Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaires: a systematic review

  • Review
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the procedures of translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and measurement properties of breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaires.

Methods

Searches were conducted in the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and SciELO using the keywords: “Questionnaires,” “Quality of life,” and “Breast cancer.” The studies were analyzed in terms of methodological quality according to the guidelines for the procedure of cross-cultural adaptation and the quality criteria for measurement properties of questionnaires.

Results

We found 24 eligible studies. Most of the articles assessed the translation and measurement properties of the instrument EORTC QLQ-BR23. Description about translation and cross-cultural adaptation was incomplete in 11 studies. Translation and back translation were the most tested phases, and synthesis of the translation was the most omitted phase in the articles. Information on assessing measurement properties was provided incompletely in 23 articles. Internal consistency was the most tested property in all of the eligible articles, but none of them provided information on agreement. Construct validity was adequately tested in only three studies that used the FACT-B and QLQ-BR23. Eight articles provided information on reliability; however, only four found positive classification. Responsiveness was tested in four articles, and ceiling and floor effects were tested in only three articles. None of the instruments showed fully adequate quality.

Conclusion

There is limited evidence on cross-cultural adaptations and measurement properties; therefore, it is recommended that caution be exercised when using breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaires that have been translated, adapted, and tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ministério da Saúde. Instituto Nacional do Câncer. (2011). Estimativas/2012 incidência de câncer no Brasil. Retrieved February 01, 2013, from http://www.inca.gov.br/estimativa/2012/estimativa20122111.pdf.

  2. Forouzanfar, M. H., Foreman, K. J., Delossantos, A. M., Lozano, R., Lopez, A. D., Murray, C. J. L., et al. (2011). Breast and cervical cancer in 187 countries between 1980 and 2010: A systematic analysis. The Lancet, 378(9801), 1461–1484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hwang, J. H., Chang, H. J., Shim, Y. H., Park, W. H., Park, H., Huh, S. J., et al. (2008). Effects of supervised exercise therapy in patients receiving radiotherapy for breast cancer. Yonsei Medical Journal, 49(3), 443–450.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Springer, B. A., Levy, E., McGarvey, C., Pfalzer, L. A., Stout, N. L., Gerber, L. H., et al. (2010). Pre-operative assessment enables early diagnosis and recovery of shoulder function in patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 120(1), 135–147.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Petito, E. L., & Gutiérrez, M. G. R. (2008). Elaboração e validação de um programa de exercício para mulheres submetidas a cirurgia oncológica de mama. Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia, 54(3), 275–287.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lotti, R. C. B., Barra, A. A., Dias, R. C., & Maklufz, A. S. D. (2008). Impacto do Tratamento de Câncer de Mama na Qualidade de Vida. Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia, 54(4), 337–367.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sandgren, A. K., Mullens, A. B., Erickson, S. C., Romanek, K. M., & McCaul, K. D. (2004). Confidant and breast cancer patient reports of quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 13(1), 155–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pais-Ribeiro, J., Pinto, C., & Santos, C. (2008). Validation study of the portuguese version of the QLC-C30-V.3. Psicologia, Saúde & Doenças, 9(1), 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brady, M. J., Cella, D. F., Mo, F., Bonomi, A. E., Tulsky, D. S., Lloyd, S. R., et al. (1997). Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 15(3), 974–986.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Terwee, C. B., D.V.H., Bouter, L. M., Stratford, P. W., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., et al. (2014). Consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments—COSMIN 2013. Retrieved June 01, 2014, from http://www.cosmin.nl/.

  11. Koller, M., Aaronson, N. K., Blazeby, J., Bottomley, A., Dewolf, L., Fayers, P., et al. (2007). Translation procedures for standardised quality of life questionnaires: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) approach. European Journal of Cancer, 43(12), 1810–1820.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25(24), 3186–3191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bullinger, M., Alonso, J., Apolone, G., Leplege, A., Sullivan, M., Wood-Dauphinee, S., et al. (1998). Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: The IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 913–923.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knola, D. L., Dekkera, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. De Vet, H. C., Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., & Knol, D. L. (2011). Measurement in medicine: A practical guide. New York: Cambrigde University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2008). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. da Menezes Costa, L. C., Maher, C. G., McAuley, J. H., & Costa, L. O. (2009). Systematic review of cross-cultural adaptations of McGill Pain Questionnaire reveals a paucity of clinimetric testing. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(9), 934–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Puga, V. O. O., Lopes, A. D., & Costa, L. O. P. (2012). Assessment of cross-cultural adaptations and measurement properties of self-report outcome measures relevant to shoulder disability in Portuguese: A systematic review. Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia, 16(2), 85–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang, Z., Tang, X. L., Wan, C. H., Zou, T. N., Chen, D. D., Zhang, D. M., et al. (2007). Development of the system of quality of life instruments for patients with breast cancer (QLICP-BR). Ai Zheng, 26(10), 1122–1126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Condón Huerta, M. J., González Viejo, M. A., Tamayo Izquierdo, R., & Martínez Zubiri, A. (2000). Calidad de vida en pacientes con y sin linfedema despúes del tratamiento del cáncer de mama: Implicaciones en la rehabilitación. Rehabilitación, 34(3), 248–253.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mihailova, Z., Antonov, R., Toporov, N., & Popova, V. (2001). Evaluation of the Bulgarian version of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30 (version 2) and breast cancer module (BR23) on the psychometric properties of breast cancer patients under adjuvant chemotherapy. Prognostic value of estrogen and progesterone receptors to quality of life. Journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology, 6(4), 415–424.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yang, P., & Lu, Q. (2009). Investigation on quality of life status of breast cancer patients after operation in follow-up period. Chinese Nursing Research, 23(5A), 1150–1153. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cerezo, O., Onate-Ocana, L. F., Arrieta-Joffe, P., Gonzalez-Lara, F., Garcia-Pasquel, M. J., Bargallo-Rocha, E., et al. (2012). Validation of the Mexican-Spanish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 questionnaires to assess health-related quality of life in Mexican women with breast cancer. European Journal of Cancer Care (Engl), 21(5), 684–691.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hahn, E. A., Holzner, B., Kemmler, G., Sperner-Unterweger, B., Hudgens, S. A., & Cella, D. (2005). Cross-cultural evaluation of health status using item response theory: FACT-B comparisons between Austrian and U.S. patients with breast cancer. Evaluations & The Health Professions, 28(2), 233–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Heil, J., Holl, S., Golatta, M., Rauch, G., Rom, J., Marme, F., et al. (2010). Aesthetic and functional results after breast conserving surgery as correlates of quality of life measured by a German version of the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS). Breast, 19(6), 470–474.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jayasekara, H., Rajapaksa, L. C., & Brandberg, Y. (2008). Measuring breast cancer-specific health-related quality of life in South Asia: Psychometric properties of the Sinhala version of the EORTC QLQ-BR23. Quality of Life Research, 17(6), 927–932.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Montazeri, A., Harirchi, I., Vahdani, M., Khaleghi, F., Jarvandi, S., Ebrahimi, M., et al. (2000). The EORTC breast cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-BR23): Translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Quality of Life Research, 9(2), 177–184.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pandey, M., Thomas, B. C., Ramdas, K., Eremenco, S., & Nair, M. K. (2002). Quality of life in breast cancer patients: Validation of a FACT-B Malayalam version. Quality of Life Research, 11(2), 87–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Parmar, V., Badwe, R. A., Hawaldar, R., Rayabhattanavar, S., Varghese, A., Sharma, R., et al. (2005). Validation of EORTC quality-of-life questionnaire in Indian women with operable breast cancer. National Medical Journal of India, 18(4), 172–177.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sprangers, M. A., Groenvold, M., Arraras, J. I., Franklin, J., te Velde, A., Muller, M., et al. (1996). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: First results from a three-country field study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 14(10), 2756–2768.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yoo, H. J., Ahn, S. H., Eremenco, S., Kim, H., Kim, W. K., Kim, S. B., et al. (2005). Korean translation and validation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast (FACT-B) scale version 4. Quality of Life Research, 14(6), 1627–1632.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yun, Y. H., Bae, S. H., Kang, I. O., Shin, K. H., Lee, R., Kwon, S. I., et al. (2004). Cross-cultural application of the Korean version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Breast-Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-BR23). Supportive Care in Cancer, 12(6), 441–445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Alawadhi, S. A., & Ohaeri, J. U. (2010). Validity and reliability of the European Organization for Research and Treatment in Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ): Experience from Kuwait using a sample of women with breast cancer. Annals of Saudi Medicine, 30(5), 390–396.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Awad, M. A., Denic, S., & El Taji, H. (2008). Validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaires for Arabic-speaking populations. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1138, 146–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Belmonte Martinez, R., Garin Boronat, O., Segura Badia, M., Sanz Latiesas, J., Marco Navarro, E., & Ferrer Fores, M. (2011). Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Questionnaire for Breast Cancer (FACT-B+4). Spanish version validation. Medicina Clínica (Barc), 137(15), 685–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bernhard, J., Sullivan, M., Hurny, C., Coates, A. S., & Rudenstam, C. M. (2001). Clinical relevance of single item quality of life indicators in cancer clinical trials. British Journal of Cancer, 84(9), 1156–1165.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Carlsson, M., Hamrin, E., & Lindqvist, R. (1999). Psychometric assessment of the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LSQ) and a comparison of a randomised sample of Swedish women and those suffering from breast cancer. Quality of Life Research, 8(3), 245–253.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chie, W. C., Chang, K. J., Huang, C. S., & Kuo, W. H. (2003). Quality of life of breast cancer patients in Taiwan: Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23. Psycho-Oncology, 12(7), 729–735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Coster, S., Poole, K., & Fallowfield, L. J. (2001). The validation of a quality of life scale to assess the impact of arm morbidity in breast cancer patients post-operatively. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 68(3), 273–282.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fernández-Suárez, H. G., Blum-Grynberg, B., Aguilar-Villalobos, E. J., & Bautista-Rodríguez, H. (2010). Validación de un instrumento para medir calidad de vida en pacientes con cáncer de mama. Revista Médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 48(2), 133–138.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kontodimopoulos, N., Ntinoulis, K., & Niakas, D. (2011). Validity of the Greek EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 for measuring health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer Care (England), 20(3), 354–361.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Ng, R., Lee, C. F., Wong, N. S., Luo, N., Yap, Y. S., Lo, S. K., et al. (2012). Measurement properties of the English and Chinese versions of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) in Asian breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 131(2), 619–625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wan, C., Tang, X., Tu, X. M., Feng, C., Messing, S., Meng, Q., et al. (2007). Psychometric properties of the simplified Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-BR53 for measuring quality of life for breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 105(2), 187–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wan, C., Yang, Z., Tang, X., Zou, T., Chen, D., Zhang, D., et al. (2009). Development and validation of the system of quality of life instruments for cancer patients: breast cancer (QLICP-BR). Supportive Care in Cancer, 17(4), 359–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wan, C., Zhang, D., Yang, Z., Tu, X., Tang, W., Feng, C., et al. (2007). Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the FACT-B for measuring quality of life for patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 106(3), 413–418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zawisza, K., Tobiasz-Adamczyk, B., Nowak, W., Kulig, J., & Jedrys, J. (2010). Validity and reliability of the quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C30) and its breast cancer module (EORTC QLQ BR23). Ginekologia Polska, 81(4), 262–267.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bullinger, M., Power, M. J., Aaronson, N. K., Cella, D. F., & Anderson, R. T. (1996). Creating and evaluating cross-cultural instruments. In B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (pp. 659–668). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hui, C., & Triandis, H. C. (1985). Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: A review and comparison of strategies. Cross Cultural Psycology, 16, 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Costa, L. O., Maher, C. G., & Latimer, J. (2007). Self-report outcome measures for low back pain: Searching for international cross-cultural adaptations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 32(9), 1028–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Chopra, I., & Kamal, K. M. (2012). A systematic review of quality of life instruments in long-term breast cancer survivors. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 10, 14.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Schellingerhout, J. M., Heymans, M. W., Verhagen, A. P., de Vet, H. C., Koes, B. W., & Terwee, C. B. (2011). Measurement properties of translated versions of neck-specific questionnaires: A systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 87.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Okamoto, T., Shimozuma, K., Katsumata, N., Koike, M., Hisashige, A., Tanaka, K., et al. (2003). Measuring quality of life in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review of reliable and valid instruments available in Japan. Breast Cancer, 10(3), 204–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, Rua Cesário Galeno 448/475, Tatuapé, São Paulo, SP, CEP 03071-000, Brazil

    Indiara Soares Oliveira, Lucíola da Cunha Menezes Costa, Felipe Ribeiro Cabral Fagundes & Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral

Authors
  1. Indiara Soares Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lucíola da Cunha Menezes Costa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Felipe Ribeiro Cabral Fagundes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 6.

Table 6 Search strategy
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oliveira, I.S., da Cunha Menezes Costa, L., Fagundes, F.R.C. et al. Evaluation of cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaires: a systematic review. Qual Life Res 24, 1179–1195 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0840-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0840-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation