Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Introduction: Learning to read, from research to policy and practice

  • Open File
  • Published:
PROSPECTS Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This introduction draws together some of the key points arising from the contributions in this timely double special issue. Learning to read is of public concern because of international measurements in education. Learning to read is seen to be complex; it takes place in formal, nonformal, and informal learning contexts—contexts that involve assemblages of identities and artefacts, open to many other ideological pressures and to power plays. It concludes that there is no one right way to teach reading but that researching the existing reading culture is a necessary first step to teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Gutierrez, K. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D., Lachicotte, J., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, E., Degener, S., & Purcell-Gates, V. (2003). Creating authentic materials and activities for the adult literacy classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard, NCSALL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. (2017). Literacies and inequality. In B. Parry, C. Burnett, & G. Merchant (Eds.), Literacy, media, technology: Past, present and future (pp. 63–78). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, M. (2017). Television as a new medium. In B. Parry, C. Burnett, & G. Merchant (Eds.), Literacy, media, technology: Past, present and future (pp. 25–40). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masny, D., & Cole, D. R. (2012). Mapping multiple literacies: An introduction to Deleuzian literacy studies. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, R. (2015). Seeing in and out, to the extended mind through an EEG analysis of page and screen reading. In M. Grabowski (Ed.), Neuroscience and media: New understandings and representations (pp. 89–107). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina, C. L., & Wohlwend, K. E. (2014). Literacy, play and globalization: Converging imaginaries in children’s critical and cultural performances. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, M. (1988). How texts teach what readers learn. Stroud: Thimble Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, B., Burnett, C., & Merchant, G. (2017). Literacy, media, technology: Past, present and future. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A. (2014). The base of the iceberg: Informal learning and its impact on formal and non-formal learning. Study guides in adult education. Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwend, K. E. (2011). Playing their way into literacies. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Rogers.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rogers, A. Introduction: Learning to read, from research to policy and practice. Prospects 46, 357–365 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-017-9407-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-017-9407-8

Keywords

Navigation