Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bridging Culture and Technology: A Study of E-Government Adoption

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of this study was to check the direct and moderating effects of the dimensions of the national culture, based on the Cultural Dimensions Theory, about the offer of E-Government services. The direct effect of the technological infrastructure installed in the countries on their E-Government levels was also tested. Data from 55 countries were analyzed and indicated technological infrastructure and individualism are direct antecedents of E-Government. This research shows policymakers and practitioners should prioritize the enhancement of technological infrastructure and consider the cultural orientation of individualism in their strategies to promote the adoption and efficiency of E-Government services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alomari, M., Woods, P., & Sandhu, K. (2012). Predictors for e-government adoption in Jordan: Deployment of an empirical evaluation based on a citizen-centric approach. Information Technology & People, 25(2), 207–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alshehri, M., Drew, S., & Alghamdi, R. (2018). The role of national culture on citizen adoption of eGovernment services: An empirical study. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 13(3), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk, S., Maseland, R., Onrust, M., van Hoorn, A., & Slangen, A. (2015). Cultural distance in international business and management: From mean-based to variance-based measures. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(2), 165–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonatto, K. S., Motoki, F. Y. S., Filho, B., J. E., & Mainardes, E. W. (2022). Social accountability: E-monitoring public management in an emerging economy. Public Organization Review, 22(1), 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chui, A. C., & Kwok, C. C. (2008). National culture and life insurance consumption. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(1), 88–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girish, J., Williams, C. B., & Yates, D. J. (2014). Predictors of on-line services and e-participation: A cross-national comparison. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 526–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. A., Myers, M. B., & Harvey, M. G. (2006). An investigation of national culture’s influence on relationship and knowledge resources in interorganizational relationships between Japan and the United States. Journal of International Marketing, 14(3), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. A., Yalcinkaya, G., & Rubera, G. (2014). Country-level performance of new experience products in a global rollout: The moderating effects of economic wealth and national culture. Journal of International Marketing, 22(4), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice-Hall.

  • Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill.

  • Hofstede, G. H., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Revised and expanded (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage publications.

  • Huang, X., Rode, J. C., & Schroeder, R. G. (2011). Organizational structure and continuous improvement and learning: Moderating effects of cultural endorsement of participative leadership. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(9), 1103–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalil, O. E. (2011). e-Government readiness: Does national culture matter? Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 388–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, S., & Lymm, J. (2016). Determinants of virtual social networks diffusion: Insights from cross-country data. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 691–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, S., & Teo, T. S. (2012). Moderating effects of governance on information infrastructure and e-government development. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 63(10), 1929–1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., Baishya, K., Sadarangani, P. H., & Samalia, H. V. (2020). Cultural influence on e–Government development. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 23(1), 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., Baishya, K., Sreen, N., Sadarangani, P. H., & Samalia, H. V. (2021). Impact of national culture on E-government development: A longitudinal study. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 29(2), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marôco, J. (2014). Análise de equações estruturais. Pêro Pinheiro, Report Number.

  • McNabb, D. E., & Barnowe, J. T. (2009). Trends shaping public sector transformation: Knowledge management, e-government and enterprise architecture. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 8(01), 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros, J., & Demo, G. (2020). Attributes of a relationship management model for the public sector (CiRS exec). Brazilian Business Review, 18(1), 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam, T. (2018). Examining the anti-corruption effect of e-government and the moderating effect of national culture: A cross-country study. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 273–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawafleh, S. (2018). The role of Mobile Applications in Jordanian Public-Sector e-Government services: Empirical study in Jordanian income and sales tax department. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 17(01).

  • Raschendorfer, E., Figueira, A., & Furtado, L. (2022). Elements that impact building a public governance model in Brazil: The case of the Brazilian navy. Brazilian Business Review, 20(1), 76–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaupp, L. C., Carter, L., & McBride, M. E. (2010). E-file adoption: A study of US taxpayers’ intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 636–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siau, K., & Long, Y. (2004, May). A stage model for e-government implementation. In 15th Information Resource Management Association International Conference (IRMA'04), New Orleans, LA (pp. 23-26).

  • Siau, K., & Long, Y. (2005). Synthesizing e-government stage models–A meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(4), 443–458.

  • Silal, P., & Saha, D. (2021). E-Government as a tool for human development: The moderating influence of national culture. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 24(4), 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souza, F. V., Motoki, F. Y., Mainardes, E. W., & Azzari, V. (2022). Public corporate e-learning: Antecedents and results. Public Organization Review, 22(4), 1139–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S. C., & Teo, T. S. (2010). E-government, e-business, and national economic performance. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 26(1), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, P. L., Ku, C. Y., & Shih, D. H. (2015). An implementation framework for E-Government 2.0. Telematics and Informatics, 32(3), 504–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takai, T. M. (2013). Adoption of the national information exchange model within the Department of Defense [Memorandum]. Department of Defense.

  • Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2010). Examining the impact of culture’s consequences: A three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede’s cultural value dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN, E. (2016). eGovernment in support of sustainable development. United Nations eGovernment Survey.

  • Whitmore, A. (2012). A statistical analysis of the construction of the United Nations E-Government development index. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yavwa, Y., & Twinomurinzi, H. (2018). Impact of culture on e-government adoption using UTAUT: A case of Zambia. In 2018 International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG) (pp. 356–360). IEEE.

  • Zhang, X., De Pablos, P. O., & Xu, Q. (2014). Culture effects on the knowledge sharing in multi-national virtual classes: A mixed method. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 491–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, F. (2011). Impact of national culture on e-government development: A global study. Internet Research, 21(3), 362–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, F., Shen, K. N., & Collier, A. (2014). Effects of national culture on e-government diffusion—A global study of 55 countries. Information & Management, 51(8), 1005–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, F., Wallis, J., & Singh, M. (2015). E-government development and the digital economy: A reciprocal relationship. Internet Research, 25(5), 734–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq/Brazil), project 307202/2021-6, by Foundation for Research Support of Espírito Santo (FAPES/Brazil), projects 2022-687ZR (644/2022), 2022-31G9Q (1010/2022) and 2022-1RJWJ (323/2023), by Portuguese Science Foundation (FCT/Portugal) through NECE (Núcleo de Estudos em Ciências Empresariais), project UID/GES/04630/2020, and by IFTS (Instituto Fucape de Tecnologias Sociais), project 2021–2024.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emerson Wagner Mainardes.

Ethics declarations

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Our study follows all ethical standards applicable to our research.

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

In our research, this is not applicable.

Informed Consent

In our research, this is not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marchiori, D.M., Mainardes, E.W. & de Ascensão Gouveia Rodrigues, R.J. Bridging Culture and Technology: A Study of E-Government Adoption. Public Organiz Rev (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-024-00761-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-024-00761-5

Keywords

Navigation