Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparison of qualitatively and quantitatively driven analytic procedures of psychotherapeutic group sessions with deviant adolescents

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper deals with the therapy-related change in a group of deviant adolescents attending a therapeutic facility. The main issue of two studies reported here is to identify pattern of changes through different methods. The paper describes how the mixing of two different types of analysis may yield a more complex and complete view of the data. The analyses were performed at the same time: the first part (study 1), which was of a clinical–quantitative nature, involved picking out changerelated features through the analysis of the frequency of lemmas in the content of the sessions; the second part (study 2) had a qualitative orientation and traced the pattern of narrative themes in the sessions during the course of time. In both studies, the same data were analyzed at the same times, though each study adopted a different approach. While both approaches focused on change, the results brought out different aspects: the study that adopted the quantitative/clinical approach highlighted changerelated problems and proposed an explanation in terms of the “deviant peer effect”; by contrast, the qualitative study underlined the possibilities offered by change and viewed therapeutic change in terms of the shift in narrative themes from the detachment and lack of responsibility initially shown by the youths towards progressive maturation that may have been due to the efficacy of the therapy. The discussion of results brings us to consider the fuzzy set approach for future research into the field of criminology and group therapy. In conclusion, the paper shows that looking at the same data through two different methodological “lenses” yields different, and only apparently contradictory, conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The coefficient of the cosine (Salton and McGill 1984) is similar to the Pearson product-moment coefficient of correlation, and measures the association of couples of lexical units: the higher the value (ranges between 0 and 1), the nearer the words in the text.

References

  • Allwood, C.M.: The distinction between qualitative and quantitative research methods is problematic. Qual. Quant. 46, 1417–1429 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazeley, P.: Issues in mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches to research. In: Buber, R., Gadner, J., Richards, L. (eds.) Applying Qualitative Methods to Marketing Management Research, pp. 141–156. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2004)

  • Birks, M., Mills, J.: Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide. Sage, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., Clark, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A.: Why do researchers integrate/combine/mesh/blend/mix/merge/fuse quantitative and qualitative research? In: Bergman, M.M. (ed.) Advances in mixed methods research, pp. 87–100. Sage, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J.S.: Acts of Meaning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke Johnson, R., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Turner, L.A.: Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J. Mixed Methods Res. 1(2), 112–133 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carli, R., Paniccia R.M.: L’analisi emozionale del testo. Uno strumento psicologico per leggere testi e discorsi [Emotional analysis of text. A psychological tool to read texts and discourses]. Franco Angeli, Milano (2002)

  • Collingridge, D.S.: A primer on quantitized data analysis and permutation testing. J. Mixed Methods Res. 7(1), 81–97 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cova, M.I., Rodríguez-Monroy, C.: A fuzzy set scale approach to value workers participation and learning. J. Innov. Knowl. 1, 133–143 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L.: Designing and Conducting Mixed Method Research. Sage, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B.: Narratives in Social Research. Sage, London (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Gregorio, E.: Narrating a crime: contexts and accounts on deviant actions. Int. J. Mult. Res. Approaches 3(2), 177–190 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Gregorio, E., Gallon, M., Verde, A.: Troubled groups in situation: qualitative analysis of psychotherapeutic sessions with deviant adolescents. Qual. Quant. 48(6), 3013–3024 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Gregorio, E., Lattanzi, P.F.: Programmi per la ricerca qualitativa [Software for Qualitative Research]. Franco Angeli, Milano (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.: Introduction. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 1–29. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K.A., Dishion, T.J., Lansford, J.E.: Deviant peer influences in intervention and public policy for youth. Soc. Policy Rep. 20(1), 1–20 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J.C., Caracelli, V.J., Graham, W.F.: Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 11(3), 255–274 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, P.C.: A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32(4), 1180–1198 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, P.C.: Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad. Manag. J. 54(2), 393–420 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huefner, J.C., Handwerk, M.L., Ringle, J.L., Field, C.E.: Conduct disordered youth in group care: an examination of negative peer influence. J. Child Fam. Stud. 18, 719–730 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelle, U.: Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in research practice: purposes and advantages. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 293–311 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M.W., Maxson, C.L.: Street Gang Patterns and Policies. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler Riessman, C., Speedy, J.: Narrative inquiry in the psychotherapy professions: a critical review. In: Clandinin, D.J. (ed.) Handbook of Narrative Inquiry. Mapping a Methodology, pp. 426–456. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, S., Richter, C., Brem, A., Cheng, C.-F., Chang, M.L.: Strategies for reward-based crowdfunding campaigns. J. Innov. Knowl. 1(1), 13–23 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuckartz, U.: Qualitative Text Analysis. A Guide to Methods, Practice and Using Software. Sage, London (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lancia, F.: Strumenti per l’analisi dei testi. Introduzione all’uso di t-lab [Tools for text analysis. Introduction to T-LAB]. Milano: Franco Angeli (2004)

  • Marsh, P., Rosser, E., Harré, R.: The Rules of Disorder. Routledge, London (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, A.J.: Putting the MIXED back into qualitative and qualitative research in educational research and beyond: moving toward the radical middle. Int. J. Mult. Res. Approaches 6(3), 192–219 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R., McGloin, J., Nguyen, H., Thomas, K.: The causal impact of exposure to deviant peers: an experimental investigation. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 20, 1–28 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C.C.: The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press (1987)

  • Ragin, C.C.: Set relations in social research: evaluating theory consistency and coverage. Polit. Anal. 14(3), 291–310 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roig-Tierno, N., Huarng, K.H., Ribeiro-Soriano, D.: Configurational comparative research methodologies. Qual. Quant. 51(5), 1921–1923 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, R., Verde, A.: Quattro fratelli, quattro modi per delinquere. Su alcuni rapporti fra criminologia e psicoanalisi [Four brothers, four ways to break the law. Relationships between criminology and psychoanalysis]. G. Ital. Psicopatol. 13(1), 4–13 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale, J.E.M., Lohfeld, L.H., Brazil, K.: Revising the quantitative-qualitative debate: implication for mixed-methods research. Quant. Qual. 36, 43–53 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski, M., Voils, C., Knafl, G.: On quantitizing. J. Mixed Methods Res. 3(3), 208–222 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salton, G., McGill, M.J.: Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarbin, T.R. (ed.): Narrative Psychology: The Storied Nature of Human Conduct. Praeger, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J.F., Strodtbeck, F.L.: Group Process and Gang Delinquency. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, M.K., Sandelowski, M., Happ, M.B.: Current practice and emerging trends in conducting mixed methods intervention study in health sciences. In: Teddlie, A., Tashakkori, C. (eds.) Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, pp. 725–747. Sage, London (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tagliafico, I., De Gregorio, E., Verde, A.: Il pensiero di gruppo dei minori devianti: un’analisi quali-quantitativa dei verbali delle sedute di una terapia di gruppo di minori inseriti in un centro diurno [Groupthing and juvenile crime. A qual-quant analysis of psychoterapeutic group session in a day care center]. Rass. Ital. Criminol. 8(1), 76–89 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, C., Yu, F.: Mixed methods sampling A typology with examples. J. Mixed Methods Res 1(1), 77–100 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiem, A.: Conducting configurational comparative research with qualitative comparative analysis. Am. J. Eval. (2016). doi:10.1177/1098214016673902

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrasher, F.M.: The Gang: A Study of 1,313 Gangs in Chicago. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1927)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Sciences, Section of Criminology, University of Genoa, Via Antonio De Toni n. 12, 16132, Genoa, Italy

    Eugenio De Gregorio, Ivana Tagliafico & Alfredo Verde

Authors
  1. Eugenio De Gregorio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ivana Tagliafico
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alfredo Verde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugenio De Gregorio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Gregorio, E., Tagliafico, I. & Verde, A. A comparison of qualitatively and quantitatively driven analytic procedures of psychotherapeutic group sessions with deviant adolescents. Qual Quant 52, 1731–1760 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0551-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0551-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation