Abstract
In their 2015 study, Sharon Green-Hennessy and Kevin D. Hennessy addressed an important gap in the literature on seclusion and restraint use in child and adolescent residential treatment centers (RTCs). Their analysis revealed that several facility-level characteristics—such as facility size and ownership—predicted the use of seclusion/restraint in child/adolescent RTCs. The authors also examined patient demographic variables that were significant predictors of seclusion/restraint in prior research on individual patients within facilities. However, Green-Hennessy and Hennessy did not find any relationship between these demographic variables and seclusion/restraint. In this commentary I argue that the null relationship between patient demographics and seclusion/restraint was a result of an ecological fallacy. Rather than attempting to use aggregate patient data to infer individual-level processes, this patient data should be used to study aggregate effects. I demonstrate that by re-conceptualizing these patient demographics as indicative of facility characteristics, rather than patient characteristics, new information can be gleaned about the types of facilities that use seclusion/restraint. The arguments presented here have broader implications for future research in this field that relies on aggregate patient data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Green-Hennessy S, Hennessy KD. Predictors of Seclusion or Restraint Use Within Residential Treatment Centers for Children and Adolescents. Psychiatric Quarterly. 2015;86(4):545–54.
Valenkamp M, Delaney K, Verheij F. Reducing Seclusion and Restraint During Child and Adolescent Inpatient Treatment: Still an Underdeveloped Area of Research. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing. 2014;27(4):169–74.
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (2015). National Mental Health Services Survey (N-MHSS), 2010. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2015-11-23. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34945.v3
Donovan A, Plant R, Peller A, Siegel L, Martin A. Two-Year Trends in the Use of Seclusion and Restraint Among Psychiatrically Hospitalized Youths. Psychiatric Services. 2003;54(7):987–93.
Furre A, Sandvik L, Heyerdahl S, Friis S, Knutzen M, Hanssen-Bauer K. Characteristics of Adolescents Subjected to Restraint in Acute Psychiatric Units in Norway: A Case-Control Study. Psychiatric Services. 2014;65(11):1367–72.
Andrés Martin MD, RN MPHHK, Frank Esposito MA, Dorothy Stubbe MD, Laurie Cardona PD. Reduction of Restraint and Seclusion Through Collaborative Problem Solving: A Five-Year Prospective Inpatient Study. Psychiatric Services. 2008;59(12):1406–12.
Stewart SL, Baiden P, Theall-Honey L. Factors associated with the use of intrusive measures at a tertiary care facility for children and youth with mental health and developmental disabilities. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 2013;22(1):56–68.
Delaney KR, Fogg L. Patient Characteristics and Setting Variables Related to Use of Restraint on Four Inpatient Psychiatric Units for Youths. Psychiatric Services. 2005;56(2):186–92.
Firebaugh G. A Rule for Inferring Individual-Level Relationships from Aggregate Data. American Sociological Review. 1978;43(4):557–72.
Hammond JL. Two Sources of Error in Ecological Correlations. American Sociological Review. 1973;38(6):764–77.
Finney JW, Humphreys K, Kivlahan DR, Harris AHS. Why Health Care Process Performance Measures Can Have Different Relationships to Outcomes for Patients and Hospitals: Understanding the Ecological Fallacy. American Journal of Public Health. 2011;101(9):1635–42.
Localio AR, Berlin JA, Ten Have TR, Kimmel SE. Adjustments for center in multicenter studies: an overview. Annals of internal medicine. 2001;135(2):112–23.
Duncan C, Jones K, Moon G. Context, composition and heterogeneity: using multilevel models in health research. Social science & medicine. 1998;46(1):97–117.
Acknowledgements
I wish to acknowledge Professor Thomas Soehl and Professor Amélie Quesnel-Vallée for their valuable advice and feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levesque, A.R. Commentary on “Predictors of Seclusion or Restraint Use Within Residential Treatment Centers for Children and Adolescents” by Green-Hennessy and Hennessy. Psychiatr Q 90, 421–429 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-019-09634-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-019-09634-3