Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dopamine agonists in prolactinomas: when to withdraw?

  • Published:
Pituitary Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dopamine agonists (DAs) are well recognized as the first-line therapy for prolactinomas due to their efficacy in achieving tumoral shrinkage and normoprolactinemia. However, it remains to be established the best timing to withdraw DAs and in which patients this should be attempted. Studies in the 1980s, mainly using bromocriptine, started to defy the concept that DAs should be regarded as a lifelong therapy considering that sustained normoprolactinemia was attained in a small subset of patients after drug withdrawal. The introduction of the more effective agent cabergoline led to an increase in the percentages of remission. The most recent meta-analysis on the topic stated than remission rates after withdrawal can range from 15% in macroprolactinoma patients treated with bromocriptine to 41% in those with microprolactinomas previously treated with cabergoline. When more stringent criteria were applied before attempting withdrawal, sustained remission ensued in more than 50% of the individuals. Treatment duration for more than 24 months, the achievement of normoprolactinemia, marked reduction (≥ 50%) in tumoral size and DAs tapering till a low maintenance dose (e.g. cabergoline 0.5 mg/week) have been the most consistently identified predictors of success. In addition, a growing amount of evidence suggests that the post-pregnancy/breastfeeding period and menopause are reasonable timings to re-access the need for continuing DAs therapy. Considering that the achievement of sustained normoprolactinemia is still far from being universal after the withdrawal, even in highly selected cohorts, future larger prospective studies should continue to address this issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Melmed S et al (2011) Diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96(2):273–288

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. dos Santos Nunes V et al (2011) Cabergoline versus bromocriptine in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis. Pituitary 14(3):259–265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Di Sarno A et al (2000) The effect of quinagolide and cabergoline, two selective dopamine receptor type 2 agonists, in the treatment of prolactinomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 53(1):53–60

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maiter D (2019) Management of dopamine agonist-resistant prolactinoma. Neuroendocrinology 109:42–50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zygourakis CC et al (2017) Cost-effectiveness analysis of surgical versus medical treatment of prolactinomas. J Neurol Surg Part B 78(2):125–131

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ananthakrishnan S (2017) The dark side of dopamine agonist therapy in prolactinoma management. AACE Clin Case Rep 3(4):e384–e386

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bancos I et al (2014) Impulse control disorders in patients with dopamine agonist-treated prolactinomas and nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: a case–control study. Clin Endocrinol 80(6):863–868

    Google Scholar 

  8. Simonis G, Fuhrmann JT, Strasser RH (2007) Meta-analysis of heart valve abnormalities in Parkinson’s disease patients treated with dopamine agonists. Mov Disord 22(13):1936–1942

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Trifirò G et al (2012) Risk of cardiac valve regurgitation with dopamine agonist use in Parkinson’s disease and hyperprolactinaemia. Drug Saf 35(2):159–171

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mehmet S, Powrie JK (2003) A survey of dopamine agonist withdrawal policy in UK endocrinologists treating patients with prolactinomas. Clin Endocrinol 58(1):111–113

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Beshyah SA et al (2017) Management of prolactinomas: a survey of physicians from the Middle East and North Africa. Pituitary 20(2):231–240

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lijin J et al (2018) Management of prolactinoma: a survey of endocrinologists in China. Endocr Connect 7(10):1013–1019

    Google Scholar 

  13. Teixeira M, Souteiro P, Carvalho D (2017) Prolactinoma management: predictors of remission and recurrence after dopamine agonists withdrawal. Pituitary 20(4):464–470

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnston DG et al (1983) Hyperprolactinemia. Long-term effects of bromocriptine. Am J Med 75(5):868–874

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zarate A et al (1983) Follow-up of patients with prolactinomas after discontinuation of long-term therapy with bromocriptine. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 104(2):139–142

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moriondo P et al (1985) Bromocriptine treatment of microprolactinomas: evidence of stable prolactin decrease after drug withdrawal. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 60(4):764–772

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnston DG et al (1984) Effect of dopamine agonist withdrawal after long-term therapy in prolactinomas. Studies with high-definition computerised tomography. Lancet 2(8396):187–192

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maxson WS et al (1984) Hyperprolactinemic response after bromocriptine withdrawal in women with prolactin-secreting pituitary tumors. Fertil Steril 41(2):218–223

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang C et al (1987) Long-term treatment of hyperprolactinaemia with bromocriptine: effect of drug withdrawal. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 27(3):363–371

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. van’t Verlaat JW, Croughs RJ (1991) Withdrawal of bromocriptine after long-term therapy for macroprolactinomas; effect on plasma prolactin and tumour size. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 34(3):175–178

    Google Scholar 

  21. Passos VQ et al (2002) Long-term follow-up of prolactinomas: normoprolactinemia after bromocriptine withdrawal. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87(8):3578–3582

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Webster J et al (1994) A comparison of cabergoline and bromocriptine in the treatment of hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea. Cabergoline Comparative Study Group. N Engl J Med 331(14):904–909

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Colao A et al (2003) Withdrawal of long-term cabergoline therapy for tumoral and nontumoral hyperprolactinemia. N Engl J Med 349(21):2023–2033

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Muratori M et al (1997) Use of cabergoline in the long-term treatment of hyperprolactinemic and acromegalic patients. J Endocrinol Invest 20(9):537–546

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cannavo S et al (1999) Cabergoline: a first-choice treatment in patients with previously untreated prolactin-secreting pituitary adenoma. J Endocrinol Invest 22(5):354–359

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Xia MY et al (2018) Optimal timing of dopamine agonist withdrawal in patients with hyperprolactinemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine 59(1):50–61

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dekkers OM et al (2010) Recurrence of hyperprolactinemia after withdrawal of dopamine agonists: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95(1):43–51

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hu J et al (2015) kcolCurrent drug withdrawal strategy in prolactinoma patients treated with cabergoline: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pituitary 18(5):745–751

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gen M et al (1984) Necrotic changes in prolactinomas after long term administration of bromocriptine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 59(3):463–470

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Landolt AM, Osterwalder V (1984) Perivascular fibrosis in prolactinomas: is it increased by bromocriptine? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 58(6):1179–1183

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schlechte J et al (1989) The natural history of untreated hyperprolactinemia: a prospective analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 68(2):412–418

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sisam DA, Sheehan JP, Sheeler LR (1987) The natural history of untreated microprolactinomas. Fertil Steril 48(1):67–71

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Casanueva FF et al (2006) Guidelines of the Pituitary Society for the diagnosis and management of prolactinomas. Clin Endocrinol 65(2):265–273

    Google Scholar 

  34. Biswas M et al (2005) Long-term remission following withdrawal of dopamine agonist therapy in subjects with microprolactinomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 63(1):26–31

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kharlip J et al (2009) Recurrence of hyperprolactinemia after withdrawal of long-term cabergoline therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94(7):2428–2436

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Colao A et al (2007) Predictors of remission of hyperprolactinaemia after long-term withdrawal of cabergoline therapy. Clin Endocrinol 67(3):426–433

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Anagnostis P et al (2012) Long term follow-up of patients with prolactinomas and outcome of dopamine agonist withdrawal: a single center experience. Pituitary 15(1):25–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Araujo B, Belo S, Carvalho D (2017) Pregnancy and tumor outcomes in women with prolactinoma. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 125(10):642–648

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Domingue M-E et al (2014) Outcome of prolactinoma after pregnancy and lactation: a study on 73 patients. Clin Endocrinol 80(5):642–648

    Google Scholar 

  40. Auriemma RS et al (2013) Results of a single-center observational 10-year survey study on recurrence of hyperprolactinemia after pregnancy and lactation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98(1):372–379

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rastogi A, Bhadada SK, Bhansali A (2017) Pregnancy and tumor outcomes in infertile women with macroprolactinoma on cabergoline therapy. Gynecol Endocrinol 33(4):270–273

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bronstein MD (2005) Prolactinomas and pregnancy. Pituitary 8(1):31–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mallea-Gil MS et al (2016) Prolactinomas: evolution after menopause. Arch Endocrinol Metab 60(1):42–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Santharam S et al (2018) Impact of menopause on outcomes in prolactinomas after dopamine agonist treatment withdrawal. Clin Endocrinol 89(3):346–353

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Indirli R et al (2019) Cabergoline withdrawal before and after menopause: outcomes in microprolactinomas. Horm Cancer 10(2):120–127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ristic N et al (2017) Effects of estradiol on histological parameters and secretory ability of pituitary mammotrophs in ovariectomized female rats. Cell J 19(3):461–468

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Dogansen SC et al (2016) Withdrawal of dopamine agonist therapy in prolactinomas: in which patients and when? Pituitary 19(3):303–310

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kwancharoen R et al (2014) Second attempt to withdraw cabergoline in prolactinomas: a pilot study. Pituitary 17(5):451–456

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Vilar L et al (2015) Second attempt of cabergoline withdrawal in patients with prolactinomas after a failed first attempt: is it worthwhile? Front Endocrinol 6:11

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal

    Pedro Souteiro, Sandra Belo & Davide Carvalho

  2. Faculty of Medicine of Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal

    Pedro Souteiro & Davide Carvalho

  3. Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal

    Pedro Souteiro & Davide Carvalho

Authors
  1. Pedro Souteiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sandra Belo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Davide Carvalho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Souteiro.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Souteiro, P., Belo, S. & Carvalho, D. Dopamine agonists in prolactinomas: when to withdraw?. Pituitary 23, 38–44 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-019-00989-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-019-00989-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation