Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The challenges of school inspection practice in demonstrating and improving education quality: stakeholder perceptions in China

  • Published:
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents new evidence that explores the strengths, weaknesses and overall quality of school inspection practice in China. In one city region of Shandong Province, the research examines stakeholder perceptions of inspection purposes, processes and outcomes, as well as the potential to improve inspection practice and compulsory education quality in China. A mixed-methods empirical design was employed to conduct the research involving ten purposively selected junior high schools. Data collection methods included a survey of 364 teachers and headteachers and 13 stakeholder interviews with headteachers, teachers, as well as city and national inspectors, and an educational officer. The survey data were analysed through descriptive analysis and a repeat-measures one-way ANOVA, and the interview data were analysed thematically. The findings supply new empirical evidence regarding the context specificity of school inspection in China and identify pertinent issues regarding school inspection quality. This study overall argues that school inspection criteria and methods in Shandong province and more broadly in China could be improved by taking better account of stakeholder views and school contexts and by putting more stress on providing school-based professional improvement guidance integrated within or alongside inspection processes, instead of just intense bureaucratic monitoring of inspection outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altrichter, H., & Kemethofer, D. (2015). Does accountability pressure through school inspections promote school improvement? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(1), 32–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altrichter, H. (2010). Schul-und Unterrichtsentwicklung durch Datenruckmeldung. In H. Altrichter & K. MaagMerki (Eds.), Handbuch neue Steuerung im Schulsystem. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

  • Bitan, K., Haep, A., & Steins, G. (2014). School inspections still in dispute-an exploratory study of school principals' perceptions of school inspections. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 1–22.

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brimblecombe, N., Shaw, M., & Ormston, M. (1996). Teachers’ intention to change practice as a result of OFSTED school inspections. Educational Management & Administration, 24(4), 339–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, A. (2009). Moving mountains stone by stone: Reforming rural educaiton in China. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(5), 454–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bruggen, J. C. (2010). Inspectorates of education in Europe: Some comparative remarks about their tasks and work. Paper presented at the Standing International Conference of Inspectorates of Educaiton in Europe (SICI).

  • Carlbaum, S. (2016). Equivalence and performance gaps in Swedish school inspection: Context and the politics of blame. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(1), 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C. (2001). Unlocking the potential: Inspection as a mechanism for school improvement. Improving Schools, 4(3), 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D. (2011). School-based management, school decision-making and education outcomes in Indonesian primary schools. Washington World Bank.

  • Clark, J., & Ozga., J. (2011). Working paper 4: Inspection as Governing Retrieved from http://www.education.ox.ac.uk/governing-by-inspection/working-papers/.

  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design- qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, M., Broadfoot, P. & Schweisfurth, M. (2007) Introduction: Changing educational contexts, issues and identities, in: Changing educational contexts, issues and identities. 40 Years of Comparative Education (London, Routledge), 1–15.

  • Darvas, P., & Balwanz, D. (2014). Basic education beyond the millennium development goals in Ghana: How equity in service delivery affects educational and learning outcomes. World Bank Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wolf, I. F., & Janssens, F. G. (2007). Effects and Side effects of inspections and accountability in education: An overview of empirical studies. Oxford Review of Education, 33(3), 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedering, K., & Muller, S. (2011). School improvement through inspections? First Empirical Insights from Germany Journal of Education Change, 12, 301–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drisko, J., & Maschi, T. (2015). Content analysis. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • EDB, H. K. E. B. (2015). 2015. Hong Kong

  • Ehren, M. C. M., & Dijkstra, A. B. (2014). Evaluating social outcomes through school inspections. In M. C. M. Ehren & P. I. de la Motte (Eds.), Social outcomes of education; the assessment of social outcomes and school improvement through school inspections (pp. 51–73). Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehren, C. M., & Visscher, J. A. (2008). The relationships between school inspections, school characteristics and school improvement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(2), 205–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehren, M. C. M., Gustafsson, J. E., Altrichter, H., Skedsmo, G., Kemethofer, D., & Huber, S. (2015). Comparing effects and side effects of different school inspection systems across Europe. Comparative Education, 51(3), 375–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehren, C. M., Edd-Spicer, D., Bangpan, M., & Reid, A. (2017). School inspections in low-and middle-income countries: Explaining impact and mechanisms of impact. A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(4), 468–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehren, M. C. M., Altrichter, H., McNamara, G., & O' Hara, J. (2013). Impact of school inspections on improvement of schools-- Describing assumptions on causal mechanisms in six European countries. Springer Science + Business Media, 25, 3–43.

  • Ehren, M. C. M. (2006). Toezicht en schoolverbetering. (Doctor), University of Twente, The Netherland.

  • Elmore, R. F., & Fuhrman, S. H. (2001). Research finds the false assumption of accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 67(4), 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurydice. (2004). Evaluation of schools providing compulsory education in Europe.

  • Faubert, V. (2009). School evaluation: Current practices in OECD countries and a literature review.

  • Fu, J. M. (2006). School-based autonomous supervision: A teacher education pattern. Theory and Practice of Education, 26(3), 15–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, L. (2009). What kind of school inspection system should be constructed for primary and secondary school? Educational Assessment and Evaluation, 1, 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, Q. (2011). Reflection and thinking about development of educational inspection system in 30-year period. Educational Practice and Research (special issue), 4–14.

  • Herselman, M., & D, H. (2002). Quality assurance in the Foundation Phase in the Eastern Cape Province: A case study. South African Journal of Education (22), 239-245.

  • Huang, W. (2009). On present situation, existing issue and reform path of educational supervision system in China. Research in Education Development, 12, 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, B., & Farmer, J. (2013). School turnaround in shanghai: the empowered-management program approach to improving school performance. Retrieved from Washington, DC: https://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/ShanghaiReport-2.pdf.

  • Klerks, M. (2012). The effect of school inspections: a systematic review. Paper presented at the ORD, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

  • Lai, M. H., & Lo, L. N. K. (2007). Teacher professionalism in educational reform: The experiences of Hong Kong and Shanghai. Compare, 37(1), 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landwehr, N. (2011). Thesen zur Wirkung und Wirksamkeit der externen Schulevaluation (T. e. o. s. i. o. s. improvement., Trans.). In V. C. Quesel, N. Husfeldt, Landwehr., & N. Steiner. (Eds.), Wirkungen und Wirksamkeit der externen Schulevaluation (pp. 35–70). Bern, Switzerland.

  • Lee, Z. (2010). Exploration and analysis of dilemma in school educational inspection is and the value of conservation. Educational Assessment and Evaluation, 7, 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. C., Ding, D., & Song, H. (2008). School supervision and evaluation in China: The Shanghai perspective. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(2), 148–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, N. K., Lai, M., & Chen, S. (2012). Performing to expectations: teachers’ dilemmas in East Asia and in Chinese societies. In C. Day (Ed.), Routledge international handbook of teacher and school development. London: Routledge.

  • Li, P., Zhu, D., & Xiao, T. (2016). The status quo and trend of research on school Inspection in China: Statistic analysis of the literature. Shanghai Education and Research, 9, 66–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, E., Shi, Q., Wang, J., Zhang, S., & Liu, H. (2012). Initial motivations for teaching: Comparison between preservice teachers in the United States and China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacBeath, J. (2006). School inspections and self-evaluation Oxford: Routledge.

  • Macpherson, R. (2011). Educational administration in Timor Leste: Language policy and capacity building challenges in a post-conflict context. International Journal of Educational Managment, 25(2), 186–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, P., & Sammons, P. (2005). Survival of the weakest: The differential improvement of schools causing concern in England. London Review of Education, 3(2), 159–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrone, T., Coghlan, M., Wade, P., & Rudd, P. (2009). Evaluation of the impact of Section 5 inspections-strand 3. Final report for Ofsted.

  • MOE. (2011). Methods of inspection and evaluation of quality education in primary and secondary schools. Retrieved from http://www.whedu21.com/zhenwugongkai/ShowArticle.asp?ArticleID=37449.

  • MOE, M. (2015a). Overview of China’s educational inspection system. Beijing, China: Ministry of Education Retrieved from http://old.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe_163/200409/3084.html

  • MOE, T. M. o. E. C. (2012b). The suggestions of the ministry of education to strengthen constructing inspection areas. Beijing Retrieved from http://www.lnen.cn/jygl/jydd/zcfg/275026.shtml

  • MOE, T. M. o. E., & State Satisitc Bureau, S. (2018). Per student education business fees on average in 2017. Beijing: The Ministry of Education & State Statistics Bureau Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A05/s3040/201810/t20181012_351301.html

  • Muijs, D. (2018). Intelligent inspection Paper presented at the EARLI SIG 28 and 23 Conference, Groningen.

  • Nelson, R., & Ehren, M. (2014). Review and synthesis of evidence on the (mechanisms of) impact of school inspections. Retrieved from Dutch Inspectorate of Education.

  • Ning, B. (2015). Study on the headmasters satisfaction on promoting school education supervision effectiveness. Educaitonal Research, 421(2), 86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • NP, P. s. G. o. S. P. (2016). Administrative division of Shandong province. Retrieved from http://www.shandong.gov.cn/col/col2966/index.html.

  • Nwaokugha, O., & Danladi, A. (2016). Language and communication: Effective tools for educational supervision and inspection in Nigeria. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(3), 420–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Education at a glance: OECD indicators. Retrieved from OECD Publishing: https://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/48631582.pdf.

  • OECD. (2013). Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. Retrieved from Paris: http://www.oecd.org/education/school/Evaluation_and_Assessment_Synthesis_Report.pdf.

  • Ofsted. (2018). Chief Inspector sets out vision for new education inspection framework. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/chief-inspector-sets-out-vision-for-new-education-inspection-framework.

  • Ofsted. (2019). The education inspection framework. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/801429/Education_inspection_framework.pdf.

  • Ouston, J., Fidler, B., & Earley, P. (1997). What do schools do after OFSTED school inspections-or before? School Leadership & Management, 17(1), 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozga, J. (2013). Accountability as a policy technology: Accounting for education performance in Europe. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(2), 292–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penninckx, M., Vanhoof, J., De Maeyer, S., & Van Petegem, P. (2015). Effects and side effects of Flemish school inspection Educational Management & Administration and Leadership, 1–17.

  • Penzer, G. (2011). School inspections: What happens next? Reading, United Kindom: CfBT Education Trust.

  • Perryman, J. (2006). Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: Disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. C. (1994). Educational reform through national standards and assessment. American Journal of Evaluation, 102(4), 421–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, P., & Zou, Y. (2014). The development of educational accountability in China and Denmark. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(121).

  • Rosenthal, L. (2004). Do school inspections improve school quality? Ofsted inspections and school examination results in the UK. Economics of Education Review, 23(2), 143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, E. K., Gandha, T., & Ahn, J. (2013). School self-evaluation and inspection for improving U.S. schools? Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center (NEPC).

  • SC, S. C. (2012). Educational inspection ordinance the Central Government, P.R.C Retrieved from http://www.gov.cn/flfg/2012-09/17/content_2226538.htm.

  • Scheerens, J., Glas, C., & Thomas, S. M. (2003). Educational evaluation, assessment, and mornitoring: A systematic approach. The Netherlands: Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

  • Schildkamp, K., & Visscher, J. A. (2010). The use of performance feedback in school improvement in Louisiana. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 26(7), 1389–1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shewbridge, C., M. Hulshof, Nusche, D., & Stoll, L. (2011). OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education: School evaluation in the Flemish community of Belgium. Retrieved from Paris: www.oecd.org/edu/evaluationpolicy.

  • SICI. (2005). SICI workshop on effective school self-evaluation (ESSE) report of the SICI workshop. Paper presented at the The standing international conference of central and general inspectorates of education, Copenhagen, Denmark.

  • Slater, L. (2013). Quality assurance and accountability. Retrieved from UK:

  • Song, X., & Yue, W. (2013). Explaining educational inspection ordinances. Chinese Teacher, 9, 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straughan, R., & Wrigley, J. (Eds.). (1980). Values and evaluation in education. Harper & Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, H., & Zheng, H. (2015). A research on evaluation standards for school educational quality: In view of education inspection: Jiuzhou Press.

  • Thomas S.M. (2020) School and teacher value added performance and the relationship with teacher professional development in Mainland China. In: Hall J., Lindorff A., Sammons P. (eds) International perspectives in educational effectiveness research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44810-3_9.

  • Tryl, L. (2018). The way ahead for accountability and inspection in England’s secondary schools. Paper presented at the Westminster Educaiton Forum Keynot Seminar: The future for secondary school accountability and inspection in England, London, UK.

  • Uwazi. (2009). When school inspection doesn’t deliver: Highlights from the CAG audit of the secondary schools inspection programme in Tanzania.

  • Wang, S., Yuan, L., Tian, Z., & Zhang, X. (2013). The comparative research on the level of regional development of education in China. Educational Research, 6, 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitby, K. (2010). School inspection: Recent experiences in high performing education systems: literature review. Reading: CfBT Education Trust.

  • Wilcox, B. (1989). Inspection and its contribution to practical evaluation. Educational Research, 31(3), 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R. (2007). Reflection on the construction of Chinese educational inspection policy System. Educaitonal Research, 331(8), 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., & Guo, L. (2005). The combination of supervision and inspection: The prominent characteristic of educational inspection system in China. Education Science, 21(2), 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D., & Lv, L. (2015). The principal pattern of educational supervision in the international perspective selection and reconstruction Mordern Education Management (7), 36–40.

  • Yang, D., Huang, S., & Yang, M. (2016). Annual report on China’s education (2016) : Social Science Literature Press.

  • Yongjina, L. (2009). A war that cannot be lost- quality education of Shandong province in 2008. China Social Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y., Y., W., & Sun, J. (2018, June 11 2018). Qingdao: Step into mordenisation in educational governance China Education Daily.

  • Zhang, J. (2011). Rational thinking the educational inspection system of China. Journal of Tianjin Academy of Educational Science, 2, 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, L., & Lan, T. (2017). Problems and governance of basic education assessment Academic Exploration (6), 133-138.

  • Zheng, H. (2020). Stakeholder perceptions on the role of school inspection standards in demonstrating education quality in China. Quality Assurance in Education, 28(2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-09-2019-0093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J. (2017). China’s path to achieve world-class education. Asianetwork Exchange, 24(2), 27–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, G., & Xue, X. (2018). 改革开放以来我国教育督导体制变迁. [Reform of China’s education supervision system since the reform and opening-up policy was Issued]. 湖南科技大学学报.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful for the valuable advice for the research provided by Dr. Liz Washbrook at the University of Bristol.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Foreign Languages, Shandong University of Science and Technology, 579 Qian Wangang Road, Huang Dao District, Qingdao, China

    Hong Zheng

  2. School of Education, University of Bristol, 35 Berkeley Square, Bristol, UK

    Sally Thomas

Authors
  1. Hong Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sally Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Zheng.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, H., Thomas, S. The challenges of school inspection practice in demonstrating and improving education quality: stakeholder perceptions in China. Educ Asse Eval Acc 34, 391–422 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-022-09390-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-022-09390-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation