Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Strengths and weaknesses of reflection as a guide to action: pressure assails performance in multiple ways

  • Published:
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current status of Beilock and Carr's (2001) "execution focus" theory of choking under pressure in performance of a sensorimotor skill is reviewed and assessed, mainly from the perspective of cognitive psychology, and put into the context of a wider range of issues, attempting to take philosophical analysis into account. These issues include other kinds of skills, pre-performance practice, post-performance evaluation and repair, and integrating new and creative achievements into repertoires of heavily practiced routines. The focus is on variation in the demand for reflection versus automaticity across the full gamut of learning and experience, not just game-time performance. Though automaticity remains important and there are many circumstances in which being "in the zone" is good whereas “execution focus” can do harm, it appears that reflective action deserves just as much a place at the performance table as does unreflective action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of a cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1987). Skill acquisition: compilation of weak-method problem solutions. Psychological Review, 94, 192–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of mind. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beilock, S. L., Bertenthal, B. I., Hoerger, M., & Carr, T. H. (2008). When does haste make waste? Speed-accuracy tradeoff, skill level, and the tools of the trade. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 340–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beilock, S. L., Bertenthal, B. I., McCoy, A. M., & Carr, T. H. (2004a). Haste does not always make waste: expertise, direction of attention, and speed versus accuracy in performing sensorimotor skills. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 373–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: what governs choking under pressure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 701–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2005). When high-powered people fail: working memory and “choking under pressure” in math. Psychological Science, 16, 101–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beilock, S. L., Carr, T. H., MacMahon, C., & Starkes, J. L. (2002). When paying attention becomes counterproductive: impact of divided versus skill-focused attention on novice and experienced performance of sensorimotor skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 6–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beilock, S. L., Jellison, W. A., Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., & Carr, T. H. (2006). On the causal mechanisms of stereotype threat: can skills that don't rely heavily on working memory still be threatened? Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1059–1071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beilock, S. L., Kulp, C. A., Holt, L. E., & Carr, T. H. (2004b). More on the fragility of performance: choking under pressure in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 584–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishara, A. J., Pleskac, T. J., Fridberg, D. J., Yechiam, E., Lucas, J., Busemeyer, J. R., Finn, P. R., & Stout, J. C. (2009). Similar processes despite divergent behavior in two commonly used measures of risky decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22, 435–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. L., & Carr, T. H. (1989). Automaticity in skill acquisition: mechanisms for reducing interference in concurrent performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 686–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, W. L., & Harter, N. (1899). Studies on the telegraphic language: the acquisition of a hierarchy of habits. Psychological Review, 6, 345–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, B. D. (2004). The effects of speed on skilled chess performance. Psychological Science, 15, 442–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, T. H., & Hinckley, J. J. (2011). Attention: Architecture and process. In R. K. Peach & L. P. Shapiro (Eds.), Cognition and acquired language disorders: An information processing approach (pp. 61–93). St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chib, V. S., De Martino, B., Shimojo, S., & O'Doherty, J. P. (2012). Neural mechanisms underlying paradoxical performance for monetary incentives are driven by loss aversion. Neuron, 74, 582–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cote, J., Baker, J., & Abernethy, B. (2007). Practice and play in the development of sport expertise. In R. Eklund & G. Tenenbaum (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 184–202). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. H., Martens, M. P., & Russell, W. D. (2003). Measuring anxiety in athletics: The Revised Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 25, 519–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossman, E. R. F. W. (1959). A theory of the acquisition of speed skill. Ergonomics, 2, 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cskiszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of the optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cskiszentmihalyi, M. (1998). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. A., & Carr, T. H. (2012). Is that what I wanted to do? Cued vocalizations influence the phenomenology of controlling a moving object. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 507–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. A., & Carr, T. H. (2013). When dyads act in parallel, a sense of agency for auditory consequences depends on the order of the actions. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. A., Seiffert, A. E., & Carr, T. H. (2010). Taking credit for success: the phenomenology of control in a goal-directed task. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 48–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, J. J., & Radosevich, D. J. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: now you see it, now you don't. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 795–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. L. (2002). Intelligence without representation – Merleau-Ponty’s critique of mental representation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 367–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2012). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66, 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericcson, K. A. (2006). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games (pp. 1–50). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericcson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993a). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericcson, K. A., & Simon, H. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Revised edition). Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.

  • Eysenck, M. W. (1982). Attention and arousal: Cognition and performance. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Belmont: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, A. M. (1972). A working model of skill acquisition with application to teaching. Quest, 17, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, A. M. (1987). Skill acquisition: Action, movement, and neuromotor processes. In J. H. Carr, R. B. Shepherd, J. Gordon, A. M. Gentile, & J. M. Held (Eds.), Movement Science. Foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation. MD: Aspen Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, A. M. (1998). Implicit and explicit processes during acquisition of functional skills. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 5, 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, A. M., & Fiez, J. A. (2004). Integrating rewards and cognition in the frontal cortex. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 540–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimmig, D., Huguet, P., & Caverni, J.-P. (2006). Choking under pressure and working memory capacity: when performance pressure reduces fluid intelligence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1005–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrigel. (1948). Zen and the art of archery. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. M., Hanton, S., Matthews, N., & Fleming, S. (2010a). A qualitative exploration of choking in elite golf. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 4, 221–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. M., Hanton, S., Matthews, N., & Fleming, S. (2010b). Choking in sport: a review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 3, 24–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. M., Hanton, S., Matthews, N., & Fleming, S. (2011). Alleviation of choking under pressure in elite golf: an action research study. The Sport Psychologist, 25, 465–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. M., & Shaw, G. (2013). A qualitative examination of choking under pressure in team sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14, 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockey, G. R. J. (1986). Changes in operator efficiency as a function of environmental stress, fatigue, and circadian rhythms. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol 2, pp 44:1–49).

  • Holt, B. J., & Rainey, S. J. (2002). An overview of automaticity and implications for training the thinking processes. Alexandria, VA: US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences Research Report 1790.

  • Hristovski, R., Davids, K., Passos, P., & Araujo, D. (2012). Sport performance as a domain of creative problem solving for self-organizing performer-environment systems. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 5(Supplement 1-M4), 26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutto, D. (February 2014). Expert thinking about expert sport performances: Lessons from embodied cognitive science. 1st International Conference on Sport Psychology and Embodied Cognition, Al Ain UAE.

  • Hutto, D., & Myin. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilundain-Agurruza, J. (February 2014a). From clumsy failure to skillful fluency:A phenomenological analysis and Eastern solution to sport's choking effect. 1st International Conference on Sport Psychology and Embodied Cognition, Al Ain UAE.

  • Ilundain-Agurruza, J. (February 2014b). Beyond expert failure: A comparative phenomenological analysis of sport's choking effect. 1st International Conference on Sport Psychology and Embodied Cognition, Al Ain UAE.

  • Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keele, S. W., & Summers, J. J. (1976). The structure of motor programs. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Motor control: Issues and trends (pp. 109–142). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kensinger, E. A., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). Memory and emotion. In M. Lewis, H.-J. M. Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 601–617). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapp, S. T., Boches, C. A., Trabert, M. L., & Logan, G. D. (1991). Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: II. Are there practice effects after automaticity is achieved? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 196–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, K., & Meyer, D. E. (1991). Induction of continous stimulus–response associations for perceptual-motor performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 811–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. D., & Genovese, E. D. (1988). Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: learning and performance effects reconsidered. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59, 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, B., & Linder, D. (1997). Thinking about choking? Attentional processes and paradoxical performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 937–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, H. S., & Braver, T. S. (2008). Motivational influences on cognitive control: behavior, brain activation, and individual differences. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. (1990). Repetition priming and automaticity – common underlying mechanisms. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, I. M., & Beilock, S. L. (2011). Mathematics anxiety: separating the math from the anxiety. Cerebral Cortex Advanced Access. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, R., Burton, D., Vealey, R. S., Bump, L. A., & Smith, D. E. (1990). Development and validation of the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2. In R. Martens, R. S. Vealey, & D. Burton (Eds.), Competitive anxiety in sport (pp. 117–190). Champaign: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, R. S. W. (2000). Theoretical aspects of implicit learning in sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 31, 530–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, R. S. W., Polman, R. C. J., & Hammond, N. V. (1993). “Reinvestment”: a dimension of personality implicated in skill breakdown under pressure. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 655–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattarella-Micke, & Beilock, S. L. (2012). Individual differences in frontoparietal activity predict high-stakes choking. Chicago: Cognitive Neuroscience Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Memmert, D., Baker, J., & Bertsch, C. (2010). Play and practice in the development of sport-specific creativity in team ball sports. High Ability Studies, 21, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesagno, C., Harvey, J. T., & Janelle, C. M. (2011). Self-presentation origins of choking: evidence from separate manipulations of pressure. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 33, 441–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesagno, C., & Hill, D. M. (2013). Choking under pressure debate: is there chaos in the brickyard? International Journal of Sport Psychology, 44, 288–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, J., Solodkin, A., Hlustik, P., & Small, S. L. (2007). The mind of expert motor performance is cool and focused. NeuroImage, 35, 804–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minear, M., & Shah, R. (2008). Training and transfer effects in task switching. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1470–1483.

  • Mobbs, D., Hassabis, D., Seymour, B., Marchant, J. L., Weiskopf, N., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2009). Choking on the money: reward-based performance decrements are associated with midbrain activity. Psychol. Sci., 20, 955–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. (2002). Intuition: Its powers and perils. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, R. (1986). Vigilance, monitoring, and search. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol 2, pp 43:1–39).

  • Persig. (1974). Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pochon, J. B., Levy, R., Fossati, P., Lehericy, S., Poline, J. B., Pillon, B., Le Bihan, D., & Dubois, B. (2002). The neural system that bridges reward and cognition in humans: an fMRI study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 99, 5669–5674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, G. F. (2011). Impact of reward and punishment motivation on behavior monitoring as indexed by the error-related negativity. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 81, 324–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, R., & Dudda, A. (1995). Skill acquisition and human performance. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raab, M., & Johnson, J. G. (2007). Expertise-based differences in search and option-generation strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 158–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raichle, M. E., Fiez, J. A., Videen, T. O., Macleod, A. M. K., Pardo, J. V., Fox, P. T., & Peterson, S. E. (1994). Practice-related changes in huma brain functional-anaotmy during nonmotor learning. Cerebral Cortex, 4, 8–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisberg, D., & Hertel, P. (2004). Memory and emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rucinska, Z. (2014). 1st International Conference on Sport Psychology and Embodied Cognition. Al Ain: UAE. Radically enacted creativity in sports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rucinska, Z. (Undated). Radically enacted creativity in sports. Response to IAPS Fourth R. Scot Kretchmar Student Essay Award. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport.

  • Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Forbes, C. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115, 336–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, D., Gitelman, D., Simmons, K., Bloise, S., Parrish, T., & Mesulam, M. (2005). Monetary incentives enhance processing in brain regions mediating top-down control of attention. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1855–1865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strobach, T., Liepelt, R., Schubert, T., & Kiesel, A. (2012). Task switching: effects of practice on switch and mixing costs. Psychological Research, 76, 74–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, K., & Rohrer, D. (2010). The effects of interleaving practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 837–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. F., Welsh, R. C., Wager, T. D., Phan, K. L., Fitzgerald, K. D., & Gehring, W. J. (2004). A functional neuroimaging study of motivation and executive functioning. NeuroImage, 21, 1045–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welford, A. T. (1973). Skilled performance: Perceptual and motor skills. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1911). An introduction to mathematics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. M., & Hodges, N. J. (2005). Practice, instruction and skill acquisition in soccer: Challenging tradition. Journal of Sport Sciences, 23, 637–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurophysiology and Psychology, 18, 459–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cognition and Cognitive Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, 316 Physics Road, East Lansing, MI, 48824-1116, USA

    Thomas H. Carr

  2. 317 Wayland Avenue, East Lansing, MI, 48823, USA

    Thomas H. Carr

Authors
  1. Thomas H. Carr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas H. Carr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carr, T.H. Strengths and weaknesses of reflection as a guide to action: pressure assails performance in multiple ways. Phenom Cogn Sci 14, 227–252 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-014-9401-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-014-9401-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation