Skip to main content
Log in

Nutritional Composition, Simulated Digestion and Biological Activities of Campomanesia xanthocarpa Fruit

  • Research
  • Published:
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gabirobeira fruits are known for their rich nutrient content and bioactive phytochemical compounds that contribute to significant biological activities. Despite these attributes, the antioxidant potential and stability of phenolic compounds in gabiroba by-products after digestion have yet to be studied. The objective of this work was to evaluate the physical-chemical composition, antibacterial activity, α-amylase, and α-glucosidase inhibitory effects, as well as the in vitro digestibility of total phenolic compounds, total flavonoids, and antioxidant activity of powder and extract from gabiroba to valorize these byproducts. The gabiroba powder had low moisture, high carbohydrate and fiber content. The extraction using 80% ethanol demonstrated higher antioxidant, antibacterial, α-amylase, and α-glucosidase inhibition activities compared to the 12% ethanol and water extracts. Catechin and ferulic acid were the major phenolic compounds identified by HPLC-DAD. After digestion, both the powder and the gabiroba extract exhibited a bioaccessibility of more than 30% for total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity during the gastric phase. However, the dry ethanol extract displayed higher total phenolic compounds after both the gastric and intestinal phases compared to the flour. Processing gabiroba into powder and extract is a promising approach to fully utilize this seasonal fruit, minimize waste, concentrate health-beneficial compounds, and valorize a by-product for use as a functional ingredient and raw material within the food and pharmaceutical industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its supplementary material, and are also available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Barbieri SF, de Oliveira Petkowicz CL, de Godoy RCB et al (2018) Pulp and jam of gabiroba (Campomanesia xanthocarpa Berg): characterization and rheological properties. Food Chem 263:292–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2018.05.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. de Oliveira Raphaelli C, Pereira E dos, Camargo S TM, et al (2021) Biological activity and chemical composition of fruits, seeds and leaves of guabirobeira (Campomanesia xanthocarpa O. Berg – Myrtaceae): a review. Food Biosci 40:100899. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FBIO.2021.100899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Czaikoski K, Mesomo MC, Krüger RL et al (2015) Extraction of Campomanesia xanthocarpa fruit using supercritical CO2 and bioactivity assessments. J Supercrit Fluids 98:79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SUPFLU.2015.01.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barbosa CH, Andrade MA, Séndon R et al (2021) Industrial fruits by-products and their antioxidant profile: can they be exploited for industrial food applications? Foods 10(2): 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020272

  5. Salmazzo GR, Verdan MH, Silva F et al (2021) Chemical composition and antiproliferative, antioxidant and trypanocidal activities of the fruits from Campomanesia xanthocarpa (Mart.) O. Berg (Myrtaceae). Nat Prod Res 35:853–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2019.1607333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Capeletto C, Conterato G, Scapinello J et al (2016) Chemical composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of guavirova (Campomanesia xanthocarpa Berg) seed extracts obtained by supercritical CO2 and compressed n-butane. J Supercrit Fluids 110:32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SUPFLU.2015.12.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pereira MC, Steffens RS, Jablonski A et al (2012) Characterization and antioxidant potential of Brazilian fruits from the Myrtaceae family. J Agric Food Chem 60:3061–3067. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf205263f

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferreira BA, da Silva ARA, Filbido GS et al (2022) In vitro bioaccessibility of the bioactive compounds and minerals in the pulp and peel of Buchenavia tomentosa Eichler fruits and their antioxidant capacities. Measurement: Food 8:100064. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEAFOO.2022.100064

  9. Andrade JKS, Chagas Barros RG, Pereira UC et al (2022) Bioaccessibility of bioactive compounds after in vitro gastrointestinal digestion and probiotics fermentation of Brazilian fruits residues with antioxidant and antidiabetic potential. LWT-Food Sci Technol 153:112469. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LWT.2021.112469

  10. Wesp C, de Santana L, Gasparetto MA, de Barros BF (2013) Caracterização física de frutos de guabirobeiras (Campomanesia spp.) coletados no estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Cadernos de Agroecologia. In: v. 8 n. 2: VIII Congresso Brasileiro de Agroecologia. pp 1–4

  11. da Silva Santos M, Carneiro PI, Wosiacki G et al (2009) Caracterização físico-química, extração e análise de pectinas de frutos de Campomanesia xanthocarpa B. (Gabiroba)

  12. Salehi F, Aghajanzadeh S (2020) Effect of dried fruits and vegetables powder on cakes quality: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 95:162–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TIFS.2019.11.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brasil (2005) Resolução - RDC No 263. https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/anvisa/2005/rdc0263_22_09_2005.html. Accessed 12 Sep 2023

  14. Fernandes I, de Maciel AA, Maroldi GM WV, et al (2022) Bioactive compounds, health-promotion properties and technological applications of Jabuticaba: a literature overview. Measurement: Food 8:100057. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEAFOO.2022.100057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brasil (2012) Resolução - RDC No 54. https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/anvisa/2012/rdc0054_12_11_2012.html. Accessed 12 Sep 2023

  16. Prasadi NVP, Joye IJ (2020) Dietary fibre from whole grains and their benefits on metabolic health. Nutrients 12:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  17. García OP, Martínez M, Romano D et al (2015) Iron absorption in raw and cooked bananas: a field study using stable isotopes in women. Food Nutr Res 59. https://doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v59.25976

  18. Bemmo ULK, Mvongo C, Bindzi JM et al (2023) Contribution to the valorization of Myrianthus arboreus fruits pulp from Cameroon: Physico-chemical characterization and nutritional value. Measurement: Food 10:100083. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEAFOO.2023.100083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cushnie TPT, Lamb AJ (2011) Recent advances in understanding the antibacterial properties of flavonoids. Int J Antimicrob Agents 38:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJANTIMICAG.2011.02.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Santos TRJ, de Aquino Santana LCL (2019) Antimicrobial potential of exotic fruits residues. South Afr J Bot 124:338–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SAJB.2019.05.031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jagadeesan G, Muniyandi K, Manoharan AL et al (2022) Understanding the bioaccessibility, α-amylase and α-glucosidase enzyme inhibition kinetics of Allmania nodiflora (L.) R.Br. Ex Wight polyphenols during in vitro simulated digestion. Food Chem 372:131294. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2021.131294

  22. Daglia M (2012) Polyphenols as antimicrobial agents. Curr Opin Biotechnol 23:174–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COPBIO.2011.08.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pedro AC, Maurer JBB, Zawadzki-Baggio SF et al (2018) Bioactive compounds of organic goji berry (Lycium barbarum L.) prevents oxidative deterioration of soybean oil. Ind Crops Prod 112:90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INDCROP.2017.10.052

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Liao X, Miao Q, Yang J et al (2022) Changes in phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of nine steaming nine sun-drying black soybeans before and after in vitro simulated gastrointestinal digestion. Food Res Int 162:111960. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODRES.2022.111960

  25. Ma YL, Wang Y, Wu ZF et al (2023) Exploring the effect of in vitro digestion on the phenolics and antioxidant activity of Lycium barbarum fruit extract. Food Biosci 51:102255. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FBIO.2022.102255

  26. Khochapong W, Ketnawa S, Ogawa Y, Punbusayakul N (2021) Effect of in vitro digestion on bioactive compounds, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) pulp aqueous extract. Food Chem 348:129094. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2021.129094

  27. Cheung M, Robinson JA, Greenspan P, Pegg RB (2023) Evaluating the phenolic composition and antioxidant properties of Georgia pecans after in vitro digestion. Food Biosci 51:102351. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FBIO.2023.102351

  28. Schulz M, Biluca FC, Gonzaga LV et al (2017) Bioaccessibility of bioactive compounds and antioxidant potential of juçara fruits (Euterpe edulis Martius) subjected to in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. Food Chem 228:447–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2017.02.038

  29. Quirós-Sauceda AE, Palafox-Carlos H, Sáyago-Ayerdi SG et al (2014) Dietary fiber and phenolic compounds as functional ingredients: interaction and possible effect after ingestion. Food Funct 5:1063–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), Brazil, for the financial support and Masters scholarship granted to S.A.P Etgeton (grant number 88887.653206/2021-00) and postdoctoral fellowship granted to S. Ávila (grant number 88887371865/2019-00); to the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) for the financial support; and to the Federal University of Paraná (UFPR) for the infrastructure and technical resources. The authors would like to thank the Butia farm for donating the fruits.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SAPE: Investigation, Methodology, Data curation, Writing - original draft. SÁ: Methodology, investigation, formal analysis, writing - original draft; ACRS: Conceptualization, methodology; JJ-Lima: Methodology, investigation; ADDPSR: Conceptualization, methodology; MRB: Conceptualization; methodology; CCHK: Conceptualization; resources; writing - Review & Editing. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Schaina Andriela Pontarollo Etgeton.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Etgeton, S.A.P., Ávila, S., Silva, A.C.R. et al. Nutritional Composition, Simulated Digestion and Biological Activities of Campomanesia xanthocarpa Fruit. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 79, 59–65 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-023-01126-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-023-01126-x

Keywords

Navigation