Abstract
Purpose
The Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI) is a commonly used measure of life satisfaction that reflects a person’s level of subjective wellbeing (SWB). The present study aimed to establish the validity and reliability of the PWI in a large sample of Indian adults and describe their SWB.
Methods
2004 Indian adults completed a cross-sectional online survey, which was presented in English and included the PWI and demographic questions. The sample was split to assess the psychometric properties of the 7-item (n = 981) and 8-item (n = 937) versions of the PWI.
Results
Both the 7- and 8-item versions of the PWI demonstrated adequate internal consistency (α = .89 and .88, respectively). The global means for both versions of the PWI (7-item = 74.43, 8-item = 73.82) were within the normative range for Western countries. Achieving in life had the lowest domain scores for both the 7-item (M = 70.51) and 8-item (M = 68.37) versions; the spirituality or religion domain had the highest domain score in the 8-item version (M = 78.84).
Conclusion
The findings suggest that both the 7- and 8-item versions of the PWI are valid and reliable measures of life satisfaction for use in India. The global mean scores for both versions of the PWI were within the normative range for Western countries. In this study, Indians reported high levels of satisfaction with their spirituality or religion, suggesting this domain may be an important contributor of SWB; however, more research is needed to determine this.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cummins, R. A. (2007). Social indicators and social development. In Paper presented at the global business and technology association tenth international conference, New York, NY,
Diener, E., & Tay, L. (2015). Subjective well-being and human welfare around the world as reflected in the Gallup World Poll. International Journal of Psychology,50(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12136.
International Wellbeing Group. (2013). Personal Wellbeing Index (5th edn.). Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University.
Cummins, R. A. (2018). The golden triangle of happiness: Essential resources for a happy family. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies,9(4), 12–39. https://doi.org/10.18357/ijcyfs94201818638.
Misajon, R. A., Pallant, J., & Bliuc, A.-M. (2016). Rasch analysis of the Personal Wellbeing Index. Quality of Life Research,25(10), 2565–2569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1302-x.
Cummins, R. A. (2010). Subjective wellbeing, homeostatically protected mood and depression: A synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies,11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9167-0.
Cummins, R. A. (2019). Wellbeing across cultures issues of measurement and the interpretation of data. In K. D. Keith (Ed.), Cross cultural psychology contemporary themes and perspectives (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Mellor, D., Hapidzal, F. M., Teh, K., Ganesan, R., Yeow, J., Latif, R. A., et al. (2012). Strong spiritual engagement and subjective well-being: A naturalistic investigation of the Thaipusam festival. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health,14(3), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/19349637.2012.697375.
Cummins, R. A. (1995). On the trail of the gold standard for subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research,35(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079026.
Cummins, R. A. (1998). The second approximation to an international standard for life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research,43(3), 307–334. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006831107052.
Chen, Z., & Davey, G. (2008). Normative life satisfaction in Chinese societies. Social Indicators Research,89(3), 557–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9250-7.
Lau, A. L. D., Cummins, R. A., & McPherson, W. (2005). An investigation into the cross-cultural equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index. Social Indicator Research,72, 403–430.
Lai, L. C. H., Cummins, R. A., & Lau, A. L. D. (2013). Cross-cultural difference in subjective wellbeing: Cultural response bias as an explanation. Social Indicators Research,114(2), 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0164-z.
Rözer, J., & Kraaykamp, G. (2012). Income inequality and subjective well-being: A cross-national study on the conditional effects of individual and national characteristics. Social Indicators Research,113(3), 1009–1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0124-7.
Agrawal, J., Murthy, P., Philip, M., Mehrotra, S., Thennarasu, K., John, J. P., et al. (2011). Socio-demographic correlates of subjective well-being in urban India. Social Indicators Research,101(3), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9669-5.
Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., et al. (2014). World Values Survey: Round six—country-pooled datafile. Madrid: JD Systems Institute.
White, S. C., Gaines, S. O., Jr., & Jha, S. (2014). Inner wellbeing: Concept and validation of a new approach to subjective perceptions of wellbeing—India. Social Indicators Research,119(2), 723–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0504-7.
Fontaine, X., & Yamada, K. (2014). Caste comparisons in India: Evidence from subjective well-being data. World Development,64, 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.06.025.
Dittmar, H., & Kapur, P. (2011). Consumerism and well-being in India and the UK: Identity projection and emotion regulation as underlying psychological processes. Psychological Studies,56(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-011-0065-2.
Linssen, R., van Kempen, L., & Kraaykamp, G. (2011). Subjective well-being in rural India: The curse of conspicuous consumption. Social Indicators Research,101(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9635-2.
White, S. C., Fernandez, A., & Jha, S. (2016). Beyond the grumpy rich man and the happy peasant: Mixed methods and the impact of food security on subjective dimensions of wellbeing in India. Oxford Development Studies,44(3), 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2015.1120278.
Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2006). The subjective well-being of the homeless, and lessons for happiness. Social Indicators Research,76(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-8671-9.
Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2001). Making the best of a bad situation: Satisfaction in the slums of Calcutta. Social Indicators Research,55(3), 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010905029386.
Banth, S., & Talwar, C. (2012). Anasakti, the Hindu ideal, and its relationship to well-being and orientations to happiness. Journal of Religion and Health,51(3), 934–946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-010-9402-3.
Fernandez, A., White, S. C., & Jha, S. (2014). Wellbeing pathways report: India round 2. Bath: University of Bath.
Gunasekara, A., Rajendran, D., & Grant, S. (2014). Life satisfaction of Sri Lankan and Indian skilled migrants in Australia. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal,23(4), 475–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/011719681402300408.
Wills, E. (2009). Spirituality and subjective well-being: Evidences for a new domain in the Personal Well-Being Index. Journal of Happiness Studies,10(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-007-9061-6.
Tiliouine, H. (2009). Measuring satisfaction with religiosity and its contribution to the Personal Well-Being Index in a Muslim sample. Applied Research Quality Life,4, 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-009-9074-x.
Capic, T., Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M., Cummins, R. A., Khor, S., Richardson, B., Greenwood, C., et al. (2018). Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: Report 35.0, financial control. Geelong: Australian centre on quality of life, school of psychology. Geelong: Deakin University.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin,112(1), 155–159.
Yiengprugsawan, V., Seubsman, S. A., Khamman, S., Lim, L. Y., Sleigh, A. C., & Thai Cohort Study Team. (2010). Personal Wellbeing Index in a national cohort of 87,134 Thai adults. Social Indicators Research,98(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9542-6.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (Eds.). (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Delhi: Pearson.
Smyth, R., Nielsen, I., & Zhai, Q. (2009). Personal well-being in urban China. Social Indicators Research,95(2), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9457-2.
Webb, D. (2008). Subjective wellbeing on the Tibetan Plateau: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Happiness Studies,10(6), 753–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9120-7.
Jovanović, V., Cummins, R. A., Weinberg, M., Kaliterna, L., & Prizmic-Larsen, Z. (2019). Personal Wellbeing Index: A cross-cultural measurement invariance study across four countries. Journal of Happiness Studies,20, 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9966-2.
Kumar, N., & Misra, G. (2016). Impact of daily spiritual experiences and private religious practices on social well-being amoung different religious community. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology,7(3), 318–324.
Weinberg, M. K., Cummins, R. A., Webb, D. A., & Gwozdz, W. (2018). Incentivised online panel recruitment and subjective wellbeing: Caveat emptor. Journal of Well-Being Assessment,2(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41543-018-0010-4.
World Bank. (2017). Country poverty brief: India. Washington: DC World Bank
Sarriera, J. C., Casas, F., Alfaro, J., Bedin, L., Strelhow, M. R., Abs, D., et al. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Personal Wellbeing Index in Brazilian and Chilean adolescents including spirituality and religion. Psicologia. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7153.201427411.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the people who participated in the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of Charles Sturt University research ethics committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McIntyre, E., Saliba, A. & McKenzie, K. Subjective wellbeing in the Indian general population: a validation study of the Personal Wellbeing Index. Qual Life Res 29, 1073–1081 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02375-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02375-7