Skip to main content
Log in

Inferential confidence intervals for fuzzy analysis of teaching satisfaction

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fuzzy sets are an extension of classical sets, used to mathematically model indefinite concepts, such as that of customer satisfaction. This is obtained by introducing a membership function expressing the degree of membership of the elements to a set. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets represent an extension of the theory of fuzzy sets, in which also a suitable non-membership function is defined. In this paper we aim at quantifying a latent construct, namely satisfaction, using fuzzy sets and intuitionistic fuzzy sets. We put forth a general evaluation method: first, we introduce a fuzzy satisfaction index to obtain membership values. Second, inferential confidence intervals (ICI), calculated through Bootstrap-t and percentile procedures, are used to assess the uncertainty underpinning membership and non-membership estimates. Third, we address the problem of optimal and multiple ICI, as well as their generalization through p values and q-values. In particular, we consider the problem of analyzing the responses to evaluation questionnaires. We apply this new method to a national program of evaluation of University courses and we discuss our framework in comparison with other evaluation techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/strengthening-education-systems/higher-education/quality-assurance/giqac/.

  2. In Italy, the evaluation of University courses became a compulsory requirement activity for all Universities, starting from 2000; Law 370, 19th October, 1999, see http://www.anvur.org/.

  3. In our dataset, bootstrap-t and percentile, when applied to calculate ICI for proportions, provided very similar results. For this reason, in the application we’ll only show the results relative to the percentile procedure.

References

  • Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20, 87–96 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atanassov, K.T.: On intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets Theory. Springer, New York (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bede, B.: Mathematics of Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bergen Communiqué 2005: Bergen Communiqué: The European higher education area—achieving the goals. In: Communiqué of the Conference of European Ministers Responsible for Higher Education, Bergen (2005). 19–20 May 2005

  • Bilgiç, T., Türkşen, I.B.: Measurement of membership functions: theoretical and empirical work. In: Dubois, D., Prade, H.M., Prade, H. (eds.) Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets, pp. 195–227. Springer, New York (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bucarest Communiqué: Bucarest communiqué 2012: Making the most of our potential: Consolidating the European higher education area. In: Communiqué of the Conference of European Ministers Responsible for Higher Education, Bucarest (2012). 26–27 Apr 2012

  • Cerioli, A., Zani, S.: A fuzzy approach to the measurement of poverty. In: Dagum, C., Zenga, M. (eds.) Income and wealth distribution, inequality and poverty, Studies in contemporary Economics, pp. 272–284. Springer Verlag, Berlin (1990)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, G., Finch, S.: Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. Am. Psychol. 60, 170–180 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Elia, A., Piccolo, D.: A mixture model for preference data analysis. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 49, 917–934 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jager, J., Gbadamosi, G.: Specific remedy for specific problem: measuring service quality in South African higher education. High. Educ. 60, 251–267 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ENQA: European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education 2009. Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area, 3rd edn. Helsinki (2009)

  • Giles, R.: The concept of grade of membership. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 25, 297–323 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H., Healy, M.J.: The graphical presentation of a collection of means. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A 158, 175–177 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, P.I.: Permutation, parametric and bootstrap tests of hypotheses. Springer, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannario, M., Piccolo, D.: CUB models: statistical methods: and empirical evidence. In: Kenett, R.S., Salini, S. (eds.) Modern Analysis of Customer Surveys: with applications using R, pp. 231–258. Wiley, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosko, B.: Fuzzy Thinking: The New Science of Fuzzy Logic. Hyperion, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marasini, D., Quatto, P.: A characterization of linear satisfaction measures. Metron 72, 17–23 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marasini, D., Quatto, P., Ripamonti, E.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets in questionnaire analysis. Qual. Quant. 50, 767–790 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, A.M.: Fuzzy sets do not form a topos. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 8, 101–104 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salini, S., Kenett, R.: Bayesian networks of customer satisfaction survey data. J. Appl. Stat. 11, 1177–1189 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, J., Tu, D.: The Jackknife and Bootstrap. Springer, New York (1995)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smithson, M., Verlukien, J.: Fuzzy Set Theory: Applications in the Social Sciences. Sage, London (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, J.D.: A direct approach to false discovery rates. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 64, 479–498 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tryon, W.W.: Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: an integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests. Psychol Methods 6, 371–386 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tryon, W.W., Lewis, C.: Evaluating independent proportions for statistical difference, equivalence, indeterminacy, and trivial difference using inferential confidence intervals. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 34, 171–189 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zani, S., Milioli, M.A., Morlini, I.: Fuzzy methods and satisfaction indices. In: Kenett, R.S., Salini, S. (eds.) Modern Analysis of Customer Surveys: With Applications Using R, pp. 439–456. Wiley, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, H.J.: Fuzzy set theory. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2, 317–332 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrico Ripamonti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marasini, D., Quatto, P. & Ripamonti, E. Inferential confidence intervals for fuzzy analysis of teaching satisfaction. Qual Quant 51, 1513–1529 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0349-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0349-7

Keywords

Navigation