Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mental Capacity Assessments Among Inpatients Referred to the Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Unit at a University Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand

  • Published:
Psychiatric Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clinicians routinely assess patients’ mental capacity on a daily basis, but a more thorough assessment may be needed in complex cases. We aimed to identify the characteristics of inpatients in a general hospital, who were referred to a liaison psychiatry service for mental capacity assessment, reasons for the referrals, and the factors associated with their mental capacity. A 6-year retrospective study (2008–2013) was conducted using data collected routinely (e.g., age, gender, diagnosis, Thai Mental State Examination score, reasons for the referral, and the outcome of capacity assessment) on referrals for mental capacity assessment to a Consultation-liaison Psychiatry Unit at a university hospital in Thailand. Among 6194 consecutive referrals to the liaison-psychiatry services, only 0.6 % [n = 37, mean age (SD), 59.83 (20.42)] were referred for capacity assessment, 43.24 % of which lacked mental capacity. The most common requests from referring physicians were for assessment of testamentary capacity (15 assessed, 53.33 % lacking capacity), financial management capacity (14 assessed, 50 % lacking capacity), and capacity to consent to treatment (9 assessed, 22.22 % lacking capacity). Delirium, rather than dementia or other mental disorders, was associated with mental incapacity (p < 0.001) and being more dependent during the admission (p = 0.048). There were no significant differences for mean age (p = 0.257) or Thai Mental State Examination score (p = 0.206). The main request from referring clinicians was to assess testamentary capacity. Delirium and being more dependent during the admission were associated with lack of mental capacity, whereas age and dementia were not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

TMSE:

Thai Mental State Examination

GAF:

Global assessment of functioning

SD:

Standard deviation

df:

Degree of freedom

IQR:

Interquartile range

χ2 :

Chi square test

U:

Mann–Whitney U test

F:

Fisher-Exact test

References

  1. Banner NF: Unreasonable reasons: normative judgements in the assessment of mental capacity. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18(5):1038–1044, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Okai D, Owen G, Mcguire H, Singh S, Churchill R, Hotopf M: Mental capacity in psychiatric patients: Systematic review. The British Journal of Psychiatry 191(4):291–297, 2007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cairns R, Maddock C, Buchanan A, David AS, Hayward P, Richardson G, Szmukler G, Hotopf M: Reliability of mental capacity assessments in psychiatric in-patients. The British Journal of Psychiatry 187(4):372–378, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Palmer BW, Savla GN, Roesch SC, Jeste DV: Changes in capacity to consent over time in patients involved in psychiatric research. The British Journal of Psychiatry 202(6):454–458, 2013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mujic F, Von Heising M, Stewart RJ, Prince MJ: Mental capacity assessments among general hospital inpatients referred to a specialist liaison psychiatry service for older people. International Psychogeriatrics 21(4):729–737, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thai Medical Council: Thai Physicians by Subspecialty. Bangkok, 2014.

  7. National Statistical Office: Key Statistics of Thailand 2012. Bangkok, 2012.

  8. Thai Medical Council: Medical Competency Assessment Criteria for National License 2012. Bangkok 94, 2012.

  9. Tsoh J, Peisah C, Narumoto J, Wongpakaran N, Wongpakaran T, O’Neill N, Jiang T, Ogano S, Mimura M, Kato Y et al: Comparisons of guardianship laws and surrogate decision-making practices in China, Japan, Thailand and Australia: a review by the Asia Consortium, International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) capacity taskforce. International psychogeriatrics 27(6):1029–1037, 2015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Raymont V, Bingley W, Buchanan A, David AS, Hayward P, Wessely S, Hotopf M: Prevalence of mental incapacity in medical inpatients and associated risk factors: Cross-sectional study. Lancet 364(9443):1421–1427, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Merel SE, Murray SB: Decisional capacity. Hospital Medicine Clinics 2(2):263–273, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Whelan PJ, Oleszek J, Macdonald A, Gaughran F: The utility of the Mini-Mental State Examination in guiding assessment of capacity to consent to research. International Psychogeriatrics 21(2):338–344, 2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Luke L, Redley M, Clare I, Holland A: Hospital clinicians’ attitudes towards a statutory advocacy service for patients lacking mental capacity: implications for implementation. Journal of health services research & policy 13(2):73–78, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramsay H, Roche E, O’Donoghue B: Five years after implementation: A review of the Irish Mental Health Act 2001. International journal of law and psychiatry 36(1):83–91, 2013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pariwatcharakul P: Psychiatric Consultation at Siriraj Hospital in 2005. Bangkok, Mahidol University, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Paholpak S: Psychiatric consultation at Srinagarind Hospital: A report on 271 cases. Journal of Medical Association of Thailand 74(8):329–336, 1991.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Maneeton B, Khemawichanurat W, Maneeton N: Consultation-liaison psychiatry in Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital. ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry 8(2):124–130, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sangkul J, Pitanupong J: Psychiatric consultation at Songklanagarind Hospital. Songklanagarind Medical Journal 18(1):57–63, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Train The Brain Forum Committee: Thai Mental State Examination (TMSE). Siriraj Hospital Gazette 45:359–374, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pariwatcharakul P, Chantarat W, Singhakant S, Jantarak L, Suriyachaiwattana T, Sakulisariyaporn C, Sitdhiraksa N, Chantakarn S, Ketumarn P, Yantadilok S: Antipsychotic prescribing pattern for geriatric patients with delirium in Thailand. Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience 8(3):144–148, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  21. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Owen GS, Szmukler G, Richardson G, David AS, Raymont V, Freyenhagen F, Martin W, Hotopf M: Decision-making capacity for treatment in psychiatric and medical in-patients: Cross-sectional, comparative study. The British Journal of Psychiatry 203(6):461–467, 2013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Seyfried L, Ryan KA, Kim SY: Assessment of decision-making capacity: Views and experiences of consultation psychiatrists. Psychosomatics 54(2):115–123, 2013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lepping P: Overestimating patients’ capacity. The British Journal of Psychiatry 199(5):355–356, 2011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Both of the authors are supported by “Chalermphrakiat” Grant, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University. The authors are thankful to Dr. Woraphat Ratta-apha, Ms. Aree Singlamphong, Ms. Reelawadee Tumsatan and Ms. Boonploy Srimana for their help and comments. This research has been presented in the Royal College of Psychiatrists International Congress 2014, London, UK and the Siriraj International Conference in Medicine and Public Health 2014, Bangkok, Thailand.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Supachoke Singhakant.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Siriraj Institutional Review Board (Certificate of Approval number Si 285/2014).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pariwatcharakul, P., Singhakant, S. Mental Capacity Assessments Among Inpatients Referred to the Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Unit at a University Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. Psychiatr Q 88, 65–73 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-016-9439-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-016-9439-x

Keywords

Navigation