Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Soft sediments and damage pattern: a few case studies from large Indian earthquakes vis-a-vis seismic risk evaluation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

India is prone to earthquake hazard; almost 65 % area falls in high to very high seismic zones, as per the seismic zoning map of the country. The Himalaya and the Indo-Gangetic plains are particularly vulnerable to high seismic hazard. Any major earthquake in Himalaya can cause severe destruction and multiple fatalities in urban centers located in the vicinity. Seismically induced ground motion amplification and soil liquefaction are the two main factors responsible for severe damage to the structures, especially, built on soft sedimentary environment. These are essentially governed by the size of earthquake, epicentral distance and geology of the area. Besides, lithology of the strata, i.e., sediment type, grain size and their distribution, thickness, lateral discontinuity and ground water depth, play an important role in determining the nature and degree of destruction. There has been significant advancement in our understanding and assessment of these two phenomena. However, data from past earthquakes provide valuable information which help in better estimation of ground motion amplification and soil liquefaction for evaluation of seismic risk in future and planning the mitigation strategies. In this paper, we present the case studies of past three large Indian earthquakes, i.e., 1803 Uttaranchal earthquake (Mw 7.5); 1934 Bihar–Nepal earthquake (Mw 8.1) and 2001 Bhuj earthquake (Mw 7.7) and discuss the role of soft sediments particularly, alluvial deposits in relation to the damage pattern due to amplified ground motions and soil liquefaction induced by the events. The results presented in the paper are mainly focused around the sites located on the river banks and experienced major destruction during these events. It is observed that the soft sedimentary sites located even far from earthquake epicenter, with low water saturation, experienced high ground motion amplification; while the sites with high saturation level have undergone soil liquefaction. We also discuss the need of intensifying studies related to ground motion amplification and soil liquefaction in India as these are the important inputs for detailed seismic hazard estimation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aki K (1993) Local site effects on weak and strong ground motion. Tectonophysics 218:93–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aki K, Richards PG (1980) Quantitative seismology: theory and methods. WH Freeman and Company, San Francisco

  • Albarello D (2001) Detection of spurious maxima in the site amplification characteristics estimated by the HVSR technique. Bull Seismol Soc Am 91:718–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aman A, Singh UK, Singh RP (1995) A new empirical relation for strong seismic ground motion for the Himalayan region. Curr Sci 69(9):772–777

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN, Bilham R (2003) A re-evaluated Intensity for the great earthquake of 12 June 1897 Shillong India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:655–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews DCA, Martin GR (2000) Criteria for liquefaction of silty soils. In: Proceedings of 12th WCEE, Auckland, New Zealand

  • Andrus RD, Stokoe KH (2000) Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity. J Geotech Geo-environ Eng 126(11):1015–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atakan K, Havskov J (1996) Local site effects in the northern North Sea based on single-station spectral rations of OBS recordings. Terra Nova 8:22–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atakan K, Brandsdottir B, Halldorsson P, Fridleifsson GO (1997) Site response as function of near-surface geology in the south Iceland seismic zone. Nat Hazards 15:139–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auden JB, Ghosh AMN (1934) Preliminary account of the earthquake of in Bihar and Nepal. Rec Geol Survey India 68:177–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird-Smith R (1844) Memoir on Indian earthquakes. Pt. III. J Asiat Soc Bengal 156:764–983

    Google Scholar 

  • Beresnev IA, Wen KL, Yeh YT (1995) Seismological evidence for nonlinear elastic ground behavior during large earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 14:103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas SK (1987) Regional framework, structure and evolution of the western marginal basins of India. Tectonophysics 135:302–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas SK (2005) A review of structure and tectonics of Kutch basin, western India, with special reference to earthquake. Curr Sci 88:1592–1600

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatwright J, Seekins LC, Fumal TE, Liu H-P, Mueller CS (1991) Ground motion amplification in the Marina district. Bull Seismol Soc Am 81:1980–1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Borcherdt R (1970) Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay. Bull Seismol Soc Am 60:29–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger RW, Idriss IM (2012) Probabilistic standard penetration test-based liquefaction-triggering procedure. J Geotech Geoenviron 138:1185–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray JD, Sancio RB, Reimer MF, Durgunoglu T (2004) Liquefaction susceptibility of fine-grained soils. In: Earthquake engineering and 3rd international conference on earthquake geotechnical. Engineering, Berkeley, CA, January 7–9, 1:655–662

  • Chakrabortty P, Pandey AD, Mukerjee S, Bhargava A (2004) Liquefaction assessment for microzonation of Kolkata city. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada August 1–6, paper no. 82

  • Chin B, Aki K (1991) Simultaneous study of the source, path, and site effects on strong ground motion during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake: a preliminary result on pervasive nonlinear site effects. Bull Seismol Soc Am 81(5):1859–1884

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra S, Choudhury P (2011) A study of response spectra for different geological conditions in Gujarat, India. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 31(11):1551–1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dash SR, Govindaraju L, Bhattacharya S (2009) A case study of damages of the Kandla Port and Customs tower supported on a mat-pile foundation in liquefied soils under the 2001 Bhuj earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29:333–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit J, Dewaikar DM, Jangid RS (2012) Assessment of liquefaction Potential index for Mumbai city. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:2759–2768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn JA, Auden JB, Ghosh AMN, Wadia DN (1939) The Bihar-Nepal earthquake of 1934. Geological Survey of India Memoir (reprinted 1981), pp 73–391

  • Eremenko NA, Negi BS (1968) A guide to the tectonic map of India. Oil Nat Gas Comm Bull 3:1–15

  • Faccioli E (1991) Seismic amplification in the presence of geological and topographic irregularities. In: Proceedings of 2nd international conference recent advances in geotechnical earthquake. Engineering, St Louis, MO, state-of-art paper, pp 1779–1797

  • Field EH, Jacob KH (1993) The theoretical response of sedimentary layers to ambient seismic noise. Geophys Res Lett 20:2925–2928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field EH, Jacob KH, Hough SE (1992) Earthquake site response estimation: a weak motion case study. Bull Seismol Soc Am 82:2283–2307

    Google Scholar 

  • Field EH, Johnson PA, Beresnev IA, Zeng Y (1997) Nonlinear ground-motion amplification by sediments during the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Nature 390:599–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn WD (1991) Assessment of liquefaction potential and post liquefaction behavior of earth structures: developments 1981–1991. In: Proceedings of second international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, St. Louis, March 11–15 2:1883–1850

  • Finn WD, Ledbetter RH, Wu G (1994) Liquefaction in silty soils: design and analysis, ground failures under seismic conditions, vol 44. Geotechnical Special publication ASCE, New York, pp 51–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Geli L, Bard PY, Jullien B (1988) The effect of topography on earthquake ground motion: a review and new result. Bull Seismol Soc Am 78:42–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh SK (2001) Observations from the Bhuj earthquake of January 26, 2001. PCI J 46(2):34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindaraju L, Ramana GV, HanumanthaRao C, Sitharam TG (2004) Site-specific ground response analysis. Curr Sci 87(10):1354–1362

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson JA (1822) Journal of a survey to the heads of the rivers, Ganges and Jumna. Asiat Res 14:60–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough SE, Bilham R (2008) Site response of the Ganges basin inferred from re-evaluated macro-seismic observation from the 1897 Shillong, 1905 Kangra, and 1934 Nepal earthquakes. J Earth Sys Sci 117:773–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IS 1893 (Part 1) (2002) Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. General provisions and buildings (Fifth Revision). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, p 42

  • Ishihara K (2006) Liquefaction of sub-surface soils during earthquakes. J Disaster Res 1(2):245–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam R, Ghosh SK, Vyshnavi S, Sundriyal YP (2011) Petrography, geochemistry and regional significance of crystalline klippen in the Garhwal lesser Himalaya, India. J Earth Syst Sci 120(3):489–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK (1992) On better engineering preparedness: lessons from the 1988 Bihar earthquake, earthquake spectra, EERI, vol 8, no. 3

  • Jain SK, Singh RP, Gupta VK, Nagar Amit (1992) Garhwal Earthquake of October 20 1991, EERI special earthquake report, EERI newsletter, vol 26, no. 2

  • Jain SK, Murty CVR, Arlekar JN (1997) Some observation on engineering aspects of the Jabalpur earthquake of 22 May 1997, EERI special earthquake report, EERI newsletter, vol 32, no. 2

  • Jain SK, Murty CVR, Arlekar JN (1999) Chamoli (Himalaya, India) earthquake of 29 March 1999, EERI special earthquake report, EERI newsletter, vol 33, no. 7

  • Khattri KN (1987) Great earthquakes, seismicity gaps and potential for earthquake disaster along the Himalaya plate boundary. In: Mogi K, Khattri KN (eds) Earthquake Prediction. Tectonophsics 138:79–92

  • Luttman-Johnson H (1898) The earthquake in Assam. J Soc Arts 46:473–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Merh SS (1995) Geology of Gujarat. Geol Soc India

  • Mitchell JK, Tseng DJ (1990) Assessment liquefaction potential by cone penetration of resistance. In: Duncan JM (ed) Proceeding, H. Bolton seed memorial symposium, vol 2. Berkeley, CA, pp 335–350

  • Molnar P, Pandey MR (1988) The distribution of intensity of the Bihar-Nepal earthquake of 15 January 1934 and bounds on the extent of the rupture zone. J Nepal Geol Soc 5(1):22–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath SK (2006) Seismic Hazard and Microzonation Atlas of the Sikkim Himalaya published by Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, India

  • Nath M, Narain K, Srivastava JP (1967) The Delhi earthquake of 27th August 1960. Rec Geol Surv Ind 95(2):367–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath SK, Sengupta P, Sengupta S, Chakrabarti A (2000) Site response estimation using strong motion network: a step towards microzonation of Sikkim Himalayas, Seismology 2000. Curr Sci 79:1316–1326

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath SK, Sengupta P, Kayal JR (2002) Determination of S-wave site response at Garhwal Himalaya from the aftershock sequence of 1999 Chamoli earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:1072–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath SK, Sengupta P, Srivastav SK, Bhattachary SN, Dattatrayam RS, Prakash R, Gupta HV (2003) Estimation of S-wave site response in and around Delhi region from weak motion data. In: Proceedings of Indian Academy of Sciences (Earth Planet. Sci) 112:441–462

  • Ni J, Barazangi M (1984) Seismotectonics of the Himalayan collision zone and geometry of the under thrusting Indian plate beneath the Himalaya. J Geophys Res 89:1147–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldham T (1883) A catalogue of Indian earthquakes from the earliest to the end of 1869. Mem Geol Surv India 19(3):1–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey MR (2000) Ground response of Kathmandu valley on the basis of microtremors. In: 12th world conference on earthquake engineering (12 WCEE) 2000, 1206

  • Parolai SP, Bormann, Milkereit C (2002) New relationships between Vs, thickness of sediments and resonance frequency calculated by the H/V ratio of seismic noise for the Cologne area (Germany). Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:2521–2527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock WH, Seed HB (1968) Sand liquefaction under cyclic loading simple shear conditions. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 94(3):689–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen HB, Le Brun, Hatzfeld D, Campillo M, Bard PY (1994) Ground Motion amplitude across ridges. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:1786–1800

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlea VG, Koester JP, Prakash S (1999) How liquefiable are cohesive soils? In: Proceedings of second international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, vol 2, pp 611–618

  • Piddington H (1804) Bengal occurrences for October 1803. Asiat Ann Reg 6(35):57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash S (1981) Soil dynamics. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghukanth STG, Lyenger RN (2007) Estimation of seismic spectral acceleration in peninsular India. J Earth Syst Sci 116:199–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran CP, Rajendran K (2005) The status of central seismic gap: a perspective based on the spatial and temporal aspects of the large Himalayan earthquakes. Tectonophysics 395(12):19–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran K, Rajendran CP, Thakkar M, Tuttle MP (2001) The 2001 Kutch (Bhuj) earthquake: coseismic surface features and their significance. Curr Sci 80(11):1397–1405

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana M, Braham G, Sumsher JB (1935) Nepalko Bhukampa, (The great earthquake of Nepal), Second edition (published in Nepali), Sahyogi Prakashan, Kathmandu, Nepal

  • Rao KS, Satyam DN (2007) Liquefaction studies for seismic microzonation of Delhi region. Curr Sci 92(5):646–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Raper FV (1810) Narratives of a survey for the purpose of discovering the resources of the Ganges. Asiat Res 11:446–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Report DST (2007) Seismic microzonation of Guwahati. Report published by Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter CF (1957) Introduction to seismology. Eurasia publishing house, New Delhi, p 768

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK, Campanella RG (1985) Liquefaction potential of sands using the CPT. J Geotech Eng ASCE 111(3):384–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydelek PA, Tuttle M (2004) Explosive craters and soil liquefaction. Nature 427:115–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safak E (2001) Local site effects and dynamic soil behavior. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 21:453–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sairam B, Rastogi BK, Aggarwal S, Chuahan M, Bhonde U (2011) Seismic site charactorisation Vs30 and site amplification in Gandhinagar region, Gujarat, India. Curr Sci 100(5):754–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeber L, Armbruster JG, Quittmeyer (1981) Seismicity and continental subduction in the Himalayan Arc. Zagros, Hindu Kush Himalaya. Geodyn Evol Geodyn Ser 3:259–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 97 (Sm9) Proc 8371:1249–1273

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1982) Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Lee KL (1966) Liquefaction of saturated sands during cyclic loading. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 92(SM6):105–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM, Arango I (1983) Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data. J Geotech Eng ASCE 109(3):458–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF, Chung R (1985) Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. J Geotech Eng ASCE 111(12):861–878

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK, Mena E, Castro R (1988) Some aspects of source of the 1985 Michoacán earthquake and ground motion amplification in and near Mexico City from strong motion data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 78:461–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh RP, Aman A, Prsad YJJ (1996) Attenuation relations for strong seismic ground motion in the Himalayan region. Pure appl Geophys 147:161–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RP, Bhoi S, Sahoo AK, Raj U, Ravindran S (2001) Surface manifestations after the Gujarat earthquake. Curr Sci 81(2):164–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Roy D, Jain SK (2005) Investigation of liquefaction failure in Earthen Dams during Bhuj Earthquake. In: Proceedings, special session on seismic aspects of Dam Design, 5th international R&D conference, Bangalore, India, February 15, 40–48

  • Sitharam TG, Anbazhagan P (2007) Seismic hazard analysis for the bangalore region. Nat Hazards 40:261–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szeliga W, Hough S, Martin S, Bilham R (2010) Intensity, magnitude, location, and attenuation in India for Felt Earthquakes since 1762. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100:570–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teves-Costa P, Matias L, Bard PY (1996) Seismic behavior estimation of thin alluvium layers using microtremor recordings. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 15:201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakur VC (1992) Geology of western Himalaya. Pergamon Press, Oxford, p 363

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdiya KS (2001) Reactivation of terrain-defining boundary thrusts in Central sector of the Himalaya: Implication. Curr Sci 81(11):1418–1430

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood HO (1908) Distribution of apparent intensity in San Francisco in the California Earthquake of April 18, 1906, Report of the state earthquake investigation commission. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publishing, Washington, DC 87:220–245

  • Youd TL, Idriss IM (2001) Liquefaction resistance of soil: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 297–313

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Secretary, Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES) has been the source of consistent encouragement and support. Discussions with Dr. G V Ramana and critical comments and suggestions offered by the two Reviewers have greatly helped in improving the manuscript. Mr. Anup Kumar and Mr. Rahul Aswal helped in fixing the figures and the references.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geoscience Division, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Prithvi Bhavan, Lodhi Road, New Delhi, 110003, India

    Mithila Verma & B. K. Bansal

  2. 101, Shiv Vihar, Janakipuram-I, Lucknow, 226020, India

    R. J. Singh

Authors
  1. Mithila Verma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. J. Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. K. Bansal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mithila Verma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verma, M., Singh, R.J. & Bansal, B.K. Soft sediments and damage pattern: a few case studies from large Indian earthquakes vis-a-vis seismic risk evaluation. Nat Hazards 74, 1829–1851 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1283-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1283-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation