Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identifying the ‘Fukushima Effect’ in Germany through policy actors’ responses: evidence from the G-GEPON 2 survey

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 09 January 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

The nuclear meltdown in Fukushima, Japan, on March 11, 2011 (“3.11”) prompted global changes in national energy policies. Public discourse created the image that “Fukushima” had prompted Germany’s Energiewende, and much research asking why the reaction of decision makers in Germany was significantly different from those in Japan has been conducted since that time. However, the effect on policy actors themselves in the policy-making network has been overlooked. Taking Germany’s socio-political history into account, we question such conclusions and argue that the measurable effect is much less than some conclude. Using an unconventional merged methods research design and innovative survey instrument with a policy-actor-network approach (the G-GEPON 2 Survey), we asked major German policy actors, interest groups, stakeholders, and civil society actors about their opinions, attitudes and governmental support regarding energy policy decisions pre- and post-Fukushima. We found that an established institutional landscape of policy actors and their cooperation in policy processes has not been affected by 3.11. New forms of inquiry for policy research show the potential to provide insights into policy processes which were not measurable with traditional single-method inquiries. Furthermore, we have found that emulation of national legal frameworks must consider socio-political traditions. We attempt to create new forms of investigation to reveal hidden structures in policy processes which are empirically difficult to grasp.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 09 January 2020

    For reason beyond the control of the authors or the editors

Notes

  1. Government policy statement on June 9, 2011, Chancellor Angel Merkel. (Speech transcript accessible through the Bundestag archives: https://archiv.bundesregierung.de/archiv-de/regierungserklaerung-von-bundeskanzlerin-angela-merkel-zur-energiepolitik-der-weg-zur-energie-der-zukunft-mitschrift--1008262).

  2. The term Energiewende has become a key term for global energy transition movements. The international network of the Heinrich Böll Foundation, for example, provides extensive resources and ongoing research on the progress of energy policy transition efforts towards more renewable energy globally: https://energytransition.org.

  3. The literature that discusses the history of the energy policy in Germany is vast. For the interested reader, the authors suggest reports offered by the Federal Ministry for Economy, Trade and Industry (https://www.bmwi.de/Navigation/EN/Topic/topic.html?cl2Categories_LeadKeyword=energiewende) or resources provided by the Heinrich Böll Foundation of their project “Energy Transition. The Global Energiewende” project (https://energytransition.org).

  4. The first wave of the GEPON series of surveys was undertaken from 1998 to 2004 in Japan, South Korea, Germany, and the United States by Yutaka Tsujinaka of the University of Tsukuba.

  5. The questions have been translated into English for the purposes of this paper as the original questions were in German.

References

  • Beck, U.: Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Belli, R.F., Callegaro, M.: The emergence of calendar interviewing. A theoretical and empirical rationale. In: Alwin, D.F., Stafford, F., Belli, R.F. (eds.) Calendar and Time Diary Methods in Life Course Research. SAGE, Thousands Oaks (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • BMUB: Kyoto Mechanismen. BMUB. https://www.bmu.de/themen/klima-energie/klimaschutz/internationale-klimapolitik/kyoto-protokoll/kyoto-mechanismen/ (2017). Accessed 30 Aug 2018

  • BMWi: Infografik Wie hat sich die EEG-Umlage über die Jahre entwickelt? BMWi. https://www.bmwi-energiewende.de/EWD/Redaktion/Newsletter/2014/31/Meldung/infografik-wie-hat-sich-die-eeg-umlage-entwickelt2.html (2014) Accessed 29 Aug 2018

  • BMWi: Unsere Energiewende: sicher, sauber, bezahlbar: BMWi. https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/DE/Dossier/energiewende.html (2017). Accessed 29 Aug 2018

  • BMWi: Das Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz: BMWi. From Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie. https://www.erneuerbare-energien.de/EE/Redaktion/DE/Dossier/eeg.html?cms_docId=73930 (2019). Accessed 29 Aug 2018

  • Bossler, M., Geis, G., Stegmaier, J.: Comparing survey data with an official administrative population: assessing sample-selectivity in the IAB Establishement Panel. Qual. Quant. 52, 899–920 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU: EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets_en (2018). Accessed 30 Aug 2018

  • Findlay, T.: Nuclear Energy and Global Governance. Taylor & Francis, New York (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, S.: Die Energiewende und Europa. Europäisierungsprozesse in der deutschen Energie- und Klimapolitik. Springer VS, Wiesbaden (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstenberger, K.: Störfälle: literary Accounts from Chernobyl to Fukushima. German Stud. Rev. 37(1), 131–148 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, J.M.: Paranoia as a marker for theory. In: Dryzek, J.S., Honig, B. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford University Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobo, G.: Re-conceptualizing generalization: Old issues in a new frame. In: Alasuutari, P., Bickman, L., Brannen, J. (eds.) Sage Handbook of Social Research Methods, pp. 193–227. Sage, London (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gobo, G.: Back to Likert. Towards a conversational survey. In: Vogt, P., Williams, M. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Innovation in Social Research Methods, pp. 228–248. Sage, London (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grasselt, N.: Die Entzauberung der Energiewende. Politik- und Diskurswandel unter schwarz-gelben Argumentationsmustern. Springer VS, Duisburg (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J.H., Jansa, J.M.: Relational concepts, measurement, and data collection. In: Victor, J.N., Montgomery, A.H., Lubell, M. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Networks. Oxford University Press, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossi, L., Heim, S., Waterson, M.: The impact of the German response to the Fukushima earthquake. Energy Econ. 66, 450–465 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig, M., Kobashi, Y., Okura, S., Tkach-Kawasaki, L.: Energy policy participation through networks transcending cleavage: An analysis of Japanese and German renewable energy promotion policies. Qual. Quant. 49(4), 1485–1512 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindmarsh, R., Priestley, R.: The Fukushima effect. Traversing a new geopolitical terrain. In: Hindmarsh, R., Priestley, R. (eds.) The Fukushima Effect: A New Geopolitical Terrain. Routledge, London (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, C.: Fukushima and Beyond. Nuclear Power in a Low-Carbon World. Routledge, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, D., Stephan, S.: Germany’s Energiewende after Fukushima. Nuclear politics at the forefront of change. In: Hindmarsh, R., Priestley, R. (eds.) The Fukushima Effect: A New Geopolitical Terrain. Routledge, London (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., Kim, S.: Impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident on belief in rumors: the role of risk perception and communication. Sustainability 9(12), 2188 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D., Kostiuchenko, T.: Power structures of policy networks. In: Victor, N.J., Montgomery, A.H., Lubell, M. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Networks. Oxford University Press, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Tkach-Kawasaki, L.: The relationship between information-sharing and resource-sharing networks in environmental policy governance: focusing on Germany and Japan. J. Contemp. East. Asia 17(2), 176–199 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüthi, S., Prässler, T.: Analyzing policy support instruments and regulatory risk factors for wind energy deployment—A developers’ perspective. Energy Policy 39(9), 4876–4892 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M.N.: Sampling for qualitative research. Fam. Pract. 13, 522–525 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moe, E.: Renewable Energy Transformation or Fossil Fuel Blacklash. Vested Interests in the Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C., Jungjohann, A.: Energy Democracy. Germany’s Energiewende to Renewables. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Murakami, M., Matsui, S., Kumagai, A., Orita, M., Kuroda, Y.: Communicating with Residents about Risks Following the Fukushima Nuclear Accident. Asia Pac. J. Public Health 29(2S), 74S–89S (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nebehay, S.: Higher cancer risk after Fukushima nuclear disaster: WHO. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-japan-nuclear-cancer/higher-cancer-risk-after-fukushima-nuclear-disaster-who-idUSBRE91R0D420130228 (2012). Accessed 31 Aug 2018

  • netztransparenz.de: EEG-Umlage: netztransparenz.de. https://www.netztransparenz.de/EEG/EEG-Umlagen-Uebersicht (2018). Accessed 29 August 2018

  • Nienierza, A.: Die größte anzunehmende Umbewertung? Eine Frame-Analyse der deutschen Presseberichterstattung über Kernenergie nach den Reaktorunfällen von Tschernobyl (1986) und Fukushima (2011). In: Wolling, J., Arlt, D. (eds.) Fukushima und die Folgen. Medienberichterstattung, Öffentliche Meinung, Politische Konsequenzen, pp. 31–54. Universitätsverlag Ilmenau, Ilmenau (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, W.J.: Nuclear Renaissance. Technologies and Policies for the Future of Nuclear Power. Taylor & Francis, New York London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Okura, S., Tkach-Kawasaki, L., Kobashi, Y., Hartwig, M., Tsujinaka, Y.: Analysis of the policy network for the “Feed-in Tariff Law” in Japan: evidence from the GEPON Survey. J. Contemp. East Asia 15(1), 41–63 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V.A.: Discursive institutionalism: the explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 11, 303–326 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreurs, M.A.: The ethics of nuclear energy: Germany’s energy politics after Fukushima. J. Soc. Sci. 77, 9–29 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreurs, M.A.: The Paris climate agreement and the three largest emitters: China, the United States, and the European Union. Polit. Gov. 4(3), 219–223 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, M.: The Fukushima Meltdown and the Global Renaissance of Nuclear Energy. http://www.fujitsu.com/jp/group/fri/en/column/message/2011/2011-03-23b.html (2011). Accessed March 2019

  • Sieber, S.D.: The integration of fieldwork and survey methods. Am. J. Sociol. 6, 1335–1359 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, C.: Inside the Energiewende: Policy and complexity in the German utility industry. ISSUES Sci. Technol. 33(2), 41 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • UN: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations. Retrieved August 30 2018, from https://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/background_publications_htmlpdf/application/pdf/conveng.pdf#page=7

  • UN: Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF): United Nations Climate Change. Retrieved August 30 2018, from United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: https://unfccc.int/topics/land-use/workstreams/land-use–land-use-change-and-forestry-lulucf

  • UNFCCC: What is the CDM: UNFCCC. Retrieved August 30 2018, from United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: https://cdm.unfccc.int/about/index.html

  • Wolling, J., Arlt, D.: Ein Erdbeben und seine (politischen) Folgen. In: Wolling, J., Arlt, D. (eds.) Fukushima und die Folgen. Medienberichterstattung, Öffentliche Meinung, Politische Konsequenzen. Universitätsverlag Ilmenau, Ilemanu (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuela G. Hartwig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hartwig, M.G., Tkach-Kawasaki, L. Identifying the ‘Fukushima Effect’ in Germany through policy actors’ responses: evidence from the G-GEPON 2 survey. Qual Quant 53, 2081–2101 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00857-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00857-x

Keywords

Navigation