Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

SGLT2 inhibitors associated pancreatitis: signal identification through disproportionality analysis of spontaneous reports and review of case reports

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In recent times, pancreatitis has been one of the most frequently reported adverse events for sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors.

Aim

To evaluate the potential association between SGLT2 inhibitors and the risk of pancreatitis by analyzing the spontaneous reports through disproportionality analysis and reviewing case reports.

Method

A retrospective case/non-case study was conducted using spontaneous reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), VigiBase, and the Canadian Adverse Reaction Database (CARD). Disproportionality analysis was performed by calculating the Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), and the Information Component (IC). In parallel, a review of case reports was conducted on SGLT2 inhibitors-induced pancreatitis.

Results

A total of 524, 510, and 40 spontaneous reports of pancreatitis suspected to be caused by SGLT2 inhibitors were identified from FAERS, VigiBase, and CARD, respectively. Through the disproportionality analysis of FAERS data, a signal was identified between the SGLT2 inhibitors and pancreatitis, with empagliflozin having highest risk [PRR = 3.9; Lower Bound (LB) ROR = 3.4; IC025 = 1.7], followed by canagliflozin [PRR = 3.6; LB ROR = 3.2; IC025 = 1.6], and dapagliflozin [PRR = 3.2; LB ROR = 2.7; IC025 = 1.4]. VigiBase and CARD data analyses reiterated the findings of FAERS. Thirteen case reports identified from a systematic literature search strengthened these findings and highlighted the importance of physical examination and laboratory parameters for the early diagnosis of pancreatitis.

Conclusion

The current study found a potential risk of pancreatitis with the use of SGLT2 inhibitors. There is an urgent need to thoroughly investigate the same and take the necessary action to avoid or minimize the risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tabish SA. Is diabetes becoming the biggest epidemic of the twenty-first century? Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2007;1:V–VIII.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the international diabetes federation diabetes atlas. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157:107843.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Guariguata L, Whiting DR, Hambleton I, et al. Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;103:137–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bastaki A. Diabetes mellitus and its treatment. Int J Diabetes Metab. 2005;13:111–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferrannini E, Solini A. SGLT-2 inhibition in diabetes mellitus: rationale and clinical prospects. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012;8:495–502.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Scheen AJ. An update on the safety of SGLT-2 inhibitors. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2019;18:295–311.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Janssen Labels. Highlights of prescribing information for INVOKANA. 2020. https://www.janssenlabels.com/package-insert/product-monograph/prescribing-information/INVOKANA-pi.pdf. Accessed 20 Jul 2022

  8. Kluger AY, Tecson KM, Barbin CM, et al. Cardiorenal outcomes in the CANVAS, DECLARE-TIMI 58, and EMPA-REG OUTCOME trials: a systematic review. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2018;19:41–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rastogi A, Bhansali A. SGLT-2 inhibitors through the windows of EMPA-REG and CANVAS trials: a review. Diabetes Ther. 2017;8:1245–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sakaeda T, Tamon A, Kadoyama K, et al. Data mining of the public version of the FDA adverse event reporting system. Int J Med Sci. 2013;10:796–803.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Böhm R, von Hehn L, Herdegen T, et al. OpenVigil FDA–inspection of US American adverse drug events pharmacovigilance data and novel clinical applications. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0157753.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Murad MH, Sultan S, Haffar S, et al. Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018;23:60–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Badwal K, Tariq T, Peirce D. Dapagliflozin-associated euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis in a patient presenting with acute pancreatitis. Case Rep Endocrinol. 2018;2018:6450563.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Chowdhary M, Kabbani AA, Chhabra A. Canagliflozin-induced pancreatitis: a rare side effect of a new drug. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015;11:991–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Dziadkowiec KN, Stawinski PM, Proenza J. Empagliflozin-associated pancreatitis: a consideration for SGLT-2 Inhibitors. ACG Case Rep J. 2021;8(1):e00530.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Gutch M, Bhattacharya A, Kumar S, et al. Dapagliflozin induced pancreatitis. Int J Med Public Health. 2018;8:45–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lightbourne T, Najafian N, McCarty TR. Consideration for empagliflozin-associated pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112:S710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McIntire DR, Bayne DB. Empagliflozin-induced pancreatitis. Ann Pharmacother. 2018;52:1158–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Oliveira M, Narayanan A, Yamanaka T, et al. Empagliflozin is a pain in my pancreas: A rare case of drug induced pancreatitis in the setting of DKA. 2020. https://shmabstracts.org/abstract/empagliflozin-is-a-pain-in-my-pancreas-a-rare-case-of-drug-induced-pancreatitis-in-the-setting-of-dka/. Accessed 20 Jul 2022

  20. Patel KM, Pikas E, George T. Drug-induced necrotizing pancreatitis with a focus on canagliflozin. Am J Ther. 2017;24:e496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Saunders E, Lowe R. Acute pancreatitis as a rare side effect of empagliflozin. Boston Medical Center. 2020. https://www.bumc.bu.edu/im-residency/acute-pancreatitis-as-a-rare-side-effect-of-empagliflozin/. Accessed 20 Jul 2022

  22. Srivali N, Thongprayoon C, Cheungpasitporn W, et al. Acute pancreatitis in the use of canagliflozin: a rare side effect of the novel therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Basic Clin Pharma. 2015;6:101–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sujanani SM, Elfishawi MM, Zarghamravanbaksh P, et al. Dapagliflozin-induced acute pancreatitis: a case report and review of literature. Case Rep Endocrinol. 2020;2020:6724504.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Verma R. Canagliflozin-associated acute pancreatitis. Am J Ther. 2016;23:e972–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zeidan BS Jr, Boadu C, Hernandez A, et al. Adverse side effects: empagliflozin-related acute pancreatitis case report. Cureus. 2020;12:e12325.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Frent I, Bucsa C, Leucuta D, et al. An investigation on the association between sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors use and acute pancreatitis: a VigiBase study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.5313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tang H, Yang K, Li X, et al. Pancreatic safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020;29:161–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Suga T, Kikuchi O, Kobayashi M, et al. SGLT1 in pancreatic α cells regulates glucagon secretion in mice, possibly explaining the distinct effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors on plasma glucagon levels. Mol Metab. 2019;19:1–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the providers of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), VigiBase, Canadian Adverse Event Reporting Database (CAERD), and OpenVigil 2.1. Thanks to the authorities of the National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER) Guwahati and the National Coordination Centre-Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI) for their constant support while conducting this study.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krishna Undela.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palapra, H., Viswam, S.K., Kalaiselvan, V. et al. SGLT2 inhibitors associated pancreatitis: signal identification through disproportionality analysis of spontaneous reports and review of case reports. Int J Clin Pharm 44, 1425–1433 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01476-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01476-7

Keywords

Navigation