Abstract
Parabolic integro-differential nondegenerate Cauchy problem is considered in the scale of Hölder spaces of functions whose regularity is defined by a radially O-regularly varying Lévy measure. Existence and uniqueness and the estimates of the solution are derived.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abels, H., Kassman, M.: The Cauchy problem and the martingale problem for integrodifferential operators with non-smooth kernels. Osaka J. Math. 46, 661–683 (2009)
Aljančić, S., Arandeloviċ, D.: O -regularly varying functions. PIMB (NS) 22(36), 5–22 (1977)
Bingham, N.H., Goldie, C.M., Teugels, J.L.: Regular Variation. Cambridge University Press (1987)
Bass, R.F.: Regularity results of stable-like operators. J. Funct. Anal. 257, 2693–2722 (2009)
Bergh, J., Löfström, J.: Interpolation Spaces. An Introduction. Springer (1976)
Caffarelli, L., Silvestre, L.: Regularity theory for fully nonlinear integro-differential equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 62, 597–638 (2009)
Chang-Lara, H., Dávila, G.: Regularity for solutions of nonlocal parabolic equations. Calc. Var. Partial Diff. Equ. 49(1–2), 139–172 (2014)
Chen, Z., Zhang, X., Zhao, G.: Well posedness of supercritical SDEdriven by Lévy processes with irregular drifts. arXiv:1709.04632 [math.PR] (2017)
Dellacherie, C., Meyer, P.-A.: Probabilities and Potential -A. North-Holland (1978)
Dong, H., Kim, D.: Schauder estimates for a class of non-local elliptic equations. Discrete Cont. Dyn.-A 33(6), 2319–2347 (2013)
Farkas, W., Jacob, N., Schilling, R.L.: Function spaces related to continuous negative definite functions: ψ-Bessel potential spaces. Diss. Math., 1–60 (2001)
Farkas, W., Leopold, H.G.: Characterization of function spaces of generalized smoothness. Annali di Matematica 185, 1–62 (2006)
Kalyabin, G.A.: Description of functions in classes of Besov-Lizorkin-Triebel type. Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov 156, 160–173 (1980)
Kalyabin, G.A., Lizorkin, P.I.: Spaces of functions of generalized smoothness. Math. Nachr. 133, 7–32 (1987)
Karamata, J.: Sur un mode de croissance regulière des fonctions. Mathematica (Cluj) 4, 38–53 (1930)
Kim, P., Song, R., Vondraček, Z.: Heat Kernels of non-symmetric jump processes: Beyond the stable case. Potential Anal. 49(1), 37–90 (2018)
Mikulevičius, R., Pragarauskas, H: On the Cauchy problem for parabolic integro-differential operators in Hölder classes and the uniqueness of the Martingale problem. Potential Anal. 40(4), 539–563 (2014)
Schwab, R., Silvestre, L.: Regularity for parabolic integro-differential equations with very irregular kernels. Analysis PDE 9(3), 727–772 (2016)
Silvestre, L.: Hölder estimates for solutions of integro-differential equations like the fractional Laplace. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 55(3), 1155–1174 (2006)
Xu, F.: On the Cauchy problem for parabolic integro-differential equations with space-dependent coefficients in generalized Hölder classes. arXiv:1810.00677 [math.PR] (2018)
Acknowledgements
We are very grateful to our reviewer for valuable comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
We simply state a few results that were used in this paper. Let \(\nu \in \mathfrak {A}^{\alpha }\), and
We assume that w = wν is an O-RV function at zero, i.e.,
By Theorem 2 in [2], the following limits exist:
Lemma 8
Assume w = wν is an O-RV function at zero.
-
a)
Let β > 0 and τ > −βp1. There is C > 0 so that
$$ {{\int}_{0}^{x}}t^{\tau }w\left( t\right)^{\beta }\frac{dt}{t}\leq Cx^{\tau }w\left( x\right)^{\beta },x\in (0,1], $$and \(\lim _{x\rightarrow 0}x^{\tau }w\left (x\right )^{\beta }=0.\)
-
b)
Let β > 0 and τ < −βq1. There is C > 0 so that
$$ {{\int}_{x}^{1}}t^{\tau }w\left( t\right)^{\beta }\frac{dt}{t}\leq Cx^{\tau }w\left( x\right)^{\beta },x\in (0,1],\text{ } $$and \(\lim _{x\rightarrow 0}x^{\tau }w\left (x\right )^{\beta }=\infty .\)
-
c)
Let β < 0 and τ > −βq1. There is C > 0 so that
$$ {{\int}_{0}^{x}}t^{\tau }w\left( t\right)^{\beta }\frac{dt}{t}\leq Cx^{\tau }w\left( x\right)^{\beta },x\in (0,1], $$and \(\lim _{x\rightarrow 0}x^{\tau }w\left (x\right )^{\beta }=0.\)
-
d)
Let β < 0 and τ < −βp1. There is C > 0 so that
$$ {{\int}_{x}^{1}}t^{\tau }w\left( t\right)^{\beta }\frac{dt}{t} ={\int}_{1}^{x^{-1}}t^{-\tau }w\left( \frac{1}{t}\right)^{\beta }\frac{dt}{t} \leq Cx^{\tau }w\left( x\right)^{\beta },x\in (0,1], $$and \(\lim _{x\rightarrow 0}x^{\tau }w\left (x\right )^{\beta }=\infty .\)
Proof
The claims follow easily by Theorems 3, 4 in [2]. Because of the similarities, we will prove c) only. Let β < 0 and τ > −βq1 . Then
Hence \(w\left (\frac {1}{t}\right )^{\beta },t\geq 1\), is an O-RV function at infinity with
Then for x ∈ (0, 1],
by Theorem 3 in [2], and \(\lim _{x\rightarrow 0}x^{\tau }w\left (x\right )^{\beta }=0\) according to Theorem 4 in [2]. □
Corollary 5
Assume w = wν is an O-RV function at zero and p1 > 0. Let N > 1,β > 0. Then
Proof
Indeed,
because, by Lemma 8a),
□
We will need some Lévy measure moment estimates.
Lemma 9
Let \(\nu \in \mathfrak {A}^{\alpha },\)andw = wν be an O-RV function at zero with p1,q1 defined in Eq. 1. Assume
Then
-
(i)
$$ \begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} \sup_{R\in (0,1]}{\int}_{\mathbf{R}^{d}}\left( \left\vert y\right\vert \wedge 1\right) \tilde{\nu}_{R}\left( dy\right) &<&\infty \text{ if }\alpha \in \left( 0,1\right) , \\ \sup_{R\in (0,1]}{\int}_{\mathbf{R}^{d}}\left( \left\vert y\right\vert^{2}\wedge 1\right) \tilde{\nu}_{R}\left( dy\right) &<&\infty \text{ if } \alpha =1, \\ \sup_{R\in (0,1]}{\int}_{\mathbf{R}^{d}}\left( \left\vert y\right\vert^{2}\wedge \left\vert y\right\vert \right) \tilde{\nu}_{R}\left( dy\right) &<&\infty \text{ if }\alpha \in (1,2). \end{array} $$
-
(ii)
$$ \inf_{R\in (0,1]}{\int}_{\left\vert y\right\vert \leq 1}\left\vert y\right\vert^{2}\tilde{\nu}_{R}\left( dy\right) \geq c_{1}, $$
for some c1 > 0.
Proof
-
(i)
Let α ∈ (0, 1) . Then by Lemma 8 (recall \( \nu _{R}\left (dy\right ) =\nu \left (Rdy\right ) ,\tilde {\nu }_{R}\left (dy\right ) =w\left (R\right ) \nu _{R}\left (dy\right ) ,\delta \left (R\right ) =w\left (R\right )^{-1}\)),
$$ \begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} {\int}_{\left\vert y\right\vert \leq 1}\left\vert y\right\vert \nu_{R}\left( dy\right) &=&R^{-1}{\int}_{\left\vert y\right\vert \leq R}\left\vert y\right\vert \nu \left( dy\right) \\ &=&R^{-1}{{\int}_{0}^{R}}[\delta \left( s\right) -\delta \left( R\right) ]ds, \end{array} $$and
$$ {\int}_{\mathbf{R}_{0}^{d}}\left( \left\vert y\right\vert \wedge 1\right) \tilde{\nu}_{R}\left( dy\right) =R^{-1}w\left( R\right) {{\int}_{0}^{R}}w\left( s\right)^{-1}ds\leq C,~R\in (0,1]. $$
Let α = 1. Then similarly using Lemma 8, we have
Let α ∈ (1, 2). Then similarly,
and with R ∈ (0, 1],
Hence, by Lemma 8,
-
(ii)
By Eq. 2, for R ∈ (0, 1],
$$ \begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} {\int}_{\left\vert y\right\vert \leq 1}\left\vert y\right\vert^{2}\tilde{\nu} _{R}\left( dy\right) &=&w\left( R\right) {\int}_{\left\vert y\right\vert \leq 1}\left\vert y\right\vert^{2}\nu_{R}\left( dy\right) \\ &=&2R^{-2}{{\int}_{0}^{R}}s^{2}\left[\frac{w\left( R\right) }{w\left( s\right) }-1\right] \frac{ds}{s}=2{{\int}_{0}^{1}}s^{2}\left[\frac{w\left( R\right) }{w\left( Rs\right) } -1\right]\frac{ds}{s}. \end{array} $$Hence, by Fatou’s lemma,
$$ \underline{\lim }_{R\rightarrow 0}{\int}_{\left\vert y\right\vert \leq 1}\left\vert y\right\vert^{2}\tilde{\nu}_{R}\left( dy\right) \geq 2{{\int}_{0}^{1}}s^{2}\left[\frac{1}{r_{1}\left( s\right) }-1\right]\frac{ds}{s}=c_{1}>0 $$if |{s ∈ [0, 1] : r1 (s) < 1}| > 0, because
$$ \lim \inf_{R\rightarrow 0}\frac{w\left( R\right) }{w\left( Rs\right) }=\frac{ 1}{\lim \sup_{R\rightarrow 0}\frac{w\left( Rs\right) }{w\left( R\right) }}= \frac{1}{r_{1}\left( s\right) },~s\in (0,1]. $$
□
According to [9], Chapter 3, 70-74, any Lévy measure \(\nu \in \mathfrak {A}^{\alpha }\) can be disintegrated as
where δ = δν, and π (r,dw),r > 0, is a measurable family of measures on the unit sphere Sd− 1 with π (r,Sd− 1) = 1,r > 0. The following is a straightforward consequence of Lemma 9(ii).
Corollary 6
Let \(\nu \in \mathfrak {A}^{\alpha },\)
where δ = δν,π (r,dw), r > 0, is a measurable family of measures on Sd− 1 with π (r,Sd− 1) = 1, r > 0. Assume \(w=w_{\nu }=\delta _{\nu }^{-1}\) is an O-RV function at zero satisfying assumptions of Lemma 9, and
Then assumption B holds.
Proof
Indeed, for \(\left \vert \hat {\xi }\right \vert =1,R\in (0,1],\) with C > 0,
Hence by Lemma 9(ii),
□
Remark 1
Let α ∈ (0, 2) , \(\nu \in \mathfrak {A}^{\alpha }\), and wν be an O-RV function at zero, p1 > 0. By Theorems 3 and 4 in [2], for any σ ∈ (0,p1),
as r → 0. Hence p1 ≤ α. On the other hand for any σ > q1, by Lemma 9,
and α ≤ q1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mikulevičius, R., Xu, F. On the Cauchy Problem for Nondegenerate Parabolic Integro-Differential Equations in the Scale of Generalized Hölder Spaces. Potential Anal 53, 839–870 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11118-019-09789-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11118-019-09789-5