Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Suicide attacks and religious cleavages

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many experts claim that religious cleavages are one of the major reasons for suicide attacks. To test this hypothesis, we investigate whether the total number of suicide attacks per violent conflict and the annual number of suicide attacks per country are associated with simmering religious conflicts. We distinguish between two kinds of religious cleavages: cleavages at the macro level between the groups engaged in violent conflicts and cleavages at the micro or battlefield level between the actual perpetrators and victims of suicide attacks. Our results do not indicate that religious cleavages are an important precondition for the incidence of suicide attacks over the period 1981-2010.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The first suicide attacks in modern conflicts were carried out in Israeli-occupied South Lebanon by the terrorist organization Hezbollah in 1982. Afterwards the incidence of suicide attacks rose quickly, from an average of four attacks per year in the 1980s to about twelve per year in the 1990s and slightly more than 200 per year in the first decade of the second millennium (Chicago Project on Security and Terrorism database).

  2. See Hsiao-Rei Hicks et al. (2011).

  3. Pittel and Rübbelke (2006) show in a theoretical study how individual terrorists are led to develop a strong feeling of belongingness to the organization, which then directs them towards committing suicide attacks. The benefits associated with belonging to a terrorist organization are, of course, likely to be outbalanced by the cost of the attack. Under which circumstances the decision to commit a suicide attack is time-inconsistent and what mechanisms might prevent time-inconsistency are analyzed in Pittel and Rübbelke (2012).

  4. See Bloom (2005), Cook (2007), Wade and Reiter (2007), Piazza (2008), and Collard-Wexler et al. (2014) for extensions and critical assessments of Pape’s theory.

  5. See Pape (2005, pp. 89–92) for a detailed discussion. The recent declaration of a caliphate, centered in Syria, has both established a territorial claim and created a magnet drawing fundamentalist Islam’s true believers to the prophesized final battle with “Rome” (i.e., the West) that will signal the “end days”.

  6. Defining the line of demarcation between religions can be tricky. In Islam, for example, many Sunni Muslims view Shias as apostates, and vice versa. We therefore complement our benchmark analysis that codes Sunni and Shia Muslims as coreligionists with an analysis that codes Sunni and Shia Muslims as belonging to two distinct religions.

  7. Christians are tolerated by Islamists, provided that they submit to Sharia Law and to differentially higher taxes.

  8. This measure of the religious cleavage is motivated by Berman and Laitin (2008) finding that almost 90 % of the suicide attacks covered in their sample were aimed at victims whose religion differed from the attacker’s religion.

  9. See the surveys by Krieger and Meierrieks (2011) and Gassebner and Luechinger (2011).

  10. This dataset is a joint project between the Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP) at the Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University, and the Centre for the Study of Civil War at the International Peace Research Institute in Oslo (PRIO).

  11. This is the definition used by UCDP. For a more in-depth discussion on the definition see the UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset Codebook, version 4-2011.

  12. We have included only the case of Lebanon, where suicide attacks were caused by the conflict between Israel and the terrorist group Hezbollah. The conflict between the United States and Al Qaeda also resulted in a small number of transnational suicide attacks against American allies (which represent 2 % of our sample). These incidences are not included in the sample since it not clear which country’s interests were targeted.

  13. See Lindberg (2008, pp. 52–53) for details concerning his methodology and his sources (see Appendix A).

  14. This reduces the sample by three countries: Ghana, Haiti and Uganda.

  15. This database was compiled by The Institute for the Study of Violent Groups at University of New Haven. (http://www.isvg.org/about/partners/).

  16. The four cases refer to the conflicts between the Central African Republic and the Union of Democratic Forces for Unity/The Convention of Patriots for Justice and Peace, between India and the Kuki National Front, between Myanmar and the Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army, and between Togo and the Togolese Movement for Democracy.

  17. We also included the CCE index together with its square to test whether the relationship between terrorism and democracy is hump-shaped as hypothesized by Bueno de Mesquitas (2013), who infers this relationship from a model in which the endogenous choice of rebel tactics depends on the availability of outside opportunities. We did not find any evidence for a hump-shaped relationship, perhaps because suicide attacks are a viable option even under severe political repression, whereas other forms of terrorism are not (indicating again that suicide attacks are not a minor variation of terrorism at large).

  18. For the period 1981–2010, the CPOST database reports a total number of 2233 suicide attacks in 35 countries. We were able to code approximately 99 % of the cases: 2211 attacks in 32 countries. We accessed and downloaded the data in the period September–October 2011.

  19. The Yazidi creed combines elements from Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and other religions. The largest group of Yazidis live in Iraq, near Mosul. The genocidal persecution of the Yazidi in 2014 by the Islamic State (ISIS) led to the American-led attacks on military formations and supply routes of ISIS.

  20. Although according to Alesina (2003) and the CIA’s Factbook the majority of Russians are non-religious, we decided to follow Pape and the MAR database and code Russia as ‘Orthodox Christian’.

  21. See http://www.isvg.org/.

  22. Replacing the democracy-dictatorship variable of Cheibub et al. (2010) by the Constraints on Chief Executive index does not change the inferences regarding the religious cleavage variable, nor other variables.

  23. Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life (2008, p. 39): “Mapping the global Muslim population: a report on the size and distribution of the world's Muslim population”.

  24. Idem, p. 40.

  25. To identify the dominant religion in the Iraqi provinces we employ the map on religions in Iraq created by Dr. Michael Izady and hosted by the Gulf/2000 project website. (available at: http://gulf2000.columbia.edu/images/maps/Iraq_Religions_lg.png).

  26. On systematic warfare and state-supported terror, see Hillman and Potrafke (2015).

References

  • Abadie, A. (2006). Poverty, political freedom, and the roots of terrorism. American Economic Review, 96, 50–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 155–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benmelech, E., Berrebi, C., & Klor, E. (2012). Economic conditions and the quality of suicide terrorism. Journal of Politics, 74, 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, E., & Laitin, D. (2008). Religion, terrorism and public goods: testing the club model. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1942–1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg, S., Broussard, N., & Hess, G. (2011). New wine in old wineskins? Growth, terrorism and the resource curse in sub-Saharan Africa. European Journal of Political Economy, 27, 50–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, M. (2005). Dying to kill: The allure of suicide terror. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozzoli, C., & Müller, C. (2011). Perceptions and attitudes following a terrorist shock: evidence from the UK. European Journal of Political Economy, 27, 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bueno de Mesquitas, E. (2013). Rebel tactics. Journal of Political Economy, 121, 323–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruso, R., & Schneider, F. (2011). The socio-economic determinants of terrorism and political violence in Western Europe (1994–2007). European Journal of Political Economy, 27, 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheibub, J., Gandhi, J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2010). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 143, 67–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collard-Wexler, S., Pischedda, C., & Smith, M. G. (2014). Do foreign occupations cause suicide attacks? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58, 625–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. (2007). A critique to Robert Pape’s dying to win. Journal of Strategic Studies, 30, 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher, A., & Gassebner, M. (2008). Does political proximity to the U.S. cause terror? Economics Letters, 99(1), 27–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher, A., Gassebner, M., & Siemers, L.-H. (2011). Does terrorism threaten human rights? Evidence from panel data. Journal of Law and Economics, 53, 65–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, W., Hoover, G. A., & Sandler, T. (2014). The changing nonlinear relationship between income and terrorism. Journal of Conflict Resolution. doi:10.1177/0022002714535252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, W., Sachsida, A., & Sandler, T. (2006). The impact of transnational terrorism on U.S. foreign direct investment. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 517–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, W., & Sandler, T. (2006). The political economy of terrorism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, W., Sandler, T., & Cauley, J. (1990). Assessing the impact of terrorist-thwarting policies: An intervention time series approach. Defence and Peace Economics, 2, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, W., Sandler, T., & Gaibulloev, K. (2011). Domestic versus transnational terrorism: Data, decomposition, and dynamics. Journal of Peace Research, 48, 319–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. (2012). The religious wave: Religion and domestic conflict from 1960 to 2009. Civil Wars, 14, 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freytag, A., Krüger, J., Meierrieks, D., & Schneider, F. (2011). The origins of terrorism: Cross-country estimates of socio-economic determinants of terrorism. European Journal of Political Economy, 27, 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaibulloev, K., Sandler, T., & Sul, D. (2014). Dynamic panel analysis under cross-sectional dependence. Political Analysis, 22, 258–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassebner, M., & Luechinger, S. (2011). Lock, stock, and barrel: A comprehensive assessment of the determinants of terror. Public Choice, 149, 235–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleditsch, N. P., Wallensteen, P., Eriksson, M., Sollenberg, M., & Strand, H. (2002). Armed conflict 1946–2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 39, 615–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henne, P. (2012). The ancient fire: Religion and suicide terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 24, 38–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. L., & Potrafke, N. (2015). The UN Goldstone Report and retraction: an empirical investigation. Public Choice, 163, 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, M. (2010). Non-state actors and the diffusion of innovations: The case of suicide terrorism. International Organization, 64, 33–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao-Rei Hicks, M., Dardagan, H., Bagnall, P., Spagat, M., & Sloboda, J. (2011). Casualties in civilians and coalition soldiers from suicide bombings in Iraq, 2003–2010: A descriptive study. The Lancet, 378(9794), 906–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israeli, R. (2002). A manual of Islamic fundamentalist terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 14, 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kis-Katos, K., Liebert, H., & Schulze, G. G. (2011). On the origin of domestic and international terrorism. European Journal of Political Economy, 27, 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kis-Katos, K., Liebert, H., & Schulze, G. G. (2014). On the heterogeneity of terror. European Economic Review, 68, 116–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollias, C., Manou, E., Papadamou, S., & Stagiannis, A. (2011). Stock markets and terrorist attacks: Comparative evidence from a large and a small capitalization market. European Journal of Political Economy, 27, 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, T., & Meierrieks, D. (2011). What causes terrorism? Public Choice, 147, 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurrild-Klitgaard, P., Justesen, M. K., & Klemmensen, R. (2006). The political economy of freedom, democracy and transnational terrorism. Public Choice, 128, 289–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, J. E. (2008). Running on faith? A quantitative analysis of the effect of religious cleavage on the intensity and duration of internal conflicts. Master’s Thesis. University of Oslo.

  • Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malečková, J., & Stanišić, D. (2011). Public opinion and terrorist acts. European Journal of Political Economy, 27, 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M. G., Jaggers, K., & Gurr, T. R. (2013). Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2012: Dataset users’ manual. Center for Systemic Peace.

  • Michel-Kerjan, E., & Raschky, P. A. (2011). The effects of government intervention on the market for corporate terrorism insurance. European Journal of Political Economy, 27, 122–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pape, R. (2003). The strategic loss of suicide terrorism. American Political Science Review, 97(3), 343–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pape, R. (2005). Dying to win: The strategic loss of suicide terrorism. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pape, R., & Feldman, J. (2010). Cutting the fuse: the explosion of global suicide terrorism and how to stop it. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, A. (2005). Suicide terrorism. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life (2008). Mapping the global Muslim population: A report on the size and distribution of the world’s Muslim population. Pew Research Center.

  • Piazza, J. A. (2008). A supply-side view of suicide-terrorism: A cross-national study. Journal of Politics, 28, 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittel, K., & Rübbelke, D. T. G. (2006). What directs a terrorist? Defence and Peace Economics, 17, 311–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittel, K., & Rübbelke, D. T. G. (2012). Decision processes of a suicide bomber—The economics and psychology of attacking and defecting. Defence and Peace Economics, 23, 251–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAND Database of Worldwide Terrorism Incidents [Data file]. Retrieved from: http://smapp.rand.org/rwtid.

  • Rapoport, D. (2004). The four waves of modern terrorism. In A. K. Cronin & J. Ludes (Eds.), Attacking terrorism: Elements of a grand strategy (pp. 46–73). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasler, K., & Thompson, W. R. (2009). Looking for waves of terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 21, 24–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, T., & Enders, W. (2004). An economic perspective on transnational terrorism. European Journal of Political Economy, 20, 301–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santifort-Jordan, C., & Sandler, T. (2014). An empirical study of suicide terrorism: A global analysis. Southern Economic Journal, 80, 981–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savun, B., & Phillips, B. J. (2009). Democracy, foreign policy, and terrorism. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(6), 878–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, M. (2007). Inspiration and the origins of global waves of terrorism. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 30, 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, K., & McCauley, C. (2014). Suicide bombers in Iraq, 2003–2010: Disaggregating targets can reveal insurgent motives and priorities. Terrorism and Political Violence, 26, 803–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shortland, A., & Vothknecht, M. (2011). Combating “maritime terrorism” off the coast of Somalia. European Journal of Political Economy, 27, 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shughart, W. F, I. I. (2006). An analytic history of terrorism, 1945–2000. Public Choice, 128, 7–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, I. (2007). Fighting with faith: Religion and conflict resolution in civil wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51, 930–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, S. J., & Reiter, D. (2007). Does democracy matter? Regime type and suicide terrorism. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51, 329–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Axel Dreher, Martin Gassebner, Arye Hillman, William F. Shughart II, four referees and the participants of the World Public Choice Meetings 2012 in Miami and the Prague Conference on Political Economy 2012 for helpful comments. Ha Quyen Ngo provided excellent research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niklas Potrafke.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 11 and 12.

Table 11 Summary statistics of conflict-based data
Table 12 Summary statistics of country-based data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Filote, A., Potrafke, N. & Ursprung, H. Suicide attacks and religious cleavages. Public Choice 166, 3–28 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0310-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0310-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation