrument: A psychometric measure of health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 8(3), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008815005736

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandavian, 67(6), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Harwood, R. H., Rogers, A., Dickinson, E., & Ebrahim, S. (1994). Measuring handicap: The London Handicap Scale, a new outcome measure for chronic disease. Quality in Health Care, 3(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.3.1.11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sturm, J. W., Osborne, R. H., Dewey, H. M., Donnan, G. A., Macdonell, R. A., & Thrift, A. G. (2002). Brief comprehensive quality of life assessment after stroke: The assessment of quality of life instrument in the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke, 33(12), 2888–2894. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000040407.44712.c7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Centre for Health Economics, M. U. (2015, May 26). Stata algorithm for AQoL-4D utility model (with missing values). Retrieved May 19 from https://www.aqol.com.au/index.php/scoring-algorithms?id=86

  29. White, J., Magin, P., Attia, J., Sturm, J., McElduff, P., & Carter, G. (2016). Predictors of health-related quality of life in community-dwelling stroke survivors: A cohort study. Family Practice, 33(4), 382–387. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmw011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cumming, T. B., Churilov, L., Collier, J., Donnan, G., Ellery, F., Dewey, H., Langhorne, P., Lindley, R. I., Moodie, M., Thrift, A. G., Bernhardt, J., & group, A. T. C. (2019). Early mobilization and quality of life after stroke: Findings from AVERT. Neurology, 93(7), e717–e728. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000007937

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Clarke, P. J., Lawrence, J. M., & Black, S. E. (2000). Changes in quality of life over the first year after stroke: Findings from the Sunnybrook Stroke Study. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 9(3), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1053/jscd.2000.5868

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim, P., Warren, S., Madill, H., & Hadley, M. (1999). Quality of life of stroke survivors. Quality of Life Research, 8(4), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008927431300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kauhanen, M. L., Korpelainen, J. T., Hiltunen, P., Nieminen, P., Sotaniemi, K. A., & Myllyla, V. V. (2000). Domains and determinants of quality of life after stroke caused by brain infarction. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(12), 1541–1546. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2000.9391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Group, U. S. C. Repeated Measures Analysis with Stata. Retrieved January 28 from https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/stata/seminars/repeated-measures-analysis-with-stata/

  35. StataCorp. Stata statistical software: Release 16. StataCorp LLC; 2019.

  36. Fu, V., Weatherall, M., McPherson, K., Taylor, W., McRae, A., Thomson, T., Gommans, J., Green, G., Harwood, M., Ranta, A., Hanger, C., Riley, J., & McNaughton, H. (2020). Taking charge after stroke: A randomized controlled trial of a person-centered, self-directed rehabilitation intervention. International Journal of Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493020915144

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Pucciarelli, G., Vellone, E., Savini, S., Simeone, S., Ausili, D., Alvaro, R., Lee, C. S., & Lyons, K. S. (2017). Roles of changing physical function and caregiver burden on quality of life in stroke: A longitudinal dyadic analysis. Stroke, 48(3), 733–739. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sturm, J. W., Donnan, G. A., Dewey, H. M., Macdonell, R. A., Gilligan, A. K., Srikanth, V., & Thrift, A. G. (2004). Quality of life after stroke: The North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke, 35(10), 2340–2345. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000141977.18520.3b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bernhardt, J., Hayward, K. S., Kwakkel, G., Ward, N. S., Wolf, S. L., Borschmann, K., Krakauer, J. W., Boyd, L. A., Carmichael, S. T., Corbett, D., & Cramer, S. C. (2017). Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: The stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable taskforce. International Journal of Stroke, 12(5), 444–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493017711816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hawthorne, G., & Osborne, R. (2005). Population norms and meaningful differences for the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) measure. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 29(2), 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842x.2005.tb00063.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Williams, L. S., Bakas, T., Brizendine, E., Plue, L., Tu, W., Hendrie, H., & Kroenke, K. (2006). How valid are family proxy assessments of stroke patients’ health-related quality of life? Stroke, 37(8), 2081–2085. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000230583.10311.9f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pedersen, S. G., Friborg, O., Heiberg, G. A., Arntzen, C., Stabel, H. H., Thrane, G., Nielsen, J. F., & Anke, A. (2020). Stroke-Specific Quality of Life one-year post-stroke in two Scandinavian country-regions with different organisation of rehabilitation services: A prospective study. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1753830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Twardzik, E., Clarke, P., Elliott, M. R., Haley, W. E., Judd, S., & Colabianchi, N. (2019). Neighborhood socioeconomic status and trajectories of physical health-related quality of life among stroke survivors. Stroke, 50(11), 3191–3197. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025874

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Phan, H. T., Gall, S. L., Blizzard, C. L., Lannin, N. A., Thrift, A. G., Anderson, C. S., Kim, J., Grimley, R. S., Castley, H. C., Kilkenny, M. F., Cadilhac, D. A., & AuScr Consortium, S. I. (2021). Sex differences in quality of life after stroke were explained by patient factors, not clinical care: Evidence from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry. European Journal of Neurology, 28(2), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Katona, M., Schmidt, R., Schupp, W., & Graessel, E. (2015). Predictors of health-related quality of life in stroke patients after neurological inpatient rehabilitation: A prospective study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13, 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0258-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Dorman, P. J., Waddell, F., Slattery, J., Dennis, M., & Sandercock, P. (1997). Are proxy assessments of health status after stroke with the EuroQol questionnaire feasible, accurate, and unbiased? Stroke, 28(10), 1883–1887. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.28.10.1883

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Oczkowski, C., & O’Donnell, M. (2010). Reliability of proxy respondents for patients with stroke: A systematic review. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 19(5), 410–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.08.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The dedication and tireless efforts of the research nurses is much appreciated. The contribution of the participants, participating hospitals and the research team is acknowledged.

Funding

The STANDFIRM trial was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) project grant (586605). We further acknowledge fellowship support from the NHMRC (AGT 1042600; DAC 1063761).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhomart Orman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

AGT reports being a Board Member of the Stroke Foundation (Australia) and funding from NHMRC. DAC reports grants from NHMRC, the Stroke Foundation and the Heart Foundation. MRN reports being a Member of Research Advisory Board of the Stroke Foundation (Australia), grants from NHMRC and the Heart Foundation, and being on a lipids advisory board for Novartis. All other authors report no potential conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Details of ethics approval and trial registration can be found on the following link https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=82711.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orman, Z., Thrift, A.G., Olaiya, M.T. et al. Quality of life after stroke: a longitudinal analysis of a cluster randomized trial. Qual Life Res 31, 2445–2455 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03066-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03066-y

Keywords

Navigation