Skip to main content
Log in

Shimmy dynamics in a dual-wheel nose landing gear with freeplay under stochastic wind disturbances

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shimmy dynamics of a dual-wheel nose landing gear system with torsional freeplay under stochastic lateral wind disturbances is studied. Dynamic characteristics of the deterministic case are numerically analysed, especially the shimmy of the landing gear through bifurcation analysis. Meanwhile, the influences of the freeplay nonlinearity on shimmy behaviours are examined in detail. We found that the freeplay leads to an enlargement of the shimmy area and an enhancement of the shimmy characteristics compared to the case without freeplay. Furthermore, impacts of stochastic lateral wind disturbances on the shimmy of the landing gear system are estimated via time history and recurrence plots. We find that the stochastic excitation enhances shimmy of the lateral bending direction. More interestingly, the stochastic excitation strengthens the effect of the freeplay nonlinearity, which causes random intermittent large-amplitude oscillations in the torsional direction. Our results show that the interaction between the freeplay nonlinearity and the random load induces a significant reduction in the critical shimmy velocity, which has an adverse impact on the stability of the nose landing gear of an aircraft. This work will provide an insightful guidance for the design of landing gear parameters in engineering practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

References

  1. Krüger, W.R., Morandini, M.: Recent developments at the numerical simulation of landing gear dynamics. Aeronaut. J. 1(1–4), 55–68 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pritchard, J.: Overview of landing gear dynamics. J. Aircr. 38(1), 130–137 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hajiloo, A., Xie, W.F.: The stochastic robust model predictive control of shimmy vibration in aircraft landing gears. Asian J. Control 17(2), 476–485 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Somieski, G.: Shimmy analysis of a simple aircraft nose landing gear model using different mathematical methods. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 1(8), 545–555 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arreaza, C., Behdinan, K., Zu, J.W.: Linear stability analysis and dynamic response of shimmy dampers for main landing gears. J. Appl. Mech. 83(8), 081002 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhuravlev, V.P., Klimov, D.M.: Theory of the shimmy phenomenon. Mech. Solids 45(3), 324–330 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wei, H., Lu, J.W., Ye, S.Y., et al.: Bifurcation analysis of vehicle shimmy system exposed to road roughness excitation. J. Vib. Control 28(9–10), 1045–1056 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Rahmani, M., Behdinan, K.: Interaction of torque link freeplay and Coulomb friction nonlinearities in nose landing gear shimmy scenarios. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 119, 103338 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thota, P., Krauskopf, B., Lowenberg, M.: Interaction of torsion and lateral bending in aircraft nose landing gear shimmy. Nonlinear Dyn. 57(3), 455–467 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thota, P., Krauskopf, B., Lowenberg, M.: Multi-parameter bifurcation study of shimmy oscillations in a dual-wheel aircraft nose landing gear. Nonlinear Dyn. 70(2), 1675–1688 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng, L., Cao, H., Zhang, L.: Two-parameter bifurcation analysis of an aircraft nose landing gear model. Nonlinear Dyn. 103(1), 367–381 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, Y., Howcroft, C., Neild, S.A., et al.: Using continuation analysis to identify shimmy-suppression devices for an aircraft main landing gear. J. Sound Vib. 408, 234–251 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, Y., Jin, X., Yin, Y.: Using nonlinear feedback control to improve aircraft nose landing gear shimmy performance. Meccanica 57(9), 2395–2411 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Howcroft, C., Lowenberg, M., Neild, S., et al.: Effects of freeplay on dynamic stability of an aircraft main landing gear. J. Aircr. 50(6), 1908–1922 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu, J., Xu, Y., Hu, C., et al.: 5-DOF dynamic model of vehicle shimmy system with clearance at universal joint in steering handling mechanism. Shock. Vib. 20(5), 951–961 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang, Y., Yang, C.: Stability analysis of the projectile based on random center manifold reduction. Theor. Appl. Mech. Lett. 13, 100385 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vechtel, D., Meissner, U.M., Hahn, K.U.: On the use of a steerable main landing gear for crosswind landing assistance. Aeronaut. J. 5(3), 293–303 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sura, N.K., Suryanarayan, S.: Lateral response of nose-wheel landing gear system to ground-induced excitation. J. Aircr. 44(6), 1998–2005 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sateesh, B., Maiti, D.K.: Vibration control of an aircraft nose landing gear due to ground-induced excitation. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. G J. Aerosp. Eng. 224(3), 245–258 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sivakumar, S., Haran, A.: Mathematical model and vibration analysis of aircraft with active landing gears. J. Vib. Control 21(2), 229–245 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Huntington, D.E., Lyrintzis, C.S.: Nonstationary random parametric vibration in light aircraft landing gear. J. Aircr. 35(1), 145–151 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Qian, J., Chen, L.: Optimization for vibro-impact nonlinear energy sink under random excitation. Theor. Appl. Mech. Lett. 12, 100364 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, Q., Xu, Y., Kurths, J., et al.: Complex nonlinear dynamics and vibration suppression of conceptual airfoil models: a state-of-the-art overview. Chaos 32(6), 062101 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu, Q., Xu, Y., Kurths, J.: Bistability and stochastic jumps in an airfoil system with viscoelastic material property and random fluctuations. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 84, 105184 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, Q., Xu, Y., Xu, C., et al.: The sliding mode control for an airfoil system driven by harmonic and colored Gaussian noise excitations. Appl. Math. Model. 64, 249–264 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu, Y., Liu, Q., Guo, G., et al.: Dynamical responses of airfoil models with harmonic excitation under uncertain disturbance. Nonlinear Dyn. 89(3), 1579–1590 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu, Y., Gu, R., Zhang, H., et al.: Stochastic bifurcations in a bistable Duffing-Van der Pol oscillator with colored noise. Phys. Rev. E 83(5), 056215 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, T., Jin, Y., Zhang, Y.: Performance improvement of the stochastic-resonance-based tri-stable energy harvester under random rotational vibration. Theor. Appl. Mech. Lett. 12, 100365 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, X., Xu, Y., Liu, Q., et al.: Rate-dependent bifurcation dodging in a thermoacoustic system driven by colored noise. Nonlinear Dyn. 104(3), 2733–2743 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu, Y., Liu, X., Li, Y., et al.: Heterogeneous diffusion processes and nonergodicity with Gaussian colored noise in layered diffusivity landscapes. Phys. Rev. E 102(6), 062106 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Xu, Y., Yue, H., Wu, J.L.: On Lp-strong convergence of an averaging principle for non-Lipschitz slow-fast systems with Lévy noise. Appl. Math. Lett. 115, 106973 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu, Q., Xu, Y., Li, Y.G.: Complex dynamics of a conceptual airfoil structure with consideration of extreme flight conditions. Nonlinear Dyn. 111(16), 14991–15010 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mei, R., Xu, Y., Kurths, J.: Transport and escape in a deformable channel driven by fractional Gaussian noise. Phys. Rev. E 100(2), 022114 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Thota, P., Krauskopf, B., Lowenberg, M.: Bifurcation analysis of nose-landing-gear shimmy with lateral and longitudinal bending. J. Aircr. 47(1), 87–95 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Von Schlippe, B., Dietrich, R.: Shimmying of a pneumatic wheel. NACA TM-1365, pp. 125–160 (1954)

  36. Eret, P., Kennedy, J., Bennett, G.J.: Effect of noise reducing components on nose landing gear stability for a mid-size aircraft coupled with vortex shedding and freeplay. J. Sound Vib. 354, 91–103 (2015)

  37. Kuznetsov, Y.A.: Two-parameter bifurcations of equilibria in continuous-time dynamical systems. Elem. Appl. Bifurc. Theory 112, 293–392 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Atabay, E., Ozkol, I.: Application of a magnetorheological damper modeled using the current-dependent Bouc–Wen model for shimmy suppression in a torsional nose landing gear with and without freeplay. J. Vib. Control 20(11), 1622–1644 (2014)

  39. Marwan, N., Romano, M.C., Thiel, M., et al.: Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems. Phys. Rep. 438(5–6), 237–329 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Takens, F.: Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. Lect. Notes Math. 898, 366–381 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Marwan, N., Kurths, J.: Nonlinear analysis of bivariate data with cross recurrence plots. Phys. Lett. A 302(5–6), 299–307 (2002)

  42. Richman, J.S., Lake, D.E., Moorman, J.R.: Sample entropy. Methods Enzymol. 384, 172–184 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was partly supported by the NSF of China (Grant No. 12072264). Q. Liu thanks the support of China Scholarship Council (CSC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XD was involved in conceptualization, methodology, investigation and writing—original draft. YX was responsible for conceptualization, methodology, funding acquisition and writing—review and editing. QL contributed to visualization, methodology and writing—review and editing. CL, XY, XL and JK took part in writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Xu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

(1):

Recurrence plot

RP is especially suitable for short time series data, and can test the stationarity and internal similarity of time series. Following Takens’ embedding theorem [40], the dynamics can be appropriately presented by a reconstruction of the phase space trajectory \({{\textbf{x}}_i}\) from a time series \(u_k\) (with a sampling time t) by using an embedding dimension m and a time delay \(\tau _1\). The RP measures recurrences of a trajectory \({\textbf{x}_i} \in {\mathbb {R}} ^d \) in phase space, and CRP compares dynamics of two trajectories \({\textbf{x}_i}\) and \({\textbf{y}_j}\), which can be formally expressed as [39],

$$\begin{aligned}{} & {} {R_{i,j}}\left( \varepsilon \right) = \Theta \left( {\varepsilon - \left\| {{{\textbf{x}}_i} - {{\textbf{x}}_j}} \right\| } \right) , i,j = 1,...,{\mathcal {N}}, \\{} & {} {CR_{i,j}}\left( \varepsilon \right) = \Theta \left( {\varepsilon - \left\| {{{\textbf{x}}_i} - {{\textbf{y}}_j}} \right\| } \right) ,\\{} & {} i= 1,...,{\mathcal {N}}, j = 1,...,{\mathcal {M}} \end{aligned}$$

where \({\mathcal {N}}\) and \({\mathcal {M}}\) are the number of measured points and \(\varepsilon \) is a predefined threshold distance. Consider a series of intervals with a given colour corresponding to each interval to this type of recursive graphs, called the unthresholded recurrence plot. \(\Theta \left( \cdot \right) \) is the Heaviside function (i.e. \(\Theta \left( x \right) = 0\), if \(x < 0\), and \(\Theta \left( x \right) = 1\) otherwise), and \(\left\| \cdot \right\| \) is a norm. For \(\varepsilon \)-recurrent states, i.e. for states which are in an \(\varepsilon \)-neighbourhood, we have \({\textbf{x}_i} \approx {\textbf{x}_j} \Leftrightarrow {R_{i,j}} \equiv 1\), and here, we use the most frequently norm \(L_2\)-norm (Euclidean norm).

(2):

Recurrence rate

The recurrence rate for CRP is defined as [41]

$$\begin{aligned} RR\left( t \right) = \frac{1}{{N - t}}\sum \limits _{l = 1}^{N - t} {l{P_t}\left( l \right) }, \end{aligned}$$

where \({P_t}\left( l \right) \) are the distributions of the diagonal line lengths. The index \(t \in \left[ { - T,T} \right] \) marks the number of the diagonal line. \(t = 0\) marks the main diagonal, \(t > 0\) the diagonals above and \(t < 0\) the diagonals below the main diagonal, which represent positive and negative time delays, respectively.

(3):

Determinism

The determinism is the proportion of recurrence points forming long diagonal structures of all recurrence points [41], that is,

$$\begin{aligned} DET\left( t \right) = \frac{{\sum \nolimits _{l = {l_{\min }}}^{N - t} {l{P_t}\left( l \right) } }}{{\sum \nolimits _{l = 1}^{N - t} {l{P_t}\left( l \right) } }}. \end{aligned}$$

Stochastic as well as heavily fluctuating data cause none or only short diagonals, whereas deterministic systems cause longer diagonals. If both deterministic systems have the same or similar phase space behaviour, i.e. parts of the phase space trajectories meet the same phase space regions during certain times, the amount of longer diagonals increases and the amount of smaller diagonals decreases. High values of DET represent a long time span of the occurrence of a similar dynamics in both systems. DET are sensitive to fast and highly fluctuating data.

(4):

Sample entropy

Sample entropy is a nonlinear dynamic parameter used to quantify the regularity and unpredictability of time series fluctuations. It uses a non-negative number to represent the complexity of a time series, reflecting the possibility of new information occurring in the time series.

$$\begin{aligned} SampEn\left( {{m_1},{r_1},S} \right) = \mathop {\lim }\limits _{S \rightarrow \infty } \left\{ { - \ln \left[ {\frac{{{A^{{m_1}}}\left( {{r_1}} \right) }}{{{B^{{m_1}}}\left( {{r_1}} \right) }}} \right] } \right\} , \end{aligned}$$

where \({m_1}\) is dimension, \({r_1}\) is the set distance, S is the number of data, \({A^{{m_1}}}\left( {{r_1}} \right) = \frac{1}{{S - {m_1} - 1}}A\), and \({B^{{m_1}}}\left( {{r_1}} \right) = \frac{1}{{S - {m_1} - 1}}B\). A and B are the number of two sets of sequences whose distance is less than or equal to \(r_1\). The more complex the time series, the greater the approximate entropy corresponding to it [42].

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, X., Xu, Y., Liu, Q. et al. Shimmy dynamics in a dual-wheel nose landing gear with freeplay under stochastic wind disturbances. Nonlinear Dyn 112, 2477–2499 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-09182-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-09182-3

Keywords

Navigation