Abstract
Prospective longitudinal study designs are often referred to as the ideal way to explain causal relationships. Nevertheless, the evaluation of such data often leads to a reduction of empirical information. This is done by eliminating the factor time by forming sum indices or by analysing correlations over only two points in time. Newer methods of longitudinal research resort to group-based trajectory models which enables the analyses of inter- and intraindividual changes over time. However, less attention has been paid to a very useful extension of this method: the dual trajectory approach which provides the opportunity to combine two separate trajectory models in one model. In this way, the relationship between two sequences of behaviours can be estimated simultaneously and checked for overlaps. This approach is introduced, and an application based on prospective panel data from the German Crime in the modern City study (CrimoC) is carried out for the intergenerational relationship between physical violent parenting and juvenile delinquency.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The last option cannot be shown because Mplus does not output confidence intervals for the robust maximum likelihood estimator used here.
The first four waves took place in the school context while the next waves of data collection were used for a stepwise change into a postal mode.
The cross-sectional re-interviewing rates ranged between 85 and 92% (2002 n = 3411; 2003 n = 3392; 2004 n = 3339; 2005 n = 3243; 2006 n = 4548; 2007 n = 3336; 2008 n = 3086; 2009 n = 3090; 2011 n = 3050; 2013 n = 2850; 2015 n = 2754. The data collection in the year 2006 was the most challenging one. Due to the school leave of respondents in the lower educational level schools and the compulsory school attendance for all adolescents up to age 18, the attempt was made to retrieve these school-leavers in selected classes at vocational schools. A consequence was that the cross-sectional data includes additional cases of individuals who attended these classes but who had not participated before. These additional cases have no impact on the panel-dataset because they could not be matched to previous cases.
Since the age of 22, respondents have also been asked whether they have children of their own (= G3) and how they raise their children.
For this purpose, the participants fill out a personal code each year, which is requested in the questionnaire. This code includes time-invariant characteristics such as the first letter of the mothers’ name and the last letter of the natural hair colour.
A cross-validation between the cumulative prevalence rates (that can be interpreted as a measurement of versatility) and much skewer incidence index (that can be interpreted as a measurement of frequency) comes to the result that persons of the high rate offender class have also the highest average incidence rates across all groups and also for all other trajectories there is an equivalent development of incidence rates. For this reason, the cumulative prevalence rates are used for the following analyses.
A six class solution was described for the age-period 13–18 in Bentrup (2018).
A five class solution was described for the age-period 13–18 in Bentrup (2018).
References
Abramovaite, J., Bandyopadhyay, S., Dixon, L.: The dynamics of intergenerational family abuse: a focus on child maltreatment and violence and abuse in intimate relationships. J. Interdisp. Econ. 27, 160–174 (2015)
Akaike, H.: Factor analysis and the AIC. Psychometrika 52, 317–332 (1987)
Altemeier, W.A., O’Connor, S., Sherrod, K.B., Tucker, D., Vietze, P.: Outcome of abuse during childhood among pregnant low income women. Child Abuse Negl. 10, 319–330 (1986)
Avery, L., Hutchinson, D., Whitaker, K.: Domestic violence and intergenerational rates of child sexual abuse: a case record analysis. Child Adolescent Soc. Work J. 19, 77–89 (2002)
Baldwin, J., Oliver, J.: Epidemiology and family characteristics of severely-abused children. Br. J. Prev. Soc. Med. 29, 205–221 (1975)
Ball, J.D.: Intergenerational transmission of abuse of incarcerated fathers: a study of the measurement of abuse. J. Fam. Issues 30, 371–390 (2009)
Bushway, S.D., Thonberry, T.P., Krohn, M.S.: Desistance as a developmental process: a comparison of static and dynamic approaches. J. Quant. Criminol. 19, 129–153 (2003)
Bartlett, J.D., Easterbrooks, M.A.: Links between physical abuse in child and child neglect among adolescent mothers. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 34, 2164–2169 (2012)
Bentrup, C.: First results of cross-generational (dis-) similarities between three crimoc-generations. The relationship between experienced violent parenting practice, delinquency and own parenting style. In: Eichelsheim, V., van de Weijer, S. (eds.) Intergenerational Continuity of Criminal and Antisocial Behaviour. An international Overview of studies, pp. 235–259. Routledge, London (2018)
Berlin, L.J., Appleyard, K., Dodge, K.A.: Intergenerational continuity in child maltreatment: mediating mechanisms and implications for prevention. Child Dev. 82, 162–176 (2011)
Bevan, E., Higgins, D.J.: Is domestic violence learned? The contribution of five forms of child maltreatment to men’s violence and adjustment. J. Fam. Violence 7, 223–245 (2002)
Boers, K., Reinecke, J., Mariotti, L., Seddig, D.: Explaining the development of adolescent violent delinquency. Eur. J. Criminol. 7, 499–520 (2010)
Caliso, J.A., Milner, J.S.: Childhood history of abuse and child abuse screening. Child Abuse Negl. 16, 647–659 (1992)
Cheong, J.W., MacKinnon, D.P., Khoo, S.T.: Investigation of mediatinal processes using parallel process latent growth curve modeling. Struct. Equ. Model. 10, 238–263 (2003)
Clausen, A.H., Crittenden, P.M.: Physical and psychological maltreatment: relations among types of maltreatment. Child Abuse Negl. 15, 5–18 (1991)
Coohey, C., Braun, N.: Toward an integrated framework for understanding child physical abuse. Child Abuse Negl. 21, 1081–1094 (1997)
Cuadra, L.E., Jaffe, A.E., Thomas, R., DiLillo, D.: Child maltreatment and adult criminal behavior: does criminal thinking explain the association. Child Abuse Negl. 38, 1399–1408 (2014)
Cui, L., Colasante, T., Malti, T., Ribeaud, D., Eisner, M.P.: Dual trajectories of reactive and proactive aggression from mid-childhood to early adolescence: relations to sensation seeking, risk taking, and moral reasoning. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 44, 663–675 (2016)
Dixon, L., Browne, K., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C.: Risk factors of parents abused as children: a mediational analysis of the intergenerational continuity of child maltreatment (part I). J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 46, 47–57 (2005)
D’Unger, A.V., Land, K.C., McCall, P.L., Nagin, D.S.: How many latent classes of delinquent/criminal careers? Results from mixed poisson regression analyses. Am. J. Soc. 103, 1593–1630 (1998)
Ehrensaft, M.K., Cohen, P., Brown, J., Smailes, E., Chen, H., Johnson, J.G.: Intergenerational transmission of partner violence: a 20-year prospective study. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 71, 741–753 (2003)
Eichelsheim, V., van de Weijer, S.: Intergenerational Continuity of Criminal and Antisocial Behaviour. An International Overview of Studies. Routledge, London (2018)
Enders, C.K.: A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Struct. Equ. Model. 8, 128–141 (2001)
Erdmann, A., Reinecke, R.: What influences the victimization of high-level offenders? A dual trajectory analysis of the victim-offender-overlap from the perspective of routine activities with peer groups. J. Interpers. Violence (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519854556
Frias-Armenta, M.: Long-term effects of child punishment on Mexican women: a structural model. Child Abuse Negl. 26, 371–386 (2002)
Heyman, R.E., Smith Slep, A.M.: Do child abuse and interparental violence lead to adulthood family violence? J. Marriage Fam. 64, 864–870 (2002)
Higgins, J.D., McCabe, M.P.: Multiple forms of child abuse and neglect: adult retrospective reports. Aggress. Violent Behav. 6, 547–578 (1999)
Hunter, R., Kilstrom, N.: Breaking the cycle in abusive families. Am. J. Psychiatry 136, 1320–1322 (1979)
Jung, H., Herrenkohl, T.I., Klika, J.B., Lee, J.O., Brown, E.C.: Does child maltreatment predict adult crime? Reexamining the question in a prospective study of gender differences, education, and marital status. J. Interpers. Violence 30, 2238–2257 (2015)
Jung, T., Wickrama, K.A.S.: An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 2(1), 302–317 (2008)
Kanz, K.-M.: Mediated and moderated effects of violent media consumption on youth violence. Eur. J. Criminol. 13, 149–168 (2016)
Kim, K., Trickett, P.K., Putnam, F.W.: Childhood experiences of sexual abuse and later parenting practices among non-offending mothers of sexually abused and comparison girls. Child Abuse Negl. 34, 610–622 (2010)
Kreuter, F., Muthén, B.O.: Analyzing criminal trajectory profiles: bridging multilevel and group-based approaches using growth mixture modeling. J. Quant. Crim. 24, 1–31 (2008)
Lacourse, E., Dupere, V., Loeber, R.: Developmental trajectories of violence and theft. In: Loeber, R., Farrington, D.P., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., White, H.R. (eds.) Violence and Serious Theft: Development and Prediction from Childhood to Adulthood, pp. 231–268. Routledge, New York (2008)
Lo, Y., Mendell, N.R., Rubin, D.B.: Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika 88, 767–778 (2001)
Magnusson, D., Bergman, L.R.: A pattern approach to the study of pathways from childhood to adulthood. In: Robins, L.N., Rutter, M. (eds.) Straight and Devious Pathways from Childhood to Adulthood, pp. 101–116. New York University Press, New York (1990)
Milaniak, I., Widom, C.S.: Does child abuse and neglect increase risk for perpetration of violence inside and outside the home? Psychol. Violence 5, 246–255 (2015)
Moffitt, T.E.: Life-course persistent versus adolescence-limited antisocial behavior. In: Cicchetti, D. (ed.) Developmental Psychopathology: Risk, Disorder, and Adaption, 570-598. Wiley, Hoboken (2006)
Muller, R.T., Hunter, J.E., Stollak, G.: The intergenerational transmission of corporal punishment: a comparison of social learning and temperament models. Child Abuse Negl. 19, 1323–1335 (1995)
Muthén, B.O.: Statistical analysis with latent variables: Technical Appendences. Working Paper. Los Angeles (2004)
Muthén, L., Muthén, B.O.: Mplus – Statistical analysis with latent variables. User’s guide. Los Angeles (1998-2015)
Muthen, B.O., Shedden, K.: Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics 55, 463–469 (1999)
Nagin, D.S.: Group-Based Modeling of Development. Havard University Press, Cambridge (2005)
Nagin, D.S.: Analyzing developmental trajectories: a semi-parametric, group-based approach. Psychol. Methods 4, 139–177 (1999)
Nagin, D.S., Land, K.C.: Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed Poisson model. Criminology 31, 327–362 (1993)
Nagin, D.S., Tremblay, R.E.: Developmental trajectory groups: fact or a useful statistical fiction? Criminology 43, 873–904 (2005)
Nagin, D.S., Tremblay, R.E.: Analyzing developmental trajectories of distinct but related behaviors: a group-based method. Psychol. Methods 6, 18–34 (2001)
Nagin, D.S., Tremblay, R.E.: Trajectories of boys’ physical aggression, opposition, and hyperactivity on the path to physically violent and nonviolent juvenile delinquency. Child Dev. 70, 1181–1196 (1999)
Nyland, K.L., Asparouhov, T., Muthen, B.O.: Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a monte carlo simulation study. Struct. Equ. Model. 14, 535–569 (2007)
Pears, K.C., Capaldi, D.M.: Intergenerational transmission of abuse: a two-generational prospective study of an at-risk sample. Child Abuse Negl. 25, 1439–1461 (2001)
Pollak, R.A.: An intergenerational model of domestic violence. J. Popul. Econ. 17, 311–329 (2004)
Pulkkinen, L., Tremblay, R.E.: Patterns of boys’ social adjustment in two cultures and different ages: a longitudinal perspective. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 15, 527–553 (1992)
Reinecke, J.: Longitudinal analysis of adolescents’ deviant and delinquent behaviour. Applications of latent class growth curves and growth mixture models. Methodology 2, 100–112 (2006)
Reinecke, J.: Mixture models for longitudinal analysis: applications of adolescents’ development of delinquency. In: Salzborn, S., Davidov, E., Reinecke, J. (eds.) Methods, Theories, and Empirical Applications in the Social Sciences. Festschrift for Peter Schmidt, pp. 75–82. Springer, Wiesbaden (2012)
Reinecke, J.: Growth curve models and panel dropouts: applications with criminological panel data. Netherlands J. Psychol. 67, 122–131 (2013)
Reinecke, J.: Strukturgleichungsmodelle in den Sozialwissenschaften. De Gruyter Oldenbourg, Berlin (2014)
Reinecke, J., Meyer, M., Boers, K.: Stage-sequential growth mixture modeling of criminological panel data. In: Stemmler, M., von Eye, A., Wiedermann, W. (eds.) Dependent Data in Social Science Research, pp. 67–89. Springer, Wiesbaden (2015)
Reinecke, J., Weins, C.: The development of delinquency during adolescence: a comparison of missing data techniques. Qual. Quant. 47, 3319–3334 (2013)
Rivera, P.M., Fincham, F.D.: A latent class approach to understand the intergenerational transmission of violence in emerging adult relationships. In: Maxwell, S.R., Blair, S.L. (eds.) Violence and Crime in the Family: Patterns, Causes and Consequences (Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research), vol. 9, pp. 23–44. Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley (2015)
Roeder, K., Lynch, K.G., Nagin, D.S.: Modeling uncertainty in latent class membership: a case study in criminology. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 94, 766–776 (1999)
Sampson, R., Laub, J.H.: Seductions of method: Rejoinder to Nagin and tremblay’s “developmental trajectory groups: fact or fiction”. Criminology 43, 905–914 (2005)
Schelbe, L., Geiger, J.M.: Intergenerational Transmission of Child Maltreatment. Springer, Cham (2017)
Schwarz, G.: Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 6, 461–464 (1978)
Seddig, D.: Crime inhibiting, interactional and co-developmental patterns of school bonds and the acceptance of legal norms. Crime Delinq. 62, 1046–1071 (2015)
Seddig, D.: Peer group association, the acceptance of norms and violent behaviour: a longitudinal analysis of reciprocal effects. Eur. J. Criminol. 11, 319–339 (2014)
Seddig, D., Reinecke, J.: Exploration and explanation of adolescent self-reported delinquency trajectories in the crimoc study. In: Blokland, A., van der Geest, V. (eds.) The Routledge International Handbook of Life-Course Criminology, pp. 159–178. Taylor & Francis, London (2017)
Smith, C.A., Thornberry, T.P.: The relationship between childhood maltreatment and adolescent involvement in delinquency. Criminology 33, 451–481 (1995)
Snyder, S.M., Smith, R.E.: Do youth with substantiated child maltreatment investigations have distinct patterns of delinquent behaviors? Child Youth Serv. Rev. 58, 82–89 (2015)
Straus, M.A.: Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. J. Marriage Fam. 41, 75–88 (1979)
Straus, M.A., Hamby, S.L., Finkelhor, D., Moore, D.W., Runyan, D.: Identification of child maltreatment with the parent-child conflict tactics scales: development and psychometric data for a national sample of American parents. Child Abuse Negl. 22, 249–270 (1998)
Theimann, M.: School as a space of socialization and prevention. Eur. J. Criminol. 13, 67–91 (2016)
Thornberry, T.P., Henry, K.L., Smith, C.A., Ireland, T.O., Greenman, S.J., Lee, R.D.: Breaking the cycle of maltreatment: the role of safe, stable, and nurturing relationships. J. Adolesc. Health 53, S25–S31 (2013)
Thornberry, T.P., Knight, K.E., Lovegrove, P.J.: Does maltreatment beget maltreatment? A systematic review of the intergenerational literature. Trauma Violence Abuse 13, 135–152 (2012)
Tremblay, R.E., Vitaro, F., Gagnon, C., Piché, C., Royer, N.: A prosocial scale for the preschool behaviour questionnaire: concurrent and predictive correlates. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 15, 227–245 (1992)
van der Put, C.E., Lanctot, N., de Ruiter, C., van Vugt, E.: Child maltreatment among boy and girl probationers: Does type of maltreatment make a difference in offending behavior and psychosocial problems? Child Abuse Negl. (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.05.012
Wardenaar, K.J., Monden, R., Conradi, H.J., de Jonge, P.: Symptom-specific course trajectories and their determinants in primary care patients with major depressive disorder: evidence fort WO etiologically distinct prototypes. J. Affect. Disord. 179, 38–46 (2015)
Weir, H., Kaukinen, C.: Delinquent effects of childhood exposure to violent victimization: a latent longitudinal class analysis. In: Maxwell, S.R., Blair, S.L. (eds.) Violence and Crime in the Family: Patterns, Causes and Consequences (Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research), vol. 9, pp. 255–284. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley (2015)
Widom, C.S.: Child abuse, neglect, and adult behavior: research design and findings on criminality, violence, and child abuse. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 59, 355–367 (1989a)
Widom, C.S.: Does violence beget violence? A critical examination of the literature. Psychol. Bull. 10, 3–28 (1989b)
Widom, C.S., Czaja, S., Dutton, M.A.: Child abuse and neglect and intimate partner violence victimization and perpetration: a prospective investigation. Child Abuse Negl. 38, 650–663 (2014)
Wu, J., Witkiewitz, K., McMahon, R.J., Dodge, K.A.: A parallel process growth mixture model of conduct problems and substance use with risky sexual behavior. Drug Alc. Depend. 111, 207–214 (2010)
Yang, C.C.: Finite mixture model selection with psychometric applications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen (1998)
Zuravin, S., McMillen, C., Depanfilis, D., Risley-Curtiss, C.: The intergenerational cycle of child maltreatment: continuity versus discontinuity. J. Interpers. Violence 11, 315–334 (1996)
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Klaus Boers and Jost Reinecke, the initiators of the here reported longitudinal panel study Crime in the modern City (CrimoC) for their support, and the best project team of all time for the practical as well as content-related cooperation. This study was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bentrup, C. The dual trajectory approach: detecting developmental behavioural overlaps in longitudinal and intergenerational research. Qual Quant 54, 43–65 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00934-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00934-1