Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An evaluation of existent methods for estimation of embankment dam breach parameters

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of dam-break analysis is considered important to predict the peak discharge during dam failure. This is essential to assess economic, social and environmental impacts downstream and to prepare the emergency response plan. Dam breach parameters such as breach width, breach height and breach formation time are the key variables to estimate the peak discharge during dam break. This study presents the evaluation of existing methods for estimation of dam breach parameters. Since all of these methods adopt regression analysis, uncertainty analysis of these methods becomes necessary to assess their performance. Uncertainty was performed using the data of more than 140 case studies of past recorded failures of dams, collected from different sources in the literature. The accuracy of the existing methods was tested, and the values of mean absolute relative error were found to be ranging from 0.39 to 1.05 for dam breach width estimation and from 0.6 to 0.8 for dam failure time estimation. In this study, artificial neural network (ANN) was recommended as an alternate method for estimation of dam breach parameters. The ANN method is proposed due to its accurate prediction when it was applied to similar other cases in water resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atallah TA (2002) A Review on dams and breach parameters estimation. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg

  • Azmatullah Md H, Deo MC, Deolalikar PB (2005) Neural networks for estimation of scour downstream of a ski-jump bucket. J Hydraul Eng 131(10):898–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas AK, Chatterjee S (1971) Dam disasters an assessment. Eng J (Canada) 54(3):3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarti A, Joshi N and Panjiar H (2015) Rainfall runoff analysis using artificial neural network. Indian J Sci Technol. doi:10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i14/54370

  • Chau KW (2006) Particle swarm optimization training algorithm for ANNs in stage prediction of Shing Mun River. J Hydrol 329(3–4):363–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chitsazan M, Rahmani G, Neyamadpour A (2013) Groundwater level simulation using artificial neural network: a case study from Aghili plain, urban area of Gotvand, south-west Iran. J Geope 3(1):35–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Cigizoglu HK, Alp M (2006) Generalized regression neural network in modelling river sediment yield. Adv Eng Softw 37(2006):63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa JE (1985) Floods from dam failures. Open file report. 85–560, Secretary. p 59

  • Daliakopoulos IN, Coulibalya P, Tsanis IK (2005) Groundwater level forecasting using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol 309(1–4):229–240. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DHI Water & Environment (2009) Dam and reservoirs—dam and levee failure modeling and mapping. MIKE Documentation. DHI Group, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Djurovic N, Domazet M, Stricevic R, Pocuca V, Spalevic V, Pivic R, Gregoric E, Domazet U (2015) Comparison of groundwater level models based on artificial neural networks and ANFIS. Sci World J. doi:10.1155/2015/742138

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler RF (1954) Comparison of theories and experiments for the hydraulic dam-break wave. Int As Sci Hydrol 3(38):319–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmazoghi HG (2013) Fuzzy algorithm for estimating average breach widths of embankment dams. Nat Hazards 68:229–248. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0350-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsafi SH (2014) Artificial neural networks (ANNs) for flood forecasting at Dongola Station in the River Nile, Sudan. Alex Eng J 53:655–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Shafie A, Mukhlisin M, Najah A, Taha MR (2011) Performance of artificial neural network and regression techniques for rainfall–runoff prediction. Int J Phys Sci 6(8):1997–2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Froehlich D (1995a) Peak outflow from breached embankment dam. J Water Resour Plan Manage 121(1):90–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froehlich D (1995b) Embankment dam breach parameters revisited. Water resources engineering. In: Proceedings of the 1995 conference on water resources engineering. Accessed 14–18 Aug, San Antonio, Texas. 887–891

  • Froehlich D (2008) Embankment dam breach parameters and their uncertainties. J Hydraul Eng 134(12):1708–1721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee D (2009) Comparison of dam breach parameter estimators. World Environ Water Resour Congr. doi:10.1061/41036(342)339

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbsa MS, Morganb N, Maiera HR, Dandya GC, Nixonc JB, Holmes M (2006) Investigation into the relationship between chlorine decay and water distribution parameters using data driven methods. Math Comput Model 44:485–498. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2006.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruner E (1963) Dam disasters: Proceedings, Institution of Civil Engineers. London, 24:47–60

  • Hanson G, Cook K, Hunt S (2005) Physical modeling of overtopping erosion and breach formation of cohesive embankments. Trans ASABE 48(5):1783–1794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haykin S (1994) Neural Networks: a comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht-Nielsen R (1987) Kolmogorov’s mapping neural network existence theorem. In: Proc. 1st IEEE Int Conf on Neural Networks. San Diego. 3:11–14

  • Heddam S (2016) Secchi disk depth estimation from water quality parameters: artificial neural network versus multiple linear regression models. Environ Process. doi:10.1007/s40710-016-0144-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooshyaripor F, Tahershamsi A, Golian S (2014) Application of copula method and neural networks for predicting peak outflow from breached embankments. J Hydro Environ Res 8(3):292–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen RB (1980) Dams and public safety. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, p 332

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson FA, Illes (1976) A classification of dams failures. In: International water power and dam construction, December 1976, pp 43–45

  • Joorabchi An, Zhang, H, Blumenstein M (2009) Application of neural network for ground water dynamics in coastal aquifers. Journal of Coastal Research. In: Proceeding of the 10th International Coastal Symposium. 966–970

  • Kalin L, Sabahattin I, Schoonover JE, Lockaby BG (2010) Predicting water quality in unmonitored watersheds using artificial neural networks. J Environ Qual 39:1429–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalil BM, Awadallahn G, Karaman H, El-Sayed A (2012) Application of artificial neural networks for the prediction of water quality variables in the nile delta. J Water Resour Prot 4:388–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lekkas DF, Cn ONOF, LEE M, BALTAS E (2004) Application of artificial neural networks for flood forecasting. Global Nest. Int J 6(3):204–210

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of the ideas imminent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5:115–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melesse AM, Ahmad S, McClain ME, Wang X, Lim YH (2011) Suspended sediment load prediction of river systems: an artificial neural network approach. Agric Water Manag 98:855–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noori R, Sabahi MS, Karbassi AR (2010) Evaluation of PCA and Gamma test techniques on ANN operation for weekly solid waste predicting. J Environ Manage 91(3):767–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palani S, Liong S, Tkalichn P (2008) An ANN application for water quality forecasting. Mar Pollut Bull 56(2008):1586–1597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pektas AO, Erdik T (2014) Peak discharge prediction due to embankment dam break by using sensitivity analysis based ANN. KSCE J Civil Eng 18(6):1868–1876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce MW, Thornton CI, Abt SR (2010) Predicting peak outflow from breached embankment dams. J Hydrol Eng 15(5):338–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powledge GR, Ralston DC, Miller P, Chen YH, Clopper PE, Temple DM (1989a) Mechanics of overflow erosion on embankments. I: research activities. J Hydraul Eng 115(8):1040–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powledge GR, Ralston DC, Miller P, Chen YH, Clopper PE, Temple DM (1989b) Mechanics of overflow erosion on embankments. II: hydraulic and design considerations. J Hydraul Eng 115(8):1056–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajurkar MP, Kothyari UC, Chaube UA (2002) Artificial neural networks for daily rainfall–runoff modelling. Hydrologkal Sciences-Jo umai-des Sciences Hydrologiques 47:65–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralston DC (1987) Mechanics of embankment erosion during overflow. In: Proc. ASCE National Conference on Hydraulic Engineering, Reston, Va. 733–738

  • Ramirez MCV, Ferreira NJ, Velho HF (2005) Artificial neural network technique for rainfall forecasting applied to the Sao Paulo region. J Hydrol 301(1–4):146–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razad AZA, Muda RS, Sidek LM, Azia ISA, Mansor FH, Yalit R (2013) Simulation of breach outflow for earthfill dam. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ. Sci 16:12–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Re R (1946) A study of sudden water releases from a body of water to a canal by the graphical method. La Houille Blanche 1(3):181–187

  • Riad S, Mania J (2004) Rain–runoff model using an artificial neural network. Math Comput Model 40:839–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter A (1892) The propagation of water waves. Ver, Deutsch Ingenie (Ver. 8)

  • Rogers LL, Dowla FU, Johnson VM (1995) Optimal field-scale groundwater remediation using neural networks and the genetic algorithm. Environ Sci Technol 29(5):1145–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt F (1958) The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol Rev 65(6):386–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakkas JG, Strelkoff T (1973) Dam-break flood in a prismatic dry. J Hydraul Div 99(12):2195–2216

    Google Scholar 

  • Schocklitch A (1917) On waves created by dam breaches. Adak. Wiss. Proc. 126. Vienna. 1489–1514

  • Singh KP, Snorrason A (1982) Sensitivity of outflow peaks and flood stages to the selection of dam breach parameters and simulation models. In: SWS Contract Report 288. State Water Survey Division. Department of Energy and Natural Resources, Illinois

  • State of Colorado Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Resources (2010) Guidelines for dam breach analysis, Rep

  • Stoker JM (1957) Water waves the mathematical theory with applications. Interscience, New York, pp 452–255

  • Su ST, Barnes AH (1970) Geometric and frictional effects of sudden releases. J Hydraul Div 96(11):2185–2200

    Google Scholar 

  • Unal B, Mamak M, Seckin G, Cobaner M (2010) Comparison of an ANN approach with 1-D and 2-D methods for estimating discharge capacity of straight compound channels Adv. Eng Softw 41:120–129

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Bureau of Reclamation (1988) Downstream Hazard Classification Guidelines, ACER Technical Memorandum No. 11, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, Colorado

  • Von Thun JL, Gillette AM (1990) Guidance on breach parameters. Unpublished internal document, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Accessed March 13, Denver, Colorado

  • Wahl TL (1998) Prediction of embankment dam breach parameters: a literature review and needs assessment, dam safety research report DSO-98-004. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl TL (2004) Uncertainty of predictions of embankment dam breach parameters. J Hydraul Eng 130(5):389–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl TL (2010) Dam breach modeling—an overview of analysis methods. In: Joint federal interagency conference on sedimentation and hydrologic modeling, 27 June–1July, Las Vegas, NV

  • Xu Y, Zhang LM (2009) Breaching parameters for earth and rockfill dams. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(12):1957–1970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zagonjolli M (2007) Dam break modelling, risk assessment and uncertainty analysis for flood mitigation, Dissertation, Delft University of Technology

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of University Putra Malaysia (Grant type GP-IPS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saad Sh. Sammen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sammen, S.S., Mohamed, T.A., Ghazali, A.H. et al. An evaluation of existent methods for estimation of embankment dam breach parameters. Nat Hazards 87, 545–566 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2764-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2764-z

Keywords

Navigation