Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bootstrap confidence intervals for biodiversity measures based on Gini index and entropy

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Monitoring the richness and the diversity of species living in an ecosystem is an important goal of ecology. To this purpose, measures of biodiversity have been introduced as statistical summaries of the abundance vector. In particular, we take into consideration the Gini–Simpson and the Shannon–Wiener indices, along with the effective number of species calculated through these measures, proposed, respectively, by Laakso and Taagepera (Comp Polit Stud 12:3–25, 1979) and Leti (Statistica descrittiva, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1983). It is an open question how to associate to these indices a measure of uncertainty. In this paper we compare confidence intervals based on these measures, calculated through three different bootstrap methods: percentile, -t and accelerated bias-corrected percentile. We recommend to practitioners to use the percentile procedure, as it is straightforward and computationally feasible, providing results very close to those obtained by more complex techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carpenter, J., Bithell, J.: Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Stat. Med. 19, 1141–1164 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B.: Better bootstrap confidence intervals. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82, 171–185 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frosini, B.V.: Descriptive measures of ecological diversity. In: Jureckova, J., El-Shaarawi, A.H. (eds.) Environmetrics. Encyclopedia of Life Support systems. Eolss Publishers, Oxford (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gini, C.: Variabilità e mutabilità. Studi economico-giuridici della Facoltà di Giurisprudenza dell’Università di Cagliari. Anno Terzo, Parte Seconda (1912)

    Google Scholar 

  • Laakso, M., Taagepera, R.: The “Effective” number of parties: a measure with application to West Europe. Comp. Polit. Stud. 12, 3–25 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Leti, G.: Statistica descrittiva. Bologna, Il Mulino (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–432 (1948)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W.: The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, E.H.: Measurement of diversity. Nature 163, 688 (1949)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, D., Shao, J.: The Jackknife and the Bootstrap. Springer, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N.: Cybernetics. Wiley, New York (1949)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola Pesenti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pesenti, N., Quatto, P. & Ripamonti, E. Bootstrap confidence intervals for biodiversity measures based on Gini index and entropy. Qual Quant 51, 847–858 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0443-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0443-x

Keywords

Navigation