Skip to main content
Log in

Common mycorrhizal networks asymmetrically improve chickpea N and P acquisition and cause overyielding by a millet/chickpea mixture

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

Cereal/legume intercropping often increases yield, partly because of increased nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) acquisition. The aim of this paper was to investigate the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal common mycorrhizal networks (CMNs) in overyielding by the millet (Setaria italica L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) mixture and to find out if the effect of a CMN depends on which of the two species was first colonized by AM fungi (AMF).

Methods

Microcosms with two compartments were used, separated by a 30-μm nylon mesh. Both compartments contained either chickpea or millet, in monoculture or mixed. One or none of the two compartments was inoculated with the AMF species Funneliformis mosseae. The plant in the inoculated compartment was referred to as the donor, and the plant in the neighboring, non-inoculated compartment as the receiver.

Results

Inoculation in one compartment resulted in mycorrhiza formation in the other compartment, providing evidence for the formation of CMNs. Inoculation of chickpea in the mixture increased N and P acquisition and biomass of both chickpea (donor) and millet (receiver) leading to overyielding of the mixture, whereas inoculation of millet increased biomass of chickpea (receiver) only, but did not increase N or P acquisition by any of the two species, and there was no overyielding. Chickpea as donor had higher numbers of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria in its rhizosphere compared to chickpea as receiver. The shoot N:P ratio of chickpea as donor was lower than as receiver.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated asymmetry in nutrient gains by a mixture of a cereal and a legume, dependent on which plant species was the donor or receiver. This suggests that initiating mycorrhizal networks by legumes in intercropping could be an important factor contributing to the magnitude of the intercropping effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by National Key R & D Program of China (2017YFD0200200/2017YFD0200202) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (32002127). We acknowledge constructive comments by the editor and three reviewers on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.

Code availability

Not relevant to the study.

Funding

This research was supported by National Key R & D Program of China (2017YFD0200200/2017YFD0200202) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (32002127).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.L., J.Z., H.L., and F.Z. designed the study. C.L. collected the data. C.L., J.Z., E.H., and T.K. performed statistical analyses and led the writing and revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Haigang Li or Junling Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Jan Jansa.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 237 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, C., Li, H., Hoffland, E. et al. Common mycorrhizal networks asymmetrically improve chickpea N and P acquisition and cause overyielding by a millet/chickpea mixture. Plant Soil 472, 279–293 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05232-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05232-0

Keywords

Navigation