Abstract
Changing teachers’ practice is difficult, especially in low- and middle-income contexts (LMIC). Recently, with attention turning to improving early mathematics in addition to reading outcomes, donors, governments, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are grappling with the design of mathematics interventions and supportive policies. However, there is limited evidence showing how to change teachers’ practices in early mathematics classrooms in LMIC. For this exploratory study, the authors provided 15 kindergarten teachers in Ghana with sequenced mathematics activities, with some teachers receiving low-cost manipulatives (e.g., bottle-cap counters and number cards), and other teachers being asked to create or gather their own. The findings showed that teachers who were given the manipulatives were much more likely than teachers not given the manipulatives to use the activities provided. In addition, the character of the instruction was qualitatively different for teachers who were given the manipulatives. These results, while exploratory, suggest the need for classroom sets of manipulatives when designing an intervention that aims to change teachers’ practices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agbatogun, A. O. (2012). Exploring the efficacy of student response system in a sub-Saharan African country: A sociocultural perspective. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11(1), 249–267.
Angrist, N., Djankov, S., Goldberg, P. K., & Patrinos, H. A. (2019). Measuring human capital. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Ball, D. L. (1992). Magical hopes: Manipulatives and the reform of math education. American Educator: the Professional Journal of the American Federation of Teachers, 16(2), 46–47.
Banerjee, A. V., Cole, S., Duflo, E., & Linden, L. (2007). Remedying education: Evidence from two randomized experiments in India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1235–1264.
Boggan, M., Harper, S., & Whitmire, A. (2010). Using manipulatives to teach elementary mathematics. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3, 1.
Brand, S. T., & Dalton, E. M. (2012). Universal design for learning: Cognitive theory into practice for facilitating comprehension in early literacy. In Forum on Public Policy Online, (1). Oxford Round Table.
Buehl, M. M., & Beck, J. S. (2015). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and teachers’ practices. In International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs. New York, NY: Routledge.
Carbonneau, K. J., Marley, S. C., & Selig, J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 380.
Clarke, P. (2003). Culture and classroom reform: The case of the district primary education project, India. Comparative Education, 39(1), 27–44.
Cuban, L. (1984). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890–1980. In Research on teaching monograph series. New York, NY: Longman.
Cohen, D. K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs, Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 311–329.
DeStefano, J., Slade, T., & Korda, M. (2013). Midterm assessment of the impact of early grade reading and math interventions. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International.
Guajardo, J., Mabeti, F., & Kelly, M. (2013). Numeracy boost Malawi: Endline report. Lilongwe: Save the Children.
Hardman, F., Abd-Kadir, J., Agg, C., Migwi, J., Ndambuku, J., & Smith, F. (2009). Changing pedagogical practice in Kenyan primary schools: The impact of school-based training. Comparative Education, 45(1), 65–86.
Hassler, B., Hennessy, S., & Hofmann, R. (2018). Sustaining and scaling pedagogic innovation in sub-Saharan Africa: Grounded insights for teacher professional development. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(1), 58–78.
Heyward, M., & Sopantini, E. D. (2013). Indonesia: The challenges of quality and equity in education. In L. Symaco (Ed.), Education in South-East Asia (pp. 71–92). London: Bloomsbury.
Jonason, C., Guajardo, J., Nath, B. D., & Hossain, M. (2014). Literacy and numeracy boost Bangladesh: Endline report. Dhaka: Save the Children.
Liu, S. H. (2011). Factors related to pedagogical beliefs of teachers and technology integration. Computers and Education, 56(4), 1012–1022.
National Council for Curriculum and Assessment, Ghana (2019). Kindergarten curriculum (KG 1 and 2). Accra: Ministry of Education. https://nacca.gov.gh/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/KG-Curriculum.pdf
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.
Piper, B., Sitabkhan, Y., & Nderu, E. (2018). Mathematics from the beginning: Evaluating the Tayari Preprimary Program’s impact on early mathematics skills. Global Education Review, 5(3), 57–81.
Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, 2, 102–119.
Schweisfurth, M. (2015). Learner-centred pedagogy: Towards a post-2015 agenda for teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 259–266.
Sitabkhan, Y., & Platas, L. M. (2018). Early mathematics counts: Promising instructional strategies from low-and middle-income countries. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI Press.
Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431.
USAID (2018). USAID education policy. Washington, DC: USAID. https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1865/2018_Education_Policy_FINAL_WEB.pdf
Willingham, D. T. (2017). Ask the cognitive scientist do manipulatives help students learn? American Educator, 6, 7.
World Bank (2019). Ending learning poverty: What will it take? Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/32553
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Sitabkhan, Y., Ampadu, E. Shifting teachers’ practice in early mathematics classrooms in Ghana: A case study. Prospects 52, 157–171 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-021-09578-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-021-09578-2