Abstract
Traditionally traffic assignment problems (TAPs) have been formulated as non-cooperative games (NCGs), and Wardrop’s user equilibrium (UE) of a TAP as Nash equilibrium (NE) of the corresponding NCG. In this study, in contrast, we propose a mapping from finite NCGs (F-NCGs) to asymmetric TAPs (A-TAPs) on a two-way or urban network, in which the travel cost of one link depends on flows on other links. With the help of three route-based formulations of UE, we show that NE of an F-NCG is equivalent to UE of the corresponding A-TAP. Based on the new relationship, we extend Nash’s fixed point formulation of NE to prove the existence of static UE. This study provides a more complete picture of the relationships between NCGs and TAPs. In the future we will be interested in studying Nash’s fixed point formulation for dynamic UE.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
1 Such a relationship has motivated studies on the price of anarchy caused by selfish route choices in both transportation and computer networks (e.g. Roughgarden 2005). Arguably, however, the price of anarchy can be defined in lieu of such a relationship, since it is based on the concepts of UE and system optimal, both of which are well-defined in TAPs.
References
Aashtiani H, Magnanti T (1981) Equilibria on a congested transportation network. SIAM J Algebraic Discret Methods 2(3):213–226
Agarwal RP, Meehan M, O’Regan D (2001) Fixed point theory and applications. Cambridge University Press
Altman E, Wynter L (2004) Equilibrium, games, and pricing in transportation and telecommunication networks. Netw Spatial Econ 4(1):7–21
Beckmann M, McGuire CB, Winsten CB (1956) Studies in the economics of transportation. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, also published as Rand-RM-1488-PR, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, May 12, p 1955
Bernstein D, Smith T (1994) Equilibria for networks with lower semicontinuous costs: With an application to congestion pricing. Transp Sci 28(3):221–235
Boyce D (2007) Forecasting travel on congested urban transportation networks: Review and prospects for network equilibrium models. Netw Spatial Econ 7(2):99–128
Boyce D, Mahmassani H, Nagurney A (2005) A retrospective on Beckmann, McGuire, and Winstens studies in the economics of transportation. Pap Reg Sci 84(1):85–103
Charnes A, Cooper W (1961) Multicopy traffic network models. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Theory of Traffic Flow (Edited by R. Herman), pp 85–96
Dafermos S (1972) The traffic assignment problem for multiclass-user transportation networks. Transp Sci 6(1):73–87
Dafermos SC (1971) An extended traffic assignment model with applications to two-way traffic. Transp Sci 5(4):366–389
Dafermos SC (1980) Traffic equilibrium and variational inequalities. Transp Sci 14(1):42–54
Dafermos SC (1982) The general multimodal network equilibrium problem with elastic demand. Networks 12(1):57–72
Dafermos SC, Sparrow FT (1969) The traffic assignment problem for a general network. J Res Natl Bur Stand: Part B 73(2):91–118
Daganzo C, Sheffi Y (1977) On stochastic models of traffic assignment. Transp Sci 11(3):253
Daganzo CF (1998) Queue spillovers in transportation networks with a route choice. Transp Sci 32(1):3–11
Daskalakis C, Goldberg PW, Papadimitriou CH (2009) The complexity of computing a nash equilibrium. SIAM J Comput 39(1):195–259
Devarajan S (1981) A note of network equilibrium and noncooperative games. Transp Res Part B 15(6):421–426
Gibbons R (1997) An introduction to applicable game theory. J Econ Perspect 11(1):127–149
Han K, Friesz TL, Yao T (2013) Existence of simultaneous route and departure choice dynamic user equilibrium. Transp Res Part B 53:17–30
Haurie A, Marcotte P (1985) On the relationship between Nash-Cournot and Wardrop equilibria. Networks 15(1):295–308
Heydecker B (1986) On the definition of traffic equilibrium. Transp Res Part B 20(6):435–440
Hofbauer J, Sigmund K (2003) Evolutionary game dynamics. Bull Am Math Soc 40(4):479–519
Iryo T (2011) Multiple equilibria in a dynamic traffic network. Transp Res Part B 45(6):867–879
Jin W-L (2007) A dynamical system model of the traffic assignment problem. Transp Res Part B 41(1):32–48
Mahmassani H (2001) Dynamic network traffic assignment and simulation methodology for advanced system management applications. Netw Spatial Econ 1(3):267–292
Marcotte P, Patriksson M (2007) Traffic equilibrium. Transportation. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science. In: Barnhardt C, Laporte G (eds). North-Holland, pp 623–714
Marcotte P, Wynter L (2004) A new look at the multiclass network equilibrium problem. Transp Sci 38(3):282–292
Merchant D, Nemhauser G (1978) A model and an algorithm for the dynamic traffic assignment problems. Transp Sci 12(3):183–199
Milchtaich I (2004) Social optimality and cooperation in nonatomic congestion games. J Econ Theory 114(1):56–87
Nagurney A (1993) Network economics: A variational inequality approach. Kluwer Academic Pub
Nagurney A, Zhang D (1996) Projected dynamical systems and variational inequalities with applications. Kluwer, Boston
Nash J (1950) Non-cooperative games. Princeton University, Ph.D. thesis
Nash J (1951) Non-cooperative games. Ann Math 54(2):286–295
Netter M (1972) Affectations de trafic et tarification au coût marginal social: critique de quelques idées admises. Transp Res 6(4):411–429
Nisan N (2007) Algorithmic game theory. Cambridge Univ Pr
Patriksson M (1994) The traffic assignment problem - models and methods. VSP, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Peeta S, Ziliaskopoulos A (2001) Foundations of dynamic traffic assignment: The past, The present and the future. Netw Spatial Econ 1(3):233–265
Roughgarden T (2005) Selfish routing and the price of anarchy, MIT Press
Sandholm W (2001) Potential games with continuous player sets. J Econ Theory 97(1):81–108
Schmeidler D (1973) Equilibrium points of nonatomic games. J Stat Phys 7(4):295–300
Sheffi Y (1984) Urban transportation networks: Equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Smith MJ (1979a) The existence, niqueness and stability of traffic equilibria. Transp Res Part B 13(4):295–304
Smith MJ (1979b) Traffic control and route-choice; a simple example. Transp Res Part B 13(4):289–294
Smith MJ (1984a) The stability of a dynamic model of traffic assignment - an application of a method of Lyapunov. Transp Sci 18(3):245–252
Smith MJ (1984b) Two alternative definitions of traffic equilibrium. Transp Res Part B 18(1):63–65
Smith MJ, Wisten MB (1995) A continuous day-to-day traffic assignment model and the existence of a continuous dynamic user equilibrium. Ann Oper Res 60(1):59–79
Taylor P, Jonker L (1978) Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics. Math Biosci 40(1-2):145–156
Wardrop JG (1952) Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proc Inst Civil Eng 1(3):325–378
Watling D, Hazelton ML (2003) The dynamics and equilibria of day-to-day assignment models. Netw Spatial Econ 3(3):349–370
Yang F (2005) An evolutionary game theory approach to the day-to-day traffic dynamics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Yang H, Huang H (2004) The multi-class, Multi-criteria traffic network equilibrium and systems optimum problem. Transp Research Part B 38(1):1–15
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Dr. Fan Yang for pointing out possible relationship between the FIFO dynamical system and replicator dynamics through private communications in 2005. The views and results are the author’s alone.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jin, WL. Advances in Dynamic Traffic Assgmnt: TAC. Netw Spat Econ 15, 617–634 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-014-9250-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-014-9250-x