Abstract
Thanks to neuroimaging technology, neuroscientists are attempting to explore the neurological foundations of religious and spiritual experiences. Andrew Newberg advocates calling this field of neuroscience ‘neurotheology’, a term that was first popularized by James Ashbrook, a theologian who studied neuroscience. As with any science, neuroscience has to be examined with a critical eye so that we become capable of seeing its limits clearly. In this particular case, we should recognize the limits of neuroscience in explaining the human relationship to Transcendence. ‘Neuroliteracy’ should be helpful in filtering out the findings of neuroscience that overreach its limits in the explanation of human nature. For a true neuroscience of spirituality, an adequate theological reflection is needed, especially in terms of defining the object of experimentation and, more importantly, for interpreting the results. The neuroscience of spirituality, contrary to the ambitious beliefs of some scholars, seems to be an interdisciplinary research program rather than a scientific discipline on its own. In this article I want to explore the pros and cons of a neuroscience of spirituality, its promises and limits.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaen-Stockdale, C. (2012). Neuroscience for the soul. Psychologist, 25(7), 520–523.
Albright, C., & Ashbrook, J. (2001). Where god lives in the human brain. New York: Sourcebooks.
Ashbrook, J. (1984). Neurotheology: The working brain and the work of theology. Zygon, 19(3), 331–350.
Beauregard, M., & O’Leary, D. (2007). The spiritual brain: A neuroscientist’s case for the existence of the soul. New York: Harper Collins.
Bennett, C., Baird, A., Miller, M., & Wolford, G. (2010). Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic salmon: An argument for multiple comparisons correction. Journal of Serendipitous and Unexpected Results, 1(1), 1–5.
Bingaman, K. A. (2013). The promise of neuroplasticity for pastoral care and counseling. Pastoral Psychology, 62, 549–560.
Brown, W. S. (2006). The brain, religion, and baseball: Neurology of religion and religious experience. In P. McNamara (Ed.), Where God and science meet: How brain and evolutionary studies alter our understanding of religion (Vol. 2) (pp. 229–244). Westport: Praeger.
Bulkeley, K. (2002, November). The evolution of wonder: Religious and neuroscientific perspectives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Religion. Toronto: Canada.
D’Aquili, E., & Newberg, A. B. (1999). The mystical mind: Probing the biology of religious experience. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
Dixon, S., & Wilcox, G. (2016). The counseling implications of neurotheology: A critical review. Journal of Spirituality in Mental Health, 18(2), 91–107.
Doehring, C. (2010). Minding the gap when cognitive neuroscience is a cognate discipline in pastoral theology: Lessons from neurotheology. Journal of Pastoral Theology, 20(2), 93–108.
Feit, J. S. (2004). Probing neurotheology’s brain, or critiquing an emerging quasi-science. Council of Societies for the Study of Religion Bulletin, 33(1), 3–9.
Granqvist, P., Fredrikson, M., Unge, P., Hagenfeldt, A., Valind, S., Larhammar, D., & Larsson, M. (2005). Sensed presence and mystical experiences are predicted by suggestibility, not by the application of transcranial weak complex magnetic fields. Neuroscience Letters, 379(1), 1–6.
Hughes, J. R. (2005). Did all those famous people really have epilepsy? Epilepsy & Behavior, 6(2), 115–139.
Jastrzebski, A. (2012). Towards a better understanding of the philosophy of psychology. History & Philosophy of Psychology, 14, 12–31.
McIlhenny, R. (2015). A revolution in mind: Andrew Newberg’s principles of neurotheology. American Theological Inquiry, 8(1), 81–84.
Newberg, A. (2010). Methodological principles for research in neurotheology. NeuroQuantology, 8(4), 531–545.
Newberg, A. (2014). The neuroscientific study of spiritual practices. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(215), 1–6.
Newberg, A., & Waldman, M. R. (2010). How god changes your brain: Breakthrough findings from a leading neuroscientist. New York: Ballantine Books.
Persinger, M. A. (1987). Neurobiological bases of god beliefs. New York: Praeger.
Persinger, M. A., Corradini, P. L., Clement, A. L., Keaney, C. C., MacDonald, M. L., Meltz, L. I., . . . & Thompson, S. E. (2010). NeuroTheology and its convergence with NeuroQuantology. NeuroQuantology, 8(4), 432–443.
Peters, K. E. (2001). Neurotheology and evolutionary theology: Reflections on the mystical mind. Zygon, 36(3), 493–500.
Reiman, E., Lane, R. D., Van Petten, C., & Bandettini, P. A. (2000). Positron emission tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging. In G. Berntson, J. T. Cacioppo, & L. G. Tassinary (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 85–118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schjoedt, U. (2009). The religious brain: A general introduction to the experimental neuroscience of religion. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 21, 310–339.
Walach, H., Schmidt, S., & Jonas, W. (Eds.). (2011). Neuroscience, consciousness, and spirituality. New York: Springer.
Wallace, A. (2000). The taboo of subjectivity. Toward a new science of consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wallace, A. (2006). Contemplative science: Where Buddhism and neuroscience converge. New York: Columbia University Press.
Weissenbacher, A. C. (2015). Ten principles for interpreting neuroscientific pronouncements regarding human nature. Dialog: A Journal of Theology, 54(1), 40–50.
Weker, M. (2016). Searching for neurobiological foundations of faith and religion. Studia Humana, 5(4), 57–63.
Acknowledgments
I am immensely grateful to Professor James Thomas from Ottawa for his insightful suggestions while I was working on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jastrzebski, A.K. The Neuroscience of Spirituality. Pastoral Psychol 67, 515–524 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-018-0840-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-018-0840-2