Abstract
The forward and inverse problem are the important parts of the Diffuse Optical Tomography system. As well as the correct determination of the optode number and good placement of the source-detector matches, the regularization method to be used relative to the selected geometry is also important. The higher the number of source-detector, the higher cost and computation time. These parameters can be reduced with a correct placement. The aim of this study is to show that the success to be obtained from a vast amount of source detector matches can also be obtained from few number of source detector matches with the correct regularization method and optode geometry. In this paper, a low cost and effective optode geometry was studied. Firstly a custom optode geometry was designed. In addition to this geometry, four different source-detector placements that are frequently used in other studies were selected to test the performance of proposed optode geometry. Then forward model weight matrix was generated for all geometries. Ordinary Least Squares, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator Regression, Ridge Regression and Elastic-Net regularization methods were used to solve inverse problem. The quality of the reconstructed images of optode geometries were examined by comparing synthetic data with and without noise. The results show that the proposed geometry and the correct regularization method has better estimation accuracy and lower computation time more robust to noise than the other cost-effective geometries.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Arridge, S.R.: Optical tomography in medical imaging. Inverse Prob. 15(2), 41–93 (1999)
Bai, Z.-Z., Buccini, A., Hayami, K., Reichel, L., Yin, J.-F., Zheng, N.: Modulus-based iterative methods for constrained Tikhonov regularization. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 319, 1–13 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2016.12.023
Bhowmik, T., Liu, H., Ye, Z., Oraintara, S.: Dimensionality reduction based optimization algorithm for sparse 3-d image reconstruction in diffuse optical tomography. Sci. Rep. 6(1), 22242 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22242
Bunce, S.C., Izzetoglu, M., Izzetoglu, K., Onaral, B., Pourrezaei, K.: Functional near-infrared spectroscopy. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 25(4), 54–62 (2006)
Cao, N., Nehorai, A., Jacobs, M.: Image reconstruction for diffuse optical tomography using sparsity regularization and expectation-maximization algorithm. Opt. Express 15(21), 13695–708 (2007)
Causin, P., Naldi, G., Weishaeupl, R.M.: Elastic net regularization in diffuse optical tomography applications. In: 2019 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2019), pp. 1627–1630 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2019.8759476
Chen, L., Yu, J., Pan, M.: Comparisons of diffuse optical imaging between direct-current and amplitude-modulation instrumentations. Opt. Quant. Electron. 48, 139, p.1-11 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-015-0366-0
Cheng, Q., Chen, L., Zhang, Y.: Classification of RCS sequences based on KL divergence. IET International Radar Conference 2019, 6475–6478 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1049/joe.2019.0358
Culver, J.P., Ntziachristos, V., Holboke, M.J., Yodh, A.G.: Optimization of optode arrangements for diffuse optical tomography: a singular-value analysis. Opt. Lett. 26(10), 701–703 (2001)
Dehghani, H., Srinivasan, S., Pogue, B.W., Gibson, A.: Numerical modelling and image reconstruction in diffuse optical tomography. Philos. Trans. Ser. A, Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 367(1900), 3073–93 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2009.0090
Dereniak, E., Crowe, D.G.: Optical Radiation Detectors. Wiley, New York (1984)
González, A.C.: Solving inverse problems in imaging using robust and regularized optimization. PhD thesis, Université catholique de Louvain (2016)
Jacques, S.: Optical properties of biological tissues: a review. Phys. Med. Biol. 58(11), 37–61 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/11/R37
Kazanci, H.O.: The effect of modulation frequency for frequency domain diffuse optic tomography (fddot). Opt. Quant. Electron. 54, 204 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-022-03595-x
Lee, C.-K., Sun, C.-W., Lee, P.-L., Lee, H.-C., Yang, C.C., Jiang, C.-P., Tong, Y.-P., Yeh, T.-C., Hsieh, J.-C.: Study of photon migration with various source-detector separations in near-infrared spectroscopic brain imaging based on three-dimensional monte carlo modeling. Opt. Express 13(21), 8339–8348 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPEX.13.008339
Lee, O., Kim, J.M., Bresler, Y., Ye, J.C.: Compressive diffuse optical tomography: noniterative exact reconstruction using joint sparsity. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 30(5), 1129–42 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2011.2125983
Miche, Y., van Heeswijk, M., Bas, P., Simula, O., Lendasse, A.: Trop-elm: a double-regularized elm using lars and Tikhonov regularization. Neurocomputing 74(16), 2413–2421 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2010.12.042
Niu, H., Tian, F., Lin, Z.-J., Liu, H.: Development of a compensation algorithm for accurate depth localization in diffuse optical tomography. Opt. Lett. 35(3), 429–31 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.000429
Özgür Kazancı, H.: Weight matrix analysis for back reflection continuous wave diffuse optical tomography (cwdot) systems: translational method. Opt. Quant. Electron. 47(12), 3847–3853 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-015-0252-9
Pan, M., Yu, J., Chen, L.: Optical-property coefficient estimation of bulky medium in experiments with a succinctly analytical calculation. Opt. Quant. Electron. 50, 33 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-019-1747-6
Pogue, B., McBride, T., Osterberg, U., Paulsen, K.: Comparison of imaging geometries for diffuse optical tomography of tissue. Opt. Express 4(8), 270–86 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.4.000270
Schweiger, M., Arridge, S.R., Nissilä, I.: Gauss-newton method for image reconstruction in diffuse optical tomography. Phys. Med. Biol. 50(10), 2365–86 (2005)
Tang, J., Han, B., Han, W., Bi, B., Li, L.: Mixed total variation and l1 regularization method for optical tomography based on radiative transfer equation. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2017, 2953560 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2953560
Tian, F., Alexandrakis, G., Liu, H.: Optimization of probe geometry for diffuse optical brain imaging based on measurement density and distribution. Appl. Opt. 48(13), 2496–2504 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.48.002496
Uysal, H., Sedef, H., Özgür Kazancı, H.: Diffüz optik tomografide ters problem ve genetik algoritma ile regülarizasyon parametresi seçimi. In: 4. Uluslararası Bilimsel Araştırmalar Kongresi, pp. 211–220 (2019)
Uysal, S., Uysal, H., Ayten, U.E.: Diffüz optik tomografide ters problem ve genetik algoritma ile regülarizasyon parametresi seçimi. In: 4. Uluslararası Bilimsel Araştırmalar Kongresi, pp. 307–318 (2019)
Wang, L., Jacques, S.L., Zheng, L.: Mcml-Monte Carlo modeling of light transport in multi-layered tissues. Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 47(2), 131–46 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2607(95)016
Wilson, BC, Patterson, MS.: The physics of photodynamic therapy. Phys. Med. Biol. 31(4), 327–60 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/31/4/001
Wu, L., Lin, Y., Li, T.: Effect of human brain edema on light propagation: a Monte Carlo modeling based on the visible Chinese human dataset. IEEE Photon. J. 9(5), 1–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2017.2743048
Xu, H., Dehghani, H., Pogue, B.W., Springett, R., Paulsen, K.D., Dunn, J.F.: Near-infrared imaging in the small animal brain: optimization of fiber positions. J. Biomed. Opt. 8(1), 102–110 (2003)
Yodh, A., Chance, B.: Spectroscopy and imaging with diffusing light. Phys. Today 48(3), 34–41 (1995)
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Author notes
Sinem Uysal, Hüseyin Özgür Kazancı and Herman Sedef contributed equally to this work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Uysal, H., Uysal, S., Kazancı, H.Ö. et al. Effect of optode geometry and regularization methods on low-cost diffuse optical tomography systems. Opt Quant Electron 55, 60 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-022-04366-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-022-04366-4