Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Same-Sex, Same Health? Health Concordance Among Same-Sex and Different-Sex Couples

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Health concordance–health similarity between intimate partners–is understudied among different-sex cohabiting, same-sex cohabiting, and same-sex married couples due to an overwhelming focus on different-sex married couples. I explore whether existing research and theory extends to health concordance among different-sex cohabiting and same-sex couples. Additionally, I examine health concordance as a site of population health disparities at the couple level. I use the 2008–2018 IPUMS National Health Interview Surveys to perform multinomial logistic regressions of poor-to-fair health and activity limitations concordance on union status, demographic similarity, and socioeconomic resources. Health concordance is common among all couples, characterizing at least 86% of each union status. Marital status differentiates concordance risk for different-sex couples, but not same-sex couples. Same-sex female couples face higher risks of health discordance and concordant disadvantaged health than many other couples, both of which represent major health disadvantages. Union status affects health concordance risk for couples in ways that cannot be easily reduced to marriage, gender, or sex composition. Negative health concordance, especially for same-sex female couples and different-sex cohabitors, warrants further attention as a site of health inequalities. Socioeconomic resources may play a major role in promoting positive health concordance among couples, which could inform policy levers to improve couple health. Health concordance is a site of health disparities because the risk of partners’ concordance in poor health varies considerably depending on union status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Public use data available at https://nhis.ipums.org/nhis/.

Code Availability

Contact author.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Dr. Jennifer Malat, Dr. Danielle Bessett, Dr. Christopher Carpenter, and Dr. Rin Reczek for their comments and suggestions during the writing of this manuscript. Their mentorship and guidance was extremely helpful in shaping this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Russell Spiker.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

Evaluated as “exempt” by Vanderbilt University IRB.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 28 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spiker, R. Same-Sex, Same Health? Health Concordance Among Same-Sex and Different-Sex Couples. Popul Res Policy Rev 40, 1313–1340 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-021-09654-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-021-09654-7

Keywords

Navigation