Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Developing a machine learning model for predicting venlafaxine active moiety concentration: a retrospective study using real-world evidence

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Venlafaxine is frequently prescribed for patients with depression. To control the concentration of venlafaxine within the therapeutic window for the best treatment effect, a model to predict venlafaxine concentration is necessary.

Aim

Our objective was to develop a prediction model for venlafaxine concentration using real-world evidence based on machine learning and deep learning techniques.

Method

Patients who underwent venlafaxine treatment between November 2019 and August 2022 were included in the study. Important variables affecting venlafaxine concentration were identified using a combination of univariate analysis, sequential forward selection, and machine learning techniques. Predictive performance of nine machine learning and deep learning algorithms were assessed, and the one with the optimal performance was selected for modeling. The final model was interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations.

Results

A total of 330 eligible patients were included. Five influential variables that affect venlafaxine concentration were venlafaxine daily dose, sex, age, hyperlipidemia, and adenosine deaminase. The venlafaxine concentration prediction model was developed using the eXtreme Gradient Boosting algorithm (R2 = 0.65, mean absolute error = 77.92, root mean square error = 93.58). In the testing cohort, the accuracy of the predicted concentration within ± 30% of the actual concentration was 73.49%. In the subgroup analysis, the prediction accuracy was 69.39% within the recommended therapeutic range of venlafaxine concentration within ± 30% of the actual value.

Conclusion

The XGBoost model for predicting blood concentration of venlafaxine using real-world evidence was developed, guiding the adjustment of regimen in clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morton WA, Sonne SC, Verga MA. Venlafaxine: a structurally unique and novel antidepressant. Ann Pharmacother. 1995;29(4):387–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Harvey AT, Rudolph RL, Preskorn SH. Evidence of the dual mechanisms of action of venlafaxine. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(5):503–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fogelman SM, Schmider J, Venkatakrishnan K, et al. O- and N-demethylation of venlafaxine in vitro by human liver microsomes and by microsomes from cDNA-transfected cells: effect of metabolic inhibitors and SSRI antidepressants. Neuropsychopharmacol. 1999;20(5):480–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ostad Haji E, Hiemke C, Pfuhlmann B. Therapeutic drug monitoring for antidepressant drug treatment. Curr Pharm Design. 2012;18(36):5818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Paulzen M, Groppe S, Tauber SC, et al. Venlafaxine and O-desmethylvenlafaxine concentrations in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015;76(1):25–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shelton R. Serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 145–80.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Montgomery SA, Mahe V, Haudiquet V, et al. Effectiveness of venlafaxine, extended release formulation, in the short-term and long-term treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: results of a survival analysis. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002;22(6):561–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Consensus Guidelines for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Neuropsychopharmacology; 2017

  9. Hiemke C. Consensus guideline based therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in psychiatry and neurology. Curr Drug Deliv. 2016;13(3):353.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schoretsanitis G, Paulzen M, Unterecker S, et al. TDM in psychiatry and neurology: A comprehensive summary of the consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring in neuropsychopharmacology, update 2017; a tool for clinicians. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2018;19(3):162–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Suwała J, Machowska M, Wiela-Hojeńska A. Venlafaxine pharmacogenetics: a comprehensive review. Pharmacogenomics. 2019;20(11):829–45. https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs-2019-0031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kobylianskii J, Wu PE. Venlafaxine-induced hypoglycemia. CMAJ. 2021;193(16):E568. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.78409.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Saade YM, Nicol G, Lenze EJ, et al. Comorbid anxiety in late-life depression: relationship with remission and suicidal ideation on venlafaxine treatment. Depress Anxiety. 2019;36(12):1125–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22964.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Alexander J, Nillsen A. Venlafaxine-induced delirium. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011;45(7):606. https://doi.org/10.3109/00048674.2011.567968.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Murphy L, Rasmussen J, Murphy NG. Venlafaxine overdose treated with extracorporeal life support. CMAJ. 2021;193(5):E167–70. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.201318.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Palacios M. The quality of research with real-world evidence. Colomb Med (Cali). 2019;50(3):140–1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Robson C. Real world research. 3rd ed. London: Wiley; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Obermeyer Z, Emanuel EJ. Predicting the future—big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(13):1216–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng P, Yu Z, Li L, et al. Predicting blood concentration of tacrolimus in patients with autoimmune diseases using machine learning techniques based on real-world evidence. Front Pharmacol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.727245.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Guo W, Yu Z, Gao Y, et al. A machine learning model to predict risperidone active moiety concentration based on initial therapeutic drug monitoring. Front Psychiatry. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.711868.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hao Y, Zhang J, Yang L, et al. A machine learning model for predicting blood concentration of quetiapine in patients with schizophrenia and depression based on real-world data. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023;89(9):2714–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Spratt DE, Tang S, Sun Y, et al. Artificial intelligence predictive model for hormone therapy use in prostate cancer. NEJM Evid. 2023;2(8):EVIDoa2300023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lundberg S, Lee SI. A unified approach to interpreting model Predictions//Nips.2017.

  24. Chen T, Guestrin C. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. San Francisco, CA: ACM; 2016. pp. 785–94.

  25. Ke, G. et al. LightGBM: in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds.Guyon, I. et al.) http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/nips/nips2017.html (CurranAssociates, Inc., 2017).

  26. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45:5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang R, Liu Y, Cao J, et al. The incidence and risk factors analysis of acute kidney injury in hospitalized patients received diuretics: a single-center retrospective study. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:924173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Rodríguez-Pérez R, Bajorath J. Evolution of support vector machine and regression modeling in chemoinformatics and drug discovery. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2022;36(5):355–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Renganathan V. Overview of artificial neural network models in the biomedical domain. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2019;120(7):536–40. https://doi.org/10.4149/BLL_2019_087.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Arik SO, Pfister T. TabNet: attentive interpretable tabular learning. 2020. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1908.07442.

  31. General Chair-Krishnapuram B, General Chair-Shah M, Program Chair-Smola A, et al. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining//Acm Sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. ACM; 2016.

  32. Hansen MR, Kuhlmann IB, Pottegård A, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of venlafaxine in an everyday clinical setting: analysis of age, sex and dose concentration relationships. Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2017;121(4):298–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Richards-Belle A, Austin-Zimmerman I, Wang B, et al. Associations of antidepressants and antipsychotics with lipid parameters: Do CYP2C19/CYP2D6 genes play a role? A UK population-based study J Psychopharmacol. 2023;37(4):396–407.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Whyte EM, Romkes M, Mulsant BH, et al. CYP2D6 genotype and venlafaxine-XR concentrations in depressed elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;21(6):542–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dean L. Venlafaxine therapy and CYP2D6 genotype. In: Pratt VM, Scott SA, Pirmohamed M, Esquivel B, Kattman BL, Malheiro AJ, editors. Medical genetics summaries. Bethesda: National Center for Biotechnology Information (US); 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lessard E, Yessine M, Hamelin BA, et al. Diphenhydramine alters the disposition of venlafaxine through inhibition of CYP2D6 activity in humans. J Clin Psychopharm. 2001;21(2):175–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Paulzen M, Schoretsanitis G, Hiemke C, et al. Reduced clearance of venlafaxine in a combined treatment with quetiapine. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018;13(85):116–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang Z, Li L, Huang S, et al. Joint population pharmacokinetic modeling of venlafaxine and O-desmethyl venlafaxine in healthy volunteers and patients to evaluate the impact of morbidity and concomitant medication. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:978202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Finance Department of Hebei Province in China (Grant Number ZF2023020) and the Medical science research project of the Hebei Health Commission (Grant Number 20221440).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunhua Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Xin Hao is employed by Dalian Medicinovo Technology Co. Ltd., China. Jinyuan Zhang, Ze Yu and Fei Gao are employed by Beijing Medicinovo Technology Co. Ltd., China. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationship that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, L., Hao, X., Yu, J. et al. Developing a machine learning model for predicting venlafaxine active moiety concentration: a retrospective study using real-world evidence. Int J Clin Pharm (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01724-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01724-y

Keywords

Navigation