Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recommendations for improving research quality: relationships among constructs, verbs in hypotheses, theoretical perspectives, and triangulation

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to suggest recommendations for improving research quality and theory development by addressing four issues. Two of them concern hypotheses, their statements, and observed inconsistencies found in articles; the other two address issues related to theoretical perspectives and triangulation. We used a purposive sampling of scientific fields and articles that support and ground the ideas of this general review. This study clarifies inconsistent opposite relationships among variables found in theoretical models, discusses the usage of verbs in hypotheses, focuses on the cause-and-effect relationship between variables, identifies ways in which to rectify inconsistencies by including additional theoretical perspectives, and reminds the research community about triangulation. This paper concludes with the implications for research, practice, and society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Hamid, T.K.: The economics of software quality assurance: A simulation-based case study. MIS Q. 12(3), 395–411 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Agag, G.M., El-Masry, A.A.: Why do consumers trust online travel websites? Drivers and outcomes of consumer trust toward online travel websites. J. Travel Res. 56(3), 347–369 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsajjan, B., Dennis, C.: Internet banking acceptance model: Cross-market examination. J. Bus. Res. 63(9–10), 957–963 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacher, J.: Association. In: Lewis-Beck, M., Bryman, A.E., Liao, T.F. (eds.) The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods. Sage Publications, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, R.D., Schutt, R.K., Plass, P.S.: Fundamentals of research in criminology and criminal justice: With selected readings. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, E., Bryman, A., Harley, B.: Business research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I., Barki, H.: Quo Vadis TAM? J. association Inform. Syst. 8(4), 211–218 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy, L.V.: General Systems Theory. George Braziller, New York (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitner, M.J.: Evaluating service encounters: the effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. J. Mark. 54(2), 69–82 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, N.W.: A critique of the use of triangulation in social research. Qual. Quantity. 25(2), 115–136 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, R.N., Drew, J.H.: A longitudinal analysis of the impact of service changes on customer attitudes. J. Mark. 55(1), 1–9 (1991a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, R.N., Drew, J.H.: A multistage model of customers’ assessments of service quality and value. J. consumer Res. 17(4), 375–384 (1991b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A.: Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Res. 6(1), 97–113 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton-Jones, A., McLean, E.R., Monod, E.: Theoretical perspectives in IS research: from variance and process to conceptual latitude and conceptual fit. Eur. J. Inform. Syst. 24(6), 664–679 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T., Fiske, D.W.: Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol. Bull. 56(2), 81–105 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlos Roca, J., José García, J., José de la Vega, J.: The importance of perceived trust, security and privacy in online trading systems. Inform. Manage. Comput. Secur. 17(2), 96–113 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, S., Srivastava, S.C., Theng, Y.L.: Evaluating the role of trust in consumer adoption of mobile payment systems: An empirical analysis. Commun. Association Inform. Syst. 27(29), 561–588 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y.S., Fang, S.R.: Antecedents and distinctions between online trust and distrust: Predicting high-and low-risk internet behaviors. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 14(2), 149 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.H., Barnes, S.: Initial trust and online buyer behaviour. Industrial Manage. data Syst. 107(1), 21–36 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chircu, A.M., Davis, G.B., Kauffman, R.J.: Trust, expertise, and e-commerce intermediary adoption, in Proceedings of the Sixth Americas Conference on Information Systems. Long Beach, CA, August 3–5, 710–716 (2000)

  • Cochran, W.G.: Sampling techniques. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocosila, M., Archer, N.: Modeling Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Personal Health Records. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 19(2), 119–134 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W., Creswell, J.D.: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Fifth edition. Sage Publications, Los Angeles (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, J.J.J., Brady, M.K., Hult, G.T.M.: Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. J. retailing. 76(2), 193–218 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, J.J.J., Taylor, S.A.: Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension. J. Mark. 56(3), 55–68 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P., Rundle-Thiele, S.: Social marketing theory measurement precision: a theory of planned behaviour illustration. J. Social Mark. 8(2), 182–201 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Syst. Res. 3(1), 60–95 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 19(4), 9–30 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N.K.: Triangulation 2.0. J. mixed methods Res. 6(2), 80–88 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N.K.: The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. McGraw-Hill, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, L., Brady, A.M., Byrne, G.: An overview of mixed methods research. J. Res. Nurs. 14(2), 175–185 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetters, M.D., Molina-Azorin, J.F.: The journal of mixed methods research starts a new decade: principles for bringing in the new and divesting of the old language of the field. J. Mixed Methods Res. 11(1), 3–10 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, N.G.: Triangulation and mixed methods designs: Data integration with new research technologies. J. mixed methods Res. 6(2), 124–136 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U.: Mantras and myths: The disenchantment of mixed-methods research and revisiting triangulation as a perspective. Qualitative Inq. 23(1), 46–57 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W.: Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Q. 27(1), 51–90 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D.A., Pitre, E.: Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Acad. Manage. Rev. 15(4), 584–602 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goerres, A., Prinzen, K.: Using mixed methods for the analysis of individuals: a review of necessary and sufficient conditions and an application to welfare state attitudes. Qual. Quantity. 46(2), 415–450 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J.C., Caracelli, V.J., Graham, W.F.: Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational evaluation and policy analysis. 11(3), 255–274 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L.: Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, M., Feddema, K., Wang, S., Harrigan, P., Diot, E.: How trust leads to online purchase intention founded in perceived usefulness and peer communication. J. Consumer Behav. 20(5), 1297–1312 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyvaert, M., Maes, B., Onghena, P.: Mixed methods research synthesis: definition, framework, and potential. Qual. Quantity. 47(2), 659–676 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, J., Jacoby, J.: Theory construction and model-building skills: A practical guide for social scientists. Guilford Press, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, G.: Level of analysis. In: Nicholson, N., Audia, P.G. (eds.) The Blackwell encyclopedia of management. Organizational behavior. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  • Knappertsbusch, F., Langfeldt, B., Kelle, U.: Mixed-methods and multimethod research. Soziologie-Sociology in the German-Speaking World. 261–272 (2021)

  • Koufaris, M., Hampton-Sosa, W.: The development of initial trust in an online company by new customers. Inf. Manag. 41(3), 377–397 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A.: Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Manage. Rev. 24(4), 691–710 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A.N.N., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., Van de Ven, A.H.: Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Acad. Manage. J. 56(1), 1–13 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavuri, R.: Intrinsic factors affecting online impulsive shopping during the COVID-19 in emerging markets.International Journal of Emerging Markets. (2021)

  • Lee, A.S. (ed.): MIS Quarterly. 25(1), (2001)

  • Lee, M.C.: Predicting and explaining the adoption of online trading: An empirical study in Taiwan. Decis. Support Syst. 47(2), 133–142 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., Kozar, K.A., Larsen, K.R.: The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Commun. Association Inform. Syst. 12(50), 752–780 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Sánchez-Fernández, J., Muñoz-Leiva, F.: Antecedents of the adoption of the new mobile payment systems: The moderating effect of age. Computers in Human Behavior. 35, 464–478 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindh, C., Rovira Nordman, E., Melén Hånell, S., Safari, A., Hadjikhani, A.: Digitalization and international online sales: Antecedents of purchase intent. J. Int. Consumer Mark. 32(4), 324–335 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y.: Paradigmatic Compatibility Matters: A Critical Review of Qualitative-Quantitative Debate in Mixed Methods Research.SAGE Open.12(1), (2022)

  • Mathison, S.: Why triangulate?. Educational researcher. 17(2), 13–17 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L.B.: Explaining organizational behavior. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D.L.: Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. J. mixed methods Res. 1(1), 48–76 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D.L.: Commentary—After triangulation, what next? J. Mixed Methods Res. 13(1), 6–11 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J.M.: Purposive sampling. In: Lewis-Beck, M., Bryman, A.E., Liao, T.F. (eds.) The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods. Sage Publications., Thousand Oaks (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M., Robey, D.: A social process model of user-analyst relationships. MIS Q. 16(2), 249–266 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Niederman, F., March, S.T.: An exposition of process theory and critique of Mohr’s (1982) conceptualization thereof. Philos. Manage. 17(3), 321–331 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Oleinik, A.: Mixing quantitative and qualitative content analysis: Triangulation at work. Qual. Quantity. 45(4), 859–873 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, S.O.: Comparative evaluation and the relationship between quality, satisfaction, and repurchase loyalty. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 30(3), 240–249 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz de Guinea, A., Webster, J.: Combining variance and process in information systems research: Hybrid approaches. Inform. Organ. 27(3), 144–162 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L.: Reassessment of expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: implications for further research. J. Mark. 58(1), 111–124 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oakes (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlou, P.A.: Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 7(3), 101–134 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J.: Graphs, causality, and structural equation models. Sociol. Methods Res. 27(2), 226–284 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A.M.: Contextualist research and the study of organizational change processes. Res. methods Inform. Syst. 1, 53–78 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M.S., Van de Ven, A.H., Dooley, K., Holmes, M.E.: Organizational change and innovation processes: Theory and methods for research. Oxford University Press, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M.S.: Central issues in the study of change and innovation. In: Poole, M.S., Van de Ven, A.H. (eds.) Handbook of organizational change and innovation. Oxford University Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribbink, D., Van Riel, A.C., Liljander, V., Streukens, S.: Comfort your online customer: quality, trust and loyalty on the internet. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal. 14(6), 446–456 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale, J.E., Lohfeld, L.H., Brazil, K.: Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Qual. Quantity. 36(1), 43–53 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S., Chauhan, S., Khare, A.: A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of trust in mobile commerce. Int. J. Inform. Manage. 50, 286–301 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarstedt, M., Bengart, P., Shaltoni, A.M., Lehmann, S.: The use of sampling methods in advertising research: A gap between theory and practice. Int. J. Advertising. 37(4), 650–663 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R.K.: Social emergence: Societies as complex systems. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, P.B.: A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inform. Syst. Res. 8(3), 240–253 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, T., Jarvenpaa, S.: Process models in information systems. In: Lee, A.S., Liebenau, J. (eds.) Information systems and qualitative research. Springer, Boston (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R.I., Staw, B.M.: What theory is not. Administrative Sci. Q. 40(3), 371–384 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzagkarakis, S.I., Kritas, D.: Mixed research methods in political science and governance: approaches and applications.Quality & Quantity.1–15(2022)

  • Van de Ven, A.H., Poole, M.S.: Alternative approaches for studying organizational change. Organ. Stud. 26(9), 1377–1404 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gigch, J.P., Le Moigne, J.L.: A paradigmatic approach to the discipline of information systems. Behav. Sci. 34(2), 128–147 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A., Bala, H.: Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems.MIS quarterly.21–54(2013)

  • Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A., Sullivan, Y.: Guidelines for conducting mixed-methods research: An extension and illustration. J. AIS. 17(7), 435–495 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W., Benbasat, I.: Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. J. association Inform. Syst. 6(3), 72–101 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, E.J., Campbell, D.T., Schwartz, R.D., Sechrest, L.: Unobtrusive measures. Rand McNally & Company, Chicago (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E.: What theory is not, theorizing is. Adm. Sci. Q. 40(3), 385–390 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.: Definition of theory, In. Nigel Nicholson, Pino G. Audia, and Madan M. Pillutla (Eds.) The Blackwell encyclopedia of management. Organizational behavior. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, (2021)

  • Whetten, D.A.: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Manage. Rev. 14(4), 490–495 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, T., Rundle-Thiele, S.: Are we speaking the same language? Call for action to improve theory application and reporting in behaviour change research. BMC Public. Health. 21(1), 1–8 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  • Statements & Declarations

Download references

Funding

The author declares that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Contemporary Sciences and Technologies, South East European University, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia

    Gjoko Stamenkov

Authors
  1. Gjoko Stamenkov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gjoko Stamenkov.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The author has no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stamenkov, G. Recommendations for improving research quality: relationships among constructs, verbs in hypotheses, theoretical perspectives, and triangulation. Qual Quant 57, 2923–2946 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01461-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01461-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation