Skip to main content
Log in

Complex dynamics and control of a dynamic R&D Bertrand triopoly game model with bounded rational rule

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we model a dynamic R&D two-stage input competition triopoly game characterized by players with a bounded rationality rule as a discrete nonlinear dynamic system, where we focus on spillover effects on cost reductions. We analyze the stability of the Nash equilibrium and obtain the stability conditions and the stability region. We show that the Nash equilibrium loses its stability and complex dynamic behaviors occur after increasing the input adjustment speed parameters. Finally, the straight-line stabilization method is applied for chaos control. The results obtained have theoretical implications for manufacturers regarding R&D input decisions in real economic markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agiza, H.N.: On the analysis of stability, bifurcation, chaos and chaos control of Kopel map. Chaos Solitons Fractals 10, 1909–1916 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Kopel, M.: Simple and complex adjustment dynamics in Cournot duopoly models. Chaos Solitons Fractals 7, 2031–2048 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Agliari, A., Naimzada, A.K., Pecora, N.: Nonlinear dynamics of a Cournot duopoly game with differentiated products. Appl. Math. Comput. 281, 1–15 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Bischi, G.I., Mammana, C., Gardini, L.: Multistability and cyclic attractors in duopoly games. Chaos Solitons Fractals 11, 543–564 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Elsadany, A.A.: Competition analysis of a triopoly game with bounded rationality. Chaos Solitons Fractals 45, 1343–1348 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ding, Z., Li, Q., Ge, D., Jiang, S.: Research on dynamics in a resource extraction game with bounded rationality. Appl. Math. Comput. 236, 628–634 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Ding, Z., Wang, Q., Jiang, S.: Analysis on the dynamics of a Cournot investment game with bounded rationality. Econ. Model. 39, 204–212 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ma, J., Xie, L.: The comparison and complex analysis on dual-channel supply chain under different channel power structures and uncertain demand. Nonlinear Dyn. 83, 1379–1393 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Peng, Y., Lu, Q.: Complex dynamics analysis for a duopoly Stackelberg game model with bounded rationality. Appl. Math. Comput. 271, 259–268 (2015)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Shi, L., Sheng, Z., Xu, F.: The dynamics of competition in remanufacturing: a stability analysis. Econ. Model. 50, 245–253 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Agiza, H.N., Elsadany, A.A.: Chaotic dynamics in nonlinear duopoly game with heterogeneous players. Appl. Math. Comput. 149, 843–860 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Askar, S.S., Alnowibet, K.: Nonlinear oligopolistic game with isoelastic demand function: rationality and local monopolistic approximation. Chaos Solitons Fractals 84, 15–22 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Cavalli, F., Naimzada, A.: A Cournot duopoly game with heterogeneous players: nonlinear dynamics of the gradient rule versus local monopolistic approach. Appl. Math. Comput. 249, 382–388 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Cavalli, F., Naimzada, A.: Nonlinear dynamics and convergence speed of heterogeneous Cournot duopolies involving best response mechanisms with different degrees of rationality. Nonlinear Dyn. 81, 967–979 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Ding, Z., Li, Q., Jiang, S., Wang, X.: Dynamics in a Cournot investment game with heterogeneous players. Appl. Math. Comput. 256, 939–950 (2015)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Ding, J., Mei, Q., Yao, H.: Dynamics and adaptive control of a duopoly advertising model based on heterogeneous expectations. Nonlinear Dyn. 67, 129–138 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Elsadany, A.A.: A dynamic Cournot duopoly model with different strategies. J. Egypt. Math. Society 23, 56–61 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Elsadany, A.A., Agiza, H.N., Elabbasy, E.M.: Complex dynamics and chaos control of heterogeneous quadropoly game. Appl. Math. Comput. 219, 11110–11118 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Naimzada, A., Tramontana, F.: Two different routes to complex dynamics in an heterogeneous triopoly game. J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 21, 553–563 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Peng, Y., Lu, Q., Xiao, Y.: A dynamic Stackelberg duopoly model with different strategies. Chaos Solitons Fractals 85, 128–134 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Shi, L., Sheng, Z., Xu, F.: Complexity analysis of remanufacturing duopoly game with different competition strategies and heterogeneous players. Nonlinear Dyn. 82, 1081–1092 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Tramontana, F.: Heterogeneous duopoly with isoelastic demand function. Econ. Model. 27, 350–357 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tramontana, F., Elsadany, A.E.A.: Heterogeneous triopoly game with isoelastic demand function. Nonlinear Dyn. 68, 187–193 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahmed, E., Elsadany, A.A., Puu, T.: On Bertrand duopoly game with differentiated goods. Appl. Math. Comput. 251, 169–179 (2015)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Fanti, L., Gori, L., Mammana, C., Michetti, E.: Local and global dynamics in a duopoly with price competition and market share delegation. Chaos Solitons Fractals 69, 253–270 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Ding, Z., Zhu, X., Jiang, S.: ArticleDynamical Cournot game with bounded rationality and time delay for marginal profit. Math. Comput. Simul. 100, 1–12 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Elsadany, A.A.: Dynamics of a delayed duopoly game with bounded rationality. Math. Comput. Model. 52, 1479–1489 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Elsadany, A.A., Awad, A.M.: Dynamical analysis of a delayed monopoly game with a log-concave demand function. Oper. Res. Lett. 44, 33–38 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Fanti, L., Gori, L., Mammana, C., Michetti, E.: The dynamics of a Bertrand duopoly with differentiated products: synchronization, intermittency and global dynamics. Chaos Solitons Fractals 52, 73–86 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Ma, J., Wu, K.: Complex system and influence of delayed decision on the stability of a triopoly price game model. Nonlinear Dyn. 73, 1741–1751 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Andaluz, J., Jarne, G.: Stability of vertically differentiated Cournot and Bertrand-type models when firms are boundedly rational. Ann. Oper. Res. 238, 1–25 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Xin, B., Chen, T.: On a master-slave Bertrand game model. Econ Model 28, 1864–1870 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Naimzada, A.K., Tramontana, F.: Dynamic properties of a Cournot–Bertrand duopoly game with differentiated products. Econ. Model. 29, 1436–1439 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ma, J., Pu, X.: The research on Cournot–Bertrand duopoly model with heterogeneous goods and its complex characteristics. Nonlinear Dyn. 72, 895–903 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Ahmed, E., Elettreby, M.F., Hegazi, A.S.: On Puu’s incomplete information formulation for the standard and multi-team Bertrand game. Chaos Solitons Fractals 30, 1180–1184 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Ahmed, E., Hegazi, A.S.: On dynamical multi-team and signaling games. Appl. Math. Comput. 172, 524–530 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Ding, Z., Hang, Q., Tian, L.: Analysis of the dynamics of Cournot team-game with heterogeneous players. Appl. Math. Comput. 215, 1098–1105 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Elettreby, M.F., Mansour, M.: On Cournot dynamic multi-team game using incomplete information dynamical system. Appl. Math. Comput. 218, 10691–10696 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Li, T., Ma, J.: The complex dynamics of R&D competition models of three oligarchs with heterogeneous players. Nonlinear Dyn. 74, 45–54 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Xu, H., Wang, G., Chen, S.: Controlling Chaos by a modified straight-line stabilization method. Eur. Phys. J. B 22, 65–69 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang, L., Liu, Z., Mao, J.: Controlling hyperchaos. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 67–70 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61273231); it was also supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2014QNB08), Postdoctoral Fund of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. 1401055B) and Department of Education and Social Sciences project of Jiangsu Provincial (Grant No. 2014SJD413).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinyu Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tu, H., Wang, X. Complex dynamics and control of a dynamic R&D Bertrand triopoly game model with bounded rational rule. Nonlinear Dyn 88, 703–714 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-3271-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-3271-6

Keywords

Navigation