Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

What constitutes successful participatory disaster risk management? Insights from post-earthquake reconstruction work in rural Gujarat, India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although for decades, public participation in disaster risk management has been strongly advocated for, in reality, it remains elusive. Planners and practitioners are still struggling to find ways to meaningfully involve the local community in disaster management programs; so far, apparently successful projects and initiatives have seldom been scaled up or replicated. The reason for this is that no comprehensive framework for participatory disaster risk management exists, and no systematic evaluation has been made to assess the necessary elements and appropriate paths for meaningful public participation in disaster management. This study attempts to examine the process and identify outcome-based factors that account for successful participatory disaster risk management. To accomplish this, we have evaluated reconstruction projects in earthquake-affected rural Gujarat, India, where the government envisioned a people-centric reconstruction project, but provided no public participation framework or guidelines. As a result, several reconstruction models pursuing different levels and types of public participation ultimately emerged. We selected three dominant reconstruction approaches and examined the extent to which various processes and outcome-based factors were successful in promoting ideal levels of public participation during these reconstruction projects. This study is considered an example of pioneering research in defining factors that account for successful participatory disaster risk management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Source: the original plan was provided by a respondent to the first author of this paper, and subsequently digitized for clarity.

Fig. 7

Source: Manav Sadhana (NGO)

Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen KM (2006) Community-based disaster preparedness and climate adaptation: local capacity-building in the Philippines. Disasters 30(1):81–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plan 35(4):216–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asian Development Bank (ADB) and World Bank (WB) (2001) Gujarat earthquake recovery program: assessment report to the Government of Gujarat and India. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/2608_fullreport.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr 2016

  • Bajek R, Matsuda Y, Okada N (2008) Japan’s Jishu-bosai-soshiki community activities: analysis of its role in participatory community disaster risk management. Nat Hazards 44(2):281–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barenstein JD (2006) Housing reconstruction in post-earthquake Gujarat: a comparative analysis. Overseas development institute (ODI). Humanitarian practice network (HPN), London, UK. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.365.7517&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 25 Aug 2016

  • Blackstock KL, Kelly GJ, Horsey BL (2007) Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. Ecol Econ 60(4):726–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blahna DJ, Yonts-Shepard S (1989) Public involvement in resource planning: toward bridging the gap between policy and implementation. Soc Nat Resour 2(1):209–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland J, Rahman M (1999) Community-based disaster management during the 1997 Red River Flood in Canada. Disasters 23(2):174–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr G, Blöschl G, Loucks DP (2012) Evaluating participation in water resource management: a review. Water Resour Res 48(11):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase LC, Decker DJ, Lauber TB (2004) Public participation in wildlife management: what do stakeholders want? Soc Nat Resour 17(7):629–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen LC, Liu YC, Chan KC (2006) Integrated community-based disaster management program in Taiwan: a case study of Shang—an village. Nat Hazards 37(1–2):209–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chess C, Purcell K (1999) Public participation and the environment: do we know what works? Environ Sci Technol 33(16):2685–2692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin SJ, Petterson MG, Taylor PW, Biliki R (2004a) Maximising multi-stakeholder participation in government and community volcanic hazard management programs; a case study from Savo, Solomon Islands. Nat Hazards 33(1):105–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin SJ, Gaylord DR, Charley D, Alloway BV, Wallez S, Esau JW (2004b) Participatory methods of incorporating scientific with traditional knowledge for volcanic hazard management on Ambae Island, Vanuatu. Bull Volcanol 66(7):652–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson CH, Johnson C, Lizarralde G, Dikmen N, Sliwinski A (2007) Truths and myths about community participation in post-disaster housing projects. Habitat Int 31(1):100–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer J, Stringer LC, Dougill AJ, Leventon J, Nshimbi M, Chama F, Syampungani S (2014) Assessing participatory practices in community-based natural resource management: experiences in community engagement from southern Africa. J Environ Manag 137:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JC, Maceda EA (2009) Participatory three-dimensional mapping for disaster risk reduction. Participatory Learn Action, Special Issue Community-based Adapt Clim Change 60:109–118

    Google Scholar 

  • GSDMA (Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority) (2001) Gujarat earthquake rehabilitation and reconstruction policy, Gandhinagar. http://www.gsdma.org/policies-acts/gujarat-earthquake.aspx. Accessed 5 Apr 2016

  • Lavell A, Mansilla E (2003) Local level risk management: concept and practices. CEPREDENAC-UNDP, Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskrey A (2011) Revisiting community-based disaster risk management. Environ Hazards 10(1):42–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCool SF, Guthrie K (2001) Mapping the dimensions of successful public participation in messy natural resources management situations. Soc Nat Resour 14(4):309–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer J, Kelman I, Lloyd K, Suchet-Pearson S (2008) Reflections on use of participatory research for disaster risk reduction. Area 40(2):172–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Na JI, Okada N, Fang L (2008) A collaborative action development approach to improving community disaster reduction using the Yonmenkaigi system. J Nat Disaster Sci 30(2):57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Na JI, Okada N, Fang L (2009) Collaborative action development for community disaster reduction by utilizing the Yonmenkaigi system method. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2009. SMC 2009. IEEE, pp 1929–1934

  • Okada N et al (2013) The Yonmenkaigi system method: an implementation-oriented group decision support approach. Gr Decision Negotiat 22(1):53–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osti R, Tanaka S, Tokioka T (2008) Flood hazard mapping in developing countries: problems and prospects. Disaster Prev Manag: Int J 17(1):104–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey BH, Okazaki K (2005) Community-based disaster management: empowering communities to cope with disaster risks. Reg Dev Dialogue 26(2):52

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (1987) How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce L (2003) Disaster management and community planning, and public participation: how to achieve sustainable hazard mitigation. Nat Hazards 28:211–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M (2007) Learning from others: the scope and challenges for participatory disaster risk assessment. Disasters 31(4):373–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv 141(10):2417–2431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn O (2015) Stakeholder and public involvement in risk governance. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 6(1):8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosener JB (1981) User-oriented evaluation: a new way to view citizen participation. J Appl Behav Sci 17(4):583–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2000) Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Sci Technol Hum Values 25(1):3–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samaddar S, Okada N (2006) Participatory approach for post-earthquake reconstruction in the villages of Kachchh, India. Ann Disaster Prev Res Inst, Kyoto Univ B 49:197–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Samaddar S, Chatterjee R, Misra BA, Tatano H (2011) Participatory risk mapping for identifying spatial risks in flood prone slum areas, Mumbai. Annuals of Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, pp 137–146

  • Samaddar S, Misra BA, Tatano H (2012) Flood risk awareness and preparedness: the role of trust in information sources. In 2012 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC), IEEE–SMC, Oct 2012, pp 3099–3104

  • Samaddar S, Yokomatsu M, Dayour F, Oteng-Ababio M, Dzivenu T, Adams M, Ishikawa H (2015a) Evaluating effective public participation in disaster management and climate change adaptation: insights from northern Ghana through a user-based approach. Risk, Hazards Crisis Public Policy 6(1):117–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samaddar S, Choi J, Misra BA, Tatano H (2015b) Insights on social learning and collaborative action plan development for disaster risk reduction: practicing Yonmenkaigi System Method (YSM) in flood-prone Mumbai. Nat Hazards 75(2):1531–1554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson D, Sharma A (2008) Winners and losers from the 2001 Gujarat earthquake. Environ Urban 20(1):177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos SL, Chess C (2003) Evaluating citizen advisory boards: the importance of theory and participant-based criteria and practical implications. Risk Anal 23(2):269–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sensarma SR, Okada N (2006) Multi stage conflict resolution process in the case of community disaster risk management: a retrospective analysis. In: 2006 IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. IEEE, vol 2, pp 929–935

  • Shaw R (2006) Critical issues of community based flood mitigation: examples from Bangladesh and Vietnam. J Cult J Sci Cult, Special Issue Flood Disaster Risk Reduct Asia 72(1/2):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw R (ed) (2012) Overview of community based disaster risk reduction. In: Book series: community-based disaster risk reduction. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, pp 3–17

  • Teitelbaum S (2014) Criteria and indicators for the assessment of community forestry outcomes: a comparative analysis from Canada. J Environ Manag 132:257–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiruppugazh V (2007) Post-disaster reconstruction and the window of opportunity: a review of select concepts, models and research studies. Jamsetji Tata Centre for Disaster Management Working Paper Series, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, pp 31–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas T, Ott JS, Liese H (2011) Coproduction, participation and satisfaction with rehabilitation services following the 2001 earthquake in Gujarat, India. Int Soc Work. doi:10.1177/0020872811400717

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran P, Shaw R, Chantry G, Norton J (2009) GIS and local knowledge in disaster management: a case study of flood risk mapping in Viet Nam. Disasters 33(1):152–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Aalst MK, Cannon T, Burton I (2008) Community level adaptation to climate change: the potential role of participatory community risk assessment. Glob Environ Change 18(1):165–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webler T (1995) Right discourse in public participation: an evaluative yardstick. In: Renn O, Webler T, Wiedemann P (eds) Fairness and competence in public participation: evaluating models for environmental discourse. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 35–86

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Webler T, Tuler S, Krueger ROB (2001) What is a good public participation process? five perspectives from the public. Environ Manag 27(3):435–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamori K (2012) Using games in community disaster prevention exercises. Group Decis Negot 21(4):571–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto, Japan

    Subhajyoti Samaddar, Junho Choi & Hirokazu Tatano

  2. Institute of Disaster Area Revitalization, Regrowth and Governance, Kawansei Gakuin University, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan

    Norio Okada

Authors
  1. Subhajyoti Samaddar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Norio Okada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Junho Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hirokazu Tatano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subhajyoti Samaddar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Samaddar, S., Okada, N., Choi, J. et al. What constitutes successful participatory disaster risk management? Insights from post-earthquake reconstruction work in rural Gujarat, India. Nat Hazards 85, 111–138 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2564-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2564-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation