Abstract
Grounded theory is a qualitative research methodology that aims to explain social phenomena, e.g. why particular motivations or patterns of behaviour occur, at a conceptual level. Developed in the 1960s by Glaser and Strauss, the methodology has been reinterpreted by Strauss and Corbin in more recent times, resulting in different schools of thought. Differences arise from different philosophical perspectives concerning knowledge (epistemology) and the nature of reality (ontology), demanding that researchers make clear theoretical choices at the commencement of their research when choosing this methodology. Compared to other qualitative methods it has ability to achieve understanding of, rather than simply describing, a social phenomenon. Achieving understanding however, requires theoretical sampling to choose interviewees that can contribute most to the research and understanding of the phenomenon, and constant comparison of interviews to evaluate the same event or process in different settings or situations. Sampling continues until conceptual saturation is reached, i.e. when no new concepts emerge from the data. Data analysis focusses on categorising data (finding the main elements of what is occurring and why), and describing those categories in terms of properties (conceptual characteristics that define the category and give meaning) and dimensions (the variations within properties which produce specificity and range). Ultimately a core category which theoretically explains how all other categories are linked together is developed from the data. While achieving theoretical abstraction in the core category, it should be logical and capture all of the variation within the data. Theory development requires understanding of the methodology not just working through a set of procedures. This article provides a basic overview, set in the literature surrounding grounded theory, for those wanting to increase their understanding and quality of research output.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Epistemology refers to the nature of knowledge or knowing.
Induction is a method of reasoning which uses observations (facts) to develop generalisations (or theory). It is the opposite reasoning process to deduction which moves from hypothesis (theory) to confirmation of a fact.
References
Annells M. Grounded theory method, part II : options for users of the method. Nurs Inq. 1997;4:4176–80.
Bissell P, Traulsen JM, Haugbølle LS. Sociological theory and pharmacy practice research: (4) The contribution of interactionist sociology to understanding the experience of health and illness. Int J Pharm Pract. 2002;10:213–24.
Creswell JW. Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River: Pearson; 2008.
Glaser BG. Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press; 1978.
Hage J. Techniques and problems of theory construction in sociology. New York: Wiley; 1972.
Glaser BG, Strauss AL. Awareness of dying. Chicago: Aldine; 1965.
Charmaz K. ‘Discovering’ chronic illness: using grounded theory. Soc Sci Med. 1990;30:1161–72.
Kearney MH. Truthful self-nurturing: a grounded formal theory of women’s addiction recovery. Qual Health Res. 1998;8:495–512.
Wilde B, Starrin B, Larsson G, Larsson M. Quality of care from a patient perspective—a grounded theory study. Scand J Caring Sci. 1993;7:113–20.
Wilson HS. Reconciling incompatibilities: a grounded theory of HIV medication adherence and symptom management. Qual Health Res. 2002;12:1309–22.
Landier W, Hughes CB, Calvillo ER, Anderson NLR, Briseño-Toomey D, Dominguez L, et al. A grounded theory of the process of adherence to oral chemotherapy in hispanic and caucasian children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2011;28:203–23.
Blumer H. Symbolic interactionism. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1969.
Alvesson M, Sköldberg K. Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2009.
Locke K. Grounded theory in management research. London: Sage; 2001.
McCann T, Clark E. Grounded theory in nursing research: part 1—methodology. Nurse Res. 2003;11:7–18.
Stern PN. Eroding grounded theory. In: Morse JM, editor. Critical issues in qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994. p. 212–23.
Streubert HJ, Carpenter DR. Qualitative research in nursing: advancing the humanistic imperative. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1999.
Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research Chicago. New York: Aldine De Gruyter; 1967.
Goulding C. Grounded theory: a practical guide for management, business and market researchers. London: Sage; 2002.
Morse JM. Situating grounded theory within qualitative inquiry. In: Schreiber RS, Stern PN, editors. Using grounded theory in nursing. New York: Springer; 2001. p. 1–15.
Liamputtong P. Research methods in health: foundations for evidence-based practice. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press Australia and New Zealand; 2010.
Locke K. Rewriting the discovery of grounded theory after 25 years? J Manag Inq. 1996;5:5239–45.
Annells M. Grounded theory method: philosophical perspectives, paradigm of inquiry, and postmodernism. Qual Health Res. 1996;6:379–93.
Strauss AL, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage; 1990.
Strauss AL, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1998.
Annells M. Grounded theory method, part I: within the five moments of qualitative research. Nurs Inq. 1997;4:4120–9.
McCann T, Clark E. Grounded theory in nursing research: part 2—critique. Nurse Res. 2003;11:19–28.
Easterby-Smith M, Thorpe R, Jackson P. Management research. 4th ed. London: Sage; 2012.
Corbin J, Strauss AL. Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2008.
Hutchinson S, Wilson H. Research and therapeutic interviews: a poststructuralist perspective. In: Morse JM, editor. Critical issues in qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994. p. 300–16.
Strauss AL, Corbin J. Grounded theory methodology: an overview. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994. p. 273–85.
Strauss AL. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.
Glaser BG. Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley: Sociology Press; 1992.
Charmaz K. Objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000. p. 509–35.
Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2002.
Holloway I, Wheeler S. Qualitative research for nurses. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1996.
Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18:59–82.
Saunders MNK. Choosing research participants. In: Symon G, Cassell C, editors. The practice of qualitative organizational research: Core methods and current challenges. London: Sage; 2012. p. 37–55.
Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2007.
Morse JM. Designing funded qualitative research. In: Denzin N, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook for qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994. p. 220–35.
Lofland J. Analysing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont: Wadsworth; 1971.
Schreiber RS. The ‘how to’ of grounded theory: avoiding the pitfalls. In: Schreiber RS, Stern PN, editors. Using grounded theory in nursing. New York: Springer; 2001. p. 55–83.
Star SL. Living grounded theory: Cognitive and emotional forms of pragmatism. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K, editors. The Sage handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage; 2007. p. 75–94.
Lempert LB. Asking questions of the data: memo writing in the grounded theory tradition. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K, editors. The Sage handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage; 2007. p. 245–64.
Kelle U. The development of categories: Different approaches in grounded theory. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K, editors. The Sage handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage; 2007. p. 191–213.
Holton LB. The coding process and its challenges. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K, editors. The Sage handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage; 2007. p. 265–90.
LaRossa R. Grounded theory methods and qualitative family research. J Marriage Fam. 2005;67:837–57.
Woods PS, Gapp R, King MA. A grounded exploration of the dimensions of managerial capability: a preliminary study of top Australian pharmacist owner-managers. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015;11:623–38.
Dey I. Qualitative data analysis. London: Routledge; 1993.
Becker PH. Common pitfalls in published grounded theory research. Qual Health Res. 1993;3:254–60.
Wilson HS, Hutchinson SA. Methodological mistakes in grounded theory. Nurse Res. 1996;45:122–4.
Charmaz K, Bryant A. Grounded theory and credibility. In: Silverman D, editor. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2011. p. 291–309.
Davidson J, di Gregorio S. Qualitative research and technology: in the midst of a revolution. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2011. p. 627–44.
Charmaz K. Grounded theory as an emergent method. In: Hesse-Biber SN, Leavy P, editors. Handbook of emergent methods. New York: The Guilford Press; 2008. p. 155–70.
Benoliel JQ. Grounded theory and nursing knowledge. Qual Health Res. 1996;6:406–28.
El Hussein M, Hirst S, Salyers V, Osuji J. Using grounded theory as a method of inquiry: advantages and disadvantages. Qual Rep. 2014;19:1–15.
Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications; 2006.
Chiovitti RF, Piran N. Rigour and grounded theory research. J Adv Nurs. 2003;44:427–35.
McCann T, Clark E. Grounded theory in nursing research: part 3—application. Nurse Res. 2003;11:29–39.
Kearney MH. From the sublime to the meticulous: the continuing evolution of grounded theory. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K, editors. The handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage; 2007. p. 127–50.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Ms Sara McMillan in refining the manuscript during the review process.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woods, P., Gapp, R. & King, M.A. Generating or developing grounded theory: methods to understand health and illness. Int J Clin Pharm 38, 663–670 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0260-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0260-2