Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

BEAUTY and the breast: is adjuvant chemotherapy the right time for a beauty boost? Lessons learned from a large randomized controlled trial

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Beauty care (BTC) is offered at many cancer hospitals having a great uptake among patients. Nevertheless, its benefits in the Quality of life (QoL) of cancer survivors have not been assessed so far.

Methods

Our study aims to determine whether BTC improves patients’ QoL related to their body image measured by the BRBI scale of the QLQ-BR23 questionnaire at the end of adjuvant chemotherapy, after breast cancer (BC) surgery. The BEAUTY study is a prospective, randomized, controlled intervention trial. The following patient-reported outcomes were filled before initiation of chemotherapy (T1) and after their last cycle (T2): EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23, and Body Image Scale (BIS). Primary objective was improvement in the BIS of BR23 (BRBI). A qualitative assessment of patients' experience was performed at each cycle through a relevant questionnaire.

Results

In total, 269 (67%) patients filled BRBI at T1 and T2. Mean BRBI scores substantially decreased between T1 and T2 and were not different with or without BTC (p = 0.88). Qualitative assessment suggests impact of BTC in physical well-being and avoids thoughts related to the disease.

Conclusion

A substantial proportion of patients have a poor body image and chemotherapy induced a substantial degradation of BRBI scores. Although BTC does not seem to impact BRBI scores, the qualitative assessment suggests some benefit of BTC in other domains. Our study highlights the need to assess patients-perceived body image and build tailored interventions at this critical phase of their disease and generates hypothesis for the impact of BTC among BC patients.

Clinical trial registration The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the NCT01459003 number since October 25, 2011

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BC:

Breast cancer

BI:

Body image

BIS:

Body Image Scale

BRBI:

Breast-related body image

BTC:

Beauty care

EORTC:

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer

IEO:

European Institute of Oncology

QLQ-BR23:

Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast 23 items

QLQ-C30:

Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 items

QoL:

Quality of life

References

  1. Izydorczyk, B., Kwapniewska, A., Lizinczyk, S., & Sitnik-Warchulska, K. (2018). Psychological resilience as a protective factor for the body image in post-mastectomy women with breast cancer. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061181

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Schilder, P. (1999). The image and appearance of the human body: Studies in the constructive energies of the psyche. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chopra, D., De La Garza 2nd, R., & Lacourt, T. E. (2021). Clinical relevance of a Body Image Scale cut point of 10 as an indicator of psychological distress in cancer patients: Results from a psychiatric oncology clinic. Supportive Care in Cancer, 29(1), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05491-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Klastersky, J., & Razari, D. (1994). Supportive care. Current Opinion in Oncology, 6(4), 333–334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Krakowski, I., Boureau, F., Bugat, R., Chassignol, L., Colombat, P., Copel, L., et al. (2004). For a coordination of the supportive care for people affected by severe illnesses: Proposition of organization in the public and private health care centres. Bulletin du Cancer, 91(5), 449–456.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Quintard, B., & Lakdja, F. (2008). Assessing the effect of beauty treatments on psychological distress, body image, and coping: A longitudinal study of patients undergoing surgical procedures for breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 17(10), 1032–1038. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Amiel, P., Dauchy, S., Bodin, J., Cerf, C., Zenasni, F., Pezant, E., et al. (2009). Evaluating beauty care provided by the hospital to women suffering from breast cancer: Qualitative aspects. Supportive Care in Cancer, 17(7), 839–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0620-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Titeca, G., Poot, F., Cassart, D., Defays, B., Pirard, D., Comas, M., et al. (2007). Impact of cosmetic care on quality of life in breast cancer patients during chemotherapy and radiotherapy: An initial randomized controlled study. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 21(6), 771–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.02080.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oliveri, S., Faccio, F., Pizzoli, S., Monzani, D., Redaelli, C., Indino, M., et al. (2019). A pilot study on aesthetic treatments performed by qualified aesthetic practitioners: Efficacy on health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. Quality of Life Research, 28(6), 1543–1553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02133-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Scott, N. W., Fayers, P. M., Aaronson, N. K., Bottomley, A., de Graeff, A., Groenvold, M., et al. (2009). Differential item functioning (DIF) in the EORTC QLQ-C30: a comparison of baseline, on-treatment and off-treatment data. [Research support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. Quality of Life Research, 18(3), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9453-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hopwood, P., Fletcher, I., Lee, A., & Al Ghazal, S. (2001). A body image scale for use with cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer, 37(2), 189–197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Avis, N. E., Crawford, S., & Manuel, J. (2004). Psychosocial problems among younger women with breast cancer. [Research support, U.S. Gov’t, P.H.S.]. Psycho-Oncology, 13(5), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Benton, M. J., Schlairet, M. C., & Gibson, D. R. (2014). Change in quality of life among breast cancer survivors after resistance training: is there an effect of age? [Clinical trial research support, non-U.S. Gov’t]. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 22(2), 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2012-0227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fallbjork, U., Rasmussen, B. H., Karlsson, S., & Salander, P. (2013). Aspects of body image after mastectomy due to breast cancer—a two-year follow-up study. [Research support, non-U.S. Gov’t]. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 17(3), 340–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jun, E. Y., Kim, S., Chang, S. B., Oh, K., Kang, H. S., & Kang, S. S. (2011). The effect of a sexual life reframing program on marital intimacy, body image, and sexual function among breast cancer survivors. Cancer Nursing, 34(2), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181f1ab7a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sayakhot, P., Vincent, A., & Teede, H. (2012). Breast cancer and menopause: perceptions of diagnosis, menopausal therapies and health behaviors. [Research support, non-U.S. Gov’t]. Climacteric, 15(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.3109/13697137.2011.603772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Helms, R. L., O’Hea, E. L., & Corso, M. (2008). Body image issues in women with breast cancer. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 13(3), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548500701405509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Begovic-Juhant, A., Chmielewski, A., Iwuagwu, S., & Chapman, L. A. (2012). Impact of body image on depression and quality of life among women with breast cancer. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 30(4), 446–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2012.684856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Feinstein, A. R. (1999). Statistical reductionism and clinicians’ delinquencies in humanistic research. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 66(3), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9236(99)70027-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lam, W. W., Ye, M., & Fielding, R. (2012). Trajectories of quality of life among Chinese patients diagnosed with nasopharynegeal cancer. PLoS ONE, 7(9), e44022. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Leplège, A. (1999). Les mesures de la qualité de vie. Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Prutkin, J. M., & Feinstein, A. R. (2002). Quality-of-life measurements: Origin and pathogenesis. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 75(2), 79–93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gal, R., Monninkhof, E. M., Peeters, P. H. M., van Gils, C. H., van den Bongard, D., Wendel-Vos, G. C. W., et al. (2019). Physical activity levels of women with breast cancer during and after treatment, a comparison with the Dutch female population. [Comparative Study Video-Audio Media]. Acta Oncologica, 58(5), 673–681.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Armer, J. S., & Lutgendorf, S. K. (2020). The impact of yoga on fatigue in cancer survivorship: A meta-analysis. JNCI Cancer Spectrum, 4(2), pkz098. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkz098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ripamonti, C. I., Giuntoli, F., Gonella, S., & Miccinesi, G. (2018). Spiritual care in cancer patients: A need or an option? Current Opinion in Oncology, 30(4), 212–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by an unrestricted grant from the L’Oréal Foundation. The L'Oréal Corporate Foundation promotes beauty and well-being treatments in medical and social settings, carried out by socio-aesthetic therapists to accompany the road to recovery and rehabilitation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MS, BL, CC, Su D, and Sa D. participated in the design of the study. MS, AG, DB, IV, and Su D. provided data for the study. MS, BL, CC, GT, DB, SD, and IV performed the analyses and the interpretation of the data. MS, GT, IV, and PA drafted the manuscript, which has been reviewed and approved in its final form by all other authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahasti Saghatchian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The local ethics committee of the hospital and the regional French Ethics Committee approved this study. Biomedical research: V. Gajdos, A. Laplanche, R. De Beaurepaire, and F. Hirsch. Pharmacist: C. Astoul. Ethic: J. Carre. Psychologist: S. Schwab. Social worker: A. Petit. Jurists: F. Boissy and V.A. Lafoy. Associations: A. Labbe and M. Zarka.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOC 232 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saghatchian, M., Lacas, B., Charles, C. et al. BEAUTY and the breast: is adjuvant chemotherapy the right time for a beauty boost? Lessons learned from a large randomized controlled trial. Qual Life Res 31, 723–732 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02947-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02947-6

Keywords

Navigation