Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Determinants of risk attitude and risk perception under changing climate among farmers in Punjab, Pakistan

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agriculture sector is uncertain and susceptible to climatic risks. Farmer’s risk attitude and risk perceptions play important roles in managing the risks at farm level. Precise and timely risk perception may help to evaluate the incidence and severity of risks while farmers’ attitude determines the response of the farmers toward risk. Therefore, farmers’ risk attitude and perceptions are significant in farmers’ decision-making during the uncertain conditions. The present study was designed to examine the farmers’ risk attitude and risk perceptions related to climatic factors. The study also focused on socioeconomic factors affecting the farmers’ risk attitude and risk perceptions. The study was conducted in three districts of Punjab such as Bahawalpur, Layyah and Rahim Yar Khan. Using a multistage sampling technique, a sample of 382 respondents was interviewed from all districts. The study employed the Equally Likely Certainty Equivalent and Cubic Utility Function to assess the risk attitude. Risk matrix was used to estimate the risk perceptions related to climate factors. The study used probit model to analyze the factors affecting the risk attitude and risk perceptions among farmers. Findings of the study indicate that most of the farmers have risk averse behavior. Farmers perceive rise in temperature as high risk followed by erratic rains, wind storms and pest breakouts. The results show that farmer’s age, education, farming experience and off-farm income significantly determine the farmers’ risk attitude and perceptions. The study results will be helpful for policy makers and researchers to design risk management strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data and material availability

Data are confidential and cannot be shared.

References

  • Ahmad D, Afzal M, Rauf A (2019) Analysis of wheat farmers’ risk perceptions and attitudes: evidence from Punjab. Pak Nat Hazards 95(3):845–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahsan DA (2011) Farmers’ motivations, risk perceptions and risk management strategies in a developing economy: Bangladesh experience. J Risk Res 14(3):325–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akhtar S, Li GC, Ullah R, Nazir A, Iqbal MA, Raza MH, Faisal M (2018) Factors influencing hybrid maize farmers’ risk attitudes and their perceptions in Punjab province Pakistan. J Integr Agric 17(6):1454–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JR (1997) An “ABC” of risk management in agriculture: overview of procedures and perspectives. Backhuys Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow kJ (1964) The role of securities in the optimal allocation of risk bearing. Rev Econ Stud 31(2):91–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asravor RK (2019) Farmers’ risk preference and the adoption of risk management strategies in Northern Ghana. J Environ Planning Manage 62(5):881–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basnayake J, Lakshmanan P, Jackson P, Chapman S, Natarajan S (2016) Canopy temperature: a predictor of sugarcane yield for irrigated and rainfed conditions. Proc Int Soc Sugar Cane Technol 29:50–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatti MS (2000) Sugarcane disease management. Pak Sugar J 15(6):62–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Binici T, Koc AA, Zulauf CR, Bayaner A (2003) Risk attitudes of farmers in terms of risk aversion: a case study of lower Seyhan plain farmers in Adana province, Turkey. Turk J Agric for 27(5):305–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandio AA, Jiang Y (2018) Determinants of credit constraints: evidence from Sindh Pakistan. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 54(15):3401–3410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang FJ, Wang YC, Tsai WP (2016) Modelling intelligent water resources allocation for multi-users. Water Resour Manage 30(4):1395–1413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper DF, Grey S, Raymond G, Walker P (2005) Project risk management guidelines. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadzie SKN, Acquah HDG (2012) Attitudes toward risk and coping responses: the case of food crop farmers at AgonaDuakwa in Agona east district of Ghana. Int J Agric for 2(2):29–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Drollete SA (2009) Managing production risk in agriculture. Uttah State University, Department of Applied Economics

    Google Scholar 

  • Duong TT, Brewer T, Luck J, Zander K (2019) A global review of farmers’ perceptions of agricultural risks and risk management strategies. Agriculture 9(1):10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein D, Kunzel V, Schafer L (2021) Global climate risk index 2021: who suffers most from extreme weather events? Weather-related loss events in 2019 and 2000–2019. German watch eV, Bonn

  • Ellis F (2000) The determinants of rural livelihood diversification in developing countries. J Agric Econ 51(2):289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahad S, Wang J, Khan AA, Ullah A, Ali U, Hossain MS, Bilal A (2018) Evaluation of farmers’ attitude and perception toward production risk: lessons from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, Pakistan. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 24(6):1710–1722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2008) Managing risk in farming, food and agriculture organization of United Nations, Rome. Available at www.fao.org/publications

  • Farooq N, Gheewala SH (2019) Water use and deprivation potential for sugarcane cultivation in Pakistan. J Sustain Energy Environ 10:33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes RP, da Costa Silva RW, Salemi LF, de Andrade TMB, de Moraes JM, Van Dijk AI, Martinelli LA (2017) The influence of sugarcane crop development on rainfall interception losses. J Hydrol 5(5):532–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finger R, Sauer J (2014) Climate risk management strategies in agriculture—the case of flood risk. In: 2014 agricultural and applied economics association’s (AAEA) annual meeting, 27–29 July 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Agricultural and Applied Economics Association available at https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/172679/files/finger_sauer_aaea2014.pdf

  • Flörke M, Schneider C, McDonald RI (2018) Water competition between cities and agriculture driven by climate change and urban growth. Nat Sustain 1(1):51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazanfar MU, Raza W, Gondal SK (2017) Screening of sugarcane cultivars against colletotrichum falcatum causing red rot disease and its control with different fungicides under laboratory conditions. Pak J Phytopathol 29(1):103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Y, Shen Y (2016) Agricultural water supply/demand changes under projected future climate change in the arid region of northwestern China. J Hydrol 5(4):257–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardaker JB, Huirne RBM, Anderson JR (1997) Coping with risk in agriculture. CAB International, Wallingford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield JL, Boote KJ, Kimball BA, Ziska LH, Izaurralde RC, Ort D, Thomson AM, Wolfe D (2011) Climate impacts on agriculture: implications for crop production. Agron J 103(2):351–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huong NTL, Bo YS, Fahad S (2017) Farmers’ perception, awareness and adaptation to climate change: evidence from northwest Vietnam. Int J Clim Change Strateg Manag 9(4):555–576. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-02-2017-0032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal MA (2017) Risk perceptions and management strategies of rice growing households: evidence from a developing country. J Appl Environ Biol Sci 7(3):15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal MA, Ping Q, Abid M, Kazmi SMM, Rizwan M (2016) Assessing risk perceptions and attitude among cotton farmers: a case of Punjab province, Pakistan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 16:68–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan ME, Abbas S, Arshad WR, Iqbal K (2018) Mini review: achievements in sugarcane variety production process. Pak Sugar J 33(3):15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan AA, Shah QA (2012) Corporate social responsibility: studying the sugar production process in Pakistan (3rd ed.). Prakhruti, Bangalore, India

  • Kouame EBH (2010) Risk, risk aversion and choice of risk management Strategies by cocoa farmers in western Cote D’ivoire. University of Cocody-AERC collaborative PHD program

  • Kundzewicz ZW, Kozyra J (2011) Reducing impacts of climatic threats to agriculture and rural areas. Pol J Agron 7:68–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusangaya S, Warburton ML, Van Garderen EA, Jewitt GP (2014) Impacts of climate change on water resources in southern Africa: a review. Phys Chem Earth Parts a/b/c 67:47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb RL (2003) Fertilizer use, risk, and off-farm labor markets in the semi-arid tropics of India. Am J Agric Econ 85(2):359–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Lin SH, Huang QY, Liang Q, Li YJ, Yang LT, Li YR (2019) Advances in research of lodging and evaluation in sugarcane. Appl Ecol Environ Res 17(3):6095–6105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas MP, Pabuayon IM (2011) Risk perceptions, attitudes, and influential factors of rainfed lowland rice farmers in Ilocos Norte, Philippines. Asian J Agric Dev 8(2):61–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Mall NK, Herman JD (2019) Water shortage risks from perennial crop expansion in California’s Central Valley. Environ Res Lett 14(10):104014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manandhar S, Pratoomchai W, Ono K, Kazama S, Komori D (2015) Local people’s perceptions of climate change and related hazards in mountainous areas of northern Thailand. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 11:47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansoor S, Khan MA, Khan NA (2016) Screening of sugarcane varieties/lines against whip smut disease in relation to epidemiological factors. J Plant Pathol Microbiol 7:366. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7471.1000366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesfin W, Fufa B, Haji J (2011) Pattern, trend and determinants of crop diversification: empirical evidence from smallholders in eastern Ethiopia. J Econ Sustain Dev 2(8):78–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Musser WN, Patrick GF (2002) How much does risk really matter to farmers? In a comprehensive assessment of the role of risk in US agriculture. Springer, Boston, MA, pp 537–556

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nadeem F, Jacobs B, Cordell D (2022) Mapping agricultural vulnerability to impacts of climate events of Punjab, Pakistan. Reg Environ Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-022-01918-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obisesan AA (2013) Credit accessibility and poverty among smallholder cassava farming households in South West Nigeria. Greener J Agric Sci 3(2):120–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogurtsov VA, Van Asseldonk MPAM, Huirne RBM (2008) Assessing and modelling catastrophic risk perceptions and attitudes in agriculture: a review. NJAS-Wageningen J Life Sci 56(1–2):39–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olarinde LO, Manyong VM, Akintola JO (2007) Attitudes towards risk among maize farmers in the dry savanna zone of Nigeria: some prospective policies for improving food production. Afr J Agric Res 2(8):399–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Olesen JE, Trnka M, Kersebaum KC, Skjelvåg AO, Seguin B, Peltonen-Sainio P, Micale F (2011) Impacts and adaptation of European crop production systems to climate change. Eur J Agron 34(2):96–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oparinde LO, Amos TT, Aturamu OA, Daramola AG (2018) Attitudes towards risk and risk combating strategies among maize and cassava farmers in Southwest, Nigeria. J Econ Manag Trade 21(7):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt JW (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32(1–2):122–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PSDF (Punjab Skilled Development Fund) (2018) Available online from https://www.psdf.org.pk/target-areas/map-of-punjab-province district-wise-in-pakistan/

  • Raskin R, Cochran RW (1986) Interpretations and transformations of scale for the pratt-arrow absolute risk aversion coefficient: implications for generalized stochastic dominance. West J Agric Econ 11(2):204–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehima M, Belay K, Dawit A, Rashid S (2013) Factors affecting farmers’ crops diversification: Evidence from SNNPR Ethiopia. Int J Agric Sci 3(6):558–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizwan M, Deyi Z, Nazir A, Ijaz U, Iqbal MA (2017) Risk perceptions and management strategies of rice growing households: evidence from a developing country. J Appl Environ Biol Sci 7(3):15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizwan M, Ping Q, Saboor A, Ahmed UI, Zhang D, Deyi Z, Teng L (2019) Measuring rice farmers’ risk perceptions and attitude: evidence from Pakistan. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 26:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos DLD, Sentelhas PC (2012) Climate change scenarios and their impact on the water balance of sugarcane production areas in the State of São Paulo. Brazil Revista Ambiente Água 7(2):07–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saqib S, Ahmad MM, Panezais S, Ali U (2016) Factors influencing farmers’ adoption of agricultural credit as a risk management strategy: the case of Pakistan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 17:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakoor U, Saboor A, Baig I, Afzal A, Rahman A (2015) Climate variability impacts on rice crop production in Pakistan. Pak J Agric Res 28(1):45–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh I, Verma RR, Srivastava TK (2018) Growth, yield, irrigation water use efficiency, juice quality and economics of sugarcane in pusa hydrogel application under different irrigation scheduling. Sugar Ind Technol 20(1):29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöberg L (2000) Factors in risk perception. Risk Anal 20(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah R, Jourdain D, Shivakoti GP, Dhakal S (2015a) Managing catastrophic risks in agriculture: simultaneous adoption of diversification and precautionary savings. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 12:268–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah R, Shivakoti GP, Ali G (2015b) Factors effecting farmers’ risk attitude and risk perceptions: the case of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 13:151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velandia M, Rejesus RM, Knight TO, Sherrick BJ (2009) Factors affecting farmers’ utilization of agricultural risk management tools: the case of crop insurance, forward contracting, and spreading sales. J Agric Appl Econ 41(1):107–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao D, Li YR (2015) Climate change and sugarcane production: potential impact and mitigation strategies. Int J Agron 2(2):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to farmers for facilitating the data and sharing their information about risk attitude and perceptions about climatic factors.

Funding

Funding information is not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MAY and KB contributed to conceptualization, methodology, and writing—original draft preparation, RA and SU contributed to software and writing—reviewing and editing, MF and SM contributed to visualization and investigation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Asim Yasin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farhan, M., Yasin, M.A., Bakhsh, K. et al. Determinants of risk attitude and risk perception under changing climate among farmers in Punjab, Pakistan. Nat Hazards 114, 2163–2176 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05465-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05465-x

Keywords

Navigation