Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative efficacy of antiepileptic drugs for patients with generalized epileptic seizures: systematic review and network meta-analyses

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background Valproate is a widely prescribed antiepileptic drug for generalized epilepsies, due to the extensive knowledge on its efficacy since it is on the market for many decades. However, a large number of new antiepileptic medicines was introduced into clinical practice and may be better options for treatment, considering that these medicines differ in terms of efficacy spectrum. Despite extensive research, questions regarding which medicine would constitute the first option for the monotherapy treatment of generalized epilepsy remain. Aim of the Review To compare the relative efficacy of all available antiepileptic drugs in the monotherapy treatment of generalized epileptic seizures; and also to compare all antiepoileptig drugs with valproate, which is the current first-line treatment for generalized epilepsy. Methods A systematic review for randomized controlled clinical trials was performed. Network meta-analyses used Bayesian random effects model. Sensitivity analyses determined the results´ robustness. The relative probability of two efficacy outcomes (“Seizure free” and “Therapeutic inefficacy”) to happen for each medcicine was calculated using the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve. Results Seven papers (1809 patients) studied the efficacy of valproate, lamotrigine, phenytoin, carbamazepine, topiramate, levetiracetam, and phenobarbital in the treatment of generalized tonicclonic, tonic, and clonic seizures. Phenytoin demonstrated to be inferior to valproate in leaving the patient free of these seizures types [OR: 0.50 (95% CrI 0.27, 0.87)]. Lamotrigine (61%) showed the highest probability of presenting the outcome “Seizure free”, followed by levetiracetam (47%), topiramate (44%), and valproate (38%) in the treatment of generalized tonic–clonic, tonic, and clonic seizures. Meanwhile, valproate exhibited greater chance of presenting the outcome “Therapeutic inefficacy” (62%). Regarding absence seizures itself, there was no difference in the efficacy of lamotrigine and ethosuximide when compared to valproate. However, the ranking indicates that ethosuximide (52%) and valproate (47%) are both more likely than lamotrigine to keep the patient free of seizures. Conclusions Lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and topiramate are as effective as valproate for treating generalized tonic–clonic, tonic, and clonic seizures. Meanwhile, valproate and ethosuximide are the best options for the treatment of absence seizures promoting better control of seizures, which is the primary goal of pharmacotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ngugi AK, Bottomley C, Kleinschmidt I, Sander JW, Newton CR. Estimation of the burden of active and life-time epilepsy: a meta-analytic approach. Epilepsia. 2010;51(5):883–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Shorvon SD. Epidemiology, classification, natural history, and genetics of epilepsy. Lancet. 1990;336:93–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lhatoo SD, Johnson AL, Goodridge DM, MacDonald BK, Sander JW, Shorvon SD. Mortality in epilepsy in the first 11–14 years after diagnosis: multivariate analysis of a long-term, prospective, population-based cohort. Ann Neurol. 2001;49(3):336–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rugg-Gunn FJ, Sander JW. Management of chronic epilepsy. BMJ. 2012;345:1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Perucca E, Beghi E, Dulac O, Shorvon S, Tomson T. Assessing risk to benefit ratio in antiepileptic drug therapy. Epilepsy Res. 2000;41(2):107–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kwan P, Brodie MJ. Early identification of refractory epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(5):314–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sirven JI, Noe K, Hoerth M, Drazkowski J. Antiepileptic drugs 2012: recent advances and trends. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(9):879–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shorvon SD, Perucca E, Enge J. Handbook of epilepsy treatment. 3a Edição. United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. ISBN 978-1-4051-9818-9.

  9. Mattson RH. Medical management of epilepsy in adults. Neurology. 1998;51(5):15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Emilio P, Torbjörn T. The pharmacological treatment of epilepsy in adults. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:446–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Savi MGM, Silva EL. Information flow in the clinical practice of resident physicians: an analysis from an evidence-based medicine perspective. Ciência Inf. 2009;38(3):177–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed 1 May 2015.

  13. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(6):e1000097.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Glauser T, Ben-Menachem E, Bourgeois B, Cnaan A, Chadwick D, Guerreiro C, et al. ILAE treatment guidelines: evidence-based analysis of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes. Epilepsia. 2006;47(7):1094–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Harbord RM, Egger M, Sterne JC. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Stat Med. 2005;25(20):3443–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cipriani A, Higgins JP, Geddes JR, Salanti G. Conceptual and technical challenges in network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(2):130–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu G, Ades AE. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2004;23:3105–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dias S, Welton NJ, Caldwell DM, Ades AE. Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2010;29(7–8):932–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(2):163–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lau J, Ioannidis JPA, Schmid CH. Quantitative syntesis in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(9):820–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Brodie MJ, Richens A, Yuen AW. Double-blind comparison of lamotrigine and carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy. Lancet. 1995;345(8948):476–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Callaghan N, O’Hare J, O’Driscoll D, O’Neill B, Daly M. Comparative study of ethosuximide and sodium valproate in the treatment of typical absence seizures (petit mal). Dev Med Child Neurol. 1982;24(6):830–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Callaghan N, Kenny RA, O’Neill B, Crowley M, Goggin T. A prospective study between carbamazepine, phenytoin and sodium valproate as monotherapy in previously untreated and recently diagnosed patients with epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985;48(7):639–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Coppola G, Auricchio G, Federico R, Carotenuto M, Pascotto A. Lamotrigine versus valproic acid as first-line monotherapy in newly diagnosed typical absence seizures: an open-label, randomized, parallel-group study. Epilepsia. 2004;45(9):1049–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Frank LM, Enlow T, Holmes GL, Manasco P, Concannon S, Chen C, et al. Lamictal (lamotrigine) monotherapy for typical absence seizures in children. Epilepsia. 1999;40(7):973–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Glauser TA, Cnaan A, Shinnar S, Hirtz DG, Dlugos D, Masur D, et al. Ethosuximide, valproic acid, and lamotrigine in childhood absence epilepsy: initial monotherapy outcomes at 12 months. Epilepsia. 2013;54(1):141–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Marson AG, Al-Kharusi AM, Alwaidh M, Appleton R, Baker GA, Chadwick DW, et al. The SANAD study of effectiveness of valproate, lamotrigine, or topiramate for generalised and unclassifiable epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369(9566):1016–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ramsay RE, Wilder BJ, Murphy JV, Holmes GL, Uthman B, Slateret J, et al. Efficacy and safety of valproic acid versus phenytoin as sole therapy for newly diagnosed primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. J Epilepsy. 1992;5(1):55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rastogi P, Mehrotra TN, Agarwala RK, Singh VS. Comparison of sodium valproate and phenytoin as single drug treatment in generalised and partial epilepsy. J Assoc Physicians India. 1991;39(8):606–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Richens A, Davidson DL, Cartlidge NE, Easter DJ. A multicentre comparative trial of sodium valproate and carbamazepine in adult onset epilepsy. Adult EPITEG Collaborative Group. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57(6):682–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Steiner TJ, Dellaportas CI, Findley LJ, Gross M, Gibberd FB, Perkin GD, et al. Lamotrigine monotherapy in newly diagnosed untreated epilepsy: a double-blind comparison with phenytoin. Epilepsia. 1999;40(5):601–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Steinhoff BJ, Ueberall MA, Siemes H, Kurlemann G, Schmitz B, Bergmann L. The LAM-SAFE Study: lamotrigine versus carbamazepine or valproic acid in newly diagnosed focal and generalised epilepsies in adolescents and adults. Seizure. 2005;14(8):597–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Thilothammal N, Banu K, Ratnam RS. Comparison of phenobarbitone, phenytoin with sodium valproate: randomized, double-blind study. Indian Pediatr. 1996;33(7):549–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Trinka E, Marson AG, Van Paesschen W, Kälviäinen R, Marovac J, Duncan B, et al. KOMET: an unblinded, randomised, two parallel-group, stratified trial comparing the effectiveness of levetiracetam with controlled-release carbamazepine and extended-release sodium valproate as monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(10):1138–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Turnbull DM, Howel D, Rawlins MD, Chadwick DW. Which drug for the adult epileptic patient: phenytoin or valproate? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985;290(6471):815–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wilder BJ, Ramsay RE, Murphy JV, Karas BJ, Marquardt K, Hammond EJ. Comparison of valproic acid and phenytoin in newly diagnosed tonic-clonic seizures. Neurology. 1983;33(11):1474–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bandstra NF, Camfield CS, Camfield PR. Stigma of epilepsy. Can J Neurol Sci. 2008;35(4):436–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Campos MSA, Ayres LR, Morelo MR, Marques FA, Pereira LR. Efficacy and tolerability of antiepileptic drugs in patients with focal epilepsy: systematic review and network meta-analyses. Pharmacotherapy. 2016;36(12):1255–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(2):163–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sato S, White BG, Penry JK, Dreifuss FE, Sackellares JC, Kupferberg HJ. Valproate versus ethosuximide in the treatment of absence seizures. Neurology. 1982;32:157–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Glauser T, Ben-Menachem E, Bourgeois B, Cnaan A, Guerreiro C, Kälviäinen R, et al. Updated ILAE evidence review of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes. Epilepsia. 2013;54(3):551–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received in support of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marília Silveira de Almeida Campos.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Campos, M.S.d.A., Ayres, L.R., Morelo, M.R.S. et al. Comparative efficacy of antiepileptic drugs for patients with generalized epileptic seizures: systematic review and network meta-analyses. Int J Clin Pharm 40, 589–598 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0641-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-018-0641-9

Keywords

Navigation