Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficiency of Combining Free and Polymer-Immobilized Prospidin with Doxorubicin for Treatment of Zajdel Ascites Hepatoma in Rats

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal Aims and scope

The antitumor activity and side effects of the drug combinations prospidin + doxorubicin and prospidin hydrogel + doxorubicin were studied in rats with transplanted Zajdel ascites hepatoma. Test animals were divided into one control group and five test groups depending on the therapy protocol. Control animals were not treated. Test groups received (i) an aqueous solution of prospidin; (ii) prospidin hydrogel; (iii) doxorubicin; (iv) prospidin + doxorubicin; and (v) prospidin hydrogel + doxorubicin. The maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of the drugs were used in monotherapy; half the MTD, in combination chemotherapy. The antitumor activity was evaluated in terms of lethality, lethality from tumor progression, total cure rate, average life expectancy, and prolonged life expectancy. Side and toxic effects were evaluated using data on the blood cell composition and biochemical parameters. It was established that the antitumor activity of combined aqueous prospidin and doxorubicin did not exceed the activity of doxorubicin monotherapy. Side effects of this combination had the same character as those of doxorubicin and were represented by leuko- and thrombocytopenia and nephropathy. The antitumor effect of combined prospidin hydrogel + doxorubicin with respect to lethality was significantly more pronounced than the effect of each individual component. This combination had a statistically significantly lower toxicity than that of the most toxic component.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. Yu. Sel’chuk, M. B. Bychkov, and M. V. Kiselevskii, Tumorous Serocytes: Pleurites, Ascites, Pericardites [in Russian], Prakticheskaya Meditsina, Moscow (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. I. Hiddinga, V. F. Surmont, and J. P. Van Meerbeeck, Panminerva Med., 55(2), 157 – 173 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. N. A. Pyataev, S. A. Shchukin, E. Yu. Korovina, et al., Ross. Bioterapevticheskii Zh., 10(2), 55 – 61 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Ohgaki, A. Takenaka, A. Shiomi, et al., Gan to Kagaku Ryoho, 31, 1858 – 1860 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. D. Soma, J. Kitayama, T. Konno, et al., Cancer Sci., 100, 1979 – 1985 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. T. L. Jurkshtovich, A. A. Kladiev, et al., RU Pat. No. 2,442,586, Feb. 20, 2012; Ref. Zh. Khim., 8(1), 513 (2012).

  7. P. M. Bychkovskii, T. L. Yurkshtovich, N. V. Golub, et al., in: Abstracts of Papers of the XVIth Russian National Congress “Man and Medicine” [in Russian], Moscow (2010), p. 629.

  8. P. M. Bychkovskii, T. L. Yurkshtovich, A. A. Kladiev, et al., Tsitologiya, 54(3), 230 – 235 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. N. A. Pyataev, A. A. Kladiev, A. V. Kokorev, et al., Sovrem. Probl. Nauki Obraz., No. 5; URL: http://www.science-education.ru/111–10532 (Publication date Oct. 29, 2013).

  10. P. M. Bychkovskii, T. L. Yurkshtovich, N. V. Golub, et al., Khim.-farm. Zh., 47(7), 46 – 51 (2013); Pharm. Chem. J., 47(7), 387 – 382 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. V. A. Chernov and S. V. Geodakyan, Khim.-farm. Zh., 10(12), 7 – 13 (1976); Pharm. Chem. J., 10, No. 12, 1585 – 1591 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Minotti, P. Menna, E. Salvatorelli, et al., Pharmacol. Rev., 56(2), 185 – 229 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. A. V. Petrov, N. V. Pigareva, S. A. Emel’yanov, et al., Tsitokiny Vospalenie, 6(1), 54 – 59 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. N. Mironov, Handbook on Conducting Preclinical Drug Trials [in Russian], Part 1, Russian Ministry of Health and Social Development, FGBU Scientific Center for Drug Expertise, Moscow (2012).

  15. T. L. Yurkshtovich, S. O. Solomevich, P. M. Bychkovskii, et al., Trudy BGU, 8(1), 260 – 265 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the Russian Ministry of Education and Science under State Task Project No. 53/3 – 14 “Targeted drug delivery systems based on liposomal and polymeric carriers.” We thank Prof. V. A. Ivanov (Res. Inst. Cytology, RAS, St. Petersburg) for graciously supplying tumor strains and assisting with the work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. A. Pyataev.

Additional information

Translated from Khimiko-Farmatsevticheskii Zhurnal, Vol. 48, No. 11, pp. 18 – 22, November, 2014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pyataev, N.A., Gurevich, K.G., Zaborovskii, A.V. et al. Efficiency of Combining Free and Polymer-Immobilized Prospidin with Doxorubicin for Treatment of Zajdel Ascites Hepatoma in Rats. Pharm Chem J 48, 714–717 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-015-1179-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-015-1179-y

Keywords

Navigation